Abstract
In this chapter three examples of teacher-guided use of ICT stimuli for learning mathematics (screencast, animation and applet) are critically examined using a range of distinctions derived from a complex framework. Six modes of interaction between teacher, student and mathematics are used to distinguish different affordances and constraints; five different structured forms of attention are used to refine the grain size of analysis; four aspects of activity are used to highlight the importance of balance between resources and motivation; and the triadic structure of the human psyche (cognition, affect and enaction, or intellect, emotion and behaviour) is used to shed light on how affordances may or may not be manifested, and on how constraints may or may not be effective, depending on the attunements of teachers and students. The conclusion is that what matters is the way of working within an established milieu. The same stimulus can be used in multiple modes according to the teacher’s awareness and aims, the classroom ethos and according to the students’ commitment to learning/thinking. The analytic frameworks used can provide teachers with structured ways of informing their choices of pedagogic strategies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
1 I use ‘e-screens’ to refer to electronic screens, as distinct from the mental ‘screen’ which is the domain of mental imagery.
- 2.
* Log in with ISBN 978-94-007-4638-1.
- 3.
* Log in with ISBN 978-94-007-4638-1.
References
Ainley, J., & Pratt, D. (2002). Purpose and utility in pedagogic task design. In A. Cockburn & E. Nardi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th annual conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education Vol. 2 (pp. 17–24). Norwich: PME.
Ascari, M. (2011). Networking different theoretical lenses to analyze students’ reasoning and teacher’s actions in the mathematics classroom. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Universita’ Degli Studi Di Torino.
Atkinson, R., Derry, S., Renkl, A., & Wortham, D. (2000). Learning from examples: Instructional principles from the worked examples research. Review of Educational Research, 70(2), 181–214.
Baird, J., & Northfield, F. (1992). Learning from the peel experience. Melbourne: Monash University.
Bennett, J. (1966). The dramatic universe (Vol. 4). London: Routledge.
Bennett, J. (1993). Elementary systematics: A tool for understanding wholes. Santa Fe: Bennett Books.
Brousseau, G. (1997). Theory of Didactical Situations in Mathematics: didactiques des mathématiques (1970–1990). (trans: Balacheff N., Cooper M., Sutherland R., Warfield V.). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Brown, S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–41.
Bruner, J. (1966). Towards a theory of instruction. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Claxton, G. (1984). Live and learn: An introduction to the psychology of growth and change in everyday life. London: Harper and Row.
Davis, B. (1996). Teaching mathematics: Towards a sound alternative. New York: Ablex.
Davis, B., & Simmt, E. (2006). Mathematics-for-teaching: An ongoing investigation of the mathematics that teachers (need) to know. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61(3), 293–319.
Dawes, L., Mercer, N., & Wegerif, R. (2004). Thinking together: A programme of activities for developing speaking, listening and thinking skills (2nd ed.). Birmingham: Imaginative Minds Ltd.
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Gardiner, A. (1992). Recurring themes in school mathematics: Part 1 direct and inverse operations. Mathematics in School, 21(5), 5–7.
Gardiner, A. (1993a). Recurring themes in school mathematics: Part 2 reasons and reasoning. Mathematics in School, 23(1), 20–21.
Gardiner, A. (1993b). Recurring themes in school mathematics: Part 3 generalised arithmetic. Mathematics in School, 22(2), 20–21.
Gardiner, A. (1993c). Recurring themes in school mathematics, part 4 infinity. Mathematics in School, 22(4), 19–21.
Gattegno, C. (1970). What we owe children: The subordination of teaching to learning. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Gattegno, C. (1987). The science of education part I: Theoretical considerations. New York: Educational Solutions.
Gibson, J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. London: Houghton Mifflin.
Habermas, J. (1998). In M. Cooke (Ed.), On the pragmatics of communication (pp. 307–342). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Handa, Y. (2011). What does understanding mathematics mean for teachers? Relationship as a metaphor for knowing (Studies in curriculum theory series). London: Routledge.
Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time. New York: Harper & Row.
Hein, P. (1966). T.T.T. in Grooks. Copenhagen: Borgen.
Hewitt, D. (1994). The principle of economy in the learning and teaching of mathematics, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Open University, Milton Keynes.
Hewitt, D. (1996). Mathematical fluency: The nature of practice and the role of subordination. For the Learning of Mathematics, 16(2), 28–35.
James, W. (1890 reprinted 1950). Principles of psychology (Vol. 1). New York: Dover.
Jaworski, B. (1994). Investigating mathematics teaching: A constructivist enquiry. London: Falmer Press.
Jordan, C., Loch, B., Lowe, T., Mestel, B., & Wilkins, C. (2011). Do short screencasts improve student learning of mathematics? MSOR Connections, 12(1), 11–14.
Kang, W., & Kilpatrick, J. (1992). Didactic transposition in mathematics textbooks. For the Learning of Mathematics., 12(1), 2–7.
Leapfrogs. (1982). Geometric images. Derby: Association of Teachers of Mathematics.
Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning—1: Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4–11.
Marton, F., & Tsui, A. (Eds.). (2004). Classroom discourse and the space for learning. Marwah: Erlbaum.
Mason, J. (1979). Which medium, Which message, Visual Education, February, 29–33.
Mason, J. (1985). What do you do when you turn off the machine? Preparatory paper for ICMI conference: The influence of computers and informatics on mathematics and its teaching (pp. 251–256). Strasburg: Inst. de Recherche Sur L’Enseignement des Mathematiques.
Mason, J. (1994a). Learning from experience. In D. Boud & J. Walker (Eds.), Using experience for learning. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Mason, J. (1994b). Professional development and practitioner research. Chreods, 7, 3–12.
Mason, J. (1998). Enabling teachers to be real teachers: Necessary levels of awareness and structure of attention. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1(3), 243–267.
Mason, J. (2003). Structure of attention in the learning of mathematics. In J. Novotná (Ed.), Proceedings, international symposium on elementary mathematics teaching (pp. 9–16). Prague: Charles University.
Mason, J. (2004). A phenomenal approach to mathematics. Paper presented at Working Group 16, ICME, Copenhagen.
Mason, J. (2007). Hyper-learning from hyper-teaching: What might the future hold for learning mathematics from & with electronic screens? Interactive Educational Multimedia 14, 19–39. (refereed e-journal) 14 (April). Accessed May 2007.
Mason, J. (2008). Phenomenal mathematics. Plenary presentation. Proceedings of the 11th RUME Conference. San Diego.
Mason, J. (2009). From assenting to asserting. In O. Skvovemose, P. Valero, & O. Christensen (Eds.), University science and mathematics education in transition (pp. 17–40). Berlin: Springer.
Mason, J., & Klymchuk, S. (2009). Counter examples in calculus. London: Imperial College Press.
Mason, J., & Watson, A. (2005). Mathematical Exercises: What is exercised, what is attended to, and how does the structure of the exercises influence these? Invited Presentation to SIG on Variation and Attention. Nicosia: EARLI.
Mason, J., Burton, L., & Stacey, K. (1982/2010). Thinking mathematically (Second Extended Edition). Harlow: Prentice Hall (Pearson).
Mason, J., Drury, H., & Bills, E. (2007). Explorations in the zone of proximal awareness. In J. Watson & K. Beswick (Eds.), Mathematics: Essential research, essential practice: Proceedings of the 30th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia Vol. 1 (pp. 42–58). Adelaide: MERGA.
Norretranders, T. (1998). The user illusion: Cutting consciousness down to size (trans: Sydenham, J.). London: Allen Lane.
O’Brien, T. (2006). What is fifth grade? Phi Beta Kappan, January, 373–376.
Piaget, J. (1970). Genetic epistemology. New York: Norton.
Piaget, J. (1971). Biology and knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Poincaré, H. (1956 reprinted 1960). Mathematical creation: Lecture to the psychology society of Paris. In J. Newman (Ed.), The world of mathematics (pp. 2041–2050). London: George Allen & Unwin.
Pólya, G. (1962) Mathematical discovery: On understanding, learning, and teaching problem solving (combined edition). New York: Wiley.
Ravindra, R. (2009). The wisdom of Patañjali’s Yoga sutras. Sandpoint: Morning Light Press.
Redmond, K. (2012). Professors without borders. Prospect, July, 42–46.
Renkl, A. (1997). Learning from worked-out examples: A study on individual differences. Cognitive Science, 21, 1–29.
Renkl, A. (2002). Worked-out examples: Instructional explanations support learning by self-explanations. Learning and Instruction, 12, 529–556.
Rhadakrishnan, S. (1953). The principal Upanishads. London: George Allen & Unwin.
Salomon, G. (1979). Interaction of media, cognition and learning. London: Jossey-Bass.
Sangwin, C. (2005). On Building Polynomials. The Mathematical Gazette, November, 441–450. See http://web.mat.bham.ac.uk/C.J.Sangwin/Publications/BuildPoly.pdf
Shah, I. (1978). Learning how to learn. London: Octagon.
Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge and growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
Skinner, B. F. (1954). The science of learning and the art of teaching. Harvard Educational Review, 24(2), 86–97.
Swift, J. (1726). In H. Davis (Ed.), Gulliver’s travels Vol. XI (p. 267). Oxford: Blackwell.
Tahta, D. (1981). Some thoughts arising from the new Nicolet films. Mathematics Teaching, 94, 25–29.
van der Veer, R., & Valsiner, J. (1991). Understanding Vygotsky. London: Blackwell.
van Hiele, P. (1986). Structure and insight: A theory of mathematics education (Developmental psychology series). London: Academic Press.
Varela, F., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Watson, A., & Mason, J. (2005). Mathematics as a constructive activity: Learners generating examples. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Watson, A., & Mason, J. (2006). Seeing an exercise as a single mathematical object: Using variation to structure sense-making. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 8(2), 91–111.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mason, J., Mason, J. (2014). Interactions Between Teacher, Student, Software and Mathematics: Getting a Purchase on Learning with Technology. In: Clark-Wilson, A., Robutti, O., Sinclair, N. (eds) The Mathematics Teacher in the Digital Era. Mathematics Education in the Digital Era, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4638-1_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4638-1_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-4637-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-4638-1
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)