Abstract
After almost 40 years of clinical use, stentless valves are unequivocally considered the ideal bioprostheses, similar to native valves, by a group of enthusiastic implanters, as well as useless, complicated, technically demanding devices with unclear indications by the skeptical majority in the surgical community.
Understanding stentless valves requires a deep knowledge of the aortic root anatomy and dynamics which is far more complex than the simple open/close leaflets mechanism. In fact, each of the following structures has a special role in aortic valve functionality and any variation may influence the aortic root dynamics: the left ventricle outflow tract, the annulus, the leaflets, the commissures, the Valsalva sinuses, and the sinotubular junction.
Engineering and biotechnology have been aimed at critical analysis of the main features of the human aortic valve in an effort to incorporate these qualities into the design of valve prostheses.
In stented valves the aortic root dynamics are not preserved, so performance and potential durability are more related to structural design. The major potential advantage of stentless valves is to achieve the ideal hemodynamic performance of the normal human valve showing significant superiority in peak and mean gradients, as well as cardiac output, compared to stented valves and very similar to homografts, but the prognostic value of these data is still to be proved.
Durability remains a primary concern for any bioprosthesis, which is even more relevant in the stentless world where technical implantation issues and complexity at reoperation should be considered.
The design of stentless valves as well as their mechanical wear and stress absorption properties should determine (and for many reasons in most cases had not) better leaflets preservation and enhanced durability. Furthermore, and perhaps even more important, stentless valve implantation techniques are generally more demanding, less reproducible and standardized, and dramatically dependent on the surgeon’s skill and experience.
Well aware of the advantages of being placed upon the shoulders of our predecessors in the stentless world, in 2004 we tried to rethink the stentless concept in the context of aortic root physiological aspects playing a paramount role in dynamics and potential durability. The ideal stentless valve should be “truly” stentless and flexible without any fabric or synthetic material as cloth or reinforcement limiting pliability and contributing to an unforeseeable variable in the degenerative process toward rigidity and calcification. Moreover both annulus and STJ should not be fixed by rigid material, preserving physiologic root dynamics and providing only new leaflets to replace the pathological ones. Then valve insertion into the aortic root should be easy, fast, and reproducible.
These concepts constituted the theoretical basis for the development of the Freedom SOLO stentless valve (Livanova): three bovine pericardial leaflets implanted in a supra-annular position with a single suture line. Minimal invasiveness and easy and fast implantability have been a successful strategy when high-risk aged patients are concerned, while valve durability, SVD rates, and long-term complications established by the test of time will play the determining role to expand indications in a younger and healthier population.
In the meantime, attentive and careful trials of all possible alternatives toward a “native-like” aortic valve with very long-term (more than 20 years) durability should be continued and evaluated to implement data to guide future indications.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Hurley PJ, Lowe JB, Barratt-Boyes BG. Debridement-valvotomy for aortic stenosis in adults: a follow-up of 76 patients. Thorax. 1967;22:314–9.
Kirklin JW, Mankin HT. Open operation in the treatment of calcific aortic stenosis. Circulation. 1960;21:578–86.
Bahnson HT, Spencer FC, Busse EF, et al. Cusp replacement and coronary artery perfusion in open operations on the aortic valve. Ann Surg. 1960;152:494–503.
Hufnagel CA, Conrad PW. The direct approach for the correction of aortic insufficiency. JAMA. 1961;178:275–9.
McGoon DC, Mankin HT, Kirklin JW. Results of open heart operation for acquired aortic valve disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1963;45:47.
McGoon DC. Prosthetic reconstruction of the aortic valve. Mayo Clin Proc. 1961;36:88.
Murray G. Homologous aortic valve segment transplant as surgical treatment for aortic and mitral insufficiency. Angiology. 1956;7:466–71.
Barratt-Boyes BG. Homograft aortic valve replacement in aortic incompetence and stenosis. Thorax. 1964;19:131–50.
Duran CG, Gunning AJ. A method for placing a total homologous aortic valve in the subcoronary position. Lancet. 1962;8(2):488–9.
Ross DN. Homograft replacement of the aortic valve. Lancet. 1962;8:487.
Hoeksima TD, Titus JL, Giuliani ER, et al. Early results of use of homografts for replacement of aortic valve in man. Circulation. 1967;35:S9–14.
Karp RB, Kirklin JW. Replacement of diseased aortic valves with homografts. Ann Surg. 1969;169:921–6.
Pacifico AD, Karp RB, Kirklin JW. Homografts for replacement of the aortic valve. Circulation. 1972;45:S36–43.
Barratt-Boyes BG. A method for preparing and inserting a homograft aortic valve. Br J Surg. 1965;52:847–56.
Barratt-Boyes BG. Long-term follow-up of aortic valvar graft. Br Heart J. 1971;33:S60–5.
Ross DN. Aortic-valve replacement. Lancet. 1966;2:461–3.
Donaldson RM, Ross DM. Homograft aortic root replacement for complicated prosthetic valve endocarditis. Circulation. 1984;70:178–81.
Gula G, Pomerance A, Bennet M, et al. Homograft replacement of aortic valve and ascending aorta in patient with non-specific giant cell aortitis. Br Heart J. 1977;39:581–5.
Ross DN, Martelli V, Wain WH. Allograft and autograft valves used for aortic valve replacement. In: Ionescu MI, editor. Tissue heart valves. London: Butterworth; 1979.
Harken DE, Soroff HS, Taylor WJ, et al. Partial and complete prostheses in aortic insufficiency. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1960;40:744–62.
Starr A, Edwards ML, McCord CW, et al. Aortic replacement: clinical experience with a semirigid ball-valve prosthesis. Circulation. 1963;27:779.
Silberman S, Shaheen J, Fink D, et al. Comparison of exercise hemodynamics among nonstented aortic bioprosthesis, mechanical valves, and normal native aortic valves. J Card Surg. 1998;13:412–6.
Akins CW. Results with mechanical cardiac valvular prostheses. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995;60:1836–44.
Edmunds LH. Evolution of prosthetic heart valves. Am Heart J. 2001;141:849–55.
Fann JI, Miller DC. Porcine valves: Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards aortic prostheses. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996;8:259–68.
Binet JP, Duran CG, Carpenter A, et al. Heterologous aortic valve transplantation. Lancet. 1965;18:1275.
Carpentier A, Lemaigre G, Robert L, et al. Biological factors affecting long-term results of valvular heterografts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1969;58:467–83.
Ionescu MI, Pakrashi BC, Holden MP, et al. Results of aortic valve replacement with frame-supported fascia lata and pericardial grafts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1972;64:340–53.
Mayne AS, Christie GW, Smaill BH, et al. An assessment of the mechanical properties of leaflets from four second-generation porcine bioprostheses with biaxial testing techniques. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1989;98:170–80.
Lawford PV, Black MM, Drury PJ, et al. The in vivo durability of bioprosthetic heart valves-modes of failure observed in explanted valves. Eng Med. 1987;16:95–103.
David TE, Pollick C, Bos J. Aortic valve replacement with stentless porcine aortic bioprosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1990;99:113–8.
O’Brien MF, Finney RS, Stafford EG, et al. Root replacement for all allograft aortic valves: preferred technique or too radical? Ann Thorac Surg. 1995;60:S87–91.
Desai ND, Merin O, Cohen GN, et al. Long-term results of aortic valve replacement with the St. Jude Toronto stentless porcine valve. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;78:2076–83.
Thubrikar MJ. The aortic valve. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1990.
Cheng A, Dagum P, Miller DC. Aortic root dynamics and surgery: from craft to science. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci. 2007;362:1407–19.
Dagum P, Green GR, Nistal FJ, et al. Deformational dynamics of the aortic root: modes and physiologic determinants. Circulation. 1999;100:S54–62.
O’Brien MF. Implantation technique of the Cryolife-O’Brien stentless xenograft aortic valve: the simple, rapid, and correct way to implant and the errors to avoid. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999;11:S121–5.
Petracek MR. Assessing options for the small aortic root. J Heart Valve Dis. 2002;11:S50–5.
Palka P, Harrocks S, Lange A, et al. Primary aortic valve replacement with cryopreserved aortic allograft: an echocardiographic follow-up study of 570 patients. Circulation. 2002;105:61–6.
Jamieson WR. Quantification of haemodynamic performance of stented and stentless aortic bioprostheses and potential influence on survival. Heart Lung Circ. 2003;12:149–56.
Vesely I. Analysis of the Medtronic intact bioprosthetic valve. Effects of “zero-pressure” fixation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1991;101:90–9.
Christie GW, Gross JF, Eberhardt CE. Fatigue-induced changes to the biaxial mechanical properties of glutaraldehyde-fixed porcine aortic valve leaflets. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999;11:S201–5.
Schoen FJ, Levy RJ. Calcification of tissue heart valve substitutes: progress toward understanding and prevention. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79:1072–80.
Del Rizzo DF, Goldman BS, Christakis GT, et al. Hemodynamic benefits of the Toronto stentless valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996;112:1431–45.
Jin XY, Zhang ZM, Gibson DG, et al. Effects of valve substitute on changes in left ventricular function and hypertrophy after aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996;62:683–90.
Westaby S, Jin XY, Katsumata T, et al. Valve replacement with a stentless bioprosthesis: versatility of the porcine aortic root. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998;116:477–84.
Cohen G, Christakis GT, Buth KJ, et al. Early experience with stentless versus stented valves. Circulation. 1997;96:S76–82.
Cohen G, Christakis GT, Joyner CD, et al. Are stentless valves hemodynamically superior to stented valves? A prospective randomized trial. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;73:767–75.
De Paulis R, Sommariva L, Colagrande L, et al. Regression of left ventricular hypertrophy after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis with different valve substitutes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998;116:590–8.
Borger MA, Carson SM, Ivanov J, et al. Stentless aortic valves are hemodynamically superior to stented valves during mid-term follow-up: a large retrospective study. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;80:2180–5.
Lehmann S, Walther T, Kempfert J, et al. Stentless versus conventional xenograft aortic valve replacement: midterm results of a prospectively randomized trial. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;84:467–72.
Maselli D, Pizio R, Bruno LP, et al. Left ventricular mass reduction after aortic valve replacement: homografts, stentless and stented valves. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;67:966–71.
Williams RJ, Muir DF, Pathi V, et al. Randomized controlled trial of stented and stentless aortic bioprotheses: hemodynamic performance at 3 years. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999;11:S93–7.
Walther T, Falk V, Langebartels G, et al. Prospectively randomized evaluation of stentless versus conventional biological aortic valves: impact on early regression of left ventricular hypertrophy. Circulation. 1999;100:S6–10.
Yun KL, Sintek CF, Fletcher AD, et al. Aortic valve replacement with the freestyle stentless bioprosthesis: five-year experience. Circulation. 1999;100:S17–23.
B K, Vijayalakshmi K, Thornley AR, et al. Meta-analysis of valve hemodynamics and left ventricular mass regression for stentless versus stented aortic valves. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;84:73–8.
Gulbins H, Reichenspurner H. Which patients benefit from stentless aortic valve replacement? Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;88:2061–8.
Collinson J, Flather M, Coats AJ, et al. Influence of valve prosthesis type on the recovery of ventricular dysfunction and subendocardial ischaemia following valve replacement for aortic stenosis. Int J Cardiol. 2004;97:535–41.
Bevilacqua S, Gianetti J, Ripoli A, et al. Aortic valve disease with severe ventricular dysfunction: stentless valve for better recovery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;74:2016–21.
David TE, Puschmann R, Ivanov J, et al. Aortic valve replacement with stentless and stented porcine valves: a case-match study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998;116:236–41.
Westaby S, Horton M, Jin XY, et al. Survival advantage of stentless aortic bioprostheses. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;70:785–90.
Tamim M, Bové T, Van Belleghem Y, et al. Stentless vs. stented aortic valve replacement: left ventricular mass regression. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2005;13(2):112–8.
Silberman S, Shaheen J, Merin O, et al. Exercise hemodynamics of aortic prostheses: comparison between stentless bioprostheses and mechanical valves. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;72:1217–21.
Fries R, Wendler O, Schieffer H, et al. Comparative rest and exercise hemodynamics of 23-mm stentless versus 23-mm stented aortic bioprostheses. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;69:817–22.
Morsy S, Zahran M, Usama M, et al. Hemodynamic performance of stentless porcine bioprosthesis and mechanical bileaflet prosthesis using dobutamine stress echocardiography. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;13:S129–35.
Blais C, Dumesnil JG, Baillot R, et al. Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on short-term mortality after aortic valve replacement. Circulation. 2003;108:983–8.
O’Brien MF, Gardner MA, Garlick B, et al. CryoLife-O’Brien stentless valve: 10-year results of 402 implants. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79:757–66.
Bach DS, Cartier PC, Kon ND, et al. Impact of implant technique following freestyle stentless aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;74:1107–13.
Wendler O, Dzindzibadze V, Langer F, et al. Aortic valve replacement with a stentless bioprosthesis using the full-root technique. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;49:361–4.
Stanger O, Bleuel I, Gisler F, et al. The freedom Solo pericardial stentless valve: single-center experience, outcomes, and long-term durability. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;150:70–7.
Repossini A, Kotelnikov I, Bouchikhi R, et al. Single-suture line placement of a pericardial stentless valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;130:1265–9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Repossini, A. (2019). The Stentless Valve Concept. In: Stanger, O., Pepper, J., Svensson, L. (eds) Surgical Management of Aortic Pathology. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-4874-7_47
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-4874-7_47
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna
Print ISBN: 978-3-7091-4872-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-4874-7
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)