Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
SpringerLink
Log in

Ein Fallbeispiel Integrierter Forschung: Das Projekt poliTE – Soziale Angemessenheit für Assistenzsysteme

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Das geteilte Ganze

Zusammenfassung

Lernfähige persönliche Assistenten und (soziale) Roboter finden in immer mehr Lebensbereichen, auch jenseits etwa der Pflege und industriellen Fertigung, Anwendung und interagieren auf unterschiedliche Weise mit Menschen. In dieser Interaktion folgen diese technischen Objekte in der Regel ihren eigenen Prozesslogiken, denen Menschen sich, auch teilweise im Sinne des Perfektionsparadoxons (vgl. Lindemann in diesem Band), anpassen. Eine Idee im Designprozess von Technikentwicklung wäre, menschliche Kulturtechniken zur Bewältigung von sozial geteilten Handlungszusammenhängen – wie zum Beispiel Normen und Konventionen angemessenen Verhaltens – zu berücksichtigen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Arndt, Horst, Richard W. Janney. 1985: Politeness revisited: Cross-Modal Supportive Strategies. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 23: 281–300. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1985.23.1-4.281

  • Arndt, Horst, Richard W. Janney. 1991: Verbal, prosodic, and kinesic emotive contrasts in speech. Journal of Pragmatics, 15: 521–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(91)90110-j

  • Axelrod, Robert. 1973: Schema Theory: An Information Processing Model of Perception and Cognition. American Political Science Review, 67: 1248–1266. https://doi.org/10.2307/1956546

  • Bartlett, Frederic C. 1932: Remembering: An experimental and social study. Cambridge: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, Sebastian, Hanns Hatt, Axel Ockenfels. 2017: Exposure to Hedione Increases Reciprocity in Humans. Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 11: 79. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00079

  • Bolbecker, Amanda R., S. Lee Hong, Jerillyn S. Kent, Mallory J. Klaunig, Brian F. O’Donnell, William P. Hetrick. 2011: Postural control in bipolar disorder: Increased sway area and decreased dynamical complexity. PloS one, 6, e19824. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019824

  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 1982: Die feinen Unterschiede. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 2005: Language and symbolic power (Reprint Ausg.). Cambridge u.a.: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bousfield, Derek, Miriam A. Locher. 2008: Impoliteness in language: Studies on its interplay with power in theory and practice (Bd. 21). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, Gordon, Matthias Scheutz. 2017: Strategies and mechanisms to enable dialogue agents to respond appropriately to indirect speech acts. Human-robot collaboration and human assistance for an improved quality of life, 323–328. Piscataway: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/roman.2017.8172321

  • Brown, Penelope, Stephen C. Levinson. 1978: Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In Questions and politeness, ed. Esther N Goody, 56–289. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Penelope, Stephen C. Levinson. 1987 [17. Auflage 2008]: Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use. Cambridge: Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Penelope, Stephen C. Levinson. 2011: Politeness: Some universals in language usage (21. pr Ausg., Bd. 4). Cambridge: Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busse, Dietrich. 2012: Frame-Semantik: Ein Kompendium. Berlin and Boston: de Gruyter. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110269451. Letzter Zugriff: 21.12.2019.

  • Campbell, Sarah. 2015: Baby, Where Did You Get Those Eyes? IEEE Pulse talks with Mark Sagar about the new face of artificial intelligence. IEEE pulse, 6: 4–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/mpul.2015.2476763

  • Cashdan, Elizabeth. 1998: Smiles, Speech, and Body Posture: How Women and Men Display Sociometric Status and Power. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 22: 209–228. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1022967721884

  • Christie, Chris. 2005: Editorial. Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture, 1: 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.1

  • Cooper, Richard P., Tim Shallice. 2006: Hierarchical schemas and goals in the control of sequential behavior. Psychological Review 113 (4), 113: 887–916. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.113.4.887

  • Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, Margret Selting. 2018: Interactional linguistics: Studying language in social interaction. Cambridge and New York, NY and Melbourne and Singapore: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, Christian, Moritz Sudhof, Dan Jurafsky, Jure Leskovec, Christopher Potts. 2013: A Computational Approach to Politeness with Application to Social Factors. Proceedings of ACL.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, Paul. 1997: Culture and Cognition. Annual Review of Sociology 23, 23: 263–287. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.23.1.263

  • Dynel, Marta. 2015: The landscape of impoliteness research. Journal of Politeness Research, 11: 329–354. https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2015-0013

  • Ekman, Paul, Wallace V. Friesen. 1969: The Repertoire of Nonverbal Behaviour. Semiotica 1(1): 49–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyereisen, Pierre. 1994: The behavioural cues of familiarity during social interactions among human adults: A review of the literature and some observations in normal and demented elderly subjects. Behavioural Processes 33 (1–2), 33: 189–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-6357(94)90066-3

  • Fraser, Bruce. 1999: Whither Politeness? International Symposium on Linguistic Politeness, Chulalongkorn University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gethmann, Carl F. 2015: Disciplinary – Interdisciplinary – Transdisciplinary: A Conceptual Analysis. In Interdisciplinary Research and Trans-disciplinary Validity, ed. Carl F. Gethmann et al., 39–60. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, James J. 1982: Wahrnehmung und Umwelt: Der ökologische Ansatz in der visuellen Wahrnehmung. München: Urban & Schwarzenberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, Erving. 1974: Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience (Bd. CN 372). New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gransche, Bruno, Carl F. Gethmann. 2018: Gutachten: Digitalisate zwischen Erklären und Verstehen. http://www.abida.de/sites/default/files/ABIDA%20Gutachten%20Digitalisate.pdf. Zuletzt aufgerufen: 21.12.2019.

  • Hariman, Robert. 1992: Decorum, power, and the courtly style. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 78: 149–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335639209383987

  • Hegenbart, Andreas. 2019: Facetten von Affordanzen gebauter Umwelten. Wiesbaden: Springer Nature.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, Gert J. 2015: Culture’s causes: The next challenge. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 22: 545–569. https://doi.org/10.1108/ccm-03-2015-0040

  • Ide, Sachiko. 1989: Formal forms and discernment: Two neglected aspects of universals of linguistic politeness. Multilingua – Journal of Cross-Cultural and Interlanguage Communication, 8: 223–248. https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.1989.8.2-3.223

  • Insafutdinov, Eldar, Leonid Pishchulin, Bjoern Andres, Mykhaylo Andriluka, Bernt Schiele. 2016: DeeperCut: A Deeper, Stronger, and Faster Multi-Person Pose Estimation Model. http://arxiv.org/pdf/1605.03170v3. Letzter Zugriff: 21.12.2019.

  • Kádár, Dániel Z., Michael Haugh. 2013: Understanding politeness (1. publ Ausg.). Cambridge u.a.: Cambridge Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keating, Caroline F. 1981: Culture and the perception of social dominance from facial expression. Journal of personality and social psychology, 40: 615–626. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.40.4.615

  • Keating, Caroline F., Allan Mazur, Marshall H. Segall. 1977: Facial Gestures Which Influence the Perception of Status. Sociometry 40 (4), 40: 374–378. https://doi.org/10.2307/3033487

  • Koffka, Kurt. 1962: Principles of Gestalt-Psychology. London: Routledge & Kegan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, Robin T. 1973: The logic of politeness: Or, minding your p’s and q’s. In Papers from the 9th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, ed. Claudia Corum, T. Cedric Smith-Stark, Ann Weiser, 292–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leech, Geoffrey N. 1983: Principles of pragmatics (1. publ Ausg., Bd. 30). London u.a.: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leongómez, Juan D., Viktoria R. Mileva, Anthony C. Little, S. Craig Roberts. 2017: Perceived differences in social status between speaker and listener affect the speaker’s vocal characteristics. PloS one, 12, e0179407. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179407

  • Lewin, Kurt. 1926: Vorsatz, Wille und Bedürfnis: Mit Vorbemerkungen über die psychischen Kräfte und Energien und die Struktur der Seele. Berlin / Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindner, Felix. 2015: Soziale Roboter und soziale Räume: Eine Affordanz-basierte Konzeption zum rücksichtsvollen Handeln. Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locher, Miriam A., Richard J. Watts. 2005: Politeness Theory and Relational Work. Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture, 1: 9–33. https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.9

  • Luhmann, Niklas. 2001: Soziale Systeme. Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie (4. Auflage Ausg.). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, Jean-François. 1994: Das postmoderne Wissen. Ein Bericht. Wien: Passagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, Ross, Amin Atrash, Maja J. Matarić. 2013: Automated Proxemic Feature Extraction and Behavior Recognition: Applications in Human-Robot Interaction. International Journal of Social Robotics 5 (3), 5: 367–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-013-0189-8

  • Miller et al. 2014: U.S. Patentnr. 8,825,584 B1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller et al. 2015: U.S. Patentnr. 9,053,421 B2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Christopher A., Caroline C. Hayes. 2011: Human-computer etiquette. Cultural expectations and the design implications they place on computers and technology. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Christopher A., Sonja Schmer-Galunder, Jeffrey M. Rye. 2010: Politeness in Social Networks: Using Verbal Behaviours to Asses Socially-Accorded Regard. IEEE International Conference on Social Computing / IEEE International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk und Trust. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/socialcom.2010.85

  • Miller, Christopher A., Peggy Wu, Harry B. Funk. 2008: A Computational Approach to Etiquette: Operationalizing Brown and Levinson’s Politeness Model. IEEE Intelligent Systems 23 (4): 28–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Christopher A., Peggy Wu, Harry B. Funk, Hannes Vilhjalmsson, Lewis Johnson. 2007: A Computational Approach to Etiquette and Politeness: An »Etiquette Engine™« for Cultural Interaction Training. Proceedings of the 2007 Conference on Behavior Representation in Modelling and Simulation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Christopher, Peggy Wu, Harry B. Funk, Peggy Wilson, Lewis Johnson. 2006: A Computational Approach to Etiquette and Politeness: Initial Test Cases. Proceedings of 2006 BRIMS Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quaquebeke, Niels van, Tilman Eckloff. 2010: Defining respectful Leadership: What It Is, How It Can Be Measured, and Another Glimpse at What It Is Related to. Journal of Business Ethics: 343–358. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0087-z

  • Rumelhart, David E. 1980: Schemata: The Building Blocks of Cognition. In Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension. Perspectives from Cognitive Psychology, Linguistics, Artificial Intelligence and Education, ed. Rand J. Spiro, Bertram C. Bruce, William Brewer, 33–59. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schank, Roger C., Robert P. Abelson. 1977: Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheflen, Albert E. 2016: The Significance of Posture in Communication Systems †. Psychiatry, 27: 316–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1964.11023403

  • Schegloff, Emanuel A., Gail Jefferson, Harvey Sacks. 1977: The Preference for Self-Correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation. Language 53(2), 53: 361–382. https://doi.org/10.2307/413107

  • Schütz, Alfred. 1972: Gesammelte Aufsätze II. Studien zur soziologischen Theorie. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scollon, Ron, Suzanne W. Scollon. 2001: Intercultural Communication. Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer-Oatey, Helen. 2000: Culturally speaking: Managing rapport through talk across cultures (1. publ Ausg.). London u.a.: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, Claudia, Roy G. D’Andrade. 1992: Human motives and cultural models. Cambridge: Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terkourafi, Marina. 2005: Beyond the micro-level in politeness research. Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture, 1: 237–262. https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.2.237

  • Torta, Elena, Raymond H. Cuijpers, James F. Juola. 2013: Design of a Parametric Model of Personal Space for Robotic Social Navigation. International Journal of Social Robotics 5 (3), 5: 357–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-013-0188-9

  • Vinciarelli, Alessandro, Maja Pantic, Hervé Bourlard. 2009: Social signal processing: Survey of an emerging domain. Image and Vision Computing, 27: 1743–1759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imavis.2008.11.007

  • Watts, Richard J. 2003: Politeness. Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615184. Letzter Zugriff: 21.12.2019.

  • Ziem, Alexander. 2008: Frames und sprachliches Wissen: Kognitive Aspekte der semantischen Kompetenz (Bd. 2). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co.KG.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Forschungskolleg FoKoS, Universität Siegen, Siegen, Deutschland

    Jacqueline Bellon & Sebastian Nähr-Wagener

  2. Philosophie & Foresight, Forschungskolleg FoKoS, Universität Siegen, Siegen, Deutschland

    Bruno Gransche

Authors
  1. Jacqueline Bellon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bruno Gransche
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sebastian Nähr-Wagener
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacqueline Bellon .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Philosophie & Foresight, Forschungskolleg FoKoS, Universität Siegen, Siegen, Germany

    Bruno Gransche

  2. Anthropologie und Ethik für Gesundheitsberufe, Evangelische Hochschule Nürnberg, Nürnberg, Germany

    Arne Manzeschke

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bellon, J., Gransche, B., Nähr-Wagener, S. (2020). Ein Fallbeispiel Integrierter Forschung: Das Projekt poliTE – Soziale Angemessenheit für Assistenzsysteme. In: Gransche, B., Manzeschke, A. (eds) Das geteilte Ganze. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-26342-3_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-26342-3_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-26341-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-26342-3

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation