Skip to main content

Image Quality Assessments

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Bildverarbeitung für die Medizin 2019

Zusammenfassung

Deep learning with Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) requires large number of training and test data sets which involves usually time-consuming visual inspection of medical image data. Recently, crowdsourcing methods have been proposed to gain such large training sets from untrained observers. In this paper, we propose to establish a lightweight method within the daily routine of radiologists in order to collect simple image quality annotations on a large scale. In multiple diagnostic centres, we analyse the acceptance rate of the radiologists and whether a substantial total number of professional annotations can be acquired to be used for deep learning later. Using a simple control panel with three buttons, 6 radiologists in 5 imaging centres assessed the image quality within their daily routine. Altogether, 1527 DICOM image studies (MR, CT, and X-ray) have been subjectively assessed in the first 70 days which demonstrates that a considerable number of training data sets can be collected with such a method in short time. The acceptance rate of the radiologists indicates that more data sets could be acquired if corresponding incentives are introduced as discussed in the paper. Since the proposed method is incorporated in the daily routine of radiologists, it can be easily scaled to even more number of professional observers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Gardner EA, Ellis JH, Hyde RJ, et al. Detection of degradation of magnetic resonance (MR) images: comparison of an automated MR image-quality analysis system with trained human observers. Acad Radiol. 1995;2(4):277–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rao TVN, Govardhan A. Assessment of diverse quality metrics for medical images including mammography. Int J Comput Appl. 2013;83(4).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Esteban O, Birman D, Schaer M, et al. MRIQC: Advancing the automatic prediction of image quality in MRI from unseen sites. PloS one. 2017;12(9):e0184661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Esses SJ, Lu X, Zhao T, et al. Automated image quality evaluation of T2-weighted liver MRI utilizing deep learning architecture. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018;47(3):723–728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Keshavan A, Yeatman J, Rokem A. Combining citizen science and deep learning to amplify expertise in neuroimaging. bioRxiv. 2018; p. 363382.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Esteban O, Blair RW, Nielson DM, et al. Crowdsourced MRI quality metrics and expert quality annotations for training of humans and machines. bioRxiv. 2018; p. 420–984.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Medha Juneja .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Juneja, M. et al. (2019). Image Quality Assessments. In: Handels, H., Deserno, T., Maier, A., Maier-Hein, K., Palm, C., Tolxdorff, T. (eds) Bildverarbeitung für die Medizin 2019. Informatik aktuell. Springer Vieweg, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-25326-4_50

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics