Skip to main content

Engineering and Scientific Software Control Standards Modelling: An Interactive Expert System Using Telecommunications

  • Conference paper
  • 61 Accesses

Abstract

Selecting an Engineering and Scientific software (ES) system is an arduous process. The overall satisfaction derived from this type of system depends on many variables. This study analyzes the influence of a number of ESS predictor variables on overall satisfaction. This study confirms the theories that suggest that ESS ease of operation, computer reliability and tech support — trouble shooting are the major determinants of overall computer user satisfaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allerton, J.L. (December, 1983) “Controlling Maintenance Costs via a Computer,” Cost & Management, pp. 45–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R.E. (February, 1982) “Consumer Dissatisfaction: The Effect of Disconfirmed Expectancy on Perceived Product Performance,” Journal of Marketing Research, 10, pp. 38–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (April 19, 1982) “Electronics Engineers Get a New Design Tool,” Business Week (Industrial Edition), pp. 92H-92L.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (July 25, 1983) “Firm Mohes Graphics Tools More Accessible to Engineers,” Computerworld, pp. 43–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (March 12, 1981) “Interactive Computing Helps Ability Planning Engineers,” Public Abilities Fortnightly, pp. 61–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barcus, S.W. and Boer, G.B. (March, 1981) “How a Small Company Evaluates Acquisition of a Mini-Computer,” Management Accounting, pp. 13–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, A. (February, 1982) “Choosing a Micro? Here’s a Cautionary Tale,” Accountancy, pp. 98–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnen, Edward J., “Desk Top Computer Applications For Industrial Engineers,” Management Journal of Methods Time Measurement, 10, No. 31983, pp. 17–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilbrey, C.P. and House, W.C. (July, 1981) “Mini-Computer Selection,” Journal of Systems Management, pp. 36–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandon, D. (February, 1980) “Staying out of Court,” Mini-Micro-Systems, pp. 127–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheney, P.H. (January, 1979) “Selecting, Acquiring and Coping with Your First Computer,” Journal of Small Business Management pp. 43–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duda, R.O., and Gaschnig, J.G. (1981) “Knowledge-Based Expert Systems Come of Age.” Byte, 6, 9:238–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farmer, D.F. (February, 1981) “Comparing the 4341 and M80.42,” Computerworld, pp. 9–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gevarter, Lillian B. (November 1983) “The Languages and Computers of Artificiari Intelligence,” Computers in Mechanical Engineering, pp. 33–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, Richard (August, 1983) “One Company’s Answer: Computer Assisted Engineering,” Interface Use, pp. 50–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grueberger, F. (January, 1981) “Making Friends with User-Friendly,” Datamation, pp. 108–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, J.V., and Messier, W. (October, 1982) “Expert Systems for Decision Support in EDP Auditing,”International Journal of Computer and Information Sciences, 11, 5:357–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, J.R. (December, 1979) “Microcomputer Limitations,” Journal of Accountancy, pp. 48–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, D. (November, 1983) “What to Look for When Buying Computer Maintenance,” Canadian Datasystems, 15, 11:34–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerlinger, F.N. and Pedhazer, E. (1973) Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, N. (May, 1980) “The Impact of Buying or Leasing,” Infosystems, p.78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinrock, L. (Spring, 1982) “A Decade of Network Development,” Journal of Telecommunication Networks, 1, 5:1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kull, David (January 1984) “Personal Computers Let Engineer Retire Their Old Tools,” Computer Decisions, pp. 136–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lean, E., Stern, R., and Monds, T., (May, 1983) “Byting Back: The Industry Responds/Computers Made Easy,” Training and Development Journal, 37, 5:13–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linzey, H.T. (November, 1983) “Computerized Centralized Maintenance: An Independent’s View,” Telephony, 205, 22:150–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, J. (September, 1982) “R1 : A rule-based Configurer of Computer Systems,” Artificial Intelligence, 19, pp. 39–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nie, H.N., Hull, C.H., Jenkins, J.F., Steinbrenner, K., and Bentl, D.H. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olshavsky, R.W. and Miller, J.A. (February, 1972) “Consumer Expectations, Product Performance, and Perceived Product Quality,” Journal of Marketing Research, 9, pp. 12–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, J.C., and Dover, P. (April, 1979) “Disconfirmation of Consumer Expectations Through Product Trial,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, pp. 179–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Overall, J.E., and Klett, C. (1973) Applied Multivariate Analysis. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, K.E. (August, 1980) “Small Users Value Maintenance, Ease of Use,” Computerworld, pp. 3–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sample, R.L. (September, 1981) “Minis-Moving Beyond the Small Business User,” Administrative Management, pp. 58–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scannell, T. (June 7, 1982) “IPL, Singer Rated Tops in Mainframe Survey/Users Find Software, Support, Problem Areas,” Computerworld, pp. 56–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, Kim L. (Autumn, 1983) “Critical Success Factors in Architectural — Engineering Firms,” Today’s Executive, pp. 8–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoor, Rita (June 2, 1980) “Panel Socks Human — Engineered Software Tools,” Computerworld, pp. 36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Harold and Straud, David (Nov/Dec, 1983) “The Hole of Computer Graphics is Central Office Engineering,” GTE Automatic Electric Worldwide Communications Journal, pp. 169–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stefik, M. (March, 1982) “The Organization of Expert Systems,” Artificial Intelligence, 18, pp. 135–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swan, J. and Martin, W.S. (1981) “Testing Comparison Level and Predictive Expectations Models of Satisfaction,” Advances in Consumer Research, 8, pp. 77–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swan, J.E. and Trawick, I.F. (Fall, 1981) “Disconfirmation of Expectations and Satisfaction with a Retail Service,” Journal of Marketing, 57, pp. 49–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theil, H. (1971) Principles of Econometrics. Wiley, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Turney, P.B. and Laitala, P-H. (November-December, 1976) “A Strategy for Computer Selection by Small Companies,” Managerial Planning, pp. 24–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • User Ratings of Computer Systems, Datapro Research Corporation (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, H.K. and Mylopoulos (1977) “Two Views of Data Semantics: Data Model in Artificial Intelligence and Database Management,” Infor, 15, 3.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1985 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Rushinek, A., Rushinek, S. (1985). Engineering and Scientific Software Control Standards Modelling: An Interactive Expert System Using Telecommunications. In: Adey, R.A. (eds) Engineering Software IV. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-21877-8_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-21877-8_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-21879-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-21877-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics