Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Laparoskopische Colonresektion beim Carcinom — sinnvoll oder nicht?

Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Resection: Is It Beneficial or Not?

  • Conference paper
Book cover Wahrung des Bestandes, Wandel und Fortschritt der Chirurgie

Part of the book series: Langenbecks Archiv für Chirurgie ((KONGRESSBAND,volume 1996))

  • 1 Accesses

Summary

It was the aim of our study to investigate the role of laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection for cure. Postoperative morbidity, pain and hospital stay (n = 21) was reduced and patients’ recovery accelerated compared to conventionally operated patients (n = 54). The number of resected lymph nodes and tumor distances were comparable; however, portal recurrences remain the main problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  1. Reilly WT, Nelson H, Schroeder G, Wieand HS, Bolton J, O’Connell MJ (1996) Wound recurrence following conventional treatment of colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 39:200

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Leroy J (1994) Laparoscopic colorectal resection. L’Ospedale Maggiore 88:262

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lumley JW, Fielding GA, Rhodes M, Nathanson LK, Siu S, Stitz RW (1996) Laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 39:155

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hanley JA, Lippmann-Hand A (1983) If nothing goes wrong, is everything alright? Operating with zero numbers. JAMA 259:1743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Franklin ME, Rosenthal D, Norem RF (1995) Prospective evaluation of laparoscopic colon resection versus open colon resection for adenocarcinoma. Surg Endosc 9:811

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. II Lehrstuhl für Chirurgie, Chirurgische Klinik Köln-Merheim, Ostmerheimer Straße 200, D-51109, Köln, Deutschland

    L. Köhler, E. Eypasch, U. Holthausen & H. Troidl

Authors
  1. L. Köhler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. E. Eypasch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. U. Holthausen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. H. Troidl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Deutschen Gesellschaft für Chirurgie, Steinhölzle 16, D-89197, Westerstetten-Vorderdenkental, Deutschland

    W. Hartel (Generalsekretär) (Generalsekretär)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Köhler, L., Eypasch, E., Holthausen, U., Troidl, H. (1996). Laparoskopische Colonresektion beim Carcinom — sinnvoll oder nicht?. In: Hartel, W. (eds) Wahrung des Bestandes, Wandel und Fortschritt der Chirurgie. Langenbecks Archiv für Chirurgie, vol 1996. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-80295-9_153

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-80295-9_153

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-61617-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-80295-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation