Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Rationales Antwortverhalten als Ursache messbezogener Mode-Effekte im Zuge der Erfassung sensitiver Merkmale

Entwicklung eines theoretischen Bezugsrahmens

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Qualitätssicherung sozialwissenschaftlicher Erhebungsinstrumente

Zusammenfassung

Der Beitrag versucht auf Grundlage einer um modevariante Nutzen- und Kostenfaktoren angereicherten Fassung der Theorie des rationalen Befragtenverhaltens das Auftreten messbezogener Mode-Effekte im Rahmen der Erfassung sensitiver Merkmale zu erklären. Konkret liegt dem Ansatz die Annahme zugrunde, dass Survey Modes spezifische soziale Befragungssettings erzeugen, die über situative Nutzen- und Kostenfaktoren wiederum Einfluss auf die Entscheidung der Befragten nehmen, sensitive Informationen wahrheitsgemäß zu berichten, eine Falschangabe zu machen oder die Antwort zu verweigern. Hierbei spielen insbesondere jene Faktoren eine Rolle, die Art und Ausmaß der sozialer Interaktion im Rahmen der Beantwortung der Fragen determinieren. Über die entsprechende Ausgestaltung der modespezifischen Befragungssettings lassen sich unter Anwendung eines Kosten-Nutzen-Schemas schließlich empirisch prüfbare Hypothesen über systematische Differenzen in den Item Nonresponse-Raten und Messfehlervarianzen zwischen den Survey Modes ableiten. Diese dienen wiederum als Basis für die Vorhersage von Ausmaß und Richtung des messbezogenen Mode-Effekts auf Aggregatebene der zu vergleichenden Surveys.Zur Veranschaulichung werden die Ausführungen am Beispiel der Messung sexualdeliktspezifischer Viktimisierungserfahrungen konkretisiert.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Auty, K. M., Farrington, D. P. & Coid, J. W. (2015). The validity of self-reported convictions in a community sample: findings from the Cambridge study in delinquent development. European Journal of Criminology, 12, 562–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axinn, W. G. (1991). The influence on interviewer sex on responses to sensitive questions in Nepal. Social Science Research, 20, 303–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bader, F., Bauer, J., Kroher, M. & Riordan, P. (2016). Privacy concerns in responses to sensitive questions. A survey experiment on the influence of numeric codes on unit nonresponse, item nonresponse, and misreporting. methods, data, analyses,10, 47–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baier, H. & Schulz, S. (2014). A free audio-CASI module for Lime Survey. Survey Methods: Insights from the Field. Online unter: https://surveyinsights.org/?p=5889 (31.05.2018).

  • Beatty, P. & Herrmann, D. (2002). To answer or not to answer: decision processes related to survey item nonresponse. In R. M. Groves, D. A. Dillman, J. L. Eltinge & R. J. A. Little (Hrsg.), Survey Nonresponse (S. 71–86). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, R. (2006). Selective response to questions on delinquency. Quality & Quantity, 40, 483–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, R. & Günther, R. (2004). Selektives Antwortverhalten bei Fragen zum delinquenten Handeln: Eine empirische Studie über die Wirksamkeit der,sealed envelope techniqueʻ bei selbst berichteter Delinquenz mit Daten des ALLBUS 2000. ZUMA Nachrichten, 54, 39–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, K., Fahmy, E. & Gordon, D. (2016). Quantitative conversations: the importance of developing rapport in standardized interviewing. Quality & Quantity, 50, 193–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bethlehem, J. & Biffignandi, S. (2012). Handbook of Web Surveys. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biemer, P. P. (2010). Total survey error. Design, implementation, and evaluation. Public Opinion Quarterly, 74, 817–848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biemer, P. P., de Leeuw, E., Eckman, S., Edwards, B., Kreuter, F., Lyberg, L. E., Tucker, N. C. & West, B. T. (Hrsg.) (2017). Total Survey Error in Practice. Wiley: Hoboken.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowling (2005). Mode of questionnaire administration can have serious effects on data quality. Journal of Public Health 27, 281–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, N. & Gautschi, T. (2011). Rational-Choice-Theorie. Weinheim: Juventa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brauer, J. R. & Tittle, C. R. (2017). When crime is not an option: inspecting the moral filtering of criminal action alternatives. Justice Quarterly, 34, 818–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, R. & Raja, S. (1999). Secondary victimization of rape victims: insights from mental health professionals who treat survivors of violence. Violence & Victims, 14, 261–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantor, D. & Lynch, J. P. (2000). Self-report surveys as measures of crime and criminal victimization. Criminal Justice, 4, 85‒138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capraro, V. (2013). A model of human cooperation in social dilemmas. PLOS ONE, 8, e72427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carley-Baxter, L. (2008). Respondent-interviewer rapport. In P. J. Lavrakas (Hrsg.), Encyclopedia of Survey Research Methods. Volume 2 (S. 743‒744). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catania, J. A., Binson, D., Canchola, J., Pollack, L. M., Hauck, W. & Coates, T. J. (1996). Effects of interviewer gender, interviewer choice, and item wording on responses to questions concerning sexual behavior. Public Opinion Quarterly, 60, 345‒375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaiken, S. & Trope, Y. (Hrsg). (1999). Dual-Process Theories in Social Psychology. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleary, P. D., Mechanic, D. & Weiss, N. (1981). The effect of interviewer characteristics on responses to a mental health interview. Journal of Health & Social Behavior, 22, 183‒193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1986). Social theory, social research, and a theory of action. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 1309‒1335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, J., Hall, N. & Paul, L. A. (Hrsg.) (2004). Causation and Counterfactuals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, J. & Worchel, S. (1970). Role of undesired consequences in arousing dissonance. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 16, 199‒206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couper, M. P. (2011). The future of modes of data collection. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75, 889‒908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Couper, M. P., Singer, E. & Tourangeau, R. (2004). Does voice matter? An interactive voice response (IVR) experiment. Journal of Official Statistics, 20, 551‒570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, R. E., Couper, M. P., Janz, N. K, Caldwell, C. H. & Resnicow, K. (2010). Interviewer effects in public health surveys. Health Education Research, 25, 14‒26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Leeuw, E.D. (1992). Data Quality in Mail, Telephone and Face to Face Surveys. Amsterdam: TT-Publikaties.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Leeuw, E. D. (2008). Choosing the method of data collection. In E. D. de Leeuw, J. J. Hox & D. A. Dillman (Hrsg.), International Handbook of Survey Methodology (S. 113‒135). New York: Psychology Press, Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Leeuw, E.D. & van der Zouwen, J. (1988). Data quality in face-to-face and telephone surveys: a comparative meta-analysis. In R.M. Groves, P.P Biemer, L.E. Lyberg, J.T. Massey, W.L. Nicholls & J. Waksberg (Hrsg.), Telephone Survey Methodology (S. 283–299). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeMaio, T. J. (1984). Social desirability and survey measurement: a review. In C. F. Turner & E. Martin (Hrsg.), Surveying Subjective Phenomena, Vol. 2 (S. 257–281). New York: Russel Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diekmann, A. (1980). Die Befolgung von Gesetzen. Empirische Untersuchungen zu einer rechtssoziologischen Theorie. Berlin: Duncker & Humbolt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diekmann, A. & Lindenberg, S. (2015). Cooperation: sociological aspects. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Hrsg.), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 4 (S. 862–866). Oxford: Elsevier. (2. Auflage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Diekmann, A. & Voss, T. (2004). Die Theorie rationalen Handelns. Stand und Perspektiven. In A. Diekmann & T. Voss (Hrsg.), Rational-Choice-Theorie in den Sozialwissenschaften. Anwendungen und Probleme (S. 13–29).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckman, S., Kreuter, F., Kirchner, A., Jäckle, A., Tourangeau, R. & Presser, S. (2014). Assessing the mechanisms of misreporting to filter questions in surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 78, 721–733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engel, U. & Schmidt, B. O. (2014). Unit- und Item-Nonresponse. In N. Baur & J. Blasius (Hrsg.), Handbuch Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung (S. 331–348). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esser, H. (1986). Können Befragte lügen? Zum Konzept des „wahren Wertes“ im Rahmen der handlungstheoretischen Erklärung von Situationseinflüssen bei der Befragung. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie & Sozialpsychologie, 38, 314–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esser, H. (1990). „Habits“, „Frames“ und „Rational Choice“. Die Reichweite von Theorien der rationalen Wahl (am Beispiel der Erklärung des Befragtenverhaltens). Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 19, 231–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esser, H. (1991). Die Erklärung systematischer Fehler in Interviews: Befragtenverhalten als „rational choice“. In R. Wittenberg (Hrsg.), Person – Situation – Institution – Kultur. Günter Büschges zum 65. Geburtstag (S. 59–78). Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esser, H. (1993). Soziologie. Allgemeine Grundlagen. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esser, H. (1999). Soziologie. Spezielle Grundlagen. Band 1: Situationslogik und Handeln. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esser, H. (2001). Soziologie. Spezielle Grundlagen. Band 6: Sinn und Kultur. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. & Carlsmith, J. M. (1959). Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology, 58, 203–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flores-Macias, F. & Lawson, C. (2008). Effects of interviewer gender on survey responses: findings from a household survey in Mexico. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 20, 100–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, F. J. (1995). Improving Survey Questions: Design and Evaluation. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, F. J. & Mangione, T. W. (1990). Standardized Survey Interviewing. Minimizing Interviewer-Related Error. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garbarski, D., Schaeffer, N. C. & Dykema, J. (2016). Interviewing practices, conversational practices, and rapport: responsiveness and engagement in the survey interview. Sociological Methodology, 46, 1–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galla, J. P., Frisone, J. D., Jeffrey, L. R. & Gaer, E. P. (1981). Effect of experimenter’s gender on responses to a sex-role attitude questionnaire. Psychological Reports, 49, 935–940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G. & Gaissmaier, W. (2011). Heuristic decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 451–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilboa, I. (2010). Rational Choice. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greve, J., Schnabel, A. & Schützeichel, R. (Hrsg.) (2008). Das Makro-Mikro-Makro-Modell der soziologischen Erklärung. Zur Ontologie, Methodologie und Metatheorie eines Forschungsprogramms. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groves, R. M., Fowler, F. J., Couper, M. P., Lepkowski, J. M., Singer, E. & Tourangeau, R. (2009). Survey Methodology. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groves, R. M. & Fultz, N. H. (1985). Gender effects among telephone interviewers in a survey of economic attitudes. Sociological Methods & Research, 14, 31–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groves, R. M. & Lyberg, L. E. (2010). Total survey error. Past, present, and future. Public Opinion Quarterly, 74, 849–879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzy, N., Birkel C. & Mischkowitz, R. (Hrsg) (2015a). Viktimisierungsbefragungen in Deutschland: Band 1: Ziele, Nutzen und Forschungsstand. Wiesbaden: BKA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guzy, N., Birkel C. & Mischkowitz, R. (Hrsg) (2015b). Viktimisierungsbefragungen in Deutschland: Band 2: Methodik und Methodologie. Wiesbaden: BKA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guzy, N. & Leitgöb, H. (2015). Assessing mode effects in online and telephone victimization surveys. International Review of Victimology, 21, 101–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, M & Reynolds, J. (2009). Incorporating categorical information into regression models: the utility of dummy variables. In M. Hardy & A. Bryman (Hrsg.), The Handbook of Data Analysis. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houtkoop-Steenstra, H. (2000). Interaction and the Standardized Survey Interview. The Living Questionnaire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holbrook, A. L., Green, M. C. & Krosnick, J. A. (2003). Telephone versus face-to-face-interviewing of national probability samples with long questionnaires: comparisons of respondent satisficing and social desirability response bias. Public Opinion Quarterly, 67, 79–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huddy, L., Billig, J., Bracciodieta, J., Hoeffler, L., Moynihan, P. J. & Pugliani, P. (1997). The effect of interviewer gender on the survey response. Political Behavior, 19, 197–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huizinga, D. & Elliott, D. S. (1986). Reassessing the reliability and validity of self-reported delinquency measures. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 2, 293–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jann, B. & Przepiorka, W. (Hrsg.) (2017). Social Dilemmas, Institutions, and the Evolution of Cooperation. Berlin: De Gruyter.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jans, M. (2008). Mode effects. In P.J. Lavrakas (Hrsg.), Encyclopedia of Research Methods. Volume 1 (S. 475–480). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jäckle, A., Roberts, C. & Lynn, P. (2010). Assessing the effect of data collection mode on measurement. International Statistical Review 78, 3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klausch, T., Hox, J.J. & Schouten, B. (2013). Measurement effects of survey mode on the equivalence of attitudinal rating scale questions. Sociological Methods & Research, 42, 227–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kollock, P. (1998). Social dilemmas: the anatomy of cooperation. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 183–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraft, M., Landes, T. & Braun, K. (1992). Statistische Methoden. Eine Einführung für das Grundstudium in den Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften. Berlin: Springer. (2. Auflage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroneberg, C. (2005). Die Definition der Situation und die variable Rationalität der Akteure. Ein allgemeines Modell des Handelns. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 34, 344–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroneberg, C. (2011). Erklärung sozialen Handelns. Grundlagen und Anwendung einer integrativen Theorie. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroneberg, C. (2014). Frames, scripts, and variable rationality: an integrative theory of action. In G. Manzo (Hrsg.), Analytical Sociology: Actions and Networks (S. 97–123). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kroneberg, C. & Kalter, F. (2012). Rational choice theory and empirical research: methodological and theoretical contributions in Europe. Annual Review of Sociology, 38, 73–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krosnick, J.A.(1991).Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitudes measures in surveys.Applied Cognitive Psychology, 5, 213–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krosnick, J.A.(1999).Survey research.Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 537–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krosnick, J.A.& Alwin, D.F.(1987).An evaluation of a cognitive theory of response-order effects in survey measurement.Public Opinion Quarterly, 51, 201–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krosnick, J.A., Narayan, S.& Smith, W.R.(1996).Satisficing in surveys: initial evidence.Evaluative Thinking, 70, 29–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krumpal, I.(2013).Determinants of social desirability bias in sensitive surveys: a literature review.Quality & Quantity, 47, 2025–2047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kury, H., Guzy, N.& Leitgöb, H.(2015).Effekte des Erhebungsmodus.In N.Guzy, C.Birkel & R.Mischkowitz (Hrsg.), Viktimisierungsbefragungen in Deutschland. Band 2: Methodik und Methodologie (S.77–105).Wiesbaden: BKA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landis, J., Sullivan, D.& Sheley, J.(1973).Feminist attitudes as related to sex of the interviewer.Pacific Sociological Review, 16, 305–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavin, D.& Maynard, D.W.(2001).Standardization vs.rapport: respondent laughter and interviewer reaction during telephones surveys.American Sociological Review, 66, 453–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R.M.(1993).Doing Research on Sensitive Topics.London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R.M.& Renzetti, C.M.(1990).The problems of researching sensitive topics.An overview and introduction.American Behavioral Scientist, 33, 510–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leitgöb, H.(2017).Ein Verfahren zur Dekomposition von Mode-Effekten in eine mess- und eine repräsentationsbezogene Komponente.In S.Eifler & F.Faulbaum (Hrsg.), Methodische Probleme von Mixed-Mode-Ansätzen in der Umfrageforschung (S.51–95).Wiesbaden.VS Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lensvelt-Mulders, G.(2008).Surveying sensitive topics.In E.D.de Leeuw, J.J.Hox & D.A.Dillman (Hrsg.), International Handbook of Survey Methodology (S.461–478).New York: Psychology Press, Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D.K.(1973a).Counterfactuals.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D.K.(1973b).Causation.The Journal of Philosophy, 70, 556–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipps, O.& Lutz, G.(2017).Gender of interviewer effects in a multi-topic centralized CATI panel survey.methods, data & analyses, 11, 67–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, M.& Stainback, K.(2013).Interviewer gender effects on survey responses to marriage-related questions.Public Opinion Quarterly, 77, 606–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lueptow, L.B., Moser, S.L.& Pendleton, B.F.(1990).Gender and response effects in telephones interviews about gender characteristics.Sex Roles, 22, 29–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lugtig, P., Lensvelt-Mulders, G.J.L.M., Frerichs, R.& Greven, A.(2011).Estimating nonresponse bias and mode-effects in a mixed-mode survey.International Journal of Market Research, 53, 669–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyberg, L.E.& Kasprzyk, D.(2004).Data collection methods and measurement error: an overview.In P.P.Biemer, R.M.Groves, L.E.Lyberg, N.A.Mathiowetz & S.Sudman (Hrsg.), Measurement Error in Surveys (S.237–258).Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard, D.W., Houtkoop-Steenstra, H., Schaeffer, N.C.& van der Zouwen, J.(Hrsg.) (2002).Standardization and Tacit Knowledge. Interaction and Practice in the Survey Interview.New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch, M., Simon, A.B., Polusny, M.A., Bangerter, A.K., Grill, J.P., Noorbaloochi, S.& Partin, M.R.(2014).Impact of different privacy conditions and incentives on survey response rate, participant representativeness, and disclosure of sensitive information: a randomized controlled trial.BMC Medical Research Methodology, 14, 90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musch, J., Brockhaus, R.& Bröder, A.(2002).Ein Inventar zur Erfassung von zwei Faktoren sozialer Erwünschtheit.Diagnostica, 48, 121–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuman, W.L.(2012).Designing the face-2-face survey.In L.Gideon (Hrsg.), Handbook of Survey Methodology for the Social Sciences (S.227–248).New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ongena, Y.P.& Dijkstra, W.(2007).A model of cognitive processes and conversational principles in survey interview interaction.Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 145–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opp, K.-D.(1999).Contending conceptions of the theory of rational action.Journal of theoretical Politics, 11, 171–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opp, K.-D.(2015).Norms.In N.J.Smelser & P.B.Baltes (Hrsg.), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 17 (S.5–10).Oxford: Elsevier.(2.Auflage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Opp, K.-D.(2013).Norms and rationality.Is moral behavior a form of rational action? Theory & Decision, 74, 383–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulhus, D.L.(1984).Two-component models of socially desirable responding.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 46, 598–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulhus, D.L.(1986).Self-deception and impression management in test responses.In A.Angleitner & J.S Wiggins (Hrsg.), Personality Assessment via Questionnaire (S.142–165).New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Paulhus, D.L.(1989).Socially desirable responding: some new solutions to old problems.In D.M.Buss & N.Cantor (Hrsg.), Personality Psychology. Recent Trends and Emerging Directions (S.201–209).New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Paulhus, D.L.(2002).Socially desirable responding: the evolution of a construct.In H.I.Braun, D.N.Jackson & D.E.Wiley (Hrsg.), The Role of Psychological and Educational Measurement (S.49–69).Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, D.L.(1971).Knowledge from What? Theories and Methods in Social Research.Chicago: Rand McNally & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, D.L.(1973).Abandoning Method.Sociological Studies in Methodology.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasinski, K.A., Baldwin, A.K, Willis, G.B.& J.B.(1994).Risk and loss perceptions associated with survey reporting of sensitive behaviors.National Center for Health Statistics (NORC) Chicago, 497–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasinski, K.A., Willis, G.B., Baldwin, A.K., Yeh, W.& Lee, L.(1999).Methods of data collection, perceptions of risks and losses, and motivation to give truthful answers to sensitive survey questions.Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, 465–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raub, W., Buskens, V.& van Assen, M.A.L.M.(2011).Micro-macro links and microfundations in sociology.Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 35, 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raub, W.& Voss, T.(2017).Micro-macro-models in sociology: antecedents of Coleman’s diagram.In B.Jann & W.Przepiorka (Hrsg.), Social Dilemmas, Institutions, and the Evolution of Cooperation (S.11–36).Berlin: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauhut, H.& Krumpal, I.(2008).Die Durchsetzung sozialer Normen in Low-Cost und High-Cost Situationen.Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 37, 380–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakshaug, J.W., Yan, T.& Tourangeau, R.(2010).Nonresponse error, measurement error, and mode of data collection.Tradeoffs in a multi-mode survey of sensitive and non-sensitive items.Public Opinion Quarterly, 74, 907–933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savage, L.J.(1954).The Foundations of Statistics.New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaeffer, N.C., Dykema, J.& Maynard, D.W.(2010).Interviews and interviewing.In P.V.Marsden & J.Wright (Hrsg.), Handbook of Survey Research (S.437–470).Howard House: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaeffer, N.C.& Maynard, D.W.(1996).From paradigm to prototype and back again: interactive aspects of cognitive processing in survey interviews.In N.E.Schwarz & S.Sudman (Hrsg.), Answering Questions: Methodology for Determining Cognitive and Communicative Processes in Survey Research (S.65–88).San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaeffer, N.C.& Maynard, D.W.(2008).The contemporary standardized survey interview for social research.In F.G.Conrad & M.F.Schober (Hrsg.), Envisioning the Survey Interview of the Future (S.31–57).Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnell, R.(1997).Nonresponse in Bevölkerungsumfragen.Opladen: Leske + Budrich.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz, S.& Kroneberg, C.(im Erscheinen).Die Vielfalt kriminellen Handelns.Zum Anwendungspotential des Modells der Frame-Selektion in der Kriminologie.Monatsschrift für Kriminologie & Strafrechtsreform.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, N.(1999).Self-reports.How the questions shape the answers.American Psychologist, 54, 93–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, N., Knäuper, B., Oyserman, D.& Stich, C.(2008).The psychology of asking questions.In E.de Leeuw, J.Hox & D.A.Dillman (Hrsg.), International Handbook of Survey Methodology (S.18–34).New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, N., Strack, F., Hippler, H.-J.& Bishop, G.(1991).The impact of administration mode on response effects in survey measurement.Applied Cognitive Psychology 5, 193–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, J.W, Gawronski, B.& Trope, Y.(Hrsg.) (2014).Dual-Process Theories of the Social Mind.New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sibley, M.H., Pelham, W.E., Molina, B.S.G., Waschbusch, D.A., Gnagy, E.M., Babinski, D.E.& Biswas, A.(2010).Inconsistent self-report of delinquency by adolescents and young adults with ADHD.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38, 645–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A.(1957).Models of Man. Social and Rational.New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonson, Julia (2009).Klassenzimmerbefragungen von Kindern und Jugendlichen: Praktikabilität, Potentiale und Probleme der Methode.In M.Weichbold, J.Bacher & C.Wolf (Hrsg.), Umfrageforschung. Herausforderungen und Grenzen (S.63–84).Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirken, M.Willis, G.B.& Nathan, G.(1991).Cognitive aspects of answering sensitive survey questions.Bulletin of the International Statistics Institute, 48, 628–629.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T.(2011).Refining the total survey error perspective.International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 23, 464–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steenkamp, J.-B.E.M., de Jong, M.G.& Baumgartner, H.(2010).Socially desirable response tendencies in survey research.Journal of Marketing Research, 47, 199–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiger, D.M.& Conroy, B.(2008).IVR: Interactive voice response.In E.de Leeuw, J.Hox & D.A.Dillman (Hrsg.), International Handbook of Survey Methodology (S.288–298).New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stocké, V.(2002).Framing und Rationalität.Die Bedeutung der Informationsdarstellung für das Entscheidungsverhalten.München: Oldenbourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stocké, V.(2004).Entstehungsbedingungen von Antwortverzerrungen durch soziale Erwünschtheit.Ein Vergleich der Prognosen der Rational-Choice Theorie und des Modells der Frame-Selektion.Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 33, 303–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stocké, V.(2007a).Determinants and consequences of survey respondents’ social desirability beliefs about racial attitudes.Methodology, 3, 125–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stocké, V.(2007b).The interdependence of determinants for the strength and direction of social desirability bias in racial attitude surveys.Journal of Official Statistics, 23, 493–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stocké, V.& Langfeldt, B.(2004).Effects of survey experience on respondents’ attitudes towards surveys.Bulletin de méthodologie sociologique, 81, 5–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stocké, V.& Stark, T.(2006).Trust in surveys and the respondents’ susceptibility to item nonresponse.Sonderforschungsbereich 504: Rationalitätskonzepte, Entscheidungsverhalten und ökonomische Modellierung, Working Paper Nr.06-06.Online unter: https://ub-madoc.bib.uni-mannheim.de/2601 (31.05.2018).

  • Stone, J.& Cooper, J.(2001).A self-standards model of cognitive dissonance.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 228–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sudman, S.& Bradburn, N.M.(1974).Response Effects in Surveys: A Review and Synthesis.Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, H.(2014).Rapport and Its Impact on the Disclosure of Sensitive Information in Standardized Interviews.Online unter: https://drum.lib.umd.edu/handle/1903/16274 (31.05.2018).

  • Sykes, G.M.& Matza, D.(1957).Techniques of neutralization: a theory of delinquency.American Sociological Review, 22, 664–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornberry, T.P.& Krohn, M.D.(2000).The self-report method for measuring delinquency and crime.Criminal Justice, 4, 33–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tourangeau, R.(1984).Cognitive sciences and survey methods.In T.Jabine, M.Straf, J.Tanur & R.Tourangeau (Hrsg.), Cognitive Aspects of Survey Methodology: Building a Bridge between Disciplines (S.73–100).Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tourangeau, R.(2018).The survey response process from a cognitive viewpoint.Quality Assurance in Education, 26, 169–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tourangeau, R.& Bradburn, N.M.(2010).The psychology of survey response.In P.M.Marsden & J.D.Wright (Hrsg.), Handbook of Survey Research (S.315–346).Howard House: Emerald.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tourangeau, R., Kreuter, F.& Eckman S.(2015).Motivated misreporting: shaping answers to reduce survey burden.In U.Engel (Hrsg.), Survey Measurements. Techniques, Data Quality and Sources of Error (S.24–41).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tourangeau, R.& McNeeley, M.E.(2003).Measuring crime and crime victimization: methodological issues.In J.V.Pepper & C.V.Petrie (Hrsg.), Measurement Problems in Criminal Justice Research (S.10–42).Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tourangeau, R.& Rasinski, K.A.(1988).Cognitive processes underlying context effects in attitude measurement.Psychological Bulletin, 103, 299–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tourangeau, R., Rips, L.J.& Rasinski, K.A.(2000).The Psychology of Survey Response.Cam-bridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tourangeau, R.& Smith, T.W.(1996).Asking sensitive questions.The impact of data collection mode, question format, and question context.Public Opinion Quarterly, 60, 275–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tourangeau, R., Steiger, D.M.& Wilson D.(2002).Self-administered questions by telephone.Evaluating interactive voice response.Public Opinion Quarterly, 66, 265–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tourangeau, R.& Yan, T.(2007).Sensitive questions in surveys.Psychological Bulletin, 133, 859–883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trasler, G.(1993).Conscience, opportunity, rational choice, and crime.In R.V.Clarke & M.Felson (Hrsg.), Routine Activity and Rational Choice (S.305–322).Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tu, S.H.& Liao, P.S.(2007).Social distance, respondent cooperation and item nonresponse in sex survey.Quality & Quantity, 41, 177–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, C.(1983).Interviewer effects in telephone surveys.Public Opinion Quarterly, 47, 84–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T.R.(2011).Why People Cooperate. The Role of Social Motivations.Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Udéhn, L.(2001).Methodological Individualism. Background, History and Meaning.London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Udéhn, L.(2002).The changing face of methodological individualism.Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 479–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ullman, S.E.(1996).Social reactions, coping strategies, and self-blame attributions in adjustment to sexual assault.Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 505–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vannieuwenhuyze, J.T.A.& Loosvelt, G.(2012).Evaluating relative mode effects in mixed-mode surveys: three methods to disentangle selection and measurement effects.Sociological Methods & Research, 42, 82–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vannieuwenhuyze, J.T.A., Loosvelt, G.& Molenberghs, G.(2010).A method for evaluating mode effects in mixed-mode surveys.Public Opinion Quarterly, 74, 1027–1045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vannieuwenhuyze, J.T.A., Loosvelt, G.& Molenberghs, G.(2014).Evaluating mode effects in mixed-mode survey data using covariate adjustment models.Journal of Official Statistics, 30, 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vercruyssen, A., Wuyts, C.& Loosveldt, G.(2017).The effect of sociodemographic (mis)match between interviewers and respondents on unit and item nonresponse in Belgium.Social Science Research, 67, 229–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Neumann, J.& Morgenstern, O.(1944).Theory Games and Economic Behavior.Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisburd, H.F.(2005).The Total Survey Error Approach. A Guide to the New Science of Survey Research.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, B.T.& Blom, A.G.(2017).Explaining interviewer effects: a research synthesis.Journal of Survey Statistics & Methodology, 5, 175–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wikström, P.-O.(2010).Explaining crime as moral action.In S.Hitlin & S.Vaisey (Hrsg.), Handbook of the Sociology of Morality (S.211–239).New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wikström, P.-O.(2013).Why crime happens: a situational action theory.In G.Manzo (Hrsg.), Analytical Sociology. Actions and Networks (S.71–94).Chichester: Wiley.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Willis, G., Rasinski, K.& Baldwin, A.(1998).Cognitive on Responses to Sensitive Survey Questions (Working Paper Series, No.24).Hyattsville: National Center for Health Statistics, Cognitive Methods Staff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, G., Sirken, M.& Nathan, G.(1994).The Cognitive Aspects of Responses to Sensitive Survey Questions (Working Paper Series, No.9).Hyattsville: National Center for Health Statistics, Cognitive Methods Staff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolter, F.(2012).Heikle Fragen in Interviews. Eine Validierung der Randomized Response-Technik.Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zick, A., Küpper, B.& Krause, D.(Hrsg) (2016).Gespaltene Mitte – Feindselige Zustände.Rechtsextreme Einstellungen in Deutschland 2016.Bonn: Dietz-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Eichstätt, Deutschland

    Heinz Leitgöb

Authors
  1. Heinz Leitgöb
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heinz Leitgöb .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. GESIS – Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften, Mannheim, Germany

    Natalja Menold

  2. FAU Erlangen-Nürnberg, Nürnberg, Germany

    Tobias Wolbring

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Leitgöb, H. (2019). Rationales Antwortverhalten als Ursache messbezogener Mode-Effekte im Zuge der Erfassung sensitiver Merkmale. In: Menold, N., Wolbring, T. (eds) Qualitätssicherung sozialwissenschaftlicher Erhebungsinstrumente. Schriftenreihe der ASI - Arbeitsgemeinschaft Sozialwissenschaftlicher Institute. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-24517-7_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-24517-7_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-24516-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-24517-7

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation