Zusammenfassung
This article outlines the various applications of longitudinal models using the structural equation modeling (SEM) framework. Two classical approaches of longitudinal analysis in SEM are the autoregressive cross-lagged models and the latent growth curve models. Hybrid longitudinal models in SEM attempt to combine the two strands of techniques. Recently, these hybrid models have been expanded upon to properly separate between- and within-effects. This article demonstrates the application of these models by empirically examining the relationship between environmental values and attitudes towards the so-called Energy Transition in Germany over time. We show that a variety of research questions can be examined using longitudinal models in SEM. The new developments in longitudinal models in SEM furthermore make it possible for researchers to more accurately test theories.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literatur
Berry, D., and M. Willoughby. 2017. On the Practical Interpretability of Cross-Lagged Panel Models: Rethinking a Developmental Workhorse. Child Development 88(4): 1186–1206.
Best, H., and T. Dannwolf 2014: Environmental Attitudes and Behavior. In: GESIS Panel – Standard Edition. Köln.
Best, H., and J. Mayerl. 2013. Values, Beliefs, Attitudes: An Empirical Study on the Structure of Environmental Concern and Recycling Participation. Social Science Quarterly 94(3): 691-714.
Bianconcini, S. and K. Bollen. 2018. The Latent Variable-Autoregressive Latent Trajectory Model: A General Framework for Longitudinal Analysis. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 00: 1-18.
Biesanz, J. 2012. Autoregressive Longitudinal Models. In Handbook of Structural Equation Modeling, Ed. R. Hoyle, 459-471. New York, London: The Guilford Press.
Bollen, K., and J. Brand. 2010. A General Panel Model with Random and Fixed Effects: A Structural Equations Approach. Social Forces 89(1): 1-34.
Curran, P., and K. Bollen. 2001. The Best of Both Worlds. Combining Autoregressive and Latent Curve Models. In New Methods for the Analysis of Change, Eds. L. M. Collins and A. G. Sayer, 107-135. Washington: American Psychological Association.
Curran, P., A. Howard, S. Bainter, S. Lane, and S. McGinley. 2014. The Separation of Between-Person and Within-Person Components of Individual Change Over Time: A Latent Curve Model With Structured Residuals. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 82(5): 879-894.
Dunlap, R., K. Van Liere, A. Mertig, and R. Jones. 2000. Measuring Endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A Revised NEP Scale. Journal of Social Issues 56(3): 425-442.
Eagly, A., and S. Chaiken. 1998. Attitude structure and function. In The Handbook of social psychology Eds. D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, and G. Lindzey, 269-322. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Ferrer, E., N. Balluerka, and K. Widaman. 2008. Factorial Invariance and the Specification of Second-Order Latent Growth Models. Methodology 4(1): 22-36.
Finkel, Stevens E. 1995. Causal analysis with panel data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Fishbein, Martin, and I. Ajzen. 2010. Predicting and Changing Behavior. New York, Hove: Psychology Press.
GESIS. 2016. GESIS Panel Extended Edition. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5664 Datafile Version 17.0.0. https://doi.org/10.4232/1.12742.
Granger, W. J. 1969. Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods. Econometrica 37(3): 424-438.
Hair, Joseph F., W. Black, B. Babin, and R. Anderson. 2010. Multivariate Data Analysis (7th Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Hamaker, E., R. Kuiper, and R. Grasman. 2015. A Critique of the Cross-Lagged Panel Model. Psychological Methods 20(1): 102-116.
Hoffmann, L. and R. Stawski. 2009. Persons as Contexts: Evaluating Between-Person and Within-Person Effects in Longitudinal Analysis. Research in Human Development 6(2-3): 97-120.
Keijsers, L. 2016. Parental monitoring and adolescent problem behaviors: How much do we really know? International Journal of Behavioral Development 40(3): 271-281.
Kline, Rex. 2011. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. Fourth Edition. New York, London: The Guilford Press.
Krause, T., and D. Urban. 2013. Panelanalyse mit Mehrebenenmodellen. Eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung. Schriftenreihe des Instituts für Sozialwissenschaften der Universität Stuttgart. https://doi.org/10.18419/opus-5649
Mayerl, J. 2016. Environmental Concern in Cross-National Comparison – Methodological Threats and Measurement Equivalence. In Green European: Environmental Behaviour and Attitudes in Europe in a Historical and Cross-Cultural Comparative Perspective, Eds. A. Telesience, and M. Groß, 182-204. London, New York: Routledge.
Opp, K.-D. 2010. Kausalität als Gegenstand der Sozialwissenschaften und der multivariaten Statistik. In Handbuch der sozialwissenschaftlichen Datenanalyse, Eds. C. Wolf and H. Best, 9-38. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Rokeach, M. 1968. A Theory of Organization and Change Within Attitude Systems. Journal of Social Issues 24(1): 13-33.
Schlüter, E., E. Davidov, and P. Schmidt. 2007. Applying Autoregressive Cross-Lagged and Latent Growth Curve Models to a Three-Wave Panel Study. In Longitudinal models in the behavior and related sciences, Eds. K. van Montfort, J. Oud and A. Satorra, 315-336. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers, EAM Book Series.
Schwartz, S. 2012. An Overview of the Schwartz Theory of Basic Values. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture 2(1). https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1116.
Stern, P., and T. Dietz. 1994. The value basis of environmental concern. Journal of Social Issues 50(3): 65-84.
Stern, P., T. Dietz, L. Kalof, and G. Guagnano. 1995. Values, beliefs and proenvironmental action: Attitude formation towards emergent attitude objects. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 25: 1611–1636.
Urban, D. 2002. Prozessanalyse im Strukturgleichungsmodell. Zur Anwendung latenter Wachstumskurvenmodelle in der Sozialisationsforschung. ZA-Information/Zentralarchiv für Empirische Sozialforschung 51: 6-37.
Urban, Dieter. 2004. Neue Methoden der Längsschnittanalyse. Zur Anwendung von latenten Wachstumskurvenmodellen in Einstellungs- und Sozialisationsforschung. Münster: Lit Verlag.
Urban, Dieter, and J. Mayerl. 2011. Regressionsanalyse: Theorie, Technik und Anwendung. 4., überarbeitete und erweiterte Auflage. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Urban, Dieter, and J. Mayerl. 2014. Strukturgleichungsmodellierung: Ein Ratgeber für die Praxis. Wiesbaden: Springer VS Verlag.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mayerl, J., Andersen, H. (2019). Recent Developments in Structural Equation Modeling with Panel Data. In: Mayerl, J., Krause, T., Wahl, A., Wuketich, M. (eds) Einstellungen und Verhalten in der empirischen Sozialforschung . Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-16348-8_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-16348-8_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-16347-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-16348-8
eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)