Skip to main content

Advanced Experimental and Numerical Analysis of Behavior Structural Materials Including Dynamic Conditions of Fracture for Needs of Designing Protective Structures

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Soft Target Protection

Abstract

The article presents the discussion of modern experimental and numerical techniques used to the design critical infrastructure protection structures. The article presents also the results of experimental researches on S235 steel sheet. The S235 steel sheets were tested using the Hopkinson Bar Technic and perforation tests. In researches were used 3D scanners and numerical controlled measuring machine for checking the final shape after the deformation. The article also presents the results of FEM analysis made using explicit solver. Full-scale CAD model was used in numeric calculations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. PWN (2018) Great Polish dictionary

    Google Scholar 

  2. Council Directive 2008/114/EC of 8 December 2008 on the identification and designation of European critical infrastructures and the assessment of the need to improve their protection, European Union (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sventekova E, Leitner B, Dvorak Z (2017) Transport critical infrastructure in Slovak republic. In: IMCIC 2017 – 8th International Multi-Conference on Complexity, Informatics and Cybernetics, Proceedings 2017-March, pp 212–215

    Google Scholar 

  4. Leitner B, Môcová L, Hromada M (2017) A new approach to identification of critical elements in railway infrastructure. Process Eng 187:143–149

    Google Scholar 

  5. Figuli L, Kavický V, Picot S (2017) Analysis of the different approaches to protection of critical infrastructures in France and Slovakia. In: Lecture notes in mechanical engineering PartF11. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, pp 120–128

    Google Scholar 

  6. Manas P (2017) The protection of critical infrastructure objects – technical principles. In: Lecture notes in mechanical engineering PartF11. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, pp 239–248

    Google Scholar 

  7. Loveček T, Velas A, Kampová K, Mariš L, Mózer V (2013) Cumulative probability of detecting an intruder by alarm systems. In: Proceedings – International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bedon C, Zhang X, Santos F, Honfi D, Kozłowski M, Arrigoni M, Figuli L, Lange D (2018) Performance of structural glass facades under extreme loads – design methods, existing research, current issues and trends. Constr Build Mater 163:921–937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Figuli L, Jangl Š, Papán D (2016) Modelling and testing of blast effect on the structures. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 44(5):052051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. European Standard EN10025:2004 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Klosak M, Rusinek A, Bendarma A, Jankowiak T, Lodygowski T (2017) Experimental study of brass properties through perforation test using a thermal chamber for elevated temperatures. Latin Am J Solid Struct. https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-78254346

  12. Moćko W, Janiszewski J, Radziejewska J, Grazka M (2015) Analysis of deformation history and damage initiation for 6082-T6 aluminium alloy loaded at classic and symmetric Taylor impact test conditions. Int J Impact Eng 75:203–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Grazka M, Janiszewski J (2012) Identification of Johnson-Cook equation constants using finite element method. Eng Trans 60(3):215–223

    Google Scholar 

  14. Panowicz R, Janiszewski J, Kochanowski K (2017) The influence of non-axisymmetric pulse shaper position on SHPB experimental data. J Theo Appl Mech (Poland) 56(3):873–886

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kruszka L, Janiszewski J (2015) Experimental analysis and constitutive modelling of steel of A-IIIN strength class. EPJ Web Conf 94:05007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Leitner B, Lusková M, Dvořák Z, Sventekova E (2017) Fatigue damage prediction as a part of technical systems reliability assessment. Key Eng Mater 755:131–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Leitner B, Figuli L (2017) Fatigue life prediction of mechanical structures under stochastic loading. In: MATEC Web of Conferences, vol. 157, 22nd Slovak-Polish Scientific Conference on Machine Modelling and Simulations, MMS 2017

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michal Grazka .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature B.V.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Grazka, M., Kruszka, L., Mocko, W., Klosak, M. (2020). Advanced Experimental and Numerical Analysis of Behavior Structural Materials Including Dynamic Conditions of Fracture for Needs of Designing Protective Structures. In: Hofreiter, L., Berezutskyi, V., Figuli, L., Zvaková, Z. (eds) Soft Target Protection. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1755-5_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics