Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Vorschlag einer Differenzierungssystematik „Händigkeitstypus mit Varianten “ zur Analyse von wechselndem Handgebrauch

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Zwischen Links- und Rechtshändigkeit

  • 1350 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Ermittelt man die Händigkeit umfassend in ihren Dimensionen und Parametern aufgrund vielseitiger Daten und Informationen, ergibt sich die Frage, welche Schlussfolgerung man daraus ziehen kann. Die zahlreichen Studienergebnisse weisen darauf hin, dass wechselnder Handgebrauch unterschiedliche Ursachen haben kann. So entstand eine Systematisierung in Form von drei Händigkeitstypen mit jeweils einem Ursprungsschwerpunkt. Der Händigkeitstypus „Ausprägung“ bezieht sich auf die veranlagten Stärke der Händigkeit (Varianten variable Links- und Rechtshändigkeit, Ambidextrie und entwicklungsverzögerte Händigkeit). Dem Händigkeitstypus „Motorik“ liegt eine motorische Störung der dominanten Hand zugrunde (Varianten pathologische Links- und Rechtshändigkeit)welches zu einer Händigkeitsumbildung führen kann. Der Händigkeitstypus „Umwelt“ geht davon aus, dass der Umwelteinfluss die dominante Hand vor allem zum Schreiben auf die nicht-dominante Hand schult (Varianten umgeschulte Links- und Rechtshänder). Diese Händigkeitstypen werden definiert und erläutert.

Man muss das Unmögliche versuchen, um das Mögliche zu erreichen. (Hermann Hesse)

Wer wagt selbst zu denken, der wird auch selber handeln. (Bettina von Arnim)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Der Ursprungsfaktor „Vererbung“ würde sich in dieser Systematik tatsächlich nur auf den Ausprägungsgrad beziehen, da Links- und Rechtshändigkeit gesondert aufgeführt werden. Daher wird der Begriff Ausprägung statt Vererbung genutzt.

  2. 2.

    Der Gesamtausprägungswert ergibt sich aus der Summe der Kategorien, nummeriert von 1–8, und dann geteilt durch 6. Dieser Gesamtausprägungswert der jeweiligen exemplarischen Profile spiegelt die quantitative Messung des Ausprägungsgrad wider und wird in den Legenden der aufgeführten Fälle angegeben.

  3. 3.

    Es ist übrigens auch möglich einen Lateralitätsquotienten für einen oder mehrere Tests von 0 zu erzielen, sodass es keine Differenz zwischen den wHänden für diesen Test gibt. In dem Fall ergibt sich ein Ausprägungswert von 4,5.

Literatur

  • Annett, M. (1978). Genetic and nongenetic influences on handedness. Behavioural Genetics 8(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01072826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Annett, M. (1985). Left, right, hand and brain: the right-shift theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Annett, M. (1994). Handedness as a continuous variable with dextral shift: sex, generation, and family handedness in subgroups of left- and right-handers. Behavioural Genetics 24, 51–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Annett, M. (2002). Handedness and brain asymmetry: The right shift theory. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Annett, M. (2004). Hand preference observed in large healthy samples. Classification, norms and interpretations of increased non-right-handedness by the right shift theory. British Journal of Psychology (London, England: 1953) 95(Pt3), 339–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arning, L., Ocklenburg, S., Schulz, S., Ness, V., Gerding, W. M., Hengstler, J. G., et al. C. (2013). PCSK6 VNTR Polymorphism is associated with degree of handedness but not direction of handedness. Public Library of Science one PLoS 1 8(6), e67251.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arning, L., Ocklenburg, S., Schulz, S., Ness, V., Gerding, W. M., Hengstler, J. G., et al. (2015). Handedness and the X chromosome: The role of androgen receptor CAG-repeat length. Scientific Report, 5. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep08325.

  • Babik, I. (2014). Development of handedness for role-differentiated bimanual manipulation of objects in relation to the development of hand-use preferences for acquisition. [Dissertation]. Greensboro: The University of North Carolina at Greensboro.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakan, P., Dibb, G., & Reed, P. (1973). Handedness and birth stress. Neuropsychologia 11(3),363–366.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, D. V. M. (1990). Handedness and developmental disorders. Oxford: Mac Keith Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryden, P. J., Roy, E. A., Rohr, L. E., & Egilo, S. (2007). Task demands affect manual asymmetries in pegboard performance. Laterality 12, 364–377.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carlier, M., Doyen, A. L., & Lamard, C. (2006). Midline crossing: developmental trend from 3 to 10 years of age in a preferential card-reaching task. Brain and Cognition 61(3),255–261.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cermak, S. A., & Ayres, A. J. (1984). Crossing the body midline in learning – disabled and normal children. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 38, 35–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Corbetta, D., & Thelen, E. (2002). Behavioral fluctuations and the development of manual asymmetries in infancy: contributions of the dynamic systems approach. Handbook Neuropsychology 8, 311–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coren, S., & Searleman, A. (1990). Birth stress and left-handedness: The Rare Trait Marker Model. In: S. Coren (Ed.), Lefthandeness: Behavioural implications and anomalies (pp. 3–32). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahmen, R., & Fagard, J. (2005). The effect of explicit cultural bias on lateral preferences in Tunisia. Cortex 41(6),805–815.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Agostini, M., Khamis, A. H., Ahui, A. M., & Dellatolas, G. (1997): Environmental influences in hand preference. An African point of view. Brain and Cognition 35(2),151–167.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • de Moura, D. R., Costa, J. C., Santos, I. S., Barros, A. J., Matijasevich, A., Halpern, R., et al. (2010). Risk factors for suspected developmental delay at age 2 years in a Brazilian birth cohort. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology 24(3),211–221.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsche Gesellschaft für Arbeitsmedizin und Umweltmedizin (DGAUM). (2014). Leitlinie: Händigkeit – Bedeutung und Untersuchung. Registernummer 002-017. Klassifikation S1. Stand: 21. 11.2014, gültig bis 20. 11.2019. http://www.awmf.org/leitlinien/detail/ll/002-017.html. Zugegriffen: 09. Juni 2018.

  • Domellöf, E., Ronnqvist, L., Titran, M., Esseily, R., & Fagard, J. (2009). Atypical functional lateralization in children with fetal alcohol syndrome. Developmental Psychobiology 51(8),696–705.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Domellöf, E., Johansson, A. M., & Ronnqvist, L. (2011). Handedness in preterm born children. A systematic review and a meta-analysis. Neuropschologia 49(9),2299–2310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eason, B. L., & Surburg, P. R. (1993). Effects of midline crossing on reaction time and movement time with adolescents classified as mildly mentally retarded. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly 10(3),269–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elneel, F. H., Carter, F., Tang, B., & Cuschieri, A. (2008). Extent of innate dexterity and ambidexterity across handedness and gender: Implications for training in laparoscopic surgery. Surgical Endoscopy 22(1),31–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Galobardes, B., Bernstein, M. S., & Morabia, A. (1999). The association between switching hand preference and the declining prevalence of left-handedness with age. American Public Health Association 89(12),1873–1875.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, R. (2016). Making it right? Social norms, hand writing and cognitive skills. [Paper]. In: Beiträge zur Jahrestagung des Vereins für Socialpolitik 2016: Demographischer Wandel. Augsburg 04.–07.09.2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatta, T., & Kawakami, A. (1995). Patterns of handedness in modern Japanese: a cohort effect shown by re-administration of the H.N. Handedness Inventory after 20 years. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 49(4),505–512.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hepper, P. G., Wells, D. L., & Lynch, C. (2005). Prenatal thumb sucking is related to postnatal handedness. Neuropsychologia 43(3),313–315.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, E. L., & Khanem, F. (2009). The development of hand preference in children: the effect of task demands and links with manual dexterity. Brain and Cognition 71(2),99–107.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hildreth, G. (1949a). The development and training of hand dominance: Characteristics of handedness (Part 1). Journal of Genetic Psychology 75(2),197–220.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hildreth, G. (1949b). The development and training of hand dominance; developmental tendencies in handedness (Part 2). Journal of Genetic Psychology 75(2),221–275.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ida, Y., & Bryden, M. P. (1996). A comparison of hand preference in Japan and Canada. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 50, 234–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ida, Y., & Mandal, M. (2003). Cultural difference in side bias: Evidence from Japan and India. Laterality 8(2),121–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain, K., Leitman, I. M., & Adusumilli, P. S. (2012). Left-handed surgeons. In: T. Dutta, M. K. Mandal, & S. Kumar (Eds.), Bias in human behavior (pp. 183–189). New York: Nova Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H., Yi, S., Son, E., & Kim, J. (2001). Evidence for the pathological right-handedness hypothesis. Neurpsychologia 15, 510–515.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klöppel, S., Vongerichten, A., van Eimeren, T., Frackowiak, R. S. J., & Siebner, H. R. (2007). Can left-handedness be switched? Insights from an early switch of handwriting. The Journal of Neuroscience 27(29),7847–7853.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Klöppel, S., Mangin, J. F., Vongerichten, A., Frackowiak, R. S., & Siebner, H. R. (2010). Nurture versus nature: long-term impact of forced right-handedness on structure of pericentral cortex and basal ganglia. Journal of Neuroscience 30(9),3271–3275.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koeda, T., & Takeshita, K. (1988). Relationship between corrected handedness and dysgraphia. No To Hattatsu 20, 191–194.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kraus, E. (2009). „Händigkeit bei Kindern Teil 2: Therapieansätze – Rückschulung als letztes Mittel der Wahl.“ ergopraxis 2(1), 22–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraus, E. (2018). Theoretische Grundlagen zum Grundkurs des Händigkeitsprofils. [Nicht publiziert. Das Manual ist nur über eine Kursteilnahme erhältlich.] Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krombholz, H. (2005). Umschriebene Entwicklungsstörungen der motorischen Funktionen. Störungen im Kindes und Jugendalter – Grundlagen und Störungen im Entwicklungsverlauf. In: P. F. Schlottke, R. K. Silbereisen, S. Schneider, & G. Lauth (Hrsg.), Störungen im Kindes- und Jugendalter – Grundlagen und Störungen im Entwicklungsverlauf (S. 545–574). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kushner, H. I. (2013). Why are there (almost) no left-handers in China? Endeavour 37(2), 71–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liederman, J. (1983). Mechanisms underlying instability in the development of hand preference. In: G. Young, S. J. Segalowitz, C. M. Corter, & E. Trehub (Eds.), Manual specialization and the developing brain (pp. 71–90). New York: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McManus, I. C., & Bryden, M. P. (1992). The genetics of handedness, cerebral dominance and lateralisation. In: I. Rupin, & S. J. Segalowitz (Eds.), Handbook of Neropsychology (Vol. 10). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • McManus, I. C., Sik, G., Cole, D. R., Mellon, A. F., Wong, J., & Kloss, J. (1988). The development of handedness in children. Developmental Psychology 6(3),257–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McManus, I. C., Nicholls, M., & Vallortigara, G. (2010). The right hand and the left hand of history. Laterality 15(1–2), 1–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McManus, I. C., Davison, A., & Armour, J. A. L. (2013). Multilocus genetic models of handedness closely resemble single-locus models in explaining family data and are compatible with genome-wide association studies. The Evolution of Human Handedness 12888, 48–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michel, G. F., & Harkins, D. A. (1987). Evidence for a maternal effect on infant hand-use preferences. Developmental Psychobiology 21, 535–541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ocklenburg, S., Beste, C., & Arning, L. (2014). Handedness genetics: considering the phenotype. Frontiers in Psychology 5, 1300.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Orton, S. T., & Travis, L. E. (1929). Studies in stuttering: IV. Studies of action currents in stutterers. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry 21, 61–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perelle, I. B., & Ehrman, L. (1994). An international study of human handedness. The data. Behavior Genetics 24(3), 217–227.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, M. (1990). Subclassification of non-pathological left-handers poses problems for theories of handedness. Neuropsychologia 28(3),279–289.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, M., & Murphy, K. (1992). Cluster analysis reveals at least three, and possibly five distinct handedness groups. Neuropsychologia 30(4),373–380.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Porac, C. (1996). Attempts to Switch the Writing Hand: Relationships to Age and Side of Hand Preference. Laterality 1(1),35–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Porac, C. (2009). Hand preference and skilled hand performance among individuals with successful rightward conversions of the writing hand. Laterality, 14(2), 105–121.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Porac, C., & Martin, W. L. B. (2007). A cross-cultural comparison of pressures to switch left-hand writing: Brazil versus Canada. Laterality 12(3),273–291.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Porac, C., & Searleman, A. (2002). The effects of hand preference side and hand preference switch history on measures of psychological and physical well-being and cognitive performance in a sample. Neurpsychologia 40(12),2074–2083.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramadhania, M. K., Koomenb, I., Grobbeea, D.E., van Donselaarc, C. A., van Furth, A. M., & Uiterwaal. C. (2006). Increased occurrence of left-handedness after severe childhood bacterial meningitis: Support for the pathological left-handedness hypothesis. Neuropsychologia 44(12), 2526–2532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rett, A., Kohlmann, T., & Strauch, G. (1973). Linkshänder: Analyse einer Minderheit. Wien, München: Jugend und Volk.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues, P. C. (2010). Human handedness: typical and atypical development. In: T. Dutta, M.K. Mandal, & S. Kumar (Eds.), Bias in human behavior (pp.111–137). New York: Nova Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sattler, J. B. (2000). Der umgeschulte Linkshänder oder Der Knoten im Gehirn (6. Aufl.). Donauwörth: Auer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satz, P. (1972). Pathological left-handedness: An explanatory model. Cortex 8(2),121–135.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Satz, P., Orsini, D. L., Saslow, E., & Henry, R. (1985). The pathological lefthandedness syndrome. Brain and Cognition 4, 27–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scharoun, S. M., & Bryden, P. J. (2014). Hand preference, performance abilities, and hand selection in children. Frontiers in Psychology 5, 82.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Searleman. A., & Porac, C. (2001). Lateral preference patterns as possible correlates of successfully switched left hand writing: data and a theory. Laterality 6(4), 303–314.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Searleman, A., Porac, C. (2003). Lateral preference profiles and right shift attempt histories of consistent and inconsistent left-handers. Brain and Cognition 52(2),175–180.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Siebner, H. R., Limmer, C., Peinemann, A., Drzezga, A., Bloem, B. R., Schwaiger, M., & Conrad, B. (2002). Long-term consequences of switching handedness: a positron emission tomography study on handwriting in "converted" left-handers. Journal of Neuroscience,22(7), 2816–2825.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soper, H. V., & Satz, P. (1984). Pathological left-handedness and ambiguous handedness. A new explanatory model. Neuropschologia 22(4),511–515.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sovák, M. (1968). Pädagogische Probleme der Lateralität. Berlin: VEB Verlag Volk und Gesundheit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Surburg, P. R. (1999). Midline-crossing inhibition: An indicator of developmental delay. Laterality 4(4),333–343.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Teixeria, L. A., & Paroli, R. (2000). Lateral asymmetries in motor actions: Preference versus training. Motriz 6(1), 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Travis, L. E., & Johnson, W. (1934). Stuttering and the concept of handedness. Psychological Review 41, 534–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volman, M. J., Wijnroks, A., & Vermeer, A. (2002). Bimanual circle drawing in children with spastic hemiparesis: effect of coupling modes on the performance of the impaired and unimpaired arms. Acta Psychologica, 110(2–3), 339–356.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, L., & Henneberg, M. (2007). Writing with the non-dominant hand: cross-handedness trainability in adult individuals. Laterality 12(2),121–130.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Woodard, R. J., & Surburg, P. R. (1999). Midline crossing behavior in children with learning disabilities. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly 16(2),155–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Alice Salomon Hochschule, Alice Salomon Platz 5, 12627, Berlin, Deutschland

    Elke Kraus

Authors
  1. Elke Kraus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elke Kraus .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Alice Salomon Hochschule, Berlin, Germany

    Elke Kraus

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kraus, E. (2019). Vorschlag einer Differenzierungssystematik „Händigkeitstypus mit Varianten “ zur Analyse von wechselndem Handgebrauch . In: Kraus, E. (eds) Zwischen Links- und Rechtshändigkeit. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-57723-3_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-57723-3_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-57722-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-57723-3

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation