Skip to main content

Teamwork — delegated or shared?

  • Chapter
Common Dilemmas in Family Medicine

Abstract

The acceptance of the primary care health team idea raises the issues of the various members of the team working together. Delegation implies hierarchical levels, leaders, directives and responsibilities. It raises sensitive interprofessional issues and decisions on who is ‘boss’. Sharing implies greater equality and democratic associations between colleagues who respect one another. It raises the same pertinent issues as to who should act as leader and whether his/her role will be accepted by the others.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abse, D. (1967). Medicine on Trial. (London: Aldus Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowling, A. (1981). Delegation to nurses in general practice. J. R. Coll. Gen.Practit., 31, 485–490

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, J. (1978). Doctors on Trial. ( London: Wildwood House )

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey-Smith, K. A., Dreaper, R. E. and Robinson, N. A. (1972). Home visits–the patient’s viewpoint. J. R. Coll. Gen. Practit., 22, 857–865

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, R. (1975). The End of Medicine. ( New York: John Wiley and Sons )

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, A. (1967). Doctors and their Patients. ( London: Routledge and Kegan Paul )

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, H. D. (1974). The case for problem-orientated medical records. Br. J. Hosp. Med., 11, 65–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, D.J., Bevan, J. M. and Floyd, C.B. (1972). The role of the practice nurse from the patient’s point of view. Community Med., 128, 534–538

    Google Scholar 

  • Danaher, K. (1977). Research memorandum from the Guy’s Self-Treatment Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health and Social Services (1974). Health and Personal Social Services Statistics for England ( London: H M SO )

    Google Scholar 

  • Essex, B. (1976). Diagnostic Pathways in Clinical Medicine. ( Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone )

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitton, F. and Acheson, H.W.K. (1979). Doctor-Patient Relationship: A Study in General Practice. (London: HMSO)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry, J. (1978). The place of primary care. In Fry, J. (ed.) Trends in General Practice 1977. ( London: Royal College of General Practitioners )

    Google Scholar 

  • Hockey, L. (1972). Use or Abuse - A Study of the State Enrolled Nurse in the Local Authority Nursing Services. (London: Queen’s Institute of District Nursing) Illich, I. (1974). Medical Nemesis. ( London: Calder and Boyars )

    Google Scholar 

  • Komoroff, A. L., Black, W. L., Flatley, M., Knopp, R. H., Reiffen, B. and Sherman H. (1974). Protocols for physician assistants. N. Engl. J. Med., 290, 307–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Last, J. M. (1963). The iceberg. Lancet, 2, 28–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lees, R. E. M. and Anderson, R. M. A. (1971). Patient attitudes to the expanded role of the nurse in family practice. Can. Med. Assoc. J., 105, 1164–1168

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mahler, H. (1975). Health: a démystification of medical technology. Lancet, 2, 829–832

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, G. N. (1969). Visiting nurse–analysis of one year’s work. Br. Med. J., 4, 42–44

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mechanic, D. (1979). Future Issues in Health Care. ( New York: Free Press )

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M. F., Barber, J.H., Robinson, E. T. and Taylor, T. R. (1973). First contact decisions in general practice - a comparison between a nurse and three general practitioners. Lancet, 1, 817

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet, E. (1977). Assessing the urgency of home visits. Nursing Times, September 22, 1427–1474

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, D. (1979). Self Help in Health. ( London: Mart in Robertson)

    Google Scholar 

  • Royal College of General Practitioners (1968). The Practice Nurse. Report from GP 16 ( London: Royal College of General Practitioners )

    Google Scholar 

  • Royal College of General Practitioners (1973). Present State and Future Needs of General Practice. 3rd edn. ( London: Royal College of General Practitioners )

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. W. and Mottram, E. M. (1967). Extended use of nursing services in general practice. Br. Med. J., 4, 672–674

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. W. and O’Donovan, J. B. (1970). The practice nurse–a new look. Br. Med. J., 4, 673–677

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spitzer, W., Sackett, D. L., Sibley, J. C., Roberts, R. S., Kergin, D.J., Hackett, B. C. and Oylnich, A. (1974). The Burlington Trial of the nurse practitioner. N. Engl. J. Med., 290, 251–256

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, P. and Wedderburn, D. (1965). The Aged in the Welfare State. ( London: Bell and Sons )

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, C. M. (1973). Assessment of the elderly by a district nursing sister ttached to a group practice. Health Bull., 31, 258–267

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, J. D. (1979). Self help and the doctor. In Hatch, S. (ed.) Mutual Aid in Health and Social Services. AR VAC Pamphlet no 1. ( London: NCVO )

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, J. D. (1980). Patient-initiated home visits in general practice. Unpublished thesis. London Faculty of Community Medicine

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, J. D. and Danaher, K. (1980). Self Care in Health. ( London: Croom Helm

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherrington, P. (1971). Management and the Health Services, p. 27. ( Oxford: Per-gamon Press )

    Google Scholar 

  • Himsworth, H. (1980). On the integration of expert knowledge into the machinery of government. Br. Med. J., 281, 1197

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ireland, J. A. and Power, D.J. (1979). The paediatric primary care clinical urse in South Africa. Curationis, 2, 33

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morley, D. (1973). Paediatric Priorities in the Developing World. ( Sevenoaks: But-terworths )

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. (1981). The day hospitals organization. S. Afr. Med. J 59, 609

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van C. de Groot, H. A., Davey, D. A., Smith, J. A. et al. (1978). The midwife bstetric unit. S. Afr. Med. J., 53, 706

    Google Scholar 

  • Van C. de Groot, H. A., Dommisse, J., Howland, R. C. (1981). Trends in obstetric practice at the University of Cape Town, 1967–1977. S. Afr. Med. 359, 824

    Google Scholar 

  • Beales G. (1978). Sick Health Centres - and How to Make Them Better. ( Tunbridge Wells: Pitman )

    Google Scholar 

  • Beales, G. (1981). Education for Co-operation in Health and Social Work. RCGP Occasional Paper No. 14, p. 5. ( London: Royal College of General Practitioners )

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, A. (1979). Murphy’s Law and Other Reasons Why Things go Wrong. ( London: Magnum Books )

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowling, A. (1981). Delegation to nurses in general practice. J. R. Coll. Gen. Practit, 31, 485

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • British Medical Journal (1981) Leading article. Doctors and nurses. Br. Med J., 283 683

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, D., Hendy, A. and Parsonage, A. (1981). Towards the reality of the primary care team: an educational approach. J. R. Coll. Gen. Practit, 31, 491

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gilmore, M., Bruce, N. and Hunt M. (1974). The Work of the Nursing Team in General Practice. ( London: Council for the Education and Training of Health Visitors )

    Google Scholar 

  • Joint Working Group (1981). The Primary Health Care Team. Report of the Standing Medical Advisory Committee and the Standing Nursing and Midwifery Advisory Committee. ( London: HMSO )

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe, D. (1979). Education for Co-operation in Health and Social Work. RCGP Occasional Paper No. 14, p. 11. ( London: Royal College of General Practitioners )

    Google Scholar 

  • Panel of Assessors for District Nurse Training (1978). Curriculum in District Nurse Training for State Registered Nurses and Registered Nurses. ( London: PADNT )

    Google Scholar 

  • Reedy, B. L. E. C. (1977). The health team. In Fry, J. (ed.) Trends in General Practice. p.. 111. (London: Royal College of General Practitioners and British Medical journal)

    Google Scholar 

  • Reedy, B. L. E. C., Philips, P. R. and Newell, D.J. (1976). Nurses and nursing in primary medical care in England. Br. Med. j, 2, 1304

    Google Scholar 

  • Standing Medical Advisory Committee (1963). The Fieldwork of the Family Doctor.Report of the Subcommittee, Central Health Services Council ( London: HMSO )

    Google Scholar 

  • Standing Medical Advisory Committee (1971). The Organisation of Group Practice.Report of Subcommittee DHSS/ Welsh Office. ( London: HMSO )

    Google Scholar 

  • Update (1979) Leading article. The primary health care team. Update,19505

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1983 MTP Press Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Williamson, J.D., Smith, J., Brooks, D. (1983). Teamwork — delegated or shared?. In: Fry, J. (eds) Common Dilemmas in Family Medicine. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9192-3_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9192-3_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-9194-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-9192-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics