Skip to main content

Digital technologies, competitiveness & policies: An integrative city-based policy roadmap for entrepreneurial ecosystems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Managing Innovation in a Global and Digital World

Abstract

This paper offers a conceptual city-based policy roadmap for policy makers who are interested in managing their entrepreneurial ecosystems. The literature lacks specific policies bringing together both technological developments and entrepreneurial activities at city level, even though recent studies point out the role of policies for entrepreneurial ecosystems in order to build entrepreneurial economies. Given the wide opportunities arising from digital technologies for economic growth, policy makers need to identify feasible frameworks to support a digitally competitive entrepreneurial ecosystem. By combining the previous literature on entrepreneurship and digital technologies within a particular urban context, this paper describes a conceptual roadmap as a tool that might help policy makers to plan the future competitiveness of their cities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Albino,V., Berardi, U. and Dangelico R.M., (2015). Smart cities: Definitions, dimensions, performance, and initiatives, Journal of Urban Technology, 22 (1), 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvedalen, J., & Boschma, R. (2017). A critical review of entrepreneurial ecosystems research: Towards a future research agenda. European Planning Studies, 25 (6), 887-903.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amer, M., & Daim, T. U. (2010). Application of technology roadmaps for renewable energy sector. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77 (8), 1355–1370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asheim, B. T., Smith, H. L., & Oughton, C. (2011). Regional innovation systems: theory, empirics and policy. Regional Studies, 45 (7): 875–891.

    Google Scholar 

  • Attaran, M. (2017). The internet of things: Limitless opportunities for business and society. Journal of Strategic Innovation and Sustainability, 12 (1), 10-29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Autio, E., Nambisan, S., Thomas, L. D. W., and Wright, M. (2018). Digital affordances, spatial affordances, and the genesis of entrepreneurial ecosystems, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12:72–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brettel, M., Friederichsen, N., Keller, M., & Rosenberg, M. (2014). How virtualization, decentralization and network building change the manufacturing landscape: An industry 4.0 perspective, International Journal of Mechanical, Industrial Science and Engineering 8 (1): 37-44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caragliu, A., Bo, C. D., & Nijkamp, P. (2011). Smart cities in Europe, Journal of Urban Technology, 18 (2): 65-82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cetindamar, D., Lammers, T., & Sick, N. (2018). Establishing Entrepreneurship Ecosystems Based on Digital Technologies: A Policy Roadmap Approach at the City Level, PICMET conference, 19-23 August, Hawaii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cetindamar, D., & Gunsel, A. (2012). Measuring the creativity of a city: A proposal and an application, European Planning Studies, 20 (8): 1-18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, P. (1992) Regional innovation systems: Competitive regulation in the new Europe, Geoforum 23 (3), 365–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dia, H. (2016, March). Who (or what) is behind the Wheel? The Regulatory Challenges of Driverless Cars, The Conversation. Retrieved January 4, 2019, from https://theconversation.com/who-or-what-is-behind-the-wheel-the-regulatory-challenges-of-driverless-cars-55434

  • Du, W., Pan, S. L., Zhou, N., & Ouyang, T. (2018) From a marketplace of electronics to a digital entrepreneurial ecosystem (DEE): The emergence of a meta‐organization in Zhongguancun, China. Information Systems Journal, 28 (6): 1158-1175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groopman, J., Lieb, R., Owyang, J., & Szymanski, J. (2017). Three Macrotrends Impacting the Journey to 2030, Kaleido Insights, http://www.kaleidoinsights.com/jeremiah/report.pdf

  • Helfat, C. E. & Raubitschek, R. S. (2018). Dynamic and integrative capabilities for profiting from innovation in digital platform-based ecosystems. Research Policy, 47 (8): 1391-1399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellwig, C. (2017). New Perspectives on Cyber Security: The Regulatory Challenge, Global Risk. Retrieved February 6, 2019, from Insights.https://globalriskinsights.com/2017/05/new-perspectives-cyber-security-regulatory-challenge/

  • Henderson, J. V. (1995). Not a funeral but a wake: regional science in perspective. International Regional Science Review, 17 (3): 333-36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, J-Y. (2014). Standardization Roadmapping: Cases of ICT Systems Standards, STI Policy Review, 5 (1): 1-33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollands, R.G. (2008). Will the Real Smart City Please Stand up? City, 12(3): 303-20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoover, E. M. (1975). An Introduction to Regional Economics. 2nd. Ed. NY: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isenberg, D. J. (2011) Introducing the Entrepreneurship Ecosystem: Four Defining Characteristics, Forbes. Retrieved March 1, 2019, from http://www.forbes.com/sites/danisenberg/2011/05/25/introducing-the-entrepreneurship-ecosystemfour-defining-characteristics/

  • Katz, B. & Wagner, J. (2014). The Rise of Innovation Districts: A New Geography of Innovation in America. Washington, D.C. USA: Brookings Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar P. A. (2017) Customer Experience Trends in Digital Transformations, CapGemini. Retrieved December 20, 2018, from https://www.capgemini.com/2017/11/customer-experience-trends-in-digital-transformations/

  • Kriz, A., Molloy, C., Kriz, A., & Sonntag, S. (2016). All Australian regions are not born equal: understanding the regional innovation management sandpit, Technology Innovation Management Review, 6 (6): 11-23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J.H., Phaal, R., & Lee, S-H. (2013). An integrated service-device-technology roadmap for smart city development, Technological Forecasting & Social Change 80: 286–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L. & Deakin, M. (2011). The triple-helix model of smart cities: A neo-evolutionary perspective. Journal of Urban Technology, 18 (2): 53-63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manyika, J., Chui, M., Miremadi, M., Bughin, J., George, K., Willmot, P., & Dewhurst, M. (2017) A Future that Works: Employment, Automation and Productivity, McKinsey Global Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, A. (1898). Principles of Economics. 4th. Ed. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, D. (2017). Top 10 Trends for Digital Transformation in 2018, Forbes. Retrieved January 6, 2019. https://www.forbes.com/sites/danielnewman/2017/09/26/top-10-trends-for-digital-transformation-in-2018/#358985ee293a

  • Oh, D. S. Phillips, F., Park, S., & Lee, E. (2016). Innovation Ecosystems: A Critical Examination. Technovation, 54: 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2013) Innovation-driven Growth in Regions: The Role of Smart Specialisation. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phaal, R., Farrukh, C. J. P., & Probert, D. R. (2010). Roadmapping for strategy and innovation. Cambridge: Institute for Manufacturing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, F. (2006). Social Culture and High Tech Economic Development: The Technopolis Columns. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radosevic, S. & Stancova, K. C. (2018). Internationalising smart specialisation: Assessment and issues in the case of EU new member states, Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 9 (1): 263–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, H. W. (1995). Economies and Diseconomies of Agglomeration. In ed. Giersch, H. Urban Agglomeration and Economic Growth. Kiel: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rissola, G. & Sörvik, J. (2018). Digital Innovation Hubs in Smart Specialisation Strategies Early lessons from European regions. European Commission. ISBN 978-92-79-94829-9

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D. (2008) One economics, many recipes: globalization, institutions, and economic growth. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roger, M., Florida, R., Pogue, M., & Mellander, C. (2015) Creativity, clusters and the competitive advantage of cities, Competitiveness Review, 25 (5): 482-96,

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlaepger, R., Koch, M., & Merkofer, P. (2014). Industry 4.0 - Challenges and Solutions for the Digital Transformation and Use of Exponential Technologies, Deloitte Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sussan, F. & Acs, Z. (2017) The digital entrepreneurial ecosystem, Small Business Economics, 49 (1): 55-73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stam, S. (2015). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and regional policy: A sympathetic critique, European Planning Studies, 23 (9): 1759-69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stam, E. (2018). Enabling Creative Destruction: An Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Approach to Policy, University Of Utrecht, Working Paper Series Number: 18-05.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, B., Pan, S. L., Xianghua, L. & Lihua, H. (2015). The role of IS capabilities in the development of multi-sided platforms: The digital ecosystem strategy of alibaba.com, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 16 (4): 248-280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, T. J. (2018). Profiting from innovation in the digital economy: standards, complementary assets, and business models in the wireless world. Research Policy, 47 (8), 1367-1387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thurik, R., Stam, E., & Audretsch, D. 2013. The rise of the entrepreneurial economy and the future of dynamic capitalism, Technovation, 33 (8-9): 302-310.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN (2017). World Cities Report 2016. UN: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weill, P. & Woerner, S. (2018). Surviving in an increasingly digital ecosystem. MIT Sloan Management Review, 59 (2): 38-38.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Economic Forum (2013). Entrepreneurial Ecosystems around the Globe and Company Growth Dynamics. Davos: World Economic Forum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dilek Cetindamar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cetindamar, D., Lammers, T., Sick, N. (2020). Digital technologies, competitiveness & policies: An integrative city-based policy roadmap for entrepreneurial ecosystems. In: Tiwari, R., Buse, S. (eds) Managing Innovation in a Global and Digital World. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27241-8_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics