Skip to main content

Concluding Remarks

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 635 Accesses

Abstract

The case studies collected in this book illustrate the considerable ­differences in bioterrorism threat perception, levels of biopreparedness, and views on how to balance general public health efforts and biopreparedness measures. While investing too little in biopreparedness leaves countries ill-equipped for a potential disaster, spending too much might create a threat in itself, for example, by redirecting resources away from dealing with everyday health threats. Countries, regardless of perceived threat or economic capacity, should aim to develop and maintain a public health system capable of a well-planned, well-rehearsed, and rapidly executed response to natural health emergencies. Such a system will diminish the consequences of both a naturally occurring health emergency and a bioterrorist attack, should it occur.

The findings and conclusions in this chapter are those of the author and no not necessarily ­represent the views of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. ECDC (2010) Joint ECDC and EMCDDA threat assessment. Anthrax outbreak among drug users, UK and Germany. Update: 11 February 2010. http://ecdc.europa.eu/en/activities/sciadvice/Documents/2010-02-11-TA_anthrax_IDU_ECDC-EMCDDA.pdf. Accessed 6 Jun 2012

  2. ECDC (2011) Annual epidemiological report. Reporting on 2009 surveillance data and 2010 epidemic intelligence data. 2011, pp. 63–64, 215–216. "http://ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications/publications/1111_sur_annual_epidemiological_report_on_communicable_diseases_in_europe.pdf" Accessed 6 Jun 2012

    Google Scholar 

  3. Haas WH, Breuer T, Pfaff G, Schmitz H, Köhler P, Asper M, Emmerich P, Drosten C, Gölnitz U, Fleischer K, Günther S (2003) Imported Lassa fever in Germany: surveillance and management of contact persons. Clin Infect Dis 2003(36):1254–1258. http://cid.oxfordjournals.org/content/36/10/1254.full.pdf. Accessed 4 Jun 2012

  4. Parashar UD, Anderson LJ (2004) Severe acute respiratory syndrome: review and lessons of the 2003 outbreak. Int J Epidemiol 33(4): 628–634. http://ije.oxfordjournals.org/content/33/4/628.full.pdf+html. Accessed 4 Jun 2012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Robert Koch Institute (2011) Final presentation and evaluation of epidemiological findings in the EHEC O104:H4 outbreak. Germany 2011. Robert Koch Institute. September 2011. http://www.rki.de/EN/Home/EHEC_final_report.pdf. Accessed 4 Jun 2012

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Iris Hunger .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hunger, I., Rotz, L.D., Belojevic, G., Radosavljevic, V. (2013). Concluding Remarks. In: Hunger, I., Radosavljevic, V., Belojevic, G., Rotz, L. (eds) Biopreparedness and Public Health. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series A: Chemistry and Biology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5273-3_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics