Abstract
This chapter addresses issues of integration of theory and practice in the education of new mathematics teachers and tries to achieve an appropriate blend of theory and practice in its approach. Thus, it begins with an episode from practice, proposes a set of theoretical models of ‘integration’, situates these models in examples from teacher education around the world and follows with a discussion of theoretical issues and the associated literature. A case study from a current programme of initial teacher education in the UK follows, where issues of integration are re-addressed from a practical perspective. We end with a short review of the status quo as we see it currently in terms of relationships between those involved in the educational process.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Artzt, A. F. (1999). A structure to enable preservice teachers of mathematics to reflect on their teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 2(2), 143–166.
Askew, M., Brown, M., Rhodes, V., Johnson, D., & Wiliam, D. (1997). Effective teachers of numeracy. London: King’s College.
Aubrey, C. (1997). Mathematics teaching in the early years: An Investigation of teachers’ subject knowledge. London: Falmer Press.
Barnett, C. S. (1998). Mathematics case methods project. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1(3), 349–356.
Bauer, K.-O., & Rolff, H.-G. (1978). Vorarbeiten zu einer theorie der schulentwicklung [Towards a theory of school development]. In K.-O. Bauer & H.-G Rolff (Eds.), Innovation und schulent- wicklung [Innovation and school development] (pp. 219–266). Weinheim: Beltz.
Bishop, A. J. (1988). Mathematical enculturation: A cultural perspective on mathematical education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Bobis, J., & Cusworth, R. (1995). Attitudinal shifts towards mathematics of preservice teachers. In B. Atweh & S. Flavel (Eds.), Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp.109–114). Darwin: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.
Brousseau, G. (1986). Fondements et méthodes de la didactique des mathématiques. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 7(2), 33–115.
Brown, S., & Mclntyre, D. (1993). Making sense of teaching. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
Burn, K., Hagger, H., Mutton, T., & Everton, T. (2000). Beyond concerns with self: The sophisticated thinking of beginning student teachers. Journal of Education for Teaching, 26(3), 259–278.
Calderhead, J., & Shorrock, S. B. (1997). Understanding teacher education: Case studies in the professional development of beginning teachers. London: Falmer Press.
Clarke, B, Clarke, D., & Sullivan, P. (1996). The mathematics teacher and curriculum development. In A. J. Bishop, K. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick & C. Laborde (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics education (pp.1207–1234). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Clarke, D. (2000). Guest editorial: Time to reflect. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 3(3), 201–203.
Cooney, T. J. (1996). Conceptualizing the professional development of teachers. In C. Alsina, J. M. Alvarez, B. Hodgson, C. Laborde & A. Pérez (Eds.), Selected lectures, 8th International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 101–117) Sevilla, Spain: SAEM Thales.
Cooney, T. J., & Shealy, B. (1997). On understanding the structure of teachers’ beliefs and their relationship to change. In E. Fennema & B. N. Nelson (Eds.), Mathematics teachers in transition (pp. 87–110). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Cooney, T. J., Shealy, B. E., & Arvold, B. (1998). Conceptualizing belief structures of pre-service secondary mathematics teachers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29(3), 306–333.
Davis, B. (1999). Basic irony: Examining the foundations of school mathematics with preservice teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 2(1), 25–48.
Dawson, A. J. (1999). The enactive perspective on teacher development: A path laid while walking. In B. Jaworski, T. Wood & A. J. Dawson (Eds.), Mathematics teacher education: Critical international perspectives. London: Falmer Press.
Dolk, M., Faes, W., Goffree, F., Hermsen, H., & Oonk, W. (1996). A multimedia interactive learning environment for (future) primary school teachers with content for primary mathematics teachers education programs. Utrecht: Freudenthal Instituut/NVORWO.
Eraut, M. (1995). Schön shock: A case for refraining reflection-in-action? Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 1(1), 9–22.
Even, R. (1999). The development of teacher leaders and inservice teacher educators. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 2, 3–24.
Even, R., & Tirosh, D. (1995). Subject-matter knowledge and knowledge about students as sources of teacher presentations and subject matter. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 29, 1–20.
Fennema, E., Sowder, J., & Carpenter, T. (1999). Creating classrooms that promote understanding. In E. Fennema & T. Romberg (Eds.), Mathematics classrooms that promote understanding (pp. 185–199). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Freudenthal, H. (1991). Revisiting mathematics education: China lectures. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Frykholm, J. A. (1999). The impact of reform: Challenges for mathematics teacher preparation. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 2(1), 79–105.
Gellert, U. (2000). Mathematics instruction in safe space: Prospective elementary teachers’ views of mathematics education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 3(3), 251–270.
Gellert, U., Jablonka, E., & Keitel, C. (2001). Mathematical literacy and common sense in mathematics education. In B. Atweh, H. Forgasz & B. Nebres (Eds.), Sociocultural research on mathematics education: An international perspective (pp. 57–73). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Giacquinta, J. B. (1998). Seduced and abandoned: Some lasting conclusions about planned change from the Cambire school study. In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan & D. Hopkins (Eds.), International handbook of educational change (pp. 163–180). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Goffree, F., & Oonk, W. (1999). Educating primary school mathematics teachers in the Netherlands: Back to the classroom. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 2(2), 207–214.
Goulding, M., & Suggate, J. (2001). Opening a can of worms: Investigating primary teachers’ subject knowledge in mathematics. Mathematics Education Review, 13,41–54.
Griffin, P. (1988). Preparing to teach ratio. Project Mathematics Update, PM753B. Milton Keynes, UK: The Open University.
Gutiérrez, A., & Jaime, A. (1999, Preservice primary teachers’ understanding of the concept of altitude of a triangle. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 2(3), 253–275.
Haggarty, L. (1995). New ideas for teacher education: A mathematics framework. London: Cassell.
HMI (1982). The new teacher in school. London: HMSO.
Howson, A. G., & Wilson, B. J. 1986). School mathematics in the 1990s. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Jaworski, B. (1998). Mathematics teacher research: Process, practice and the development of teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1(1), 3–31.
Jaworski, B. (2001). Developing mathematics teaching: Teachers, teacher-educators and researchers as co-learners. In F-L Lin & T. J. Cooney (Eds.), Making sense of mathematics teacher education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Jaworski, B., & Watson, A. (Eds.) (1994a). Mentoring in mathematics teaching. London: Falmer Press.
Jaworski, B., & Watson, A. (1994b). Mentoring, co-mentoring and the inner mentor. In B. Jaworski & A. Watson (Eds.), Mentoring in mathematics teaching. London: Falmer Press.
Jaworski, B., & Watson, A. (2002). PGCE Mathematics: Mathematics course handbook. Oxford: University of Oxford Department of Educational Studies.
Keitel, C. (1992). The education of teachers of mathematics: An overview. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 24(1), 265-273.
Keitel, C, & Hopmann, S. (1995). Editorial. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 27(1), 1-2.
Keitel, C, & Kilpatrick, J. (1999). Rationality and irrationality of international comparative studies. In G. Kaiser, I. Huntley & E. Luna (Eds.), International comparative studies in mathematics education (pp. 241-257). London: Falmer Press.
Klafki, W. (1995a). Didactic analysis as the core of preparation of instruction. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 27(1), 13-30.
Klafki, W. (1995b). On the problem of teaching and learning contents from the standpoint of critical-constructive didaktik. In S. Hopmann & K. Riquarts (Eds.), Didaktik and/or curriculum (pp. 187-200). Kiel: Institute für die Pädagogik der Naturwissenschaften.
Krainer, K., & Posch, P. (Eds.) (1996). Lehrerfortbildung zwischen prozessen und produkten [‘Teacher inservice education between processes and products’, reviewed by A. Peter, in Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 1(1), 113-116]. Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt.
Krummheuer, G. (1999). Die analyse von unterrichtsepisoden im rahmen von grundschullehrerausbildung’ [The analysis of classroom episodes in the frame of primary teacher education’]. In F. Ohlhaver & A. Wernet (Eds.), Schulforschung - Fallanalyse - Lehrerbildung [‘Research on schools - Case method - Teacher education’] (pp. 99-120). Opladen: Leske + Budrich.
Krummheuer, G. (2000). Mathematics learning in narrative classroom cultures: Studies of argumentation in primary mathematics education. For the Learning of Mathematics, 20(1), 22-32.
Lampert, M., & Ball, D. L. (1998). Teaching, multimedia and mathematics: Investigations of real practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Lave, J. (1997). The culture of acquisition and the practice of understanding. In D. Kirshner & J. A. Whitson (Eds.), Situated cognition: Social, semiotic, and psychological perspectives (pp. 17-35). London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Lortie, D. C. (1998). Unfinished work: Reflections on schoolteachers. In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan & D. Hopkins (Eds.), International handbook of educational change (pp. 145-162). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Luhmann, N., & Schorr, K.-E. (1979). Reflexionsprobleme im erziehungssystem [‘Issues for reflection within the system of education’]. Stuttgart, Germany: Klett-Cotta.
Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers’ understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Marks, R. (1990). Pedagogical content knowledge: From a mathematical case to a modified conception. Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 3-11.
Mason, J., & Waywood, A. (1996). The role of theory in mathematics education and research. In A. J. Bishop, K. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick & C. Laborde (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics education (pp. 1055-1089). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Mathematical Association (1991). Develop your teaching. Cheltenham, UK: Stanley Thornes.
Mclntyre, D., Hagger, H., & Wilkin, M (Eds.) (1993). Mentoring: Perspectives on school-based teacher education. London: Kogan Page.
McNamara, D. (1991). Subject knowledge and its application: Problems and possibilities for teacher educators. Journal of Education for Teaching, 27(2), 113-128.
Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Merseth, K. K. (1996). Cases and case methods in teacher education. In J. Sikula, T. J. Buttery & E. Guyton (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (2nd ed.) (pp. 722-744). New York: Macmillan.
Mousley, J. (1999). Bringing teaching to teacher education. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 22(2), 149-153.
Nicol, C. (1999). Learning to teach mathematics: Questioning, listening, and responding. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 37, 45-66.
Noddings, N. (1992). Professionalization and mathematics teaching. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 197-208). New York: Macmillan.
Nolder, R., Smith, S., & Melrose, J. (1994). Working together: Roles and relationships in the mentoring process. In B. Jaworski & A. Watson (Eds.), Mentoring in Mathematics Teaching (pp. 41-51). London: Falmer Press.
Norman, N. (2000). The use of television for the teaching and learning of mathematics insecondary school. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Oxford.
Polanyi, M. (1967). The tacit dimension. New York: Doubleday.
Potari, D., & Jaworski, B. (2002). Tackling complexity in mathematics teaching development: Using the teaching triad as a tool for reflection and analysis. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 5(4), 351-380.
Prestage, S., & Perks, P. (2001). Models and super models: Ways of thinking about professional knowledge. In C. Morgan & K. Jones (Eds.), Research in Mathematics Education, Volume 3: Papers of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics (pp. 101-114). London: British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics.
Romberg, T. A., & Carpenter, T. P. (1986). Research on teaching and learning mathematics: Two disciplines of scientific enquiry. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.) (pp. 850-873). New York: Macmillan.
Rowland, T., Martyn, S., Barber, P., & Heal, C. (2000). Primary teacher trainees’ mathematics subject knowledge and classroom performance. In T. Rowland & C. Morgan (Eds.), Research in Mathematics Education, Volume 2: Papers of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics (pp. 3-18). London: British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics.
Schifter, D. (1998). Learning mathematics for teaching: From a teachers’ seminar to the classroom. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1(1), 55-87.
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. London: Maurice Temple Smith.
Seeger, F., & Steinbring, H. (1992). The practical phase in teacher training: Preparing for professional practice under changing conditions. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 24(1), 280-286.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 75(2), 4-14.
Skemp, R. R. (1978). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Arithmetic Teacher, 26(3), 9-15.
Skott, J. (2001). The emerging practices of a novice teacher: The roles of his school mathematics images. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 4, 3-28.
Smith, D. N. (Jim) (2001). The influence of mathematics teachers on student teachers of secondary mathematics. Mathematics Education Review 13, 22-40.
Smyth, J. (1998). Three rival versions and a critique of teacher staff development. In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan & D. Hopkins (Eds.), International handbook of educational change (pp. 1242-1256). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Soeffner, H.-G. (1989). Auslegung des alltags — Der alltag der auslegung [The interpretation of everyday life — Daily routines of interpreting’]. Frankfurt, Germany: Suhrkamp.
Stigler, J. W., Gonzales, P., Kawanaka, T., Knoll, S., & Serrano, A. (1999). The TIMSS Videotape Classroom Study: Methods and findings from an explanatory research project on Eighth-Grade Mathematics instruction in Germany, Japan, and the United States. Washington, D. C: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Stigler, J. W, & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap. New York: The Free Press.
Sullivan, P., & Mousley, J. (1996). Learning about teaching: The potential of specific mathematics teaching examples, presented on interactive media. In L. Puig & A Gutiérrez (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 283-290). Valencia, Spain: International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.
Tzur, R. (2001). Becoming a mathematics teacher educator: Conceptualising the terrain through self-reflective analysis. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 4(4), 259-283.
Van Zoest, L. R., & Bohl, J. V. (2002). The role of reform curricular materials in an internship: The case of Alice and Gregory. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 5, 265 288
Voigt, J. (1995). Thematic patterns of interaction and sociomathematical norms. In P. Cobb & H. Bauersfeld (Eds.), The emergence of mathematical meaning: Interaction in classroom cultures (pp. 163-201). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Walen, S. B., & Williams, S. R. (2000). Validating classroom issues: Case method in support of teacher change. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 3(1), 3-26.
Watson, A. (1994). A mentor’s eye view. In B. Jaworski & A. Watson (Eds.), Mentoring in mathematics teaching (pp. 1-12). London: Falmer Press.
Wilson, S., Shulman, L., & Richert, A. (1987). 150 ways of knowing: Representations of knowledge in teaching. In J. Calderhead (Ed.), Exploring teachers’ thinking (pp. 104-124). London: Cassell.
Wood, T., Cobb, P., Yackel, E., & Dillon, D. (Eds.) (1993). Rethinking elementary school mathematics: Insights and issues. Reston, VA: NCTM.
Zaslavsky, O., & Leikin, R. (1999). Interweaving the training of mathematics teacher-educators and the professional development of mathematics teachers. In O. Zaslavsky (Ed.), Proceedings of the 23rd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 143-158). Haifa, Israel: Israel Institute of Technology.
Zeichner, K. M., & Gore, J. M. (1990). Teacher socialization. In W. R. Houston, M. Haberman & J. Sikula (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 329-348). New York: Macmillan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jaworski, B., Gellert, U. (2003). Educating New Mathematics Teachers: Integrating Theory and Practice, and the Roles of Practising Teachers. In: Bishop, A.J., Clements, M.A., Keitel, C., Kilpatrick, J., Leung, F.K.S. (eds) Second International Handbook of Mathematics Education. Springer International Handbooks of Education, vol 10. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0273-8_27
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0273-8_27
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-3951-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0273-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive