Skip to main content

International Cyberspace Governance

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
World Internet Development Report 2017

Abstract

Cyberspace is the product of the IT Revolution. Since 1990s, IT Revolution represented by the Internet has gone beyond national and regional borders and cultural differences and created the man-made space connecting all countries and regions, which is the global cyberspace. On the one hand, state and non-state actors have more and more interactions in the cyberspace to enjoy benefits and convenience. On the other hand, traditional politics, economy and social structures are faced with the totally new shock and challenge resulting from the cyberspace and practice proves that no individual actor can only rely on himself in tackling the shock and challenge. How to exercise effective governance over the global cyberspace and build peaceful, secure, open and cooperative cyberspace has become the key strategic issue facing all countries and all actors. (1) The antagonism between the “multiple stakeholders” model and “multilateralism” is the main thread running through the global cyberspace governance, but the two have begun to integrate with each other. China holds that the cyber sovereignty should be respected and consultation should be carried out about common issues, and the country advocates multilateral cyberspace governance involving different participants. (2) The international community has different opinions on global cyberspace governance principles, digital economy development and cyberspace militarization, but they all hold that complete governance rules should be made for cyberspace governance. (3) The global cyberspace governance mechanism keeps being improved. ITU, UN and ICANN play different roles in cyberspace governance and all countries participate in it through bilateral and multilateral mechanisms. (4) China is an active promoter of the reform of the global cyberspace governance system. The proposals on international cyberspace made by President Xi Jinping have won extensive acknowledgement in the international community. To build a community of shared future in cyberspace is becoming the common direction of responsible actors’ effort.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    U.S. Department of Defense. The National Defense Strategy of the United States of America. March 2005, http://archive.defense.gov/news/Mar2005/d20050318nds1.pdf.

  2. 2.

    The top four manufacturers were HPE/ New H3C Group, Dell, Cisco and IBM, with their market share accounting respectively for 24.2%, 20.1%, 7.0% and 6.3%. See Worldwide Server Market Revenue Declines 4.6% in the First Quarter as the Market Prepares for a Major Refresh, According to IDC, June 6, 2017, https://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=prUS42707717.

  3. 3.

    Internet Assigned Numbers Authority. Root Servers, http://www.iana.org/domains/root/servers.

  4. 4.

    Marshall Leaffer. Domain Names, Globalization, and Internet Governance, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 1998, pp.139–165.

  5. 5.

    Château de Bossey. Report of the Working Group on Internet Governance. WGIG, 2015, http://www.wgig.org/docs/WGIGREPORT.pdf.

  6. 6.

    Lu Chuanying, Power Game, Idea Evolution and China Strategy on Cyberspace. Global Review, 2016(1), pp. 117–134.

  7. 7.

    The White House. International Strategy for Cyberspace: Prosperity, Security, and Openness in a Networked World. May 2011, p. 5, https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/international_strategy_for_cyberspace.pdf.

  8. 8.

    John E. Savage and Bruce W. McConnell. Exploring Multi-Stakeholder Internet Governance. EastWest Institute, January 2015, https://www.eastwest.ngo/sites/default/files/Exploring%20Multi-Stakeholder%20Internet%20Governance_0.pdf.

  9. 9.

    Lawrence E. Strickling. Moving Together Beyond Dubai. National Telecommunications & Information Administration, April 2, 2013, https://www.ntia.doc.gov/blog/2013/moving-together-beyond-dubai.

  10. 10.

    Lennard G. Kruger. Internet Governance and the Domain Name System: Issues for Congress. Congressional Research Service, November 18, 2016, https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R42351.pdf.

  11. 11.

    Château de Bossey. Report of the Working Group on Internet Governance. WGIG, 2015, http://www.wgig.org/docs/WGIGREPORT.pdf.

  12. 12.

    Information Office of the State Council of the People’s Republic of China,The Internet in China (White Paper), people.cn, June 8th, 2010, http://politics.people.com.cn/GB/1026/11813615.html.

  13. 13.

    Xinhuanet.com, Speech delivered by President Xi Jinping at the National Congress of Brazil, July 7th, 2014, http://news.xinhuanet.com/world/2014-07/17/c_1111665403.htm.

  14. 14.

    Xinhuanet.com, Remarks by President Xi Jinping at the Opening Ceremony of the Second World Internet Conference, December 16th, 2015, http://news.xinhuanet.com/politics/2015-12/16/c_1117481089.htm.

  15. 15.

    Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of the People’s Republic of China, Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China, November 8th, 2016, http://www.miit.gov.cn/n1146295/n1146557/n1146614/c5345009/content.html .

  16. 16.

    United Nations General Assembly. Group of Governmental Experts on Developments in the Field of Information and Telecommunications in the Context of International Society. June 24, 2013. http://www.unidir.org/files/medias/pdfs/developments-in-the-field-of-information-and-telecommunications-in-the-context-of-international-security-2012-2013-a-68-98-eng-0-578.pdf.

  17. 17.

    Joseph S Nye Jr. The Regime Complex for Managing Global Cyber Activities. Global Commission on Internet Governance, Paper Series No. 1, May 2014.

  18. 18.

    The White House. International Strategy for Cyberspace: Prosperity, Security, and Openness in a Networked World. May 2011, https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/international_strategy_for_cyberspace.pdf.

  19. 19.

    U.S. Department of Defense. The DoD Cyber Strategy. April 2015, https://www.defense.gov/Portals/1/features/2015/0415_cyber-strategy/Final_2015_DoD_CYBER_STRATEGY_for_web.pdf.

  20. 20.

    The White House. Statement by President Donald J. Trump on the Elevation of Cyber Command. August 18, 2017, https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2017/08/18/statement-donald-j-trump-elevation-cyber-command.

  21. 21.

    Xinhuanet.com, Remarks by President Xi Jinping at the Opening Ceremony of the Second World Internet Conference, December 16th, 2015, http://news.xinhuanet.com/politics/2015-12/16/c_1117481089.htm.

  22. 22.

    Xinhuanet.com, Remarks by President Xi Jinping at the Opening Ceremony of the Second World Internet Conference, December 16th, 2015, http://news.xinhuanet.com/politics/2015-12/16/c_1117481089.htm.

  23. 23.

    Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China, International Strategy of Cooperation on Cyberspace, http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/web/ziliao_674904/tytj_674911/zcwj_674915/t1442389.shtml.

  24. 24.

    European Commission. Digital Single Market: Bringing Down Barriers to Unlock Online Opportunities. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/priorities/digital-single-market_en.

  25. 25.

    United Nations General Assembly. Letter Dated 12 September 2011 from the Permanent Representatives of China, the Russian Federation, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan to the United Nations Addressed to the Secretary-General. September 14, 2011, https://ccdcoe.org/sites/default/files/documents/UN-110912-CodeOfConduct_0.pdf.

  26. 26.

    The Centre for Internet Society. India’s Statement Proposing UN Committee for Internet-Related Policy. October 26, 2011, https://cis-india.org/internet-governance/blog/india-statement-un-cirp.

  27. 27.

    General Assembly of the United Nations. Brazil, HE Mrs. Dilma Rousseff, President. September 24, 2013, https://gadebate.un.org/en/68/brazil.

  28. 28.

    ICANN. Indian Government Declares Support for Multistakeholder Model of Internet Governance at ICANN53. June 22, 2015, https://www.icann.org/resources/press-material/release-2015-06-22-en.

  29. 29.

    Cameron F. Kerry. Bridging the Internet-Cyber Gap: Digital Policy Lessons for the Next Administration. Center for Technology Innovation at Brookings, October 2016, https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/internet-cyber-gap-final.pdf; Gulshan Rai. Lesson from BRICS: Developing an Indian Strategy on Global Internet Governance. Observer Research Foundation, September 6, 2014, http://www.orfonline.org/article/lessons-from-brics-developing-an-indian-strategy-on-global-internet-governance.

  30. 30.

    Silja Baller, Soumitra Dutta and Bruno Lanvin, eds. The Global Information Technology Report 2016: Innovating in the Digital Economy. 2016, http://www3.weforum.org/docs/GITR2016/GITR_2016_full%20report_final.pdf.

  31. 31.

    World Economic Forum. The Global Risks Report 2017, 12th Edition. 2017, http://www3.weforum.org/.

  32. 32.

    World Bank. World Development Report 2016: Digital Dividends. 2016, http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/896971468194972881/pdf/102725-PUB-Replacement-PUBLIC.pdf.

  33. 33.

    Geneva Internet Platform. Members of UN GGE. https://dig.watch/processes/ungge.

  34. 34.

    WSIS Executive Secretariat. Report of the Western Asia Regional Conference for WSIS. February 5, 2003, http://www.itu.int/net/wsis/preparatory/regional/beirut.html.

  35. 35.

    Wolfgang Kleinwachter. Beyond ICANN vs ITU? How WSIS Tries to Enter the New Territory of Internet Governance. The International Journal for Communications Studies, Vol. 64, No. 3–4, 2004, pp. 233–251.

  36. 36.

    Shen Yi. Disputes over the Principles of Global Cyberspace Governance and China’s Strategic Choice. Foreign Affairs Review, 2015 (2), pp. 65–79.

  37. 37.

    National Telecommunications & Information Administration, United States Department of Commerce. NTIA Announces Intent to Transition Key Internet Domain Name Functions. March 14, 2014, https://www.ntia.doc.gov/ press-release/2014/ntia-announces-intent-transition-key-internet-domain-name-functions.

  38. 38.

    e-APEC Task Force. e-APEC Strategy. October 2011, http://publications.apec.org/publication-detail.php?pub_id=584.

  39. 39.

    APEC. APEC Strategy to Ensure Trusted Safe and Sustainable Online Environment. November 2005.

  40. 40.

    People.cn. Sanya Declaration. BRICS Leaders Meeting, April 4th, 2011, http://politics.people.com.cn/GB/1024/14391387.html.

  41. 41.

    Xinhuanet.com. BRICS Leaders’ Xiamen Declaration, September 4th, 2017, http://news.xinhuanet.com/world/2017-09/04/c_1121603652.htm.

  42. 42.

    APCERT Secretariat. APCERT Annual Report 2016. https://www.apcert.org/documents/pdf/APCERT_Annual_Report_2016.pdf.

  43. 43.

    United Nations General Assembly. Group of Governmental Experts on Developments in the Field of Information and Telecommunications in the Context of International Security. July 22, 2015, http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/70/174.

  44. 44.

    United Nations General Assembly. Resolution Adopted by the General Assembly on 18 December 2013: 68/167. The Right to Privacy in the Digital Age. January 21, 2014, http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/68/167.

  45. 45.

    OECD. Digital Security Risk Management for Economic and Social Prosperity: OECD Recommendation and Companion Document. 2015, http://www.oecd.org/sti/ieconomy/digital-security-risk-management.pdf.

  46. 46.

    OECD (2008), “The Seoul Declaration for the Future of the Internet Economy”, OECD Digital Economy Papers, No. 147, OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/230445718605.

  47. 47.

    APEC. APEC Telecommunications and Information Working Group Strategic Action Plan 20162020. 2016, https://www.apec.org/Meeting-Papers/Sectoral-Ministerial-Meetings/Telecommunications-and-Information/2015_tel.

  48. 48.

    East West Institute. Global Cooperation in Cyberspace Initiative: 20162017 Action Agenda. 2015, https://www.eastwest.ngo/sites/default/files/ideas-files/ActionAgenda2016_Spread.pdf.

  49. 49.

    The Hague Centre for Strategic Studies. The Global Commission on the Stability of Cyberspace. July 18, 2017, https://hcss.nl/news/global-commission-stability-cyberspace.

  50. 50.

    Brad Smith. The Need for a Digital Geneva Convention. Microsoft, February 14, 2017, https://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2017/02/14/need-digital-geneva-convention/.

  51. 51.

    Michael N. Schmitt, ed. Tallinn Manual on the International Law Applicable to Cyber Warfare, Cambridge University Press, 2013; Michael N Schmitt and Liis Vihul, eds. Tallinn Manual 2.0 on the International Law Applicable to Cyber Operations, Cambridge University Press, 2017.

  52. 52.

    Lee Branstetter. TPP and Digital Trade. in Jeffrey J. Schott and Cathleen Cimino-Isaacs, eds., Assessing the Trans-Pacific Partnership, Volume 2: Innovations in Trading Rules, Peterson Institute for International Economics, 2016, pp. 72–81.

  53. 53.

    Mike Lennon. Defining and Debating Cyber Warfare. Security Week, April 6, 2010, http://www.securityweek.com/content/defining-and-debating-cyber-warfare.

  54. 54.

    Clay Wilson. Cybersecurity and Cyber Weapons: Is Nonproliferation Possible? in Maurizio Martellini, ed. Cyber Security: Deterrence and IT Protection for Critical Infrastructures, Springer, 2013, pp. 11–24.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Consortia

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Publishing House of Electronics Industry, Beijing and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Chinese Academy of Cyberspace Studies. (2019). International Cyberspace Governance. In: Chinese Academy of Cyberspace Studies (eds) World Internet Development Report 2017. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-57524-6_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-57524-6_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-57523-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-57524-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics