Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Sportpsychologie pp 43–68Cite as

Lernen und Gedächtnis im Sport

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Zusammenfassung

Das Kapitel befasst sich mit den psychologischen Grundlagen von Lern- und Gedächtnisleistungen und konkretisiert sie im Kontext von Sport und Bewegung. Dafür wird Lernen als eine dauerhafte Veränderung des Verhaltens bzw. Verhaltenspotenzials auf der Basis von Assoziationsbildung, Lernen am Modell und implizitem Lernen vorgestellt. Darüber hinaus werden Gedächtnisleistungen thematisiert, die solche lernabhängigen Verhaltensänderungen durch die sukzessive Verarbeitung von Informationen über verschiedene Gedächtnisprozesse hinweg in unterschiedlichen Gedächtnissystemen ermöglichen. Schließlich stehen der Erwerb und die Repräsentation von Bewegungswissen sowie dessen Veränderung im Mittelpunkt. Dabei werden ausgewählte Aspekte der Gestaltung von Lehr- und Lernprozessen im Sport vermittelt und die Repräsentation sportlicher Fertigkeiten im Langzeitgedächtnis dargestellt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Abernethy, B. (2001). Attention. In R. N. Singer, H. A. Hausenblas, & C. M. Janelle (Hrsg.), Handbook of sport psychology (2. Aufl., S. 53–85). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agethen, M., & Krause, D. (2016). Effects of bandwidth feedback on the automatization of an arm movement sequence. Human Movement Science, 45, 71–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ata, S. (2005). Zum Kontext-Interferenz-Effekt beim Fertigkeitserwerb im Bodenturnen. Dissertationsschrift, Technische Universität, Darmstadt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K. W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Hrsg.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Bd. 2). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. (2003). Working memory: Looking back and looking forward. Nature Review Neuroscience, 4, 829–839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1965). Influence of models reinforcement contingencies on the acquisition of imitative response. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 589–595.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. New York: General Learning Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekkering, H., Wohlschläger, A., & Gattis, M. (2000). Imitation of gestures in children is goal-directed. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A, 153–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bläsing, B., Tenenbaum, G., & Schack, T. (2009). The cognitive structure of movements in classical dance. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 10(3), 350–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, S. M., Beurskens, A. J., Borm, P. J., Schack, T., & Wade, D. T. (2006). The effects of mental practice in stroke rehabilitation: A systematic review. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 87, 842–852.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chein, J. M., & Schneider, W. (2012). The brain’s learning and control architecture. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 78–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A. M., & Quillian, M. R. (1969). Retrieval time from semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8(2), 240–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, N. (1997). Attention and memory: An integrated framework. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1985). Das Flow-Erlebnis – Jenseits von Angst und Langeweile: Im Tun aufgehen. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. J., Turvey, M. T., & Crowder, R. G. (1972). The auditory analogue of the Sperling partial report procedure: Evidence for brief auditory storage. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 255–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daugs, R., Blischke, K., Olivier, N., & Marshall, F. (1989). Beiträge zum visuomotorischen Lernen im Sport. Schorndorf: Hofmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driskell, J., Copper, C., & Moran, A. (1994). Does mental practice enhance performance? Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 481–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebbinghaus, H. (1885). Über das Gedächtnis (Untersuchungen zur experimentellen Psychologie). Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberspächer, H. (2007). Mentales Training. Das Handbuch für Trainer und Sportler (7. Aufl.). München: Copress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Effenberg, A. O. (2000). Zum Potential komplexer akustischer Bewegungsinformationen für die Technikansteuerung. Leistungssport, 30, 19–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Effenberg, A. O. (2005). Movement sonification: Effects on perception and action. IEEE Multimedia, 12, 53–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabbri-Destro, M., & Rizzolatti, G. (2008). Mirror neurons and mirror systems in monkeys and humans. Physiology, 23, 171–179.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Focke, A., Spancken, S., Stockinger, C., Thürer, B., & Stein, T. (2016). Bilateral practice improves dominant leg performance in long jump. European Journal of Sport Science, 16, 787–793.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fontana, F. E., Furtado, O., Jr., Mazzardo, O., & Gallagher, J. D. (2009). Whole and part practice: A meta-analysis. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 109, 517–530.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, C., Land, W. M., & Schack, T. (2013). Mental representation and learning: The influence of practice on the development of mental representation structure in complex action. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 14(3), 353–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, C., Land, W. M., Popp, C., & Schack, T. (2014). Mental representation and mental practice: Experimental investigation on the functional links between motor memory and motor imagery. PLoS One, 9(4), e95175.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Frensch, P. A. (2006). Implizites Lernen. In J. Funke & P. A. French (Hrsg.), Handbuch der Allgemeinen Psychologie – Kognition (S. 229–238). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergely, G., Bekkering, H., & Király, I. (2002). Rational imitation in preverbal infants. Nature, 415, 755.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glimcher, P. W. (2011). Understanding dopamine and reinforcement learning: The dopamine reward prediction error hypothesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 15647–15654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Göhner, U. (1983). Wie sich sportliche Bewegungen analysieren und strukturieren lassen. In H. Digel (Hrsg.), Lehren im Sport (S. 139 ff.). Hamburg: Reinbek.

    Google Scholar 

  • Göhner, U. (1996). Bewegungslehre und Biomechnik des Sports. Tübingen: U. Göhner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Göhner, U. (2002). Bewegungslehre und Biomechanik des Sports. Fundamentum mit Hoch- und Weitsprung. Tübingen: U. Göhner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Göhner, U. (2017). Springen, Werfen und Laufen aus bewegungstheoretischer und biomechanischer Perspektive. Tübingen: U. Göhner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, T. (2018). Gedächtnis (2. Aufl.). Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Guadagnoli, M. A., & Lee, T. D. (2004). Challenge Point: A framework for conceptualizing the effects of various practice conditions in motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 36, 212–224.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hikosaka, O., Nakahara, H., Rand, M. K., Sakai, K., Lu, X., Nakamura, K., Miyachi, S., & Doya, K. (1999). Parallel neural networks for learning sequential procedures. Trends in Neuroscience, 22, 464–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, J. (1993). Vorhersage und Erkenntnis: Die Funktion von Antizipationen in der menschlichen Verhaltenssteuerung und Wahrnehmung. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, J., & Engelkamp, J. (2017). Lern- und Gedächtnispsychologie (2. Aufl.). Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hommel, B., & Nattkemper, D. (2011). Handlungspsychologie: Planung und Kontrolle intentionalen Handelns. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC). A framework for perception and action. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849–937.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, P. L., Meltzoff, A. N., & Decety, J. (2006). Neural circuits involved in imitation and perspective-taking. Neuroimage, 31, 429–439.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. New York: Dover Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeannerod, M. (2001). Neural simulation of action: A unifying mechanism for motor cognition. NeuroImage, 14, 103–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keele, S. W., Mayr, U., Ivry, R., Hazeltine, E., & Heuer, H. (2003). The cognitive and neural architecture of sequence representation. Psychological Review, 110, 316–339.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Knoblich, G., & Flach, R. (2001). Predicting the effects of actions: Interactions of perception and action. Psychological Science, 12(6), 467–472.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koopmann, T., Steggemann-Weinrich, Y., Baumeister, J., & Krause, D. (2017). Mental rotation of tactical instruction displays affects information processing demand and execution accuracy in basketball. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 88, 365–370.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krause, D., & Kobow, S. (2013). Effects of model orientation on the visuomotor imitation of arm movements: The role of mental rotation. Human Movement Science, 32, 314–327.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krause, D., Agethen, M., & Zobe, C. (2018). Error feedback frequency affects automaticity but not accuracy and consistency after extensive motor skill practice. Journal of Motor Behavior, 50, 144–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause, D., Ramme, K., & Weigelt, M. (2019). Erwerb motorischer und sensorischer Kompetenzen. In B. Klemme, U. Weyland, & J. Harms (Hrsg.), Praktische Ausbildung in der Physiotherapie (S. 59–69). Stuttgart: Thieme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunde, W., Koch, I., & Hoffmann, J. (2004). Anticipated action effects affect the selection, initiation, and execution of actions. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. Section A: Human Experimental Psychology, 57, 87–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Künzell, S., & Hossner, E. J. (2012). Differenzielles Lehren und Lernen: Eine Kritik. Sportwissenschaft, 42, 83–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, W. K., Maxwell, J. P., & Masters, R. (2009). Analogy learning and the performance of motor skills under pressure. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 31, 337–357.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lander, H.-J., & Lange, K. (1992). Eine differentialpsychologische Analyse begrifflich-strukturierten Wissens. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 200(3), 181–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewicki, P., Hill, T., & Czyzewska, M. (1992). Nonconscious acquisition of information. American Psychologist, 47, 796–801.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lex, H., Essig, K., Knoblauch, A., & Schack, T. (2015). Cognitive representations and cognitive processing of team-specific tactics in soccer. PLoS One, 10(2), e0118219.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lohse, K. R., Wadden, K., Boyd, L. A., & Hodges, N. J. (2014). Motor skill acquisition across short and long time scales: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging data. Neuropsychologia, 59, 130–141.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marschall, F., Bund, A., & Wiemeyer, J. (2007). Does frequent augmented feedback really degrade learning? A meta-analysis. E-Journal Bewegung und Training, 1, 74–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters, R. S. W., van der Kamp, J., & Jackson, R. C. (2007). Imperceptibly off-centre goalkeepers influence penalty-kick direction in soccer. Psychological Science, 18, 222–223.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Medin, D. L., Altom, M. W., Edelson, S. M., & Freko, D. (1982). Correlated symptoms of simulated medical classification. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8, 37–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meltzoff, A. N., & Moore, M. K. (1977). Imitation of facial and manual gestures by human neonates. Science, 198, 75–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. The Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, H., & Blischke, K. (2009). Motorisches Lernen. In W. Schlicht & B. Strauß (Hrsg.), Grundlagen der Sportpsychologie: Bd. 1. Enzyklopädie der Psychologie: Themenbereich D, Praxisgebiete: Serie 5, Sportpsychologie. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdock, B. B. (1961). The retention of individual items. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 618–625.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murdock, B. B. (1962). The serial position effect of free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(5), 482–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naylor, J. C., & Briggs, G. E. (1963). Effects of task complexity and task organization on the relative efficiency of part and whole training methods. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 217–224.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nissen, M. J., & Bullemer, P. (1987). Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olivier, N., & Müller, H. (2002). Sporttechnisches Bildschirmtraining im Spiegel des „motor approach“ der Motorikforschung. In H. Altenberger (Hrsg.), Medien im Sport: Bd. 136. Beiträge zur Lehre und Forschung im Sport (S. 261–285). Schorndorf: Hofmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olivier, N., Rockmann, U., & Krause, D. (2013). Grundlagen der Bewegungswissenschaft und -lehre (2., überarb. und erw. Aufl.). Schorndorf: Hofmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawlow, I. P. (1953). Ausgewählte Werke. Berlin: Akademie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Physiofun. (2010). Physiofun Senso Move [DVD]. Düsseldorf: Kaasa health GmbH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9(2), 129–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reber, A. S. (1989). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 219–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (Hrsg.), Cognition and categorization (S. 27–48). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumiati, R., & Tessari, A. (2002). Imitation of novel and well-known actions. Experimental Brain Research, 142, 425–433.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sainburg, R. L. (2002). Evidence for a dynamic-dominance hypothesis of handedness. Experimental Brain Research, 142, 241–258.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Salmoni, A. W., Schmidt, R. A., & Walter, S. B. (1984). Knowledge of results and motor learning: A review and critical reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin & Review, 95, 355–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schack, T. (2004). The cognitive architecture of complex movement. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 2(4), 403–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schack, T. (2010). Die Kognitive Architektur menschlicher Bewegung. Aachen: Meyer & Meyer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schack, T. (2012). Measuring mental representations. In R. C. E. G. Tenenbaum & A. Kamata (Hrsg.), Measurement in sport and exercise psychology (S. 203–214). Champaign: Human Kinetics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schack, T., & Mechsner, F. (2006). Representation of motor skills in human long-term memory. Neuroscience Letters, 391(3), 77–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, R. A. (1975). A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 82, 225–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, R. A. (1976). Control processes in motor skills. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, 4, 22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, R. A., Lee, T., Winstein, C., Wulf, G., & Zelaznik, H. (2018). Motor control and learning (6. Aufl.). Champaign: Human Kinetics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schöllhorn, W. I., Beckmann, H., Eekhoff, A., & Hegen, P. (2013). Differenzielles Lehren und Lernen:(k) eine Kritik – Eine Bestätigung. Sportwissenschaft, 43, 56–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schöllhorn, W. I., Hegen, P., & Eekhoff, A. (2014). Differenzielles Lernen und andere motorische Lerntheorien. Spectrum der Sportwissenschaft, 2, 35–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schücker, L., Hagemann, N., Strauss, B., & Völker, K. (2009). The effect of attentional focus on running economy. Journal of Sports Sciences, 27(12), 1241–1248.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Selg, H., & Schermer, F. J. (2015). Lernpsychologie. In A. Schütz, M. Brand, H. Selg, & S. Lautenbacher (Hrsg.), Psychologie – Eine Einführung in ihre Grundlagen und Anwendungsfächer (5. Aufl., S. 101–116). Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senff, O., & Weigelt, M. (2011). Sequential effects after practice with the dominant and non-dominant hand on the acquisition of a sliding task in schoolchildren. Laterality, 16, 227–239.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shea, J. B., & Morgan, R. L. (1979). Contextual interference effects on the acquisition, retention and transfer of a motor skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 5, 179–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shea, C. H., Lai, Q., Black, C., & Park, J. H. (2000). Spacing practice sessions across days benefits the learning of motor skills. Human Movement Science, 19, 737–760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherwood, D. E. (1988). Effect of bandwidth knowledge of results on movement consistency. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 66, 535–542.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms: An experimental analysis. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperling, G. (1960). The information available in brief visual presentations. Psychological Monographs, 74, 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Squire, L. R. (Hrsg.). (1992). Encyclopedia of learning and memory. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Squire, L. R., & Kandel, E. R. (1999). Gedächtnis. Die Natur des Erinnerns. Heidelberg: Spektrum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, S. (1966). High-speed scanning in human memory. Science, 153, 652–654.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stock, A., & Stock, C. (2004). A short history of ideo-motor action. Psychological Research, 68(2–3), 176–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stöckel, T., & Weigelt, M. (2012). Brain lateralisation and motor learning: Selective effects of dominant and non-dominant hand practice on the early acquisition of throwing skills. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition, 17, 18–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, E. L. (1911). Animal intelligence: Experimental studies. New York: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, E. L., & Woodworth, R. S. (1901). The influence of improvement in one mental function upon the efficiency of other functions. II. The estimation of magnitudes. Psychological Review, 8, 384–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tulving, E. (1985). How many memory systems are there? American Psychologist, 40, 385–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Meer, E. (2006). Langzeitgedächtnis. In J. Funke & P. A. French (Hrsg.), Handbuch der Allgemeinen Psychologie – Kognition (S. 346–355). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weigelt, M., Ahlmeyer, T., Lex, H., & Schack, T. (2011). The cognitive representation of a throwing technique in judo experts – Technological ways for individual skill diagnostics in high-performance sports. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 12(3), 231–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wickens, C. D., Hutchins, S., Carolan, T., & Cumming, J. (2013). Effectiveness of part-task training and increasing-difficulty training strategies: A meta-analysis approach. Human Factors, 55, 461–470.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wiemeyer, J. (1998). Schlecht Üben, um gut zu lernen? Narrativer und metaanalytischer Überblick zum Kontext-Interferenz-Effekt. Psychologie und Sport, 5, 82–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohlschläger, A. (2001). Mental object rotation and the planning of hand movements. Perception and Psychophysics, 63, 709–718.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wulf, G. (2009). Aufmerksamkeit und motorisches Lernen. München: Urban & Fischer/Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wulf, G., & Lewthwaite, R. (2016). Optimizing performance through intrinsic motivation and attention for learning: The OPTIMAL theory of motor learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(5), 1382–1414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wulf, G., McNevin, N., & Shea, C. H. (2001). The automaticity of complex motor skill learning as a function of attentional focus. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, 54, 1143–1154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer, H. D., & Kaernbach, C. (2006). Ikonischer und auditiver Speicher. In J. Funke & P. A. French (Hrsg.), Handbuch der Allgemeinen Psychologie – Kognition (S. 334–339). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department Sport & Gesundheit, Universität Paderborn, Paderborn, Deutschland

    Matthias Weigelt, Daniel Krause & Iris Güldenpenning

Authors
  1. Matthias Weigelt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Daniel Krause
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Iris Güldenpenning
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthias Weigelt .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Fachgruppe Sportwissenschaft, Universität Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany

    Julia Schüler

  2. Institut für Sportwissenschaft, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Mirko Wegner

  3. Institut für Sport und Sportwissenschaft, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

    Henning Plessner

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Weigelt, M., Krause, D., Güldenpenning, I. (2020). Lernen und Gedächtnis im Sport. In: Schüler, J., Wegner, M., Plessner, H. (eds) Sportpsychologie. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56802-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56802-6_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-56801-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-56802-6

  • eBook Packages: Psychology (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation