Skip to main content

Woran stirbt der Intensivpatient?

What Is the Cause of Death in Intensive Care Patients?

  • Conference paper
Wahrung des Bestandes, Wandel und Fortschritt der Chirurgie

Part of the book series: Langenbecks Archiv für Chirurgie ((KONGRESSBAND,volume 1996))

  • 2 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Die Leistungen der Intensivmedizin werden heute von verschiedenen Standpunkten aus beurteilt: Der Erfolg für den individuellen Patienten wird daran gemessen, ob der Patient überlebt. In neueren Untersuchungen wird nunmehr auch der funktionelle Status und die Lebensqualität des Patienten nach der Intensivtherapie in die Abschätzung des Therapieerfolgs miteinbezogen. Die detaillierte Beurteilung der Lebensqualität des Patienten nach der akuten Behandlung soll unter Berücksichtigung seiner funktionellen, psychischen und sozialen Kompetenz eine objektive individuelle Erfolgsabschätzung ermöglichen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP et al. (1985) APACHE II: A severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 13:818–829

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Knaus WA, Wagner DP, Draper EA et al. (1991) The APACHE III prognostic system: Risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalized adults. Chest 100:1619–1636

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Seneff M, Knaus WA (1989) Predicting patient outcome from intensive care: a guide to APACHE, MPM, SAPS, PRISM, and other prognostic scoring systems. J Intens Care Med 4:33–51

    Google Scholar 

  4. Frisho-Lima P, Gurman G, Schapira A et al. (1994) Rationing critical care — what happens to patients who are not admitted? Theory Surg 9:208–211

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lewandowsky K, Pappert D, Kuhlen R et al. (1996) Klinische Aspekte des akuten Lungenversa-gens des Erwachsenen (ARDS). Anaesthesist 45:2–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Warner MA, Hosking MP, Lobdell CM et al. (1988) Surgical procedures among those greater than or equal to 90 years of age. A population-based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota 1975–1985. Ann Surg 207:380–386

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Forst H (1992) Ökonomie als limitierender Faktor der Intensivtherapie im hohen Lebensalter. Chirurg BDC 31:79–81

    Google Scholar 

  8. Luce JM (1994) The changing physician-patient relationship in critical care medicine under health care reform. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 150:266–270

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Le Gall J-R, Lemeshow S, Saulnier F (1993) A new simplified acute physiology score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American Multicenter Study. JAMA 270:2957–2963

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Atkinson S, Bihari D, Smithies M et al. (1994) Identification of futility in intensive care. Lancet 344:1203–1206

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sauaia A, Moore FA, Moore EE et al. (1995) Epidemiology of trauma deaths: a reassessment. J Trauma Injury Infect Crit Care 38:185–193

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sluis van der CK, Duis ten HJ, Geertzen JHB (1995) Multiple injuries: an overview of outcome. J Trauma Injury Infect Crit Care 38:681 – 686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pape H-Ch, Remmers D, Kleemann W et al. (1994) Posttraumatic multiple organ failure — a report on clinical and autopsy findings. Shock 2:228–234

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Livingston DH, Mosenthal Ac, Deitch EA (1995) Sepsis and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome: a clinical-mechanistic overview. New Horizons, SCCM 3:257–266

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Brun-Buisson C, Doyon F, Carlet J et al. (1995) Incidence, risk factors, and outcome of severe sepsis and septic shock in adults. A multicenter prospective study in intensive care units. French ICU group for severe sepsis. JAMA 274:968–974

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Friedman G (1995) Outcome from Septic Shock: have we made progress? 15th Symposium on Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Brussels March: 21–24

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ziegler EF, Fisher CJ, Sprung CL et al. (1991) Treatment of gram-negative bacteremia and septic shock with HA-1A human monoclonal antibody against endotoxin — A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. N Engl J Med 324:429–436

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Vincent J-L, Chamlou R (1996) Sepsis trials. Curr Op Anaesth 9:146–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fisher ChJ, Agosti JM, Opal SM et al. (1996) Treatment of septic shock with the tumor necrosis factor receptor: Fc fusion protein. New Engl J Med 334:1697–1702

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Frey, L., Meßmer, K. (1996). Woran stirbt der Intensivpatient?. In: Hartel, W. (eds) Wahrung des Bestandes, Wandel und Fortschritt der Chirurgie. Langenbecks Archiv für Chirurgie, vol 1996. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-80295-9_70

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-80295-9_70

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-61617-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-80295-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics