Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Technik der Stomaanlage

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Chirurgie des intestinalen Stomas

  • 1461 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Präoperative Markierung, Ausleiten des Stomas mindestens 1 cm über dem Hautniveau und vollständiger mukokutaner Kontakt sind die wichtigsten Anforderungen an die Stomaanlage. Ausgedehnte Voroperationen, Notfallsituationen und Adipositas können zu erheblichen technischen Schwierigkeiten führen. In diesem Kapitel wird die Technik der konventionellen und der laparoskopischen Stomaanlage beschrieben und Praxistipps für „schwierige“ Stomaanlagen vorgestellt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Beck DE (2011) The ASCRS textbook of colon and rectal surgery. Springer, New York, S 522

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Block GE, Moossa AR (1994) Operative Colorectal Surgery. W.B. Saunders, S 448

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooke BN (1952) The management of an ileostomy, including its complications. Lancet 2(6725):102–104

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Corman ML (2013) Corman’s colon and rectal surgery. Wolter Kluwer, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Correa-Marinez A, Grenabo J, Bock D, Wedin A, Angenete E (2018) The type of stoma matters-morbidity in patients with obstructing colorectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 33(12):1773–1780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cottam J, Richards K, Hasted A, Blackman A (2007) Results of a nationwide prospective audit of stoma complications within 3 weeks of surgery. Colorectal Dis 9(9):834–838

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ein SH (1984) Divided loop colostomy that does not prolapse. Am J Surg 147(2):250–252

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keighly M, Williams N (1994) Surgery of the anus, rectum and colon. Balliere Tindall 2:198

    Google Scholar 

  • Khoo RE, Cohen MM, Chapman GM, Jenken DA, Langevin JM (1994) Loop ileostomy for temporary fecal diversion. Am J Surg 167(5):519–522

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leong AP, Londono-Schimmer EE, Phillips RK (1994) Life-table analysis of stomal complications following ileostomy. Br J Surg 81(5):727–729

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Bruch HP et al (2005) Stoma formation for fecal diversion: a plea for the laparoscopic approach. Tech Coloproctol 9:9–14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marcello PW, Roberts PL, Schoetz DJ, Coller JA, Murray JJ, Veidenheimer MC (1993) Obstruction after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: a preventable complication? Dis Colon Rectum 36(12):1105–1111

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Myrelid P, Söderholm JD, Olaison G, Sjödahl R, Andersson P (2012) Split stoma in resectional surgery of high-risk patients with ileocolonic Crohn’s disease. Colorectal Dis 14:188–193

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira L, Reissman P et al (1997) Laparoscopic creation of stomas. Surg Endosc 11:19–23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prasad ML, Pearl RK, Abcarian H (1984) End-loop colostomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 158(4):380–382

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpelick V (1997) Operationsatlas Chirurgie. Enke, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Shellito PC (1998) Complications of abdominal stoma surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 41(12):1562–1572

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sier MF, Wisselink DD, Ubbink DT, Oostenbroek RJ, Veldink GJ, Lamme B, van Duijvendijk P, van Geloven AAW, Eijsbouts QAJ, Bemelman WA (2018) ISI trial study group. Randomized clinical trial of intracutaneously versus transcutaneously sutured ileostomy to prevent stoma-related complications (ISI trial). Br J Surg 105(6):637–644

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Speirs M, Leung E, Hughes D, Robertson I, Donnelly L, Mackenzie I, Macdonald A (2006) Ileostomy rod–is it a bridge too far? Colorectal Dis 8:484–487

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Strong SA (1994) The difficult stoma: challenges and strategies. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 29(2):152–159

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Endokrine und Minimal-Invasive Chirurgie, Klinikum Bogenhausen, München, Deutschland

    Igors Iesalnieks

Authors
  1. Igors Iesalnieks
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Igors Iesalnieks .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Endokrine und Minimal-invasive Chirurgie, München Klinik Bogenhausen, München, Germany

    Igors Iesalnieks

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Iesalnieks, I. (2020). Technik der Stomaanlage. In: Iesalnieks, I. (eds) Chirurgie des intestinalen Stomas. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-59123-9_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-59123-9_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-59122-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-59123-9

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation