Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Mobilität in Zeiten der Veränderung pp 31–49Cite as

Transformationspfade in der Automobilindustrie im Zuge der Digitalisierung

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Zusammenfassung

Als Digitalisierung werden technologische Veränderungen bezeichnet, die eine „umfassende Vernetzung aller Bereiche von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft“ ermöglichen (BMWi, 2015: 3). Weil sie vor keiner Branche haltmacht, gilt sie als eine der weitreichendsten Veränderungen unserer Zeit (Baker, 2015). Sie ermöglicht und treibt Verbesserungen oder inkrementelle Veränderungen einzelner Prozesse entlang der Wertschöpfungskette (BMWi, 2015), einzelner Leistungen, vor allem individualisierter und integrierter Kundenlösungen und einzelner Geschäftsmodelle (Köhler/Wollschläger, 2014; Kane et al., 2016).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Aaker, D. A. (2013): Strategic Market Management. 10th ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Son.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abdelkafi, N./Makhotin, S./Posselt, T. (2013): Business model innovations for electric mobility. What can be learned from existing business model patterns? In: International Journal of Innovation Management, 17(1): 1-41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambrosini, V./Bowman, C. (2009): What are dynamic capabilities and are they a useful construct in strategic management? In: International Journal of Management Reviews, 11(1): 29-49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, P./Tushman, M. L. (1990): Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: A cyclical model of technological change. In: Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(4): 604-633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreeva, T./Ritala, P. (2016): What are the source of capabilities dynamism? In: Baltic Journal of Management, 11(3): 238-259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arend, R. J./Bromiley, P. (2009): Assessing the dynamic capability view: Spare change, everyone? In: Strategic Organization, 7: 75-90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, M. (2015): Digital transformation: Strategy | Technology | Digital | Operations. 4. ed. Buckingham, UK: Buckingham Business Monographs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. B. (1991): Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. In: Journal of Management, 17(1): 99-120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basil, D. C./Cook, C. W. (1974): The management of change. London: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benner, M. J./Tushman, L. M. (2003): Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited. In: The Academy of Management Review, 28(2): 238-256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BMWi (2015): Industrie 4.0 und Digitale Wirtschaft – Impulse für Wachstum, Beschäftigung und Innovation. Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie. Öffentlichkeitsarbeit. Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K./Lennox, R. (1991): Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective. In: Psychological Bulletin, 110(2): 305-314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bucherer, E./Eisert, U./Gassmann, O. (2012): Towards systematic business model innovation: Lessons from product innovation management. In: Creativity and Innovation Management, 21(2): 183-198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. In Marcoulides, G. A. (Ed.), Modern methods for business research, London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 295-336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collis, D. J. (1994): How Valuable are Organizational Capabilities? In: Strategic Management Journal, 15(S1): 143-152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danneels, E. (2002): The Dynamics of product innovation and firm competences, In: Strategic Management Journal 23(12): 1095-1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danneels, E. (2015): Survey Measures of First- and Second-Order Competences, In: Strategic Management Journal, 37(10): 2174–2188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. P./Eisenhardt, K. M./Bingham, C. B. (2009): Optimal structure, market dynamism, and the strategy of simple rules. In: Administrative Science Quarterly, 54: 413-452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamantopoulos, A./Sarstedt, M./Fuchs, C./Wilczynski, P./Kaiser, S. (2012): Guidelines for choosing between multi-item and single-item scales for construct measurement: a predictive validity perspective, In: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40: 434-449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamantopoulos, A./Riefler, P. (2008): Formative Indikatoren: Einige Anmerkungen zu ihrer Art, Validität und Multikollinearität. In: Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft (ZfB), 78(11): 1183–1196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterby-Smith, M./Prieto, I. M. (2008): Dynamic Capabilities and Knowledge Management: an Integrative Role for Learning? In: British Journal of Management, 19(3): 235-249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterby-Smith, M./Lyles, M./Peteraf, M. (2009): Dynamic capabilities: Current debates and future directions. In: British Journal of Management, 20: 1-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M./Martin, J. A. (2000): Dynamic capabilities: What are they? In: Strategic Management Journal, 21(10/11): 1105-1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foss, N./Saebi, T. (2017): Fifteen years of research on business model innovation: How far have we come, and where should we go? In: Journal of Management, 43(1): 200-227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R. M./Verona G. (2015): What’s holding back empirical research into organizational capabilities? Remedies for common problems, In: Strategic Organization, 13(1): 61-74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamidian, K./Kraijo, C. (2013): Digitalisierung: Status Quo. In: Keuper, F./Hamidian, K./Verwaayen, E./Kalinowski, T./Kraijo, C. (Hrsg.): Digitalisierung und Innovation. Planung – Entstehung – Entwicklungsperspektiven. Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helfat, C. E./Raubitschek, R. (2000): Product sequencing: Co-evolution of knowledge, capabilities and products. In: Strategic Management Journal, 21(10/11): 961-979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helfat, C./Winter, S. G. (2011): Untangling dynamic und operational capabilities: Strategy for the (n)ever changing world. In: Strategic Management Journal, 32(11): 1243-1250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henseler, J./Ringle, C. M./Sinkovics, R. R. (2009): The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing, In: Advances in International Marketing, 20: 277-320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobides, M. G./MacDuffie, J. P. (2013): How to drive value your way. In: Harvard Business Review, 91(7): 92-100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobides, M. G./Knudsen, T./Augier, M. (2006): Benefiting from innovation: Value creation, value appropriation and the role of industry architectures. In: Research Policy, 35: 1200-1221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, G. C./Palmer, D./Phillips, A. N./Kiron, D./Buckley, N. (2016): Aligning the Organization for its digital future. Findings from the 2016 Digital Business Global Executive Study and Research Project (= MIT Sloan Management Review Research Report in collaboration with Deloitte University Press). MIT: Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karimi, J./Walter, Z. (2015): The Role of Dynamic Capabilities in Responding to Digital Disruption: A Factor-Based Study of the Newspaper Industry, In: Journal of Management Information Systems, 32(1): 39-81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerin, R. A./Varadarajan, P. R./Peterson, R. A. (1992): First mover advantage: A synthesis, conceptual framework, and research propositions. In: Journal of Marketing, 56(4): 33-52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, K./Timm, N. (2006): Univariate and Multivariate General Linear Models: Theory and Applications with SAS, Second Edition, London/New York: Chapman and Hall/CRC.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, B. H. (1977): Dynamic Ecomomics. Cambridge (MA): Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, J. S./Rosenberg, N. (1986): An overview of innovation, In: Landau, R./Rosenberg, N. (eds): The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth, Washington: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Köhler, T. R./Wollschläger, D. (2014): Die digitale Transformation des Automobils 5 Megatrends verändern die Branche. Pattersen: Media-Manufaktur GmbH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krosnick, J. A./Fabrigar L.R (1997): Designing rating scales for effective measurement in surveys. In: Lyberg, L/Biemer, P./Collins, M./deLeeuw, E./Dippo, C./Schwarz, N./Trewin, D. (Ed.): Survey Measurement and Process Quality, New York: Wiley InterScience, 141-164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liesenkötter, B./Schewe, G. (2013): Der Sailing-Ship-Effekt in der Automobilwirtschaft. In: Proff, H./Pascha, W./Schönharting, J./Schramm, D. (Hrsg.): Schritte in die Mobilität. Technische und betriebswirtschaftliche Aspekte. Wiesbaden: SpringerGabler, 273-286.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Linz, C./Müller-Stewens, G./Zimmermann, A. (2017): Radical Business Model Transformation: Gaining the Competitive Edge in a Disruptive World. London: Kogan Page Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohmöller, J. B. (1989): Latent variable path modeling with partial least squares. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lusch, R./Nambisan, R. (2015): Service Innovation: A Service-Dominant Logic Perspective. In: MIS Quarterly 39(1): 155-175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, R. G./MacMillan, I. C./Venkatraman, S. (1995): Defining and developing competence. A strategic process paradigm. In: Strategic Management Journal, 16(4): 251-275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miliken, J. F. (1987): Three types of perceived uncertainty. About environment: State, effect, and response uncertainty, In: Academy of Management Review, 12(1): 133-143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miozzo, M./Yamin, M. (2012): Institutional and sectoral determinants of headquarters-subsidiary relationships: A study of UK service multinationals in China, Korea, Brazil and Argentina. In: Long Range Planning, 45(1): 16-40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, D./Coles, C. (2003): The ultimate competitive advantage of continuing business model innovation. In: Journal of Business Strategy, 24(5): 15-22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadler, D. A./Tushman, M. L. (1989): Organizational frame bending: Principles for managing reorientation, In: Academy of Management Executive, 3(3): 194-204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peteraf, M. A./Di Stefano, G./Verona, G. (2013): The elephant in the room of dynamic capabilities: Bringing two diverging conversations together. In: Strategic Management Journal, 34(12): 1389-1410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E./Heppelmann, J. E. (2014): How smart, connected products are transforming competition. In: Harvard Business Review, 92(11): 64-88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proff, H. (2005): A “model of resources refinement“ for deriving competence-based competitive advantage and strategies. In: Sanchez, R/Heene, A. (Ed.): Resources, stakeholers, and renewal, Amsterdam: Pergamon Press, 55-80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proff, H./Fojcik, T. M. (2016): Die Bedeutung von Dynamic Capabilities bei langfristigen, diskontinuierlichen technologischen Veränderungen. Paper beim SLM/CBM-Symposium zum organisationalen Wandel und Lernen aus kompetenzbasierter Perspektive, September 2016: Wien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, D. L. (2016): The digital transformation playbook. Rethink your business for the digital age. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J-M./Sharapov, D. (2015): When the Leader Follows: Avoiding Dethronement through Imitation. In: Academy of Management Journal, 58(3): 658-679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothaermel, F. T./Deeds, D. L. (2004). Exploration and exploitation alliances in biotechnology: A system of new product development. In: Strategic Management Journal, 25(3): 201-221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rumelt, R. P. (1984): Towards a strategic theory of the firm. In: Lamb, R. B. (Ed.): Competitive strategic management. Eaglewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 556-570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sackett, P. R./Larson, J. R. (1990): Research strategies and tactics in I/O psychology. In: Dunnette, M. D./Ackerman, P. L./Hough, L. M./Triandis, H. C. (Ed.): Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (1). Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press, 419–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, R. (1997): Managing articulated knowledge in competence-based competition. In: Sanchez, R./Heene, A. (Ed.): Strategic learning and knowledge management. Chichester: Wiley, 163-187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seltin, N./Keeves, J. P. (1994): Path analysis with latent variables. In: Husen, T./Postlethwaite, T. (Ed.): The international encyclopedia of education, Second Edition, Oxford: Elsevier Science, 4352–4359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stähler, P. (2002): Geschäftsmodelle in der digitalen Ökonomie. 2. Auflage, Köln: Josef EUL Verlag. Taylor, A./Helfat, C. E. (2009): Organizational Linkages for Surviving Technological Change: Complementary Assets, Middle Management, and Ambidexterity. In: Organization Science, 20(4): 718-739.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. (2007): Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. In: Strategic Management Journal, 28 (13): 1319-1350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. (2010): Business models, business strategy and innovation. In: Long Range Planning, 43(2/3): 172-194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. (2012): Dynamic Capabilities: Routines versus Entrepreneurial Action. In: Journal of Management Studies, 49(8): 1395-1401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. (2014): A dynamic capabilities-based entrepreneurial theory of the multinational enterprise. In: Journal of International Business Studies, 45(1): 8-37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. (2018a): Business models and dynamic capabilities. In: Long Range Planning 51(1): 40-49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. (2018b): Dynamic capabilities as (workable) management systems theory, in: Journal of Management & Organization, 24(3): 359-368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J./Pisano, G./Shuen, A. (1997): Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. In: Strategic Management Journal, 18(7): 509-533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J./Peteraf, M./Leih, S. (2016): Dynamic capabilities and organizational agility. In: California Management Review, 58(4): 13-35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Utterback, J. M./Abernathy, W. J. (1975): A Dynamic Model of Product and Process Innovation. In: Omega 3(6): 639-656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L./Lusch, R. F. (2008): Service-dominant logic continuing the evolution. In: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1): 1-10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiber, R./Mühlhauser, D. (2010): Strukturgleichungsmodellierung Eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung in die Kausalanalyse mit Hilfe von AMOS, SmartPLS und SPSS, 2. erweiterte Auflage, Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, S. G. (2003): Understanding dynamic capabilities. In: Strategic Management Journal, 24(10): 991-995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, Y./Lyytinen, K. J./Boland, R. J., Jr./Berente, N. (2010): The next wave of digital innovation: Opportunities and challenges: A report on the research workshop ‘digital challenges in innovation research.’ Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1622170

  • Zollo, M./Winter, S. G. (2002): Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. In: Organization Science, 13(3): 339-351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universität Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Deutschland

    F. Knobbe, Heike Proff, G. Szybisty & S. Sommer

Authors
  1. F. Knobbe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Heike Proff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. G. Szybisty
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. S. Sommer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Knobbe .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Universität Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany

    Heike Proff

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Knobbe, F., Proff, H., Szybisty, G., Sommer, S. (2019). Transformationspfade in der Automobilindustrie im Zuge der Digitalisierung. In: Proff, H. (eds) Mobilität in Zeiten der Veränderung . Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-26107-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-26107-8_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-26106-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-26107-8

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation