Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Rechtspopulismus in Einwanderungsgesellschaften pp 243–265Cite as

Populismus, UKIP und der rechte Rand

Die Souveränitätsfrage als Instrument der Ausgrenzung

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Zusammenfassung

Britische RechtspopulistInnen konnten durch Opposition gegen Einwanderung immer wieder kurzfristig erfolgreich die politische Stimmung im Vereinigten Königreich für sich nutzen. In den 1960er Jahren waren es die ZuwanderInnen aus den karibischen, afrikanischen und asiatischen Ländern, die zum Politikum wurden. Der rechtsradikale Rand hatte aber längerfristig keine Chance, sich politisch zu etablieren.

Der Brexit hat die Einwanderungsfrage mit der Frage nach der politischen Souveränität des Vereinigten Königreiches verbunden. Zeitweilig gelang es der United Kingdom Independence Party, über den rechtsradikalen Rand des politischen Spektrums hinaus Wählerinnen und Wähler an sich zu binden und Wahlerfolge (insbesondere bei der Europawahl 2014) zu erzielen. Der größte Erfolg für UKIP war das Ergebnis des Brexit-Referendums, das das Ende der EU-Mitgliedschaft des Vereinigten Königreiches herbeiführte. In der Folge versank UKIP jedoch in der Bedeutungslosigkeit. Der Populismus bemächtigte sich der beiden großen Parteien: Labour und Conservatives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   37.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Allen, Chris. 2014. Britain First: The › Frontline Resistance ‹ to the Islamification of Britain. Political Quarterly 85 (3, July – September): 354 – 361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bale, Tim, James Hampshire, und Rebecca Partos. 2011. Having One’s Cake and Eating it Too: Cameron’s Conservatives and Immigration. Political Quarterly 82 (3, July – September): 398 – 406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blinder, Scott. 2015. Imagined Immigration: The Impact of Different Meanings of › Immigrants ‹ in Public Opinion and Policy Debates in Britain. Political Studies 63 (1): 80 – 100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carey, Sean, und Andrew Geddes. 2010. Less is more: Immigration and European Integration at the 2010 General Election. Parliamentary Affairs 63 (4, October): 849 – 865.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaffin, Joshua. 2017. Political shock in the valley. Financial Times vom 15. 08. 2017: 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowley, Philip, und Dennis Kavanagh. 2016. The British General Election of 2015. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cushion, Stephen, Richard Thomas, und Oliver Ellis. 2015. Interpreting UKIP’s › Earthquake ‹ in British Politics: UK Television News Coverage of the 2009 and 2014

    Google Scholar 

  • EU Election Campaigns. Political Quarterly 86 (2, April – June): 314 – 322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Decker, Frank, und Marcel Lewandowsky. 2017.Rechtspopulismus in Europa: Erscheinungsformen, Ursachen und Gegenstrategien. Zeitschrift für Politik 64 (1, März): 21 – 38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, Bobby. 2014. Perceptions and Reality: Ten Things We Should Know About Attitudes to Immigration in the UK. Political Quarterly 85 (3, July – September): 259 – 266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, Geoffrey, und Jon Mellon. 2016. Working Class Votes and Conservative Losses: Solving the UKIP Puzzle. Parliamentary Affairs 69 (2, April): 464 – 479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, David. 2014. Talking the Talk; Immigration Policy Since 1962. Political Quarterly 85 (3, July – September): 348 – 350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, Robert, und Matthew Goodwin. 2016. Different Class? UKIP’s Social Base and Political Impact: A Reply to Evans and Mellon. Parliamentary Affairs 69 (2, April): 480 – 491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, Robert, und Matthew Goodwin. 2014. Understanding UKIP: Identity, Social Change and the Left Behind. Political Quarterly 85 (3, July – September): 277 – 284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, Robert, Matthew Gordon, und David Cutts. 2012. Strategic Eurosceptics and polite xenophobes: Support for the United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP) in the 2009 European Parliament elections. European Journal of Political Research 51: 204 – 234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geddes, Andrew. 2014. The EU, UKIP and the Politics of Immigration. Political Quarterly 85 (3, July – September): 289 – 295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibney, Matthew. 2008. Asylum and the Expansion of Deportation in the United Kingdom. Government and Opposition 43(2): 146 – 167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodhart, David. 2017. The Road to Somewhere: The Populist Revolt and the Future of Politics. London: Hurst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodhart, David. 2014. Racism: Less is More. Political Quarterly 85 (3, July – September): 251 – 258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, Matthew J. 2014. Forever a False Dawn? Explaining the Electoral Collapse of the British National Party (BNP). Parliamentary Affairs 67 (4, October): 887 – 906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huysmans, Jef, und Alessandra Buonfino. 2008. Politics of Exception and Unease: Immigration, Asylum and Terrorism in Parliamentary Debates in the UK. Political Studies 56 (4, December): 766 – 788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John, Peter, und Helen Margetts. 2009. The Latent Support for the Extreme Right in British Politics. West European Politics 32 (3, May), S. 496 – 513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kassimeris, George, und Leonie Jackson. 2015. The Ideology and Discourse of the English Defence League: › Not Racist, Not Violent, Just No Longer Silent ‹. British Journal of Politics and International Relations 17 (1, February): 171 – 188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, Eric. 2014: Introduction. The Politics of Immigration: UKIP and Beyond. Political Quarterly 85 (3, July – September): 247 – 250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, Eric, und Gareth Harris. 2015. » White Flight « or Positive Contact? Diversity and Attitudes to Immigration in Britain. Comparative Political Studies 48 (12, October): 1563 – 1590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kavanagh, Dennis, und Philip Cowley. 2010. The British General Election of 2010. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaren, Lauren. 2011. Immigration and Trust in Politics in Britain. British Journal of Political Science 42 (1, December): 163 – 185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mellon, Jon, und Geoffrey Evans. 2016. Class, Electoral Geography and the Future of UKIP: Labour’s Secret Weapon? Parliamentary Affairs 69 (2, April): 492 – 498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philipps, Trevor, und Richard Webber. 2014. Superdiversity and the Browning of Labour. Political Quarterly (3, July – September): 304 – 311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturm, Roland. 2017a. Eine Regierungschefin besiegt sich selbst. Die britischen Parlamentswahlen vom 8. Juni 2017. Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen 48 (4): 824 – 837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sturm, Roland. 2017b. Heilmittel oder Spardiktat? Wahrnehmungen und Realitäten der Austeritätspolitik. In Europas Ende, Europas Anfang, hrsg. von Jürgen Rüttgers und Frank Decker, 213 – 228. Frankfurt a. M.: Campus Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturm, Roland. 2016. Brexit – das Vereinigte Königreich im Ausnahmezustand? Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen 47 (4): 878 – 892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sturm, Roland. 2015. Das politische System Großbritanniens. 2. Aufl. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tournier-Sol, Karine. 2015. Reworking the Eurosceptic and Conservative Traditions into a Populist Narrative: UKIP’s Winning Formula? Journal of Common Market Studies 53 (1): 140 – 156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, Martin. 1977. The National Front. Glasgow: Fontana/Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, Paul, und Tim Bale. 2014. Why Do Tories Defect to UKIP? Conservative Party Members and the Temptation of the Populist Right. Political Studies 62 (4, December): 961 – 970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilks-Heeg, Stuart. 2009. The Canary in a Coalmine? Explaining the Emergence of the British National Party in English Local Politics. Parliamentary Affairs 62 (3, July): 377 – 398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winnett, Robert, und Gordon Rayner. 2009. No expenses spared. London: Bantam Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Erlangen, Deutschland

    Roland Sturm

Authors
  1. Roland Sturm
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roland Sturm .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Alfter, Germany

    Heinz Ulrich Brinkmann

  2. Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Münster, Germany

    Isabelle-Christine Panreck

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sturm, R. (2019). Populismus, UKIP und der rechte Rand. In: Brinkmann, H., Panreck, IC. (eds) Rechtspopulismus in Einwanderungsgesellschaften. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-23401-0_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-23401-0_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-23400-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-23401-0

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation