Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Geschlechtstypisierung

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Entwicklungspsychologie des Kindes- und Jugendalters für Bachelor

Part of the book series: Springer-Lehrbuch ((SLB))

Zusammenfassung

Bei verschiedenen physischen und psychischen Merkmalen lassen sich empirisch Geschlechtsunterschiede zeigen. In diesem Kapitel soll erläutert werden, bei welchen Merkmalen Geschlechtsunterschiede nachweisbar sind und welche Mechanismen zur Entstehung derartiger Geschlechtsunterschiede beitragen. Dabei werden insbesondere biologische, sozialisatorische und kognitive Erklärungsansätze dargestellt. Abschließend wird auf Entwicklungsveränderungen im Bereich der Geschlechtstypisierung eingegangen, wobei vor allem die Entwicklung von geschlechtsbezogenen Präferenzen und die Entwicklung von Geschlechtsrollenstereotypen im Zentrum des Interesses stehen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Alfermann, D. (1996). Geschlechterrollen und geschlechtstypisches Verhalten. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S. (2003). The essential difference: Men, women and the extreme male brain. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S., Knickmeyer, R. C., & Belmonte, M. K. (2005). Sex differences in the brain: Implications for explaining autism. Science, 310, 819–823.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barresi, J. (2001). Extending self-consciousness into the future. In C. Moore & K. Lemmon (Hrsg.), The self in time: Developmental perspectives (S. 141–161). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumert, B. J., et al. (1997). TIMMS – Mathematisch-naturwissenschaftlicher Unterricht im internationalen Vergleich. Deskriptive Befunde. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baumert, B. J., Bos, W., & Lehmann, R. (2000). TIMMS/III – Dritte internationale Mathematik- und Naturwissenschaftsstudie. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1981a). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88, 354–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1981b). Bem sex-role inventory professional manual. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berenbaum, S. A., & Beltz, A. M. (2016). How early hormones shape gender development. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 7, 53–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bischof-Köhler, D. (2006). Von Natur aus anders. Die Psychologie der Geschlechtsunterschiede. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bischof-Köhler, D. (2011). Von Natur aus anders. Die Psychologie der Geschlechtsunterschiede (4. Aufl.). Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boldizar, J. P. (1991). Assessing sex typing and androgyny in children: The children’s sex role inventory. Developmental Psychology, 27, 505–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A., Shirley, L., & Heywood, C. (2000). Infants’ visual preference for sex-congruent babies, children, toys, and activities. A longitudinal study. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 18, 479–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen-Bendahan, C. C. C., Van de Beek, C., & Berenbaum, S. A. (2004). Prenatal sex hormone effects on child and adult sex-typed behavior: Methods and findings. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 29, 353–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, H. B. (1992). Matrifocality and female aggression in Margeriteno society. In K. Björkqvist & P. Niemelä (Hrsg.), Of mice and women: Aspects of female aggression (S. 149–162). San Diego: Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Côté, S. M., Vaillancourt, T., Barker, E. D., Nagin, D., & Tremblay, R. E. (2007). The joint development of physical and indirect aggression: Predictors of continuity and change during childhood. Development and Psychopathology, 19, 37–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crick, N. R. (1997). Engagement in gender normative versus nonnormative forms of aggression: Links to social-psychological adjustment. Developmental Psychology, 33, 610–617.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crick, N. R., & Grotpeter, J. K. (1995). Relational aggression, gender, and social-psychological adjustment. Child Development, 66, 710–722.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dindia, K., & Allen, M. (1992). Sex differences in self-disclosure: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 106–124.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Crowley, M. (1986). Gender and helping behaviour: A meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 283–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, W. O., & Enns, L. R. (1986). Sex differences in human motor activity level. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 19–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Egan, S. K., & Perry, D. G. (2001). Gender identity: A multidimensional analysis with implications for psychological adjustment. Developmental Psychology, 37, 451–463.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Faltermaier, T. (2017). Gesundheitspsychologe (2. Aufl.). Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feingold, A. (1992). Sex differences in variability in intellectual abilities: A new look at an old controversy. Review of Educational Research, 62, 61–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frost, J. A., et al. (1999). Language processing is strongly left lateralized in both sexes: Evidence from functional MRI. Brain, 122, 199–208.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Galen, B. R., & Underwood, M. K. (1997). A developmental investigation of social aggression among children. Developmental Psychology, 33, 589–600.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gittler, G., & Vitouch, O. (1994). Empirical contribution to the question of sex-dependent inheritance of spatial ability. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 78, 407–417.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, J. M., et al. (2001). Normal sexual dimorphism of the adult human brain assessed by in vivo magnetic resonance imaging. Cerebral Cortex, 11, 490–497.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, D. F., & Lamay, M. L. (2000). The smarter sex: A critical review of sex differences in intelligence. Educational Psychology Review, 12, 229–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hastings, P. D., & Coplan, R. (2007). Conceptual and empirical links between children’s social spheres: Relating maternal beliefs and preschoolers’ behaviors with peers. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 86, 43–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedges, L. V., & Nowell, A. (1995). Sex differences in mental test scores, variability, and numbers of high-scoring individuals. Science, 269, 41–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, J. P., & Lynch, M. E. (1983). The intensification of gender-related role expectations during adolescence. In J. Brooks-Gunn & A. C. Peterson (Hrsg.), Girls at puberty: Biological and psychological perspectives (S. 201–228). New York: Plenum Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, M. L. (1991). Empathy, social cognition and moral action. In W. M. Kurtines, J. Gerwitz, & L. Lamb (Hrsg.), Handbook of moral behavior and development. Vol. 1: Theory (S. 275–301). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyenga, K. B., & Hoyenga, K. T. (1993). Gender-related differences. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similiarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60, 581–592.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, J. S., & Linn, M. C. (1988). Gender differences in verbal ability: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 53–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inchley, J., Currie, D., Young, T., Samdal, O., Torsheim, T., Augustson, L., Mathison, F., Aleman-Diaz, A., Molcho, M., Weber, M., & Barnekow, V. (2016). Growing up unequal: Gender and socioeconomic differences in young people’s health and well-being. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karniol, R., Gabay, R., Ochion, Y., & Harari, Y. (1998). Is gender or gender-role orientation a better predictor of empathy in adolescence? Sex Roles, 39, 45–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knickmeyer, R., Baron-Cohen, S., Raggatt, P., Taylor, K., & Hackett, G. (2006). Fetal testosterone and empathy. Hormones and Behavior, 49, 282–292.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1966). A cognitive-developmental analysis of children’s sex-role concepts and attitudes. In E. E. Maccoby (Hrsg.), The development of sex differences (S. 82–173). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lytton, H., & Romney, D. M. (1991). Parents’ differential socialization of boys and girls: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 267–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, C. L., & Halverson, C. F. (1981). A schematic processing model of sex-typing and stereotyping in children. Child Development, 52, 1119–1134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, C. L., Ruble, D. N., & Szkrybalo, J. (2002). Cognitive theories of early gender development. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 903–933.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McClure, M. B. (2000). A meta-analytic review of sex-differences in facial expression processing and their development in infants, children, and adolescents. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 424–453.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, C. D., Tsao, J. C., & Glover, D. A. (2006). Sex, gender, and age: Contributions to laboratory pain responding in children and adolescents. The Journal of Pain, 8, 556–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pease, A., & Pease, B. (2002). Warum Männer nicht zuhören und Frauen schlecht einparken. Berlin: Ullstein.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, M., Servos, P., & Day, R. (1990). Marked sex differences on a fine motor skill task disappear when finger size is used as a covariate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 87–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Quaiser-Pohl, C., & Jordan, K. (2005). Warum Frauen glauben, sie könnten nicht einparken - und Männer ihnen Recht geben. München: Beck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reilly, D., Neumann, D. L., & Andrews, G. (2017). Investigating gender differences in mathematics and science: Results from the 2011 Trends in Mathematics and Science Survey. Research in Science Education, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9630-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruble, D. N., & Martin, C. L. (1998). Gender development. In W. Damon & N. Eisenberg (Hrsg.), Handbook of child psychology (Bd. 3, S. 933–1016). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smoll, F. L., & Schutz, R. W. (1990). Quantifying gender differences in physical performance: A developmental perspective. Developmental Psychology, 26, 360–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stöger, H., & Heilemann, M. (Hrsg.). (2012). Mädchen und Frauen in MINT: Bedingungen von Geschlechtsunterschieden und Interventionsmöglichkeiten (Bd. 1). Münster: LIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannen, D. (1998). Du kannst mich einfach nicht verstehen: Warum Männer und Frauen aneinander vorbeireden. Hamburg: Ernst Kabel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, D. C., & Ounsted, C. (1972). The nature of gender differences explored through ontogentic analysis of sex ratios. In C. Ounsted & D. C. Taylor (Hrsg.), Gender differences: Their ontogeny and significance (S. 215–240). Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. R., & French, K. E. (1985). Gender differences across age in motor performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 260–282.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tiffin, J. (1968). Purdue pegboard examiner manual. Chicago: Science Research Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trautner, H. M., & Hartmann, P. (2009). Die Bedeutung des Pubertätsstatus und des Entwicklungstempos für die Geschlechtsidentität von Mädchen und Jungen in der Adoleszenz. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 41, 63–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trautner, H. M., Helbing, N., Sahm, W. B., & Lohaus, A. (1988). Unkenntnis – Rigidität – Flexibilität: Ein Entwicklungsmodell der Geschlechtsrollen-Stereotypisierung. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 20, 105–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trautner, H. M., Gervai, J., & Németh, R. (2003). Appearance-reality distinction and development of gender constancy understanding in children. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 27, 275–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trautner, H. M., Ruble, D. N., Cyphers, L., Kirsten, B., Behrendt, R., & Hartmann, P. (2005). Rigidity and flexibility of gender stereotypes in childhood: Developmental or differential? Infant and Child Development, 14, 365–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vierhaus, M., Lohaus, A., & Schmitz, A.-K. (2011b). Sex, gender, coping, and self-efficacy: Mediation of sex-differences in pain perception in children and adolescents. European Journal of Pain, 15, 621–628.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Voyer, D., & Bryden, M. P. (1990). Gender, level of spatial ability, and lateralization of mental rotation. Brain and Cognition, 13, 18–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Voyer, D., Voyer, S., & Bryden, M. P. (1995). Magnitude of sex-differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 250–270.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Fakultät für Psychologie und Sportwissenschaft, Universität Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Deutschland

    Prof. Dr. Arnold Lohaus

  2. Bildungs- und Schulberatung, Kreis Gütersloh, Gütersloh, Deutschland

    Dr. Marc Vierhaus

Authors
  1. Prof. Dr. Arnold Lohaus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dr. Marc Vierhaus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lohaus, A., Vierhaus, M. (2019). Geschlechtstypisierung. In: Entwicklungspsychologie des Kindes- und Jugendalters für Bachelor. Springer-Lehrbuch. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-59192-5_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-59192-5_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-59191-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-59192-5

  • eBook Packages: Psychology (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation