Skip to main content

Approaching Short-Term Empires in World History, a First Attempt

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Short-term Empires in World History

Abstract

The paper presents an overview on the imperial turn and empire studies of the last decades. It introduces the innovative concept of “short-term empire” and contextualizes the contributions of the present volume. Finally, the authors specify and exemplify their terminological qualification in relation to the much-discussed empire of Alexander III.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For an overview see Gehler/Rollinger 2014. Gehler/Rollinger 2020.

  2. 2.

    Kennedy 1987; Demandt 1997, 2007; Ferguson 2003; Ferguson 2004; Münkler 2005; Morris/Scheidel 2009; Scheidel 2009.

  3. 3.

    Cf. Gehler/Rollinger 2014. Gehler/Rollinger 2020.

  4. 4.

    Kohler 1999.

  5. 5.

    Whereas some contributors render personal names by their scientific transliterations, this essay makes use of the more common and established forms, thus Mahmud of Ghazna for Maḥmūd of Ghazna, Nader Shah for Nāder Šāh, Genghis Khan for Chingiz Khan/Chinggis Khan, etc.

  6. 6.

    Cf. the contributions of Rollinger, Ruffing, Müller, Heather, and Reinfandt in this volume.

  7. 7.

    Cf. the contributions of Mitsiou, and Wiesehöfer/Rollinger in this volume.

  8. 8.

    Cf. the contribution of Suppan in this volume.

  9. 9.

    Cf. the contributions of Van de Mieroop, Richardson, Ruffing, Müller, Heather, Reinfandt, Rota, and Suppan in this volume. Unfortunately, the paper of Johannes Willms on Napoleon (‘Napoleon oder das ufer- und planlose Reich’) could not be included into this volume.

  10. 10.

    Cf. the contributions of Manz, and Schäfer in this volume.

  11. 11.

    Cf. the contributions of Mitsiou, and Wiesehöfer/Rollinger in his volume.

  12. 12.

    Cf. the contributions of Rollinger, and Gehler in this volume.

  13. 13.

    Gehler 2018, 185, 199, 202, 363.

  14. 14.

    One might think about legendary figures like the Assyrian queen Semiramis and, of course, Jeanne d’ Arc. However, it is questionable whether they were related to short-term empires. A better example might have been Zenobia of Palmyra. The editors of this volume tried hard but unfortunately were not successful in receiving a contribution on this interesting topic.

  15. 15.

    Kershaw 1987.

  16. 16.

    Kershaw 2011.

  17. 17.

    Cf. the contributions of Suppan, and Van de Mieroop in this volume.

  18. 18.

    Cf. the contributions of Ruffing, Reinfandt, and Manz in this volume.

  19. 19.

    Cf. the contributions of Manz, and Rota in this volume.

  20. 20.

    Cf. the contribution of Rollinger in this volume.

  21. 21.

    Cf. the contributions of Van de Mieroop, Müller, Manz, and Rota in this volume.

  22. 22.

    Cf. the contributions of Manz, and Rota in this volume.

  23. 23.

    Cf. the contributions of Reinfandt, and Manz in this volume.

  24. 24.

    Cf. the contribution of Mitsiou in this volume.

  25. 25.

    Cf. the contributions of Suppan, and Van de Mieroop in this volume. For Timur the world was clearly defined as the ‘islamic world’ (Manz, this volume); for Hannibal and Mithradates much depends on the weight given to their alliances with Philipp V of Macedon and Sertorius (Ruffing and Müller, this volume).

  26. 26.

    Cf. the contributions of Suppan, and Reinfandt in this volume.

  27. 27.

    Cf. the contribution of Manz in this volume.

  28. 28.

    Cf. the contributions of Suppan, Reinfandt, Ruffing, Müller, and Mitsiou in this volume.

  29. 29.

    Cf. the contributions of Müller, Reinfandt, Manz, and Suppan in this volume.

  30. 30.

    Cf. the contribution of Rota in this volume.

  31. 31.

    Cf. the contributions of Ruffing, Reinfandt, Manz, Rota, and Suppan in this volume.

  32. 32.

    Cf. the contributions of Ruffing, Müller, Mitsiou on the Bulgars, and Suppan in this volume.

  33. 33.

    Cf. the contributions of Heather, Manz, and Rota.

  34. 34.

    See the contributions of Heather, and Manz in this volume.

  35. 35.

    Nader Shah disposes his alreay installed son and has him blinded (Rota, this volume).

  36. 36.

    Cf. the contribution of Manz in this volume.

  37. 37.

    Cf. the contributions of Suppan, Heather, Mitsiou, Reinfandt, and Rota.

  38. 38.

    Rota, this volume.

  39. 39.

    See the contributions of Heather, and Manz in this volume.

  40. 40.

    See Rollinger 2020. There are, however, always exemptions to this ‘rule’. Thus, the Roman empire was successful for a very long time without establishing a permanent dynasty. Also in this case, it was acceptance that mattered. Yet, at least the official names of the emperors, not the individual ones transmitted by the historiographers, created the impression of continuity and similarity in a pseudo-dynastic framework.

  41. 41.

    Cf. the contributions of Suppan, and Van de Mieroop in this volume.

  42. 42.

    Cf. the contribution of Reinfandt in this volume.

  43. 43.

    Cf. the contribution of Manz in this volume.

  44. 44.

    Cf. the contribution of Mitsiou in this volume.

  45. 45.

    Cf. the contributions of Reinfandt, Manz, and Rota in this volume.

  46. 46.

    Cf. the contributions of Rollinger, and Heather in this volume.

  47. 47.

    Cf. the contribution of Rota in this volume. While Mussolini started a policy of reconciliation with the Holy Sea, which led to the Lateran Treaties in 1929 (Pollard 2005; Kertzer 2014), Hitler (Besier 2001) and Stalin (Döpmann 1981) began a cultural fight against Christianity. The Red Tsar destroyed the Russian Orthodox Churches while Hitler allowed to persecute and execute priests of the Roman Catholic Church. Both actions endangered the dictators’ public acceptance. The threat of weakening their power basis forced them to reconsider a stop of these policies, not at least to legitimize their wars against each other.

  48. 48.

    Cf. the considerations of Van de Mieroop, Ruffing, Mainz, and Rota in this volume.

  49. 49.

    Cf. the contribution of Heather in this volume.

  50. 50.

    Cf. the contribution of Gehler in this volume.

  51. 51.

    Cf. the contribution of Suppan in this volume with a special reference to a lack of oil.

  52. 52.

    Cf. the contribution of Reinfandt in this volume, also referring to the source problems related to the introduction of the iqṭā’ system which has to be seen as a continuous process.

  53. 53.

    Cf. the contribution of Mitsiou in this volume.

  54. 54.

    Cf. the contribution by Rota in this volume, and see Payne 2016.

  55. 55.

    Cf. the contribution by Heather in this volume.

  56. 56.

    Suppan, this volume.

  57. 57.

    Ruffing, this volume.

  58. 58.

    Reinfandt, this volume.

  59. 59.

    Manz, this volume.

  60. 60.

    Heather, this volume.

  61. 61.

    Rota, this volume.

  62. 62.

    Rollinger, this volume.

  63. 63.

    Schäfer, this volume.

  64. 64.

    Wiesehöfer/Rollinger, this volume.

  65. 65.

    Gehler, this volume.

  66. 66.

    Akyol 2016.

  67. 67.

    Skawa 2008.

  68. 68.

    Suppan this volume.

  69. 69.

    Cf. the contribution of Müller in this volume.

  70. 70.

    Cf. the contributions of Van de Mieroop and Schäfer in this volume.

  71. 71.

    Cf. the contribution of Manz in this volume.

  72. 72.

    Cf. the contribution of Ruffing, this volume.

  73. 73.

    Cf. also the contribution of Rota in this volume who compares Frederick the Great with Nader Shah concluding that the first one appears to have been just more fortunate.

  74. 74.

    Cf. also the contribution by Müller in this volume.

  75. 75.

    The most influential biographies—or at least biographical treatments—on Alexander in the last years are: Müller 2019; Wiemer 2015; Worthington 2014; Nawotka 2010; Cartledge 2004.

  76. 76.

    On the alleged mutiny at the river Hyphasis see Howe/Müller 2012.

  77. 77.

    For critics among modern scholarship see Bowden 2014.

  78. 78.

    Cf. Degen 2019; Briant 2010; Briant 2002.

  79. 79.

    Collections of fragments in translation are Gilhaus 2017 and Pearson 1960.

  80. 80.

    Nawotka/Rollinger/Wiesehöfer/Wojciechowska 2018; Müller 2014.

  81. 81.

    Howe/Müller 2012; Wiemer 2011; Spencer 2002; Roisman 1984; Rosen 1979.

  82. 82.

    Epigrahical sources: Rhodes/Osborne 2003 esp. 76; 83; 84; 85; 86; 101; Hatzopoulos 1997; Heisserer 1980; Numismatics: LeRider 2003.

  83. 83.

    Van der Spek 2003; Nawotka/Wojciechowska 2016.

  84. 84.

    Müller 2019, 221–236; Anson 2013; see now also Degen 2020; Rollinger/Degen 2020.

  85. 85.

    Nawotka 2012; Fox 2010; Muccioli 2004.

  86. 86.

    Hauben/Meeus 2014.

  87. 87.

    Strootman 2014; Meuus 2014.

  88. 88.

    Bichler 2014.

  89. 89.

    Müller 2014; Stewart 1993.

  90. 90.

    Bosworth 1988.

  91. 91.

    Müller 2019; Heckel 2012; Müller 2003.

  92. 92.

    Müller 2014, 187–246; Müller 2003.

  93. 93.

    Zahrnt 2016a; Zahrnt 2016b; Anson 2013, 83–120.

  94. 94.

    Briant 2002, 817–871; Briant 2006.

  95. 95.

    Briant 2009.

  96. 96.

    Braudel 1990.

References

  • Akyol, Çiğdem. 2016. Erdoğan. Die Biografie. Freiburg im Breisgau: Herder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anson, Edward M. 2013. Alexander the Great. Themes and Issues. London et al.: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besier Gerhard (Ed.). 2001. Zwischen „nationaler Revolution“ und militärischer Aggression. Transformationen in Kirche und Gesellschaft während der konsolidierten NS-Gewaltherrschaft 1934–1939 (Schriften des Historischen Kollegs. Kolloquien 48). München: Oldenbourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bichler, Reinhold. 2014. Die Wahrnehmung des Alexanderreichs: Ein Imperium der Imagination. In: Imperien und Reiche in der Weltgeschichte. Epochenübergreifende und universalhistorische Vergleiche, Teil II, eds. Michael Gehler, Robert Rollinger, 1557–1592. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosworth, Albert B. 1988. Conquest and Empire. The Reign of Alexander the Great. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowden, Hugh. 2014. Recent Travels in Alexanderland. The Journal of Hellenic Studies 134: 136–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braudel, Fernand. 1990. La méditerranée et le monde méditerranéen à l’époque de Philippe 2 vols. Paris: Armand Colin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briant, Pierre. 2002. From Cyrus to Alexander. A History of the Persian Empire. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briant, Pierre. 2006. L’Asie mineure en transition. In: La transition entre l’empire achéménide et les royaumes hellénistiques (vers 350–300 av. J.-C.) (Persika 9), eds. P. Briant, Joannès, 309–351. Paris: De Boccard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briant, Pierre. 2009. The empire of Darius III in perspective. In: Alexander the Great: A New History, eds. W. Heckel, L- Trittle, 141–170. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briant, Pierre. 2010. Alexander the Great and his Empire. A short Introduction. Translated by Amélie Kuhrt. Princeton, Oxford: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartledge, Paul. 2004. Alexander the Great. The Hunt for a New Past. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Degen, Julian. 2019. Alexander III., Dareios I. und das speererworbene Land. Journal of Ancient Near Eastern History 6: 53–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Degen, Julian. 2020. Alexander III. zwischen Ost und West. Indigene Traditionen und Herrschaftsinszenierung im makedonischen Weltimperium, phil.-Diss. Innsbruck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demandt, Alexander (Ed.). 1997. Das Ende der Weltreiche. Von den Persern bis zur Sowjetunion. München: Beck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Döpmann, Hans-Dieter. 1981. Die Russische Orthodoxe Kirche in Geschichte und Gegenwart, 2nd revised edition. Berlin: Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, Niall, Empire. 2003. The Rise and Demise of the British World Order and the Lessons for Global Power. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, Niall. 2004. Colossus. The Rise and Fall of the American Empire. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, Robin L. 2010. The first Hellenistic Man. In Cresting a Hellenistic World, eds. A. Erskine, L. Llewellyn-Jones, 1–29. Swansea: Classical Press of Wales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehler, M. 2018. Ideen – Institutionen – Vereinigung – Zusammenhalt. Reinbek/Hamburg: Lau-Verlag

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehler, M. and R. Rollinger. 2014. Imperien und Reiche in der Weltgeschichte—Epochenübergreifende und globalhistorische Vergleiche. In Imperien in der Weltgeschichte. Epochenübergreifende und globalhistorische Vergleiche, 2 Vols., eds. M. Gehler and R. Rollinger, 1–32. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehler, M. and R. Rollinger. eds. 2020. Imperial Turn. Challenges, Problems and Questions. In Empires to be remembered, forthc. Springer: Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilhaus Lennart. 2017. Fragmente der Historiker: Die Alexanderhistoriker (FGrHist 117–153) (Bibliothek der griechischen Literatur 83). Stuttgart: Hiersemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauben, Hans and Alexander Meeus (eds.). 2014. The Age of the Successors and the Creation of the Hellenistic Kingdoms (323–276 B.C.) (Studia Hellenistica 53), Leuven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazopoulos, Miltiades B. 1997. Alexandre en Perse. La Revanche et l’Empire. Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 116: 41–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckel, Waldemar. 2012. The marshals of Alexander’s empire, London, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heisserer Andrew J. 1980. Alexander the Great and the Greeks. The Epigraphical Evidence, Norman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, Timothy. 2008. Alexander in India. Ptolemy as Near Eastern Historiographer. In Macedonian Legacies. Studies in Ancient Macedonian History and Culture in Honor of Eugene N. Borza, eds. T. Howe, J. Reames, 215–233. Claremont, CA: Regina Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, Timothy and Sabine Müller. 2012. Mission Accomplished: Alexander at the Hyphasis. The Ancient History Bulletin 26: 24–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, Paul. 1987. The Rise and Fall oft he Great Powers. Economic change and military conflict from 1500–2000. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kershaw, Ian. 1987. The Hitler Myth: Image and Reality in the Third Reich. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kershaw, Ian. 2011.The End: Hitler’s Germany 1944–45. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kertzer, David I. 2014. The Pope and Mussolini: The Secret History of Pius XI and the Rise of Fascism in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler, Alfred. 1999. Karl V., 1500–1558: Eine Biographie. München: C. H. Beck.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeRider Georges. 2003. Alexandre le Grand. Monnaie, finances et politique. Paris: Presses Univ. de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meuus, Alexander. 2014. The Territorial Ambitions of Ptolemy I. In The Age of the Successors and the Creation of the Hellenistic Dynasties (323–276 B.C.) (Studia Hellenistica 53), eds. H. Hauben, A. Meeus, 263–306. Leuven: Peeters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, Ian/Scheidel, Walter (Eds.). 2009. The Dynamics of Ancient Empires: State Power from Assyria to Byzantium. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muccioli, Federicomaria. 2004. “Il re dell’Asia”: Ideologia e propaganda da Alessandro Magno a Mitridate VI. Simblos 4: 105–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, Sabine. 2019. Alexander der Große. Eroberungen—Politik—Rezeption. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, Sabine. 2014. Alexander, Makedonien und Persien (Frankfurter Kulturwissenschaftliche Beiträge 18). Berlin: Trafo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, Sabine. 2003. Maßnahmen der Herrschaftssicherung gegenüber der makedonischen Opposition bei Alexander dem Großen. Frankfurt a. Main: P. Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Münkler, Herfried. 2005. Imperien. Die Logik der Weltherrschaft—vom Alten Rom bis zu den Vereinigten Staaten. Berlin: Rowohlt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nawotka, Krzysztof. 2010. Alexander the Great. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nawotka, Krzysztof. 2012. Persia, Alexander the Great and the Kingdom of Asia. Klio 94, 2: 348–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nawotka, Krzysztof and Agnieszka Wojciechowska eds. 2016. Alexander the Great and the East: History, Art, Tradition (Philippika 103). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nawotka, Krzysztof, Robert Rollinger, Josef Wiesehöfer and Agnieszka Wojciechowska. 2018. The Historiography of Alexander the Great (Classica et Orientalia 20). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, R. 2016. The Making of Turan: The Fall and Transformation of the Iranian East in Late Antiquity. Journal of Late Antiquity 9 (1): 4–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson Lionel. 1960. The lost histories of Alexander the Great (American Philological Association; Philological monographs of the American Philological Association). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, John F. 2005. The Vatican and Italian Fascism, 1929–32: A Study in Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, Peter J. and Robin Osborne eds. 2003. Greek Historical Inscriptions 404–323 BC. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roisman, Joseph. 1984. Ptolemy and his Rivals in his History of Alexander the Great. The Classical Quarterly 34, 2: 373–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollinger, R. 2020. From Assurbanipal to Cambyses, in: Bruno Jacobs and Robert Rollinger (eds.), Blackwell Companion of the Achaemenid-Persian empire, 2 volumes, Malden—Oxford, 2019, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollinger, Robert and Degen, Julian. 2020. Alexander the Great and the borders of the world, in: Damien Agut-Labordère, Rémy Boucharlat, Francis Joannès, Amelie Kuhrt, Matthew Stolper (eds.), Festschrift Pierre Briant (Persika), Paris 2020, in press

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, Klaus. 1979. Politische Ziele in der Frühen Hellenistischen Geschichtsschreibung. Hermes 107, 4: 460–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheidel, Walter (Ed.) 2009. Rome and China: Comparative Perspectives on Ancient World Empires. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skawa, Richard. 2008. Putin: Russia’s Choice. 2nd edition. Milton Park: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, Diana. 2002. The Roman Alexander. Reading a Cultural Myth. Exeter: University of Exeter Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, Andrew. 1993. Faces of Power: Alexander’s Image and Hellenistic Politics, Berkeley, Los Angeles, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strootman, Rolf. 2014. “Men to whose rapacity neither sea nor mountain sets a limit”—The aims of the Diadochs. In The Age of the Successors and the Creation of the Hellenistic Dynasties (323–276 B.C.) (Studia Hellenistica 53), eds. H. Hauben, A. Meeus, 307–322. Leuven: Peeters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Spek, Robartus J. 2003. Darius III, Alexander the Great and Babylonian Scholarship. In A Persian Perspective: Essays in Memory of Heleen Sancisi-Weerdenburg (Achaemenid History 13), 289–246. Leiden: Nederlands Instituut voor het Nabije Oosten.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiemer, Hans-Ulrich. 2011. Held, Gott oder Tyrann? Alexander der Große im frühen Hellenismus. Hermes 139: 179–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiemer, Hans-Ulrich. 20152. Alexander der Große. München: C.H. Beck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worthington, Ian. 2014. By the Spear. Philip II, Alexander the Great, and the Rise and Fall of the Macedonian Empire (Ancient Warfare and Civilization). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahrnt, Michael. 2016a. Alexander in Kleinasien und die feldzugsbegleitende Propaganda. Hermes 144: 18–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahrnt, Michael. 2016b. Von Siwa bis Babylon: Alexanders Weg vom Gottessohn zum Gott. In Diwan. Untersuchungen zu Geschichte und Kultur des Nahen Ostens und des östlichen Mittelmeerraumes im Altertum. Festschrift für Josef Wiesehöfer zum 65. Geburtstag, eds. C. Binder, H. Börm and A. Luther, 303–323. Duisburg: Wellem.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Rollinger .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rollinger, R., Degen, J., Gehler, M. (2020). Approaching Short-Term Empires in World History, a First Attempt. In: Rollinger, R., Degen, J., Gehler, M. (eds) Short-term Empires in World History. Universal- und kulturhistorische Studien. Studies in Universal and Cultural History. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-29435-9_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-29435-9_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-29434-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-29435-9

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics