Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Social Bots – Meinungsroboter im Netz

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Die Psychologie des Postfaktischen: Über Fake News, „Lügenpresse“, Clickbait & Co.

Zusammenfassung

„Wir glauben an die Meinungsfreiheit und sind überzeugt davon, dass jeder einzelne Mensch die Welt beeinflussen kann“. Das hier zitierte Werteversprechen von Twitter, einem der größten sozialen Onlinenetzwerke der Welt, klingt beeindruckend. Doch sind tatsächlich nur reale menschliche Twitter-User für die Informationsverbreitung und Stimmungsbilder auf der populären Plattform verantwortlich? Erhebungen über den US-Präsidentschaftswahlkampf im Jahr 2016 deuten in eine andere Richtung.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Bessi, A., & Ferrara, E. (2016). Social bots distort the 2016 us presidential election online discussion. First Monday, 21, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruter, M., & Harrison, S. (2016). The impact of Brexit on consumer behaviour [Report]. https://www.lansons.com/download-brexit-report-2.

  • Davis, C. A., Varol, O., Ferrara, E., Flammini, A., Menczer, F. (2016). BotOrNot. A system to evaluate Social Bots. In Proceedings of the 25th international conference companion on world wide web (S. 273–274). International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deb, A., Majmundar, A., Seo, S., Matsui, A., Tandon, R., Yan, S., et al. (2018). Social bots for online public health interventions. In 2018 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dechêne, A., Stahl, C., Hansen, J., & Wänke, M. (2010). The truth about the truth: A meta-analytic review of the truth effect. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 238–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, C., Edwards, A., Spence, P., & Ashleigh, K. (2014). Is that a bot running the social media feed? Testing the differences in perceptions of communication quality for a human agent and a bot agent on Twitter. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 372–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrara, E., Varol, O., Davis, C., Menczer, F., & Flammini, A. (2016). The rise of social bots. Communications of the ACM, 59, 96–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guilbeault, D. (2016). Growing bot security: An ecological view of bot agency. International Journal of Communication, 10, 5003–5021.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegelich, S. (2016). Invasion der Meinungs-Roboter (Konrad Adenauer Stiftung – Analysen und Argumente, 221). http://www.kas.de/wf/doc/kas_46486-544-1-30.pdf?161222122757.

  • Howard, P. N., & Kollanyi, B. (2016). Bots, #StrongerIn, and #Brexit: Computational Propaganda during the UK-EU Referendum [RESEARCH NOTE 2016.1].

    Google Scholar 

  • Kind, S., Jetzke, T., Ehrenberg-Silies, S., Bovenschulte, M., & Weide, S. (2017). Social Bots. TA-Vorstudie. Büro für Technikfolgen-Abschätzung beim Deutschen Bundestag (Hrsg.). https://www.tab-beim-bundestag.de/de/aktuelles/20161219/Social%20Bots_Thesenpapier.pdf.

  • Koerth, K. (18. Juli 2018). Alle miteinander haben wir Terror gemacht. http://www.spiegel.de/kultur/kino/amoklauf-von-muenchen-wie-die-terrorangst-entstand-dokumentation-a-1218229.html.

  • Kollanyi, B., Howard, P. N., & Woolley, S. C. (2016). Bots and automation over Twitter during the first US presidential debate. COMPROP Data Memo, 1, 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K., Palsetia, D., Narayanan, R., Patwary, M. D. M. A., Agrawal, A., & Choudhary, A. (2011). Twitter trending topic classification. In L. O’Conner (Hrsg.), 2011 11th IEEE international conference on data mining workshops (S. 251–258).

    Google Scholar 

  • Parmar, B. (2012). Protecting against spear-phishing. Computer Fraud & Security, 1, 8–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pew Research Center. (Dezember 2016). Many americans believe fake news is sowing confusion [Report]. http://www.journalism.org/2016/12/15/many-americans-believe-fake-news-is-sowing-confusion.

  • Pew Research Center. (Oktober 2018). Social media bots draw public’s attention and concern [Report]. http://www.journalism.org/2018/10/15/social-media-bots-draw-publics-attention-and-concern.

  • Ross, B., Brachten, F., Stieglitz, S., Wikstrom, P., Moon, B., Münch, F., & Bruns, A. (2018). Social bots in a commercial context – A case study on soundcloud. In Association for Information Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schanze, R. (07. Juni 2017). Was ist ein Algorithmus? – Einfach erklärt. https://www.giga.de/extra/ratgeber/specials/was-ist-ein-algorithmus-einfach-erklaert.

  • Shao, C., Ciampaglia, G. L., Varol, O., Yang, K. C., Flammini, A., & Menczer, F. (2018). The spread of low-credibility content by social bots. Nature Communications, 9, 4787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stieglitz, S., Brachten, F., Berthelé, D., Schlaus, M., Venetopoulou, C., & Veutgen, D. (Juli 2017a). Do social bots (still) act different to humans? – Comparing metrics of social bots with those of humans. In International conference on social computing and social media (S. 379–395). Springer, Cham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stieglitz, S., Brachten, F., Ross, B., & Jung, A. K. (2017b). Do social bots dream of electric sheep? A categorisation of social media bot accounts. In Australasian conference on information systems. Hobart, Tasmanien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subrahmanian, V. S., Azaria, A., Durst, S., Kagan, V., Galstyan, A., Lerman, K., Zhu, L., Ferrara, E., Flammini, A., & Menczer, F. (2016). The DARPA Twitter bot challenge. Computer, 49, 38–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unsere Werte. (o. D.). https://about.twitter.com/de/values.html.

  • Unz, D. (2016). Kultivierung (Cultivation of beliefs). In N. C. Krämer, S. Schwan, D. Unz, & M. Suckfüll (Hrsg.), Medienpsychologie: Schlüsselbegriffe und Konzepte (2. Aufl., S. 225–233). Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veale, T., Valitutti, A., & Li, G. (2015). Twitter: The best of bot worlds for automated wit. In Distributed, ambient, and pervasive interactions (S. 689–699).

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolley, S. C. (2016). Automating power. Social bot interference in global politics. First Monday, 21. http://firstmonday.org/article/view/6161/5300.

  • Woolley, S. C., & Howard, P. N. (2016). Political communication, computational propaganda, and autonomous agents. International Journal of Communication, 10, 4882–4890.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Eibelstadt, Deutschland

    Martina Neis

  2. LIT Robopsychology Lab, Johannes Kepler Universität Linz, Linz, Österreich

    Martina Mara

Authors
  1. Martina Neis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Martina Mara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany

    Markus Appel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Neis, M., Mara, M. (2020). Social Bots – Meinungsroboter im Netz. In: Appel, M. (eds) Die Psychologie des Postfaktischen: Über Fake News, „Lügenpresse“, Clickbait & Co.. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-58695-2_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-58695-2_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-58694-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-58695-2

  • eBook Packages: Psychology (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation