Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Zeit: Geschlechtsspezifika der Zeitverwendung und Zeitwahrnehmung

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbuch Interdisziplinäre Geschlechterforschung

Part of the book series: Geschlecht und Gesellschaft ((GUG,volume 65))

Zusammenfassung

Fragen der Zeit, wie die in diesem Beitrag betrachtete Zeitverwendung und Zeitwahrnehmung, sind von großer individueller und gesellschaftlicher Bedeutung. Neben geschlechtsspezifischen Ausprägungen der Zeitverwendung und -wahrnehmung werden Erklärungsansätze für empirisch ermittelbare Geschlechterdifferenzen beim Umgang mit Zeit vorgestellt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Aassve, Arnstein, Giulia Fuochi, und Letizia Mencarini. 2014. Desperate housework: Relative resources, time availability, economic dependency, and gender ideology across Europe. Journal of Family Issues 35(8): 1000–1022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anttila, Timo, Tomi Oinas, Mia Tammelin, und Jouko Nätti. 2015. Working-time regimes and work-life balance in Europe. European Sociological Review 31(6): 713–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrighi, Barbara A., und David J. Maume Jr. 2000. Workplace subordination and men’s avoidance of housework. Journal of Family Issues 21(4): 464–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaujot, Roderic, und Robert Andersen. 2007. Time crunch: Impact of time spent in paid and unpaid work, and its division in families. Canadian Journal of Sociology 32(3): 295–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Gary S. 1965. A theory of the allocation of time. The Economic Journal 75(299): 493–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bianchi, Suzanne M. 2000. Maternal employment and time with children: Dramatic change or surprising continuity? Demography 37(4): 401–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bittman, Michael, Paula England, Nancy Folbre, Liana Sayer, und George Matheson. 2003. When does gender trump money? Bargaining and time in household work. American Journal of Sociology 109(1): 186–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burda, Michael, Daniel S. Hamermesh, und Philippe Weil. 2013. Total work and gender: Facts and possible explanations. Journal of Population Economics 26(1): 239–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesley, Noelle. 2005. Blurring boundaries? Linking technology use, spillover, individual distress, and family satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and Family 67(5): 1237–1248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clawson, Dan, und Naomi Gerstel. 2014. Unequal time. Gender, class, and family in employment schedules. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, Lyn. 2006. Children and the revolution. A time-diary analysis of the impact of motherhood on daily workload. Journal of Sociology 42(2): 125–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig, Lyn, und Janeen Baxter. 2016. Domestic outsourcing, housework shares and subjective time pressure: Gender differences in the correlates of hiring help. Social Indicators Research 125(1): 271–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dukhovnov, Denys, und Emilio Zagheni. 2015. Who takes care of whom in the United States? Time transfers by age and sex. Population and Development Review 41(2): 183–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elder Jr., Glen H. 1994. Time, human agency, and social change: Perspectives on the life course. Social Psychology Quarterly 57(1): 4–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuwa, Makiko, und Philip N. Cohen. 2007. Housework and social policy. Social Science Research 36(2): 512–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gimenez-Nadal, J. Ignacio, und Almudena Sevilla. 2012. Trends in time allocation: A cross-country analysis. IZA Discussion Paper No. 6709. Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodin, Robert E. 2010. Temporal justice. Journal of Social Policy 39(1): 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurley-Calvez, Tami, Katherine Harper, und Amelia Biehl. 2009. Self-employed women and time use. https://www.sba.gov/advocacy/self-employed-women-and-time-use. Zugegriffen am 27.07.2017.

  • Hakim, Catherine. 1991. Grateful slaves and self-made women: Fact and fantasy in women’s work orientations. European Sociological Review 7(2): 101–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heisig, Jan Paul. 2011. Who does more housework: Rich or poor? A comparison of 33 countries. American Sociological Review 76(1): 74–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, Arlie. 1989. The second shift. Working parents and the revolution at home. London: Judy Piatkus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofäcker, Dirk, Rumiana Stoilova, und Jan R. Riebling. 2013. The gendered division of paid and unpaid work in different institutional regimes: Comparing West Germany, East Germany and Bulgaria. European Sociological Review 29(2): 192–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holst, Elke, und Hartmut Seifert. 2012. Arbeitszeitpolitische Kontroversen im Spiegel der Arbeitszeitwünsche. WSI-Mitteilungen 65(2): 141–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jurczyk, Karin. 1998. Time in women’s everyday life. Between self-determination and conflicting demands. Time & Society 7(2): 283–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kan, Man Yee, Oriel Sullivan, und Jonathan Gershuny. 2011. Gender convergence in domestic work: Discerning the effects of interactional and institutional barriers from large-scale data. Sociology 45(2): 234–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lachance-Grzela, Mylène, und Geneviève Bouchard. 2010. Why do women do the lion’s share of housework? A decade of research. Sex Roles 63(11): 767–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, Robert. 2005. A geography of busyness. Social Research 72(2): 355–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyness, Karen S., Janet C. Gornick, Pamela Stone, und Angela R. Grotto. 2012. It’s all about control: Worker control over schedule and hours in cross-national context. American Sociological Review 77(6): 1023–1049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 2011. Society at a glance 2011: OECD social indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Oechsle, Mechtild, und Birgit Geissler. 2003. Between paid work and private commitments: Women’s perceptions of time and life planning in young adulthood. Time & Society 12(1): 79–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Offer, Shira, und Barbara Schneider. 2011. Revisiting the gender gap in time-use patterns: Multitasking and well-being among mothers and fathers in dual-earner families. American Sociological Review 76(6): 809–833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter, Felicitas. 2015. Schluss mit dem Spagat. Wie Sie aufhören, sich zwischen Familie und Beruf zu zerreißen. München: Südwest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosa, Hartmut. 2005. Beschleunigung. Die Veränderung der Zeitstrukturen in der Moderne. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roxburgh, Susan. 2002. Racing through life: The distribution of time pressures by roles and role resources among full-time workers. Journal of Family and Economic Issues 23(2): 121–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schöneck, Nadine M. 2009. Zeiterleben und Zeithandeln Erwerbstätiger. Eine methodenintegrative Studie. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schöneck, Nadine M. 2011. „Der perfekte Zeitmanager“ – und warum es ihn so selten gibt. Soziologische Betrachtungen der Methoden und Techniken des Zeitmanagements. Sociologia Internationalis 49(2): 227–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schöneck, Nadine M. 2015. Europeans’ work and life – out of balance? An empirical test of assumptions from the „acceleration debate“. Time & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X15577286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, Jenny. 1998. ‚Felling a List Coming On‘: Gender and the pace of life. Time & Society 7(2): 383–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Southerton, Dale. 2003. ‚Squeezing Time‘: Allocating practices, coordinating networks and scheduling society. Time & Society 12(1): 5–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistisches Bundesamt. 2016. Arbeitsmarkt auf einen Blick. Deutschland und Europa. Wiesbaden. https://www.destatis.de/DE/Publikationen/Thematisch/Arbeitsmarkt/Erwerbstaetige/BroeschuereArbeitsmarktBlick0010022169004.pdf?__blob=publicationFile. Zugegriffen am 27.07.2017.

  • Stratton, Leslie S. 2015. The determinants of housework time. Boosting the efficiency of household production could have large economic effects. IZA World of Labor. https://doi.org/10.15185/izawol.133.

  • Sullivan, Oriel. 2013. What do we learn about gender by analyzing housework seperately from child care? Some considerations from time-use evidence. Journal of Family Theory & Review 5(2): 72–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Lippe, Tanja, Kea Tijdens, und Esther de Ruijter. 2004. Outsourcing of domestic tasks and time-saving effects. Journal of Family Issues 25(2): 216–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webber, Gretchen, und Christine Williams. 2008. Part-time work and the gender division of labor. Qualitative Sociology 31(1): 15–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. 2011. World development report 2012: Gender equality and development. Washington DC. https://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTWDR2012/Resources/7778105-1299699968583/7786210-1315936222006/Complete-Report.pdf. Zugegriffen am 27.07.2017.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Professur für Soziologie und Empirische Sozialforschung, Hochschule Niederrhein, Mönchengladbach, Deutschland

    Nadine M. Schöneck

Authors
  1. Nadine M. Schöneck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nadine M. Schöneck .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Netzwerk Frauen- und Geschlechterforschung NRW, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany

    Beate Kortendiek

  2. Universität Paderborn, Paderborn, Germany

    Birgit Riegraf

  3. Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany

    Katja Sabisch

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Schöneck, N.M. (2019). Zeit: Geschlechtsspezifika der Zeitverwendung und Zeitwahrnehmung. In: Kortendiek, B., Riegraf, B., Sabisch, K. (eds) Handbuch Interdisziplinäre Geschlechterforschung. Geschlecht und Gesellschaft, vol 65. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-12496-0_66

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-12496-0_66

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-12495-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-12496-0

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation