Abstract
Yablo’s paradox results in a set of formulas which (with local disquotation in the background) turns out consistent, but \(\omega \)-inconsistent. Adding either uniform disquotation or the \(\omega \)-rule results in inconsistency. One might think that it doesn’t arise in finitary contexts. We study whether it does. It turns out that the issue turns on how the finitistic approach is formalized.
This research has been supported by the FWO postdoctoral research grant and the National Science Centre SONATA BIS research grant number 2016/22/E/HS1/00304. The second author has been supported by the National Science Centre OPUS research grant number 2014/13/B/HS1/02892.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The methods we develop here – especially the semantics of quantifiers in FM-domains – is similar to the framework of modal potentialism developed independently in [2].
References
Godziszewski, M.T.: Yablo sequences in potentially infinite domains and partial semantics (2018). [submitted]
Hamkins, J.D., Linnebo, Ø.: The modal logic of set-theoretic potentialism and the potentialist maximality principles. Rev. Symb. Logic (2018, to appear). http://wp.me/p5M0LV-1zC, arXiv:1708.01644
Ketland, J.: Yablo’s paradox and \(\omega \)-inconsistency. Synthese 145, 295–302 (2005)
Mostowski, M.: On representing concepts in finite models. Math. Logic Q. 47, 513–523 (2001)
Mostowski, M.: On representing semantics in finite models. In: Rojszczak, A., Cachro, J., Kurczewsk, G. (eds.) Philosophical Dimensions of Logic and Science, pp. 15–28. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2001)
Mostowski, M., Zdanowski, K.: FM-representability and beyond. In: Cooper, S.B., Löwe, B., Torenvliet, L. (eds.) CiE 2005. LNCS, vol. 3526, pp. 358–367. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/11494645_45
Mostowski, M.: Truth in the limit. Rep. Mathe. Logic 51, 75–89 (2016)
Priest, G.: Yablo’s paradox. Analysis 57, 236–242 (1997)
Urbaniak, R.: Potential infinity, abstraction principles and arithmetic (Leśniewski style). Axioms 5(2), 18 (2016)
Yablo, S.: Paradox without self-reference. Analysis 53, 251–252 (1993)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature
About this paper
Cite this paper
Godziszewski, M.T., Urbaniak, R. (2019). Infinite Liar in a (Modal) Finitistic Setting. In: Khan, M., Manuel, A. (eds) Logic and Its Applications. ICLA 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11600. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-58771-3_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-58771-3_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-58770-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-58771-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)