Skip to main content

A Clinical Practice Guideline

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Basic Methods Handbook for Clinical Orthopaedic Research
  • 2311 Accesses

Abstract

After extensive inquiry and backlash against the historic recommendation-based clinical practice guidelines, the Institute of Medicine, and others, called for a revision of the recommendation-based clinical practice guidelines. The new guidelines were to be evidence-based. A rigorous rubric was created to standardize the development process of future clinical practice guidelines. These evidence-based clinical practice guidelines are designed to stand certain scrutiny their recommendation-based predecessors could not, improve the quality of health care, decrease inefficiencies, and reduce practice variation. Through the extensive and deliberate analysis of high-quality medical literature, clinical practice guidelines provide evidence-supported health-care plans for physicians and patients alike. As clinical practice guidelines serve as a summary of scientific evidence available, those areas which lack adequate clinical research may become research priority.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Graham R, Mancher M, Miller Wolman D, Greenfield S, Steinberg E, eds. Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust. Washington, DC; 2011. https://doi.org/10.17226/13058.

  2. Shea KG, Sink EL, Jacobs JC Jr. Clinical practice guidelines and guideline development. J Pediatr Orthop. 2012;32(Suppl 2):S95–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC; 2001. https://doi.org/10.17226/10027.

  4. Rosenfeld RM, Shiffman RN, Robertson P, Department of Otolaryngology State University of New York. Clinical practice guideline development manual, third edition: a quality-driven approach for translating evidence into action. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;148:S1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Foundation TRWJ. Chronic care in America: the 21st century challenge. 1996. http://www.rwjf.org/library/chrcare/. Accessed 19 Sept 2000.

  6. Chassin MR, Galvin RW. The urgent need to improve health care quality. Institute of Medicine National Roundtable on Health Care Quality. JAMA. 1998;280:1000–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cooke CR, Gould MK. Advancing clinical practice and policy through guidelines: the role of the American Thoracic Society. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;187:910–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hoffman C, Rice D, Sung HY. Persons with chronic conditions. Their prevalence and costs. JAMA. 1996;276:1473–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gerteis J. Multiple chronic conditions Chartbook: 2010 medical expenditure panel survey data. 2014. www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/prevention-chronic-care/desicion/mcc/mccchartbook.pdf.

  10. Hempstead K. The real killer is still out there: update on health care spending. 2017. http://www.rwjf.org/en/library/research/2017/08/the-real-killer-is-still-out-there-update-on-health-care-spending.html.

  11. Roehrig C. The health SPending slowdown for 2008–2013: implications for sustainability. 2017. http://altarum.org/sites/default/files/uploaded-related-files/11_Roehrig%20Symposium%20July%2018%202017%20FINAL.pdf.

  12. Centers for Disease Control. Arthritis—National Statistics. 2017. Located at: CDC.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Association PIaAH. Quality and patient safety. 2006. http://aha.org/advocacy-issues/quality/background/shtml.

  14. AAOS. Clinical Practice Guidelines. Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Als-Nielsen B, Chen W, Gluud C, Kjaergard LL. Association of funding and conclusions in randomized drug trials: a reflection of treatment effect or adverse events? JAMA. 2003;290:921–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bekelman JE, Li Y, Gross CP. Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research: a systematic review. JAMA. 2003;289:454–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Riaz H, Raza S, Khan MS, Riaz IB, Krasuski RA. Impact of funding source on clinical trial results including cardiovascular outcome trials. Am J Cardiol. 2015;116:1944–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gagnon A. Corporate influence over clinical research: considering the alternatives. Prescrire Int. 2012;21:191–4.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Turner EH, Matthews AM, Linardatos E, Tell RA, Rosenthal R. Selective publication of antidepressant trials and its influence on apparent efficacy. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:252–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Shea KGMC, Quinn R, Beckmann JT. Evidence based quality and outcomes assessment in Pediatric Orthopedics. Rosemont, IL: AAOS; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jevsevar D, Shea K, Cummins D, Murray J, Sanders J. Recent changes in the AAOS evidence-based clinical practice guidelines process. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96:1740–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336:924–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. AAOS Introductory Packet for Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG)/Systematic Review (SR) Work Group Members. 2015:31.

    Google Scholar 

  24. AAOS. Guideline peer review and public responses. https://www.aaos.org/guidelinepeerreview/?ssopc=1. Accessed 20 Nov 2017.

  25. Waters E. Evidence for public health decision-making: towards reliable synthesis. Bull World Health Organ. 2009;87:164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Shekelle P, Eccles MP, Grimshaw JM, Woolf SH. When should clinical guidelines be updated? BMJ. 2001;323:155–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Management of anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Located at: Clinical Practice Guidelines. 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kevin G Shea CTP. Turning a CPG into a care map. 2016. https://www.aaos.org/AAOSNow/2016/Oct/Research/research03/. Accessed 14 Nov 2017.

  29. AAOS. DDH Care Map-Diagnoses and Referral Pathway. 2016. http://hipdysplasia.org/diagnosis-and-referral-pathway/.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kevin Shea .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 ISAKOS

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dingel, A., Murray, J., Carey, J., Cummins, D., Shea, K. (2019). A Clinical Practice Guideline. In: Musahl, V., et al. Basic Methods Handbook for Clinical Orthopaedic Research. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-58254-1_52

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-58254-1_52

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-58253-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-58254-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics