Abstract
Data-driven innovation has great potential for the development of innovative services that not only have economic value, but that help to address societal challenges. Many of these challenges can only be addressed by data sharing of public and privately owned data. These public-private data sharing collaborations require data governance rules. Data governance can address many barriers, for example by deploying a decision model to guide choices regarding data sharing resulting in interventions supported by a data sharing platform. Based on a literature review of data governance and three use cases for data sharing in the logistics sector, we have developed a data sharing decision model from the perspective of a data provider. The decision model addresses technical as well as ownership, privacy, and economical barriers to sharing publicly and privately owned data and subsequently proposes interventions to address these barriers. We found that the decision model is useful for identifying and addressing data sharing barriers as it is applicable to amongst others privacy and commercial sensitive data.
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
European Commission, Digital agenda: Turning government data into gold, European Commission, Brussels (2011)
Manyika, J., et al.: Big data: the next frontier for innovatioin, competition, and productivity. McKinsey&Company (2011)
Janssen, K.: The influence of the PSI directive on open government data: An overview of recent developments. Government Information Quarterly 28(4), 446–456 (2011)
Jaeger, P., Bertot, J.: Transparancy and technological change: ensuring qeual and sustained public access to government information. Government Information Quarterly 27(4), 371–376 (2010)
Harrison, T., Pardo, T., Cook, M.: Creating Open Government Ecosystems: a research and development agenda. Future Internet 4(4), 900–928 (2012)
Endsley, M.R.: Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 37(1), 32–64 (1995)
Zuiderwijk, A., Helbig, N., Gil-Garcia, J., Janssen, M.: Guest Editors’ Introduction. Innovation through open data: a review of the state-of-the-art and an emerging research agenda. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research 9(2) (2014)
Jetzek, T., Avital, M., Bjørn-Andersen, N.: Generating Value from Open Government Data. In: The 34th International Conference on Information Systems, ICIS 2013 (2013)
Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., Zuiderwijk, A.: Benefits, Adoption Barriers and Myths of Open data and Open government. Information Systems Management 29(4), 258–268 (2012)
Klein, H., Myers, D.: A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretitive field studies in information systems. MIS Quarterly 23(1), 67–93 (1999)
Walsham, G.: Doing interpretive research. European Journal on Information Systems 15(3), 320–330 (2006)
Mingers, J.: Combining IS research methods: towards a pluralist methodology. Information System Research 12(3), 240–259 (2001)
Janssen, M., Zuiderwijk, A.: Open data and transformational government. In: TGov Conference, London (2012)
Barry, E., Bannister, F.: Barriers to open data release: a view from the top. In: 2013 EGPA Annuaul Conference, Edinburgh (2013)
Weill, P., Ross, J.: IT Governance: how top performers manage IT decisions rights for superior results. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (2004)
Weber, K., Otto, B., Osterle, H.: One size does not fit all - a contigency approach to data governance. Journal of Data and Information Quality (JDIQ) 1(1), 4 (2009)
Batini, C., Scannapieco, M.: Data Quality: concepts. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Knight, S., Burn, J.: Developing a framework for assessing information quality on the World Wide Web. Informing Science, 159–172 (2005)
Nousak, P., Phelps, R.: A scorecard approach to improving data quality (January 1, 2002), http://www2.sas.com/proceedings/sugi27/p158-27.pdf (accessed March 14, 2014)
McDonnell, Big Data Challenges and Opportunities (2011), http://spotfire.tibco.com/blog/?p=6793
Bizer, C., et al.: Linked Data - The Story So Far (2011)
Batini, C., Scannapieco, M.: Data quality: concepts, methodologies, and techniques. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
United Nations, Rotterdam Rules (2008), http://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/texts/transport/rotterdam_rules (accessed 2012)
Dalmolen, S., Cornelisse, E., Stoter, A., Hofman, W., Bastiaansen, H., Punter, M., Knoors, F.: Improving sustainability throuhg intelligent cargo and adaptive decision making. In: E-Freight 2012. Delft (2012)
Esmeijer, J., Bakker, T., Munck, S.D.: Thriving and surviving in a data-driven society, TNO, Delft (2013)
Hofman, W., Bastiaansen, H.: A global IT infrastructure improving container security by data completion. In: ECITL, Zaragoza, Spain (2013)
Miller, P., Styles, R., Heath, T.: Open data commons, a license for open data. In: LODW 2008, Beijing (2008)
Berners-Lee, T.: Linked Data - four rules (June 18, 2009), http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Eckartz, S.M., Hofman, W.J., Van Veenstra, A.F. (2014). A Decision Model for Data Sharing. In: Janssen, M., Scholl, H.J., Wimmer, M.A., Bannister, F. (eds) Electronic Government. EGOV 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8653. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44426-9_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44426-9_21
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-44425-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-44426-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)