Abstract
Lactate dehydrogenases, LDH, catalyzed reaction has been used in this chapter as a conductor wire to present the evolution and difficulties on computing methods to model chemical reactions in enzymes, since the early calculations based at semiempirical level carried out in gas phase to the recent sophisticated simulations based on hybrid Quantum Mechanical/Molecular Mechanics Dynamics (QM/MM MD) schemes. LDH catalyzes the reversible transformation of pyruvate into lactate. The chemical step consists in a hydride and a proton transfer from the cofactor (NADH) and a protonated histidine (His195), respectively. This fact has generated a lot of controversy about the timing of both transfers in the active site, as well as the role of the different aminoacids of the active site and problems related with the flexibility of the protein. We herein show how an adequate method within a realistic model, taking into account the pKa of the titratable aminoacids, the flexibility of the protein, the size of the MM and QM region or the level of theory used to describe the QM region, must be used to obtain reliable conclusions. Finally, and keeping in mind the size of the system under study, it has been demonstrated the need of performing statistical simulations to sample the full conformational space of all states involved in the reaction, that allow getting free energies and averaged properties directly compared with experimental data.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ertl G, Gloyna T (2003) Zeitschrift Fur Physikalische Chemie-Int J Res Phys Chem Chem Phys 217(10):1207–1219
Ostwald W (1902) Phys Z 3:313–322
Ostwald W (1910) Ann Naturphil 9:1
Corma A (2004) Cat Rev Sci Eng 46(3–4):369–417
Garcia-Viloca M, Gao J, Karplus M, Truhlar DG (2004) Science 303(5655):186–195
Warshel A, Sharma PK, Kato M, Xiang Y, Liu HB, Olsson MHM (2006) Chem Rev 106(8):3210–3235
Truhlar DG (2008) J Am Chem Soc 130(50):16824–16827
Field MJ (2007) A practical introduction to the simulation of molecular systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Warshel A, Levitt M (1976) J Mol Biol 103(2):227–249
Kollman P (1993) Chem Rev 93(7):2395–2417
Kollman PA, Kuhn B, Donini O, Perakyla M, Stanton R, Bakowies D (2001) Acc Chem Res 34(1):72–79
Marti S, Andres J, Moliner V, Silla E, Tuñón I, Bertran J, Field MJ (2001) J Am Chem Soc 123(8):1709–1712
Marti S, Roca M, Andres J, Moliner V, Silla E, Tuñón I, Bertran J (2004) Chem Soc Rev 33(2):98–107
Marti S, Andres J, Moliner V, Silla E, Tuñón I, Bertran J (2008) Chem Soc Rev 37(12):2634–2643
Gao JL, Truhlar DG (2002) Annu Rev Phys Chem 53:467–505
Villa J, Warshel A (2001) J Phys Chem B 105(33):7887–7907
Warshel A (1998) J Biol Chem 273(42):27035–27038
Lin H, Truhlar DG (2007) Theor Chem Acc 117(2):185–199
Clarke AR, Wigley DB, Chia WN, Barstow D, Atkinson T, Holbrook JJ (1986) Nature 324(6098):699–702
Hart KW, Clarke AR, Wigley DB, Chia WN, Barstow DA, Atkinson T, Holbrook JJ (1987) Biochem Biophys Res Commun 146(1):346–353
Clarke AR, Atkinson T, Holbrook JJ (1989) Biochem Sci 14:145–148
Badcoe IG, Smith CJ, Wood S, Halsall DJ, Holbrook JJ, Lund P, Clarke AR (1991) Biochemistry 30(38):9195–9200
Deng H, Zheng J, Clarke A, Holbrook JJ, Callender R, Burgner JW (1994) Biochemistry 33(8):2297–2305
Clarke AR, Wigley DB, Barstow DA, Chia WN, Waldman ADB, Hart KW, Atkinson T, Holbrook JJ (1987) Biochem Soc Trans 15(1):152–153
Andres J, Moliner V, Krechl J, Silla E (1993) Bioorg Chem 21(3):260–274
Andres J, Moliner V, Safont VS (1994) J Chem Soc Faraday Trans 90(12):1703–1707
Andres J, Moliner V, Krechl J, Silla E (1995) J Chem Soc Perkin Trans 2(7):1551–1558
Krechl J, Kuthan J (1988) Theochem J Mol Struct 47:239–244
Wilkie J, Williams IH (1992) J Am Chem Soc 114(13):5423–5425
Wilkie J, Williams IH (1995) J Chem Soc Perkin Trans 2(7):1559–1567
Ranganathan S, Gready JE (1994) J Chem Soc Farad Trans 90(14):2047–2056
Yadav A, Jackson RM, Holbrook JJ, Warshel A (1991) J Am Chem Soc 113(13):4800–4805
Siegbahn PEM, Himo F (2009) J Biol Inorg Chem 14(5):643–651
de la Lande A, Gerard H, Moliner V, Izzet G, Reinaud O, Parisel O (2006) J Biol Inorg Chem 11(5):593–608
de la Lande A, Parisel O, Gerard H, Moliner V, Reinaud O (2008) Chem Eur J 14(21):6465–6473
Alhambra C, Corchado J, Sanchez ML, Garcia-Viloca M, Gao J, Truhlar DG (2001) J Phys Chem B 105(45):11326–11340
Moliner V, Turner AJ, Williams IH (1997) Chem Commun 14:1271–1272
Turner AJ, Moliner V, Williams IH (1999) Phys Chem Chem Phys 1(6):1323–1331
Brooks BR, Bruccoleri RE, Olafson BD, States DJ, Swaminathan S, Karplus M (1983) J Comput Chem 4(2):187–217
Cramer CJ, Truhlar DG (1999) Chem Rev 99(8):2161–2200
Xue QF, Yeung ES (1995) Nature 373(6516):681–683
Tan WH, Yeung ES (1997) Anal Chem 69(20):4242–4248
Ranganathan S, Gready JE (1997) J Phys Chem B 101:5614–5618
Weiner SJ, Kollman PA, Nguyen DT, Case DA (1986) J Comput Chem 7(2):230–252
Moliner V, Williams IH (2000) Chem Commun 19:1843–1844
Gilson MK (1993) Proteins Struct Funct Genet 15(3):266–282
Antosiewicz J, McCammon JA, Gilson MK (1994) J Mol Biol 238(3):415–436
Field MJ, David L, Rinaldo D. Personal Communication
Ferrer S, Silla E, Tuñón I, Oliva M, Moliner V, Williams IH (2005) Chem Commun 47:5873–5875
Marti S, Moliner V, Tuñón I (2005) J Chem Theor Comput 1(5):1008–1016
Swiderek K, Paneth P (2010) J Phys Chem B 114(9):3393–3397
Ferrer S, Tuñón I, Marti S, Moliner V, Garcia-Viloca M, Gonzalez-Lafont A, Lluch JM (2006) J Am Chem Soc 128(51):16851–16863
Zhang YK, Liu HY, Yang WT (2000) J Chem Phys 112(8):3483–3492
Schenter GK, Garrett BC, Truhlar DG (2003) J Chem Phys 119(12):5828–5833
Roca M, Moliner V, Ruiz-Pernia JJ, Silla E, Tuñón I (2006) J Phys Chem A 110(2):503–509
Kumar S, Bouzida D, Swendsen RH, Kollman PA, Rosenberg JM (1992) J Comput Phys 13(8):1011–1021
Torrie GM, Valleau JP (1977) J Comput Phys 23(2):187–199
Kou SC, Cherayil BJ, Min W, English BP, Xie XS (2005) J Phys Chem B 109(41):19068–19081
Smiley RD, Hammes GG (2006) Chem Rev 106(8):3080–3094
Lu HP, Xun LY, Xie XS (1998) Science 282(5395):1877–1882
Yang H, Luo GB, Karnchanaphanurach P, Louie TM, Rech I, Cova S, Xun LY, Xie XS (2003) Science 302(5643):262–266
Seravalli J, Huskey WP, Schowen KB, Schowen RL (1994) Pure Appl Chem 66(4):695–702
Acknowledgements
We thank the Spanish Ministry Ministerio de Ciencia e Inovación for project CTQ2009-14541, Universitat Jaume I - BANCAIXA Foundation for projects P1·1B2005-13, P1·1B2005-15 and P1·1B2005-27, and Generalitat Valenciana for Prometeo/2009/053 project. We are also grateful to Prof. Ian H. Williams and Prof. J. Andrés for fruitful discussions. The authors also acknowledge the Servei d´Informatica, Universitat Jaume I for generous allotment of computer time. V. Moliner would like to thank the Spanish Ministry Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación for traveling financial support, project PR2009-0539.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Netherlands
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ferrer, S., Martí, S., Moliner, V., Tuñón, I. (2010). Computational Modeling of Biological Systems: The LDH Story. In: Paneth, P., Dybala-Defratyka, A. (eds) Kinetics and Dynamics. Challenges and Advances in Computational Chemistry and Physics, vol 12. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3034-4_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3034-4_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-3033-7
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-3034-4
eBook Packages: Chemistry and Materials ScienceChemistry and Material Science (R0)