Skip to main content

Damage Tolerance of Naval Sandwich Panels

  • Chapter

Abstract

This paper is a review of activities concerning various damage tolerance modelling and testing aspects of sandwich panels for typical Naval applications. It starts with a review of testing methods for primarily core materials and how to extract properties and data required for damage tolerance assessment. Next some typical damage types are defined and how they are modelled with the aim of predicting their effect on load bearing capacity. The paper then describes in brief how such models can used in the context of providing a systematic damage assessment scheme for composite sandwich ship structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hayman B (2007) Approaches to damage assessment and damage tolerance for FRP sandwich structures. J Sand Struct Mater 9:571–596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zenkert D, Bull P, Shipsha A, Hayman B (2005) Damage tolerance assessment of composite sandwich panels with localised damage. Compos Sci Technol 65:2597–2611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zenkert D, Bäcklund J (1989) PVC Sandwich core materials:Mode I fracture toughness. Compos Sci Technol 34:225–242

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Zenkert D (1989) PVC Sandwich core materials:fracture behaviour under mode II and mixed mode loading. Mater Sci Eng A108:233–240

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Shipsha A, Burman M, Zenkert D (2000) On mode I fatigue crack growth in foam core materials for sandwich structures. J Sandwich Struct 2:103–116

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Carlson LA (1991) On the design of the cracked sandwich beam (CSB) specimen. J Reinforced Plast 10:434–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Shipsha A, Burman M, Zenkert D (1999) Interfacial fatigue crack growth in foam core sandwich structures. Fatigue Fracture Eng Mater Struct 22:123–131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Østergaard RC, Sørensen BF, Brøndsted P (2007) Measurement of interface fracture toughness of sandwich structures under mixed mode loadings. Sandwich Struct Mater 9:445–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zenkert D (1990) Strength of sandwich beams with mid-plane debondings in the core. Compos Struct 15:279–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zenkert D (1991) Strength of sandwich beams with interface debondings. Compos Struct 17:331–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zenkert D, Groth HL (1989) The influence of flawed butt-joints in foam core sandwich beams. In:Olsson KA, Reichard RP (eds.), First International Conference on Sandwich Constructions, EMAS, UK, pp. 363–381

    Google Scholar 

  12. Groth HL, Zenkert D (1990) Fracture of defect foam core sandwich beams. ASTM J Testing Eval 18(6):390–395

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zenkert D (1992) Effect of manufacturing-induced flaws on the strength of foam core sandwich beams. In:Masters JE (ed.), Damage Detection in Composite Materials, ASTM STP 1128, ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 137–151

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Zenkert D, Schubert O, Burman M (1997) Fracture initiation in foam core sandwich structures due to singular stresses at corners of flawed butt-joints. Mech Compos Mater Struct 4(1):1–21

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Burman M, Zenkert D (1997) Fatigue of foam core sandwich beams. Part I:Undamaged specimens. Int J Fatigue 19(7):551–561

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Burman M, Zenkert D (1997) Fatigue of foam core sandwich beams. Part II:Effect of initial damages. Int J Fatigue 19(7):563–578

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Burman M, Zenkert D (2000) Fatigue of undamaged and damaged honeycomb sandwich. J Sand Struct 2:50–74

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zenkert D, Shipsha A, Persson K (2004) Static indentation and unloading response of sandwich beam. Compos B 35(6–8):511–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rizov V, Shipsha A, Zenkert D (2005) Indentation study of foam core sandwich panels. Compos Struct 69:95–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Koissin V, Shipsha A (2008) Residual dent in locally loaded foam core sandwich structures –analysis and use for NDI. Compos Sci Technol 68:57–74

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hallström S, Shipsha A, Zenkert D (2000) Failure of impact damaged foam core sandwich beams. In:Rajapakse YDS (ed.), ASME ICEME'2000, ASME AERO/AMD AD-Vol. 62/AMD Vol. 245, pp. 11–19

    Google Scholar 

  22. Shipsha A, Hallström S, Zenkert D (2003) Failure mechanisms and modelling of impact damage in sandwich beams —a 2D approach:Part I —Experimental investigation. J Sandwich Struct Mater 5(1):7–31

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Shipsha A, Hallström S, Zenkert D (2003) Failure mechanisms and modelling of impact damage in sandwich beams —a 2D approach:Part II —Analysis and modelling. J Sandwich Struct Mater 5(1):33–51

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Koissin V, Skortsov V, Shipsha A (2007) Stability of the face layer of sandwich beams with sub-interface damage in the foam core. Compos Struct 78:507–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Shipsha A, Zenkert D (2003) Fatigue behaviour of foam core sandwich beams with sub-interface impact damage. J Sand Struct Mater 5(1):147–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zenkert D, Falk F (1991) Interface debondings in foam core sandwich beams and panels. In:Springer G, Tsai S (eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Composite Materials, Publ. by SAMPE, (ICCM/VIII), 3-H

    Google Scholar 

  27. Falk F (1992) Strength of foam-core sandwich panels with face-to-core debonds. In:Weissman-Berman D, Olsson KA (eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Sandwich Constructions, EMAS Ltd, UK, pp. 645–663

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wennhage P, Zenkert D (1998) Testing of sandwich panels under uniform pressure. J Testing Eval 26(2):101–108

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Jolma P, Segercrantz S, Berggreen C (2007) Ultimate failure of debond damaged sandwich panels loaded with lateral pressure —an experimental and fracture mechanics study. J Sand Struct Mater 9:167–196

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Berggreen C (2004). Damage tolerance of debonded sandwich structures, Ph.D. thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark

    Google Scholar 

  31. Nokkentved A, Lundsgaard-Larsen C, Berggreen C (2005) Non-uniform compressive strength of debonded sandwich panels —I. Experimental investigation. J Sand Struct Mater 7(6):461–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Berggreen C, Simonsen BC (2005) Non-uniform compressive strength of debonded sandwich panels —II. Fracture mechanics investigation. J Sand Struct Mater 7(6):461–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Causes, mechanisms and preventive actions to avoid blistering, Technical Bulletin, DIAB AB, www.diabgroup.com

  34. Shipsha A, Zenkert D (2005) Compression-after-impact strength of sandwich panels with core crushing damage. Appl Compos Mater 12(3–4):149–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Edgren F, Asp L, Bull P (2004) Compressive failure of impacted NCF composite sandwich panels —characterisation of failure process. J Compos Mater 38(6):495–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Bull P, Edgren F (2004) Compressive strength after impact of CFRP-foam core sandwich panels. Compos B 35:535–541

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Sutcliffe M, Xin A, Fleck NA, Curtis P (1999) Composite compressive strength modeller, Engineering Department, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  38. Edgren F, Soutis C, Asp L (2008) Damage tolerance analysis of NCF composite sandwich panels. Compos Sci Technol 68(13):2635–2645

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The work summarised in this chapter has been ongoing since the 1980s with various support. Thanks are due to The Swedish Defence Materiel Administration and Mr. Anders Lönnöfor funding parts of this. The Nordic Industrial Fund (NI) provided support for a long time in the 1990s. A lot of the more recent work was performed within the WEAG-project saNDI in collaboration with Prof. Brian Hayman at DNV. During most of the past 10 years invaluable support has been provided from the Structural Mechanics Programme of ONR through programme officer Dr. Y. Rajapakse.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dan Zenkert .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zenkert, D. (2009). Damage Tolerance of Naval Sandwich Panels. In: Daniel, I.M., Gdoutos, E.E., Rajapakse, Y.D.S. (eds) Major Accomplishments in Composite Materials and Sandwich Structures. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3141-9_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics