Skip to main content

How to Write a Study Protocol

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 2382 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter aims to provide a guide for young trainees writing their first study protocol. It includes important aspects junior researchers should consider before getting started and preparing their first study protocol. After having read the chapter, the reader should have a good idea about what a study protocol is about and be able to answer the question why, when, and how a study protocol should be written. Finally, the reader will be prepared to master the very first step of conducting a successful study—writing a brief, concise, but comprehensive study protocol.

Study protocol examples of typical clinical scenarios further illustrate the approach to this mandatory and important part of a research project.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Al-Jundi A, Sakka S. Protocol writing in clinical research. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10:ZE10–3.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Babyak MA. What you see may not be what you get: a brief, nontechnical introduction to overfitting in regression-type models. Psychosom Med. 2004;66:411–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bando K, Sato T. Did you write a protocol before starting your project? Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;63:71–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Barletta JF. Conducting a successful residency research project. Am J Pharm Educ. 2008;72:92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brody BA, McCullough LB, Sharp RR. Consensus and controversy in clinical research ethics. JAMA. 2005;294:1411–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Doran G. There’s a S.M.A.R.T. way to write management’s goals and objectives. Manag Rev. 1981;70:35–6.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Doran PC. Understanding dentures: instructions to patients. J Colo Dent Assoc. 1981;59:4–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fleming TR, DeMets DL. Surrogate end points in clinical trials: are we being misled? Ann Intern Med. 1996;125:605–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fronteira I. How to design a (good) epidemiological observational study: epidemiological research protocol at a glance. Acta Medica Port. 2013;26:731–6.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ghooi RB, Divekar D. Insurance in clinical research. Perspect Clin Res. 2014;5:145–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gilmore SJ. Evaluating statistics in clinical trials: making the unintelligible intelligible. Australas J Dermatol. 2008;49:177–84; quiz 185–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Huang Y, Gilbert PB. Comparing biomarkers as principal surrogate endpoints. Biometrics. 2011;67:1442–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kanji S. Turning your research idea into a proposal worth funding. Can J Hosp Pharm. 2015;68:458–64.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. O’Brien K, Wright J. How to write a protocol. J Orthod. 2002;29:58–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Richardson WS, Wilson MC, Nishikawa J, Hayward RS. The well-built clinical question: a key to evidence-based decisions. ACP J Club. 1995;123:A12–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rosenthal R, Schafer J, Briel M, Bucher HC, Oertli D, Dell-Kuster S. How to write a surgical clinical research protocol: literature review and practical guide. Am J Surg. 2014;207:299–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sade RM, Akins CW, Weisel RD. Managing conflicts of interest. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;149:971–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Skelly AC, Dettori JR, Brodt ED. Assessing bias: the importance of considering confounding. Evid Based Spine Care J. 2012;3:9–12.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Van Spall HG, Toren A, Kiss A, Fowler RA. Eligibility criteria of randomized controlled trials published in high-impact general medical journals: a systematic sampling review. JAMA. 2007;297:1233–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, Mulrow CD, Pocock SJ, et al. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2007;4:e297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Vavken P, Culen G, Dorotka R. Management of confounding in controlled orthopaedic trials: a cross-sectional study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:985–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Warren MD. Aide-memoire for preparing a protocol. Br Med J. 1978;1:1195–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael T. Hirschmann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 ISAKOS

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Moser, L.B., Hirschmann, M.T. (2019). How to Write a Study Protocol. In: Musahl, V., et al. Basic Methods Handbook for Clinical Orthopaedic Research. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-58254-1_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-58254-1_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-58253-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-58254-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics