Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

The European Social Model under Pressure pp 365–382Cite as

Polarisierung der Parteiensysteme in Zeiten des Populismus

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

The increasingly visible populist surge affects the party systems of Western democracies. It may be expected that populism be accompanied by increasing polarization of party systems. This contribution reviews the possibilities of a comparative measurement of this polarization of party systems. There are either one-dimensional measurements on the left-right scale or multidimensional measurements. In addition, I compare the development of polarization in an international context as well as over time. The dataset encompasses 41 developed and defective democracies, covering their development over the past three mandate periods. In contrast to what could be expected according to the veto player theory, polarization matters as it predicts an increasing stagnation of reforms. The results show that polarization has grown over time in the 41 countries surveyed, particularly among countries with populist tendencies or parties. Moreover, there is a tendency towards increasing polarization in countries with a proportional representation electoral system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  • Allport, Gordon. 1954. The Nature of Prejudice. New York: Doubleday and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armingeon, Klaus, Virginia Wenger, Fiona Wiedemeier, Christian Isler, Laura Knöpfel, David Weisstanner und Sarah Engler. 2018. Comparative Political Data Set 1960-2016. Institute of Political Science, University of Berne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arzheimer, Kai. 2009. Ideologien. In Politische Soziologie, herausgegeben von Viktoria Kaina und Andrea Römmele, 83-100. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, Ryan, Catherine de Vries, Erica Edwards, Lisbet Hooghe, Seth Jolly, Gary Marks, Jonathan Polk, Jan Rovny, Marco Steenbergen und Milada Vachudova. 2015. “Measuring Party Positions in Europe: The Chapel Hill Expert Survey Trend File, 1999–2010.” Party Politics 21 (1): 143-152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benoit, Kenneth, Slava Mikhaylov und Michael Laver. 2009. “Treating Words as Data with Error: Uncertainty in Text Statements of Policy Positions.” American Journal of Political Science 53 (2): 495-513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benoit, Kenneth und Michael Laver. 2006. Party Policy in Modern Democracies. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betz, Hans-Georg. 1994. Radical Right-Wing Populism in Western Europe. Houndsmills: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betz, Hans-Georg. 2002. “Rechtspopulismus in Westeuropa: Aktuelle Entwicklungen und politische Bedeutung.” Österreichische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 31 (3): 251–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyme, Klaus von. 1984. Parteien in westlichen Demokratien, 2. Auflage. München: Piper Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyme, Klaus von 2017. Rechtspopulismus: Ein Element der Neodemokratie? Wiesbaden: Springer Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobbio, Norberto. 1994. Rechts und Links: Gründe und Bedeutungen einer politischen Unterscheidung. Berlin: Wagenbach Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bräuninger, Thomas und Marc Debus. 2008. “Der Einfluss von Koalitionsaussagen, programmatischen Standpunkten und der Bundespolitik auf die Regierungsbildung in den deutschen Ländern.” Politische Vierteljahresschrift 49 (2): 309-338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budge, Ian, David Robertson und Derek Hearl (Hrsg.). 1987. Ideology, Strategy and Party Change: Spatial Analyses of Post-War Election Programmes in 19 Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budge, Ian, Hans-Dieter Klingemann, Andrea Volkens, Judith Bara und Eric Tanenbaum. 2001. Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors and Governments 1945–1998. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castles, Francis G. und Paul Mair. 1984. “Left-Right Political Scales: Some ‘Expert’ Judgement.” European Journal of Political Research 12 (1): 73-88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbetta, Piergiorgio, Nicoletta Cavazza, and Michele Roccato. 2009. “Between Ideology and Social Representations: Four Theses Plus (a New) One on the Relevance and the Meaning of the Political Left and Right.” European Journal of Political Research 48 (5): 622-641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Decker, Frank. 2000. Parteien unter Druck: Der neue Rechtspopulismus in den westlichen Demokratien. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, Anthony. 1968. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen. 1961. Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit: Untersuchungen zu einer Kategorie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft. Berlin: Luchterhand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartleb, Florian. 2004. Rechts- und Linkspopulismus. Eine Fallstudie anhand von Schill-Partei und PDS. Wiesbaden: Springer Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, John D. 1989. “Values and Partisanship in Left‐Right Orientations: Measuring Ideology.” European Journal of Political Research 17 (5): 599-621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber, John und Ronald Inglehart. 1995. “Expert Interpretations of Party Space and Party Locations in 42 Societies.” Party Politics 1 (1): 73-111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, Ronald. 1977. “The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles in Advanced Industrial Society.” Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jäckle, Sebastian und Pascal D. König. 2017. “The Dark Side of the German ‘Welcome Culture’: Investigating the Causes behind Attacks on Refugees in 2015.” West European Politics 40 (2): 223-251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jäckle, Sebastian, Uwe Wagschal und Andreas Kattler. 2018. “Distanz zur Grenze als Indikator für den Erfolg der AfD bei der Bundestagswahl 2017 in Bayern?” Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft 12 (3): 539-566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jost, John T., Christopher M. Federico und Jaime L. Napier. 2009. “Political Ideology: Its Structure, Functions, and Elective Affinities.” Annual Review of Psychology 60 (1): 307-333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirchheimer, Otto. 1965. “Der Wandel des westeuropäischen Parteisystems.” Politische Vierteljahresschrift 6 (1): 20-41

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitschelt, Herbert. 1995. The Radical Right in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klingemann, Hans-Dieter, Ian Budge, Andrea Volkens, Judith Bara und Michael McDonald. 2006. Mapping Policy Preferences II: Estimates for Parties, Electors and Governments in Eastern Europe, the European Union and the OECD, 1990-2003. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knutsen, Oddbjørn. 1995. “Value Orientations, Political Conflicts and Left‐Right Identification: A Comparative Study.” European Journal of Political Research 28 (1): 63-93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, Jan-Erik und Svante O. Ersson. 1991. Politics and Society in Western Europe, 2. Auflage. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laver, Michael und William B. Hunt. 1992. Policy and Party Competition. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lengfeld, Holger. 2017. “Die ‘Alternative für Deutschland’: Eine Partei für Modernisierungsverlierer?” Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 69 (2): 209–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, Arend. 2012. Patterns of Democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, Gary, Lisbet Hooghe, Moira Nelson und Erica Edwards. 2006. “Party Competition and European Integration in the East and West: Different Structure, same Causality.” Comparative Political Studies 39 (2): 155-175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marschall, Stefan. 2011. Nutzer und Nutzen – Der Wahl-O-Mat zur Bundestagswahl 2009. In Das Internet im Wahlkampf, herausgegeben von Eva Schweitzer und Steffen Albrecht, 136-153. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marschall, Stefan. 2011. „Wahlen, Wähler, Wahl-O-Mat.“ Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte 61 (4): 40-46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merkel, Wolfgang, Hans-Jürgen Puhle, Aurel Croissant, Claudia Eicher und Peter Thiery. 2003. Defekte Demokratie. Band 1: Theorie. Wiesbaden: Springer Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudde, Cas. 2004. “The Populist Zeitgeist.” Government and Opposition 39 (4): 541-563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mudde, Cas. 2006. “Politischer Extremismus und Radikalismus in Westeuropa – Typologie und Bestandsaufnahme.” In Gefährdungen der Freiheit. Extremistische Ideologien im Vergleich, herausgegeben von Uwe Backes und Eckhard Jesse, 87–104. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudde, Cas. 2007. Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudde, Cas. 2013. “Three Decades of Populist Radical Right Parties in Western Europe: So What?” European Journal of Political Research 52 (1): 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mudde, Cas. 2014. “Fighting the System? Populist Radical Right Parties and Party System Change.” Party Politics 20 (2): 217–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niedermayer, Oskar 2008. „Das fluide Parteiensystem nach der Bundestagswahl 2005.“ In Die Parteien nach der Bundestagswahl 2005, herausgegeben von Oskar Niedermayer, 9-35. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niedermayer, Oskar. 2009. „Gesellschaftliche und parteipolitische Konfliktlinien.“ In Wähler in Deutschland, herausgegeben von Steffen Kühnel et al., 30-67. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Niedermayer, Oskar. 2013. “Die Analyse von Parteiensystemen.” In Handbuch Parteienforschung, herausgegeben von Oskar Niedermayer, 83-117. Wiesbaden: Springer Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartori, Giovanni. 1976. Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis, Band 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, Fritz W. 1970. Demokratietheorie zwischen Utopie und Anpassung. Konstanz: Universitätsverlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, Fritz W. 2004. Legitimationskonzepte jenseits des Nationalstaats. Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung: Working Paper 2004 (6).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigelman, Lee und Syng Nam Yough. 1978. “Left-Right Polarization in National Party Systems: A Cross-National Analysis.” Comparative Political Studies 11 (3): 355-379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spier, Tim. 2010. Modernisierungsverlierer? Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, Ben. 2008. “The Thin Ideology of Populism.” Journal of Political Ideologies 13 (1): 95-110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Michael und V.M. Herman. 1971. “Party Systems and Government Stability.” American Political Science Review 65 (1): 28-37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorisdottir, Hulda, John Jost, Ido Liviatan und Patrick Shrout. 2007. “Psychological Needs and Values underlying Left-Right Political Orientation: Cross-national evidence from Eastern and Western Europe.” Public Opinion Quarterly 71 (2): 175-203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsebelis, George. 2002. Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volkens, Andrea, Pola Lehmann, Theres Matthieß, Nicolas Merz, Sven Regel und Bernhard Weßels. 2017. The Manifesto Project Dataset - Codebook. Version 2017b. Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, Ulrich, Oliver Christ, Thomas F. Pettigre, Jost Stellmacher und Carina Wolf. 2006. “Prejudice and Minority Proportion: Contact instead of Threat Effects.” Social Psychology Quarterly 69 (4): 380–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagschal, Uwe und Pascal König. 2014. “Alle gleich? Analyse der programmatischen Parteienunterschiede bei Bundestagswahlen auf der Basis des Wahl-O-Mats.” Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen 45 (4): 865-884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warwick, Paul V. 2002. “Toward a Common Dimensionality in West European Policy Spaces.” Party Politics 8 (1): 101-122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westle, Bettina. 2012. “European Identity as a Contrast or an Extension of National Identity? On the Meaning of European Identity.” In Methods, Theories, and Empirical Applications in the Social Sciences, herausgegeben von Samuel Salzborn, Eldad Davidov und Jost Reinecke, 249-254. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zechmeister, Elizabeth. 2006. “What’s Left and Who’s Right? A Q-Method Study of Individual and Contextual Influences of the Meaning of Ideological Labels.” Political Behavior 28 (2): 151-173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universität Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany

    Uwe Wagschal

Authors
  1. Uwe Wagschal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Uwe Wagschal .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Political Science, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark

    Romana Careja

  2. Department of Political Science, University of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland

    Patrick Emmenegger

  3. Department of Political Science, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland

    Nathalie Giger

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wagschal, U. (2020). Polarisierung der Parteiensysteme in Zeiten des Populismus. In: Careja, R., Emmenegger, P., Giger, N. (eds) The European Social Model under Pressure. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27043-8_21

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation