Skip to main content

Securitization and Terroristization: Analyzing States’ Usage of the Rhetoric of Terrorism

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
State Terror, State Violence

Part of the book series: Staat – Souveränität – Nation ((SSN))

Abstract

“Terrorism” remains “essentially contested” in its meaning and yet it is often and uncritically used by various actors. Here, I draw from and modify the Copenhagen School’s securitization theory to outline a “terroristization” approach. This terroristization approach is useful in studying and analyzing when rhetoric of terrorism is used and its sociopolitical consequences. A terroristization approach can be used to study how acts, actions, events become understood as “terrorism” as it focuses attention on how the term “terrorism” is used during specific interactions, what terrorism means, and to the sociopolitical and ethical implications of labeling practices. In doing so, it also draws attention to spaces and modes by which the usage of “terrorism” can be questioned and challenged. Additionally, a focus on the meaning-making of terrorism directs attention to how various violent acts are legitimated in different contexts and the self-other identities produced in the process of labelling actors, events, acts as “terrorist” (or not). This chapter also outlines a brief example of the consequences of terroristization, focusing specifically on post-9/11 debates and discussions on surveillance and monitoring by the US state.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For more information on the report, please see the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU’s) coverage of torture at: http://www.thetorturereport.org/. Harris and Mak (2014) have some additional features of the Report. Mazetti (2014) describes how there is a lack of accountability for those authorizing and conducting such acts.

  2. 2.

    For a comprehensive overview of the developments of this and related programs, please see The Guardian’s “The NSA Files” web site at http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/the-nsa-files.

  3. 3.

    The Associated Press first made the story public and the outcome of its investigations can be found here: http://www.ap.org/Index/AP-In-The-News/NYPD.

  4. 4.

    The main NYPD unit which conducted the spying, the Demographics Unit (which was later renamed the Zone Assessment Unit) was shut down in April 2014 (Apuzzo and Goldstein 2014). Further effects of the program are detailed by Friedersdorf (2013) and the City University of New York (2013).

  5. 5.

    Hansen (2012) footnote no. 2 summarizes a series of readings on desecuritization and how it relates to the ethico-political aspects of security.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Priya Dixit .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dixit, P. (2016). Securitization and Terroristization: Analyzing States’ Usage of the Rhetoric of Terrorism. In: Koch, B. (eds) State Terror, State Violence. Staat – Souveränität – Nation. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-11181-6_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics