Skip to main content

Preferred customer status, supplier satisfaction and their contingencies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Supply Management Research

Part of the book series: Advanced Studies in Supply Management ((ASSM))

  • 3820 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Over the last decades, firms have increasingly shifted from traditional in‐house value creation strategies to cooperative buyer‐supplier relationships as a source of value creation and competitive advantage. To reap extensive benefits from relationships with suppliers, assuring supplier satisfaction and achieving preferred customer status are key for buyers. In the past, several mechanisms have been identified that influence supplier satisfaction and preferred customer status; however, little is known about the role of major contingency factors such as: product types, dependencies and the power to influence them. The dissertation focuses on the potential of preferred customer status to mitigate the negative effects of buyer dependency, the influences of a buyer’s power usage on supplier satisfaction, and potential perception differences of preferred status in buyer‐supplier relationships. Additionally, the dissertation adds novel methods (i.e. partial least squares point predictions and polynomial regressions with response surface modeling) together with a dyadic perspective to supplier satisfaction and preferred customer research. These methods enable an assessment of the predictive abilities of models, reveal curvilinear interaction effects and discover asymmetric relationships between factors, which would not have been discovered otherwise.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Batenburg, R. (2007): E‐procurement adoption by European firms: A quantitative analysis, in: Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 13, pp. 182–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, R. (2012): How can business buyers attract sellers’ resources?: Empirical evidence for preferred customer treatment from suppliers, in: Industrial Marketing Management, 41, pp. 1249–1258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blois, K. (2010): The legitimacy of power in business‐to‐business relationships, in: Marketing Theory, 10, pp. 161–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, P. N.; Perry, V.G. (2001): Retailer power and supplier welfare: The case of Wal‐Mart, in: Journal of Retailing, 77, pp. 379–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boer, L. de; Holmen, E.; Pop‐Sitar, C. (2003): Purchasing as an organizational design problem: the case of non‐product‐related items and services, in: Management Decision, 41, pp. 911–922.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowersox, D. J.; Closs, D.C. (1996): Logistical Management: The Integrated Supply Chain Process, New York, The McGraw‐Hill Companies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caniato, F.; Golini, R.; Luzzini, D.; Ronchi, S. (2010): Towards full integration: EProcurement implementation stages, in: Benchmarking, 17, pp. 491–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caniëls, M.C.; Gelderman, C.J. (2007): Power and interdependence in buyer‐supplier relationships: A purchasing portfolio approach, in: Industrial Marketing Management, 36, pp. 219–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casciaro, T.; Piskorski, M.J. (2005): Power imbalance, mutual dependence, and constraint absorption: A closer look at resource dependence theory, in: Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, pp. 167–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J.; Zhao, X.; Lewis, M.; Squire, B. (2016a): A Multi‐Method Investigation of Buyer Power and Supplier Motivation to Share Knowledge, in: Production and Operations Management, 25, pp. 417–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y.‐S.; Su, H.‐C.; Ro, Y.K. (2016b): Can I read your mind? Perception gaps in supply chain relationships, in: Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 22, pp. 311–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chopra, S.; Meindl, P. (2007): Supply chain management. Strategy, planning & operation, Upper Saddle River, NJ, Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J.H.; Hatch, N.W. (2006): Relation‐specific capabilities and barriers to knowledge transfers: creating advantage through network relationships, in: Strategic Management Journal, 27, pp. 701–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989): Agency theory: An assessment and review, in: The Academy of Management Review, 14, pp. 57–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, S.C.; Henke, J.W.; Kull, T.J. (2012): The effect of buyer behaviors on preferred customer status and access to supplier technological innovation: An empirical study of supplier perceptions, in: Industrial Marketing Management, 41, pp. 1259–1269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, R.M. (1962): Power‐dependence relations, in: American Sociological Review, 25, pp. 31‐41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R.; Sytch, M. (2007): Dependence asymmetry and joint dependence in interorganizational relationships: Effects of embeddedness on a manufacturer’s performance in procurement relationships, in: Administrative Science Quarterly, 52, pp. 32–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, A.; Johnston, W.J. (2010): The impact of coercive and non‐coercive forms of influence on trust, commitment, and compliance in supply chains, in: Industrial Marketing Management, 39, pp. 519–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huo, B.; Wang, Q.; Zhao, X.; Schuh, S. (2016): Threats and benefits of power discrepancies between organisations: a supply chain perspective, in: International Journal of Production Research, 54, pp. 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hüttinger, L. (2014): Preferential costomer treatment by suppliers – identifying benefits and antecedents, Berlin, Logos Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hüttinger, L.; Schiele, H.; Schröer, D. (2014): Exploring the antecedents of preferential customer treatment by suppliers: A mixed methods approach, in: Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 19, pp. 697–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hüttinger, L.; Schiele, H.; Veldman, J. (2012): The drivers of customer attractiveness, supplier satisfaction and preferred customer status: A literature review, in: Industrial Marketing Management, 41, pp. 1194–1205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, T.; Laforge, R.; Avila, R.; Schwepker, C.; Williams, M. (2007): Professional selling: A trust‐based approach, Mason, Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ireland, R.D.; Webb, J.W. (2007): A multi‐theoretic perspective on trust and power in strategic supply chains, in: Journal of Operations Management, 25, pp. 482–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, D. (1974): Dependency and Vulnerability: An Exchange Approach to the Control of Organizations, in: Administrative Science Quarterly, 19, pp. 45–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S.C.; Pak, B.Y.; Lee, H.G. (2004): Business value of B2B electronic commerce: the critical role of inter‐firm collaboration, in: Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 2, pp. 350–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonidou, L.C.; Talias, M.A.; Leonidou, C.N. (2008): Exercised power as a driver of trust and commitment in cross‐border industrial buyer‐seller relationships, in: Industrial Marketing Management, 37, pp. 92–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, S.S.; Prietula, M.J. (2013): Open collaboration for innovation: principles and performance, in: Organization Science, 25, pp. 1414–1431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liker, J.K.; Choi, T.Y. (2004): Building deep supplier relationships, in: Harvard business review, 82, pp. 104–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mol, M.J. (2003): Purchasing’s strategic relevance, in: Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 9, pp. 43–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosgaard, M.; Riisgaard, H.; Huulgaard, R.D. (2013): Greening non‐product‐related procurement – when policy meets reality, in: Journal of Cleaner Production, 39, pp. 137–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nandeesh, S.; Mylvaganan, R.; Siddappa, S. (2015): A multi‐step recommendation engine for efficient indirect procurement, in: 2015 IEEE International Advance Computing Conference (IACC), 12–13 June 2015, pp. 377–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neef, D. (2001): E‐procurement: From strategy to implementation, Upper Saddle River, NJ, Pentice‐Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nollet, J.; Rebolledo, C.; Popel, V. (2012): Becoming a preferred customer one step at a time, in: Industrial Marketing Management, 41, pp. 1186–1193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyaga, G.N.; Whipple, J.M.; Lynch, D.F. (2010): Examining supply chain relationships: Do buyer and supplier perspectives on collaborative relationships differ?, in: Journal of Operations Management, 28, pp. 101–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oosterhuis, M.; Molleman, E.; van der Vaart, T. (2013): Differences in buyers’ and suppliers’ perceptions of supply chain attributes, in: International Journal of Production Economics, 142, pp. 158–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J.; Salancik, G.R. (2003): The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective, Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehme, J.; Nordigården, D.; Ellström, D.; Chicksand, D. (2016): Power in distribution channels – Supplier assortment strategy for balancing power, in: Industrial Marketing Management, 54, pp. 176–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, E.B. (2001): Benchmarking global strategic management of technology, in: Research‐Technology Management, 44, pp. 25–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sunil Kumar, C.V.; Routroy, S. (2016): Analysis of preferred customer enablers from supplier’s perspective, in: Business Process Management Journal, 22, pp. 1170–1191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiele, H. (2012): Accessing supplier innovation by being their preferred customer, in: Research‐Technology Management, 55, pp. 44–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiele, H.; Calvi, R.; Gibbert, M. (2012): Customer attractiveness, supplier satisfaction and preferred customer status: Introduction, definitions and an overarching framework, in: Industrial Marketing Management, 41, pp. 1178–1185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiele, H.; Veldman, J.; Hüttinger, L. (2011a): Being a preferred customer of leading suppliers and its impact on supplier contribution to innovation, in: Evangelista, P.; McKinnon, A.; Sweeney, E. (eds.): Supply Chain Innovation for Competing in Highly Dynamic Markets: Challenges and Solutions, Hershey PA: Business Science Reference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiele, H.; Veldman, J.; Hüttinger, L. (2011b): Supplier innovativeness and supplier pricing: The role of preferred customer status, in: International Journal of Innovation Management, 15, pp. 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiele, H.; Vos, F.G.S. (2015): Dependency on suppliers as a peril in the acquisition of innovations? The role of buyer attractiveness in mitigating potential negative dependency effects in buyer‐supplier relations, in: Australasian Marketing Journal, 23, pp. 139–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A. (1955): A behavioral model of rational choice, in: The quarterly journal of economics, 69, pp. 99–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sturm, R.E.; Antonakis, J. (2015): Interpersonal Power A Review, Critique, and Research Agenda, in: Journal of Management, 41, pp. 136–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tassabehji, R.; Moorhouse, A. (2008): The changing role of procurement: Developing professional effectiveness, in: Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 14, pp. 55–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villa, F. Da; Panizzollo, R. (1996): Buyer‐subcontractor relationships in the Italian clothing industry: An interpretive framework, in: International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 16, pp. 38–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villena, V.H.; Choi, T.Y.; Revilla, E. (2016): Revisiting interorganizational trust: is more always better or could more be worse?, in: Journal of Management, Vol 45, Issue 2, pp. 752–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villena, V.H.; Revilla, E.; Choi, T.Y. (2011): The dark side of buyer‐supplier relationships: A social capital perspective, in: Journal of Operations Management, 29, pp. 561–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vos, F.G.S.; Schiele, H.; Hüttinger, L. (2016): Supplier Satisfaction: Explanation and Out‐of‐Sample Prediction for Direct and Indirect Procurement, in: Journal of Business Research, 69, pp. 4613–4623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Vos, F.G.S. (2019). Preferred customer status, supplier satisfaction and their contingencies. In: Bode, C., Bogaschewsky, R., Eßig, M., Lasch, R., Stölzle, W. (eds) Supply Management Research. Advanced Studies in Supply Management. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-26954-8_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-26954-8_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-26953-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-26954-8

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics