Skip to main content

Definitions and Limits of Triassic Stages and Substages: Suggestions Prompted by Comparisons Between North America and the Alpine-Mediterranean Region

  • Conference paper
Die Stratigraphie der alpin-mediterranen Trias / The Stratigraphy of the Alpine-Mediterranean Triassic

Part of the book series: Schriftenreihe der Erdwissenschaftlichen Kommissionen ((ERDWISSENSCHAFT,volume 2))

Abstract

Suggestions are made regarding the conventions that govern the scope and interpretation of Triassic stages and substages. Different interpretations of the Anisian-Ladinian and Carnian-Norian boundaries are discussed. It is suggested that a twofold rather than threefold division of the Carnian be adopted on the grounds that there seems to be insufficient evidence that the Jul (“Middle Carnian”) is younger than the Cordevol (“Lower Carnian”). Pelson, Illyr, Fassan, Longobard, Cordevol (or Jul), Tuval, Alaun and Sevat substages are more or less adequately defined and will be useful for expressing correlations provided that agreement is reached regarding the definition of their boundaries. Intervals deserving formal designation for which no names are available are Lower Anisian and Lower Norian (sensu Silbekling and Tozer, 1968). Interpretation of Rhaetian in terms of the Marshi Zone, rather than the whole of the Kössen Beds, is recommended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arkell, W. J. (1956): Jurassic Geology of the World; Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arkhipov, Y. V., Bytshkov, Y. M. & Polubotko, I. V. (1971): A new zonal scheme for Triassic deposits from Northeast U.S.S.R. Bull. Can. Petrol. Geol. 19 (2), 313–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthaber, G. V. (1905): Die Alpine Trias des Mediterran-Gebietes. In Frech, F., Lethaea Geog., II (1), Trias, 224–391, 417-472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Assereto, R. (1969): Sul significato stratigrafico della „Zona ad Avisianus“ del Trias medio delle Alpl. Boll. Soc. Geol. It., 88, 1969, 123–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1971): Die Binodosus-Zone. Ein Jahrhundert wissenschaftlicher Gegensätze. S. B. Akad. Wiss. Wien, 178, 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1972): Notes on the Anisian biostratigraphy of the Gebze Area (Kocaeli Peninsula, Turkey). Z. Deutsch. Geol. Ges. 123, 435–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bender, H. (1970): Der Nachweis von Unter-Anis („Hydasp“) auf der Insel Chios. Ann. Geol. Pays Hellen. (1), 19, (1968), 412–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callomon, J. H. (1965): Notes on Jurassic stratigraphic nomenclature. I. Principles of stratigraphic nomenclature. Carpatho-Balkan Geol. Ass. VII Congress Sofia. 1, (2), 81–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, C. (1921): Die Faunen der Hallstätter Kalke des Feuerkogels bei Aussee. S. B. Akad. Wiss. Wien, 130, 21–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1925): Leitfossilien der Trias. Borntraeger, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harland, W. B. et al. (1972): A concise guide to Stratigraphical Nomenclature. J. Geol. Soc., 128, 295–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedberg, H. D. (Ed.) (1972): An International Guide to Stratigraphie Classification Terminology and Usage; Introduction and Summary; Report 7, International Subcommission on Stratigraphie Classification; Lethaia, 5 (3), 283–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozur, H. (1972a): Probleme der Triasgliederung und Parallelisierung germanische/ tethyale Trias. Symposium Mikrofazies und Mikrofauna der Alpinen Trias und deren Nachbargebiete, Kurzfassung der Vorträge Innsbruck. 18-23.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1972b): Die Conodontengattung Metapolygnathus Hayashi 1968 und ihr stratigraphischer Wert. Geol. Paläont. Mitt. Innsbruck, 2 (11), 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1972c): Vorläufige Mitteilung zur Parallelisierung der germanischen und tethyalen Trias sowie einige Bemerkungen zur Stufen-und Unterstufengliederung der Trias. Mitt. Ges. Geol. Bergbaustud. Innsbruck, 21, 361–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1973): Beiträge zur Stratigraphie und Paläontologie der Trias. Geol. Paläont. Mitt. Innsbruck, 3 (1), 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krystyn, L. (1973): Zur Ammoniten-und Conodonten-Stratigraphie der Hallstätter Obertrias (Salzkammergut, Österreich). Ver. Geol. B. A., 1973 (1), 113-153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krystyn, L., Schäffer, G. & Schlager, W. (1968): Stratigraphie und Sedimentationsbild obertriadischer Hallstätter Kalke des Salzkammergutes. Anz. Akad. Wiss. Wien., Math.-Naturwiss. KL, 1968 (14), 329–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schäffer, G. & Schlager, W. — (1971a): Über die Fossil-Lagerstätten in den triadischen Hallstätter Kalken der Ostalpen. N. Jb. Geol. Paläont. Abh. 137 (2), 284–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schäffer, G. & Schlager, W. — (1971b): Der Stratotypus des Nor. Ann. Inst. Geol. Pub. Hung., 54 (2), 607–629.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mojsisovics, E. v. (1902): Die Cephalopoden der Hallstätter Kalke (Suppl.). Abh. Geol. Reichsanst. Wien, 6 (3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mojsisovics, E. v., Waagen, W. & Diener, C. (1895): Entwurf einer Gliederung der pelagischen Sedimente des Trias-Systems. S. B. Akad. Wiss. Wien Math.-Naturwiss. Kl. Abt. I, 104, 1271–1302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, D. A. B. (1970): Problems of Rhaetian Stratigraphy with special reference to the lower boundary of the stage. Q. Jl. Geol. Soc. Lond., 126, 125–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pia, J. (1930): Grundbegriffe der Stratigraphie, Leipzig, Wien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieber, H. (1967): Über die Grenze Anis-Ladin in den Südalpen. Eclogae geol. Helv., 60 (2), 611–614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saks, V. N. et al. (1972): The session on Biostratigraphy of the Marine Mesozoic of Siberia and the Far East. Geol. and Geophys., Akad. Nauk. C. C. C. P., Siberian Branch, 1972 (7), 136–147. (In Russian.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schindewolf, O. H. (1970): Stratigraphie und Stratotypus. Akad. Wiss. Lit. Mainz, 1970 (2), 101–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silberling, N. J. (1959): Pre-Tertiary stratigraphy and Upper Triassic paleontology of the Union District, Shoshone Mountains, Nevada. U. S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Pap. 322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silberling, N. J. — (1962): Stratigraphie distribution of Middle Triassic Ammonites at Fossil Hill, Humboldt Range, Nevada. J. Paleontol., 36 (1), 153–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silberling, N. J. & Tozer, E. T. (1968): Biostratigraphic Classification of the Marine Triassic in North America. Geol. Soc. Amer. Spec. Pap. 110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silberling, N. J. & Wallace, R. E. (1969): Stratigraphy of the Star Peak Group (Triassic) and overlying Lower Mesozoic Rocks, Humboldt Range, Nevada. U. S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Pap. 592.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spath, L. F. (1934): Catalogue of the fossil Cephalopoda in the British Museum (Natural History). Part IV. The Ammonoidea of the Trias. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summesberger, H. & Wagner, L. (1972): Der Stratotypus des Anis (Trias). Ann. Naturhistor. Mus. Wien, 76, 515–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tozer, E. T. (1965): Upper Triassic Ammonoid zones of the Peace River Foothills and their bearing on the classification of the Norian Stage. Can. J. Earth Sci., 2, 216–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (1967): A standard for Triassic Time. Geol. Surv. Can. Bull. 156.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1971): Triassic Time and Ammonoids: Problems and Proposals. Can. J. Earth Sci., 8, 989–1031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (1972): The Earliest Marine Triassic Rocks: their Definition, Ammonoid fauna, Distribution and relationship to underlying formations. Bull. Can. Petrol. Geol., 20 (4), 643–650.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urlichs, M. (1972): Ostracoden aus den Kössener Schichten und ihre Abhängigkeit von der Ökologie. Mitt. Ges. Geol. Bergbaustud. Innsbruck, 21, 661–710.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiedmann, J. (1970): Problems of stratigraphie classification and the definition of stratigraphie boundaries. Newsl. Strat. 1 (1), 35–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1972): Ammoniten-Nuklei aus Schlammproben der nordalpinen Obertrias — ihre stammesgeschichtliche und stratigraphische Bedeutung. Mitt. Geol. Ges. Bergbaustud. Innsbruck, 21, 561–622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zapfe, H. (1968): Fragen und Befunde von allgemeiner Bedeutung für die Biostratigraphie der alpinen Obertrias. Ver. Geol. B. A., 1967 (1/2), 13–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1971): Die Stratotypen des Anis, Tuval und Nor und ihre Bedeutung für die Biostratigraphie und Biostratinomie der Alpinen Trias. Ann. Inst. Geol. Publ. Hung. 54, (2), 579–590.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Helmuth Zapfe

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1974 Springer-Verlag Wien

About this paper

Cite this paper

Tozer, E.T. (1974). Definitions and Limits of Triassic Stages and Substages: Suggestions Prompted by Comparisons Between North America and the Alpine-Mediterranean Region. In: Zapfe, H. (eds) Die Stratigraphie der alpin-mediterranen Trias / The Stratigraphy of the Alpine-Mediterranean Triassic. Schriftenreihe der Erdwissenschaftlichen Kommissionen, vol 2. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-4497-8_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-4497-8_24

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-211-81253-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-4497-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics