Skip to main content

Education Governance by Numbers

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Handbuch Educational Governance Theorien

Part of the book series: Educational Governance ((EDUGOV,volume 43))

Zusammenfassung

Our interest is on historically how numbers become a preferred mode of telling the truth about schooling, teachers, pupils, and their relation to society. Numbers are here parts of communication systems whose technologies create distances from phenomena by appearing to summarize complex events and transactions. The seemingly technical appearances of the numbers enter into cultural realms that are never merely numbers but codifications and standardization of what are to constitute ‘reality’ and planning which affect several activities taking place within education. The different activities inscribe rules and standards by which experiences are classified, problems located, and procedures given to order what is ‘seen’, thought about, and acted on. We perform this task by especially discussing the role played by international, regional and national assessments in promoting a reasoning based on numbers affecting educational governance.

Parts of this text have also been published in: Pettersson, D., Popkewitz, T. S., & Lindblad, S. (2016). On the use of Educational Numbers: Comparative Constructions of Hierarchies by means of Large-Scale Assessments. Espacio, Tiempo y Education 3 (1) 177–202; Pettersson, D., Popkewitz, T. S., & Lindblad, S. (2017). Into the Greyzone: Agencies betwixt and between governmental policy, research and practice? Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy 3 (1) 29–41.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 179.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 229.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Ball, S. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy 18 (2), 215–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D. (1972). ‘On meritocracy and equality’. The Public Interest 29 (48), 30–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benavot, A., & Tanner, E. (2007). The Growth of National Learning Assessments in the World, 1995–2006. UNESCO-IBE: Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, B. (1969). Cross-National Study of Educational Attainment: Stage I of the IEA Investigation in Six Subject Areas. Final Report. Volume I. Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1971). Systems of education and systems of thought. In M. F. D. Young (Ed.), Knowledge and Control: New Directions in the Sociology of Education (pp. 189–207). London: Collier-Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brickman, W. W. (1966). Ten Years of the Comparative Education Society. Comparative Education Review 10 (1), 4–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brickman, W. W. (2010). Comparative Education in the Nineteenth Century. European Education 42 (2), 46–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butterfield, H. (1965). The Origins of Modern Science, 1300–1800. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danziger, K. (1997). Naming the Mind: How Psychology Found its Language. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danziger, K. (2008). Marking the Mind: A History of Memory. Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, Sao Paulo, Delhi: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desrosières, A. (1991). How to make things which hold together: Social science, statistics and the state. Discourses on society (pp. 195–218). Springer Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desrosières, A. (1998). The Politics of Large Numbers: A History of Statistical Reasoning. Cambridge & London: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1894/1938). The Rules of Sociological Method. New York: Collier-Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Encinas-Martin, M. (2006). A Global Survey of Educational Evaluation: International, Regional, and National Assessments of Student Learning. Paper commissioned for the EFA Global Monitoring Report 2007. Strong Foundations: Early Childhood Care and Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foshay, A. W., Thorndike, R. L., Hotyat, F., Pidgeon, D. A., & Walker, D. A. (1962). Educational Achievements of 13 Year Olds in Twelve Countries. Hamburg: UNESCO Institute of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsberg, E. (2006). International tests, national assessment cultures and reform history. Research project. Stockholm: The Swedish Research Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsberg, E., & Pettersson, D. (2015). Meritokratin och jämförande kunskapsmätningar. In G-B.Wärvik, C. Runesdotter, E. Forsberg, B. Hasselgren & F. Sahlström (Eds.), Skola Lärare Samhälle: en vänbok till Sverker Lindblad. Göteborg: Göteborgs universitet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gautherin, J. (1993). Marc-Antoine Jullien (Jullien de Paris) (1775–1848). Prospects: the quarterly review of comparative education. Vol. XXIII, No.¾., 757–73. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grek, S. (2009). Governing by numbers: The PISA ‘effect’in Europe. Journal of education policy, 24 (1), 23–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, I. (1983). Representing and intervening: Introductory topics in the philosophy of natural science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, I. (1992). “Style” for historians and philosophers. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 23 (1), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, B. (1981). Comparative Education: some consideration of method. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Igo, S. E. (2007). The Averaged American: Surveys, Citizens, and the Making of Mass Public. cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamens, D. H., & Benavot, A. (2011). National, regional and international learning assessments: trends among developing countries 1960–2009. Globalisation, Societies and Education 9 (2), 285–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kandel, I. L. (1933). Comparative Education. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellaghan, T., Greaney, V., & Murray, S. (2009). Using the results of a national assessment of educational achievement (Vol. 5). World Bank Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koyré, A. (1968). From the Closed World to the Infinite Universe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagemann, E. C. (2000). An elusive science. The troubling history of education research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landahl, J., & Lundahl, C. (2013). (Mis-)Trust in Numbers: shape shifting and directions in the modern history of data in Swedish educational reform. M. Lawn (Ed.), The Rise of Data in Education Systems: collection, visualization and use. Comparative Histories of Education (S. 57–78). Oxford: Symposium Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1988). The Pasteurization of France. Cambridge & London: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawn, M. (2013). The Internationalization of Education Data: exhibitions, tests, standards and associations. In M. Lawn (Ed.), The Rise of Data in Education Systems: collection, visualization and use. Comparative Histories of Education (S. 11–25). Oxford: Symposium Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemann, N. (1999). The Big Test: The Secret History of the American Meritocracy. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblad, S., Pettersson, D., & Popkewitz, T. S. (2015). International Comparisons of School Results: A Systematic Review of Research on Large Scale Assessments in Education. Delrapport från SKOLFORSK-projektet, Vetenskapsrådet 2015. Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lussi Borer, V., & Lawn, M. (2013). Governing Education Systems by Shaping Data: from the past to the present, from national to international perspectives. European Educational Research Journal 12 (1), 48–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCall, W. (1922). How to measure in education? New York: The Macmillian Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martens, K. (2007). “How to become an influential actor – The ‘comparative turn’ in OECD education policy”. In K. Martens, A. Rusconi & K. Lutz (Eds.), Transformations of the state and global governance (S. 40–56). London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Neves, L. M. P. (2000). Putting Meritocracy in its Place. The Logic of Performance in the United States, Brazil and Japan. Critique of Anthropology 20 (4), 333–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noah, H., & Eckstein, M. (1969). Toward a Science of Comparative Education. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nóvoa, A., & Lord, M. (Eds.) (2002). Fabricating Europe: The formation of an education space. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owens, T. L. (2013). Thinking Beyond League Tables: a review of key PISA research questions. In H-D. Meyer & A. Benavot (Eds.), PISA, Power and Policy: the emergence of global educational governance. Oxford Studies in Comparative Education; 23:1. Oxford: Symposium Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettersson, D. (2008). Internationell kunskapsbedömning som inslag i nationell styrning av skolan. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. Uppsala Studies in Education No 120. Uppsala: Uppsala universitet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettersson, D. (2014). Three Narratives: National Interpretations of PISA. Knowledge Cultures. 2 (4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Poovey, M. (1998). A history of the modern fact: Problems of knowledge in the sciences of wealth and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, T. M. (1995). Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postlethwaite, N., & Ross, K. N. (1992). Effective schools in reading: implications for educational planners. An exploratory study. The Hague: IEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purves, A. C. (1987). The Evolution of the IEA: A Memoir. Comparative Education Review 31 (1), 10–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (1998). Governing the soul: The shaping of the private self. London, New York: Free Association Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (1999). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenkvist, M. A. (2010). Using students test results for accountability and improvement: a literature review. OECD Education Working Paper No.54. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapin, S. (1994). A social history of truth. Civility and science in seventeenth-century England. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven, London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapin, S. (1996). The Scientific Revolution. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapin, S. (2010). Never Pure: Historical Studies of Science as it was Produced by People with Bodies, Situated in Time, Space, Culture, and Society, and Struggling for Credibility and Authority. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyers, P., & Depaepe, M. (2010). Representation or Hard Evidence? The Use of Statistics in Education and Educational Research. In P. Smyers & M. Depaepe (Eds.), Educational Research: The Ethics and Aesthetics of Statistics. Educational Research 5, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, (2008). The Origins of the International Standard Classification of Education. Peabody Journal of Education 83 (1), 5–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2004). The Global Politics of Educational Borrowing and Lending. Teachers College. New York, London: Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, S. M. (1992). A Historical View of Statistical Concepts in Psychology and Educational Research. American Journal of Education 101, 60–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Pettersson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Pettersson, D., Lindblad, S., Popkewitz, T.S. (2019). Education Governance by Numbers. In: Langer, R., Brüsemeister, T. (eds) Handbuch Educational Governance Theorien. Educational Governance, vol 43. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-22237-6_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-22237-6_30

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-22236-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-22237-6

  • eBook Packages: Education and Social Work (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics