Skip to main content

‘Virtual Learning-by-Doing’ Teamwork KSA: Strategic Management Simulation as an Effective Tool

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 73))

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to evaluate the effectiveness of strategic management simulations as a learning-by-doing tool, that is they can enhance their knowledge, skills and abilities for effective teamwork. We have carried out an analysis of the effect of business simulation on the teamwork KSA with a group of undergraduates of the Business School. The results show that the teamwork KSA can improve and that the initial knowledge of those teamwork KSA, at the individual level, is the only factor which conditions their learning. Initial knowledge of the teamwork KSA and the spread of this knowledge within the team, are not a determinant influence on the individual learning-by-doing. Neither are features such as intelligence, personality, attitude to teamwork and teamwork self-efficacy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Stevens, M., Campion, M.: The Knowledge, Skill and Ability Requirements for Teamwork: Implications for Human Resource Management. Journal of Management 20(2), 503–530 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Stevens, M., Campion, M.: Staffing work teams: Development and validation of a selection test for team-work settings. Journal of Management 25(2), 207–228 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cannon-Bowers, J.A., Tannenbaum, S.I., Salas, E., Volpe, C.E.: Defining Competencies and Establishing Team Training Requirements. In: Guzzo, R.A., Salas, E. (eds.) Team Effectiveness and Decision Making in Organizations. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cannon, M.D., Edmonson, A.C.: Confronting failure: antecedents and consequences of shared beliefs about failure in organizational work groups. Journal of Organizational Behavior 22(2), 161–177 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, G., Donahue, L., Klimoski, R.: Training undergraduates to work in organizational teams. Academy of Management Learning and Education 3(1), 27–40 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zantow, K., Knowlton, D.S., Sharp, D.C.: More than fun and games: Reconsidering the virtues of strategic management simulations. Academy of Management Learning & Education 4(4), 451–458 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Boone, C., Van Olffen, W., Witteloostuijn, A.: Team locus-of-control composition, leadership structure, information acquisition, and financial performance: A business simulation study. Academy of Management Journal 48(5), 889–909 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pisano, G.P.: Knowledge, integration and the locus of learning: An empirical analysis of process development. Strategic Management Journal 15(1), 85–100 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nelson, R., Winter, S.: An evolutionary theory of economic change. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Doloi, H., Jaafari, A.: Towards a dynamic simulation model for strategic decision making in life cycle project management. Project Management Journal 33(4), 23–38 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jennings, D.: Strategic management: An evaluation of the use of three learning methods. The Journal of Management Development 21(9/10), 655–665 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Butterfield, J., Pendegraft, N.: Gaming techniques to improve the team-formation process. Team Performance Management: An International Journal 2(4), 11–20 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rulke, D.L., Galaskiewicz, J.: Distribution of knowledge, group network structure, and group performance. Management Science 46(5), 612–626 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Watkins, K.E., Marsick, V.: Sculpting the learning organization. Lessons in the art of systemic change. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kraut, R.E., Fussell, S.R., Lerch, F.J., Espinosa, A.: Coordination in teams: Evidence from a simulated management game. Unpublished manuscript (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mohammed, S., Dumville, B.C.: Team mental models in a team knowledge framework: Expanding theory and measurement across disciplinary boundaries. Journal of Organizational Behavior 22(2), 89–106 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fiol, C.M.: Consensus, diversity, and learning in organizations. Organization Science 5(3), 403–420 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Argote, L., Gruenfeld, D., Naquin, C.: Group learning in organizations. In: Turner, M.E. (ed.) Groups at work: Advances in theory and research. Erlbaum, New York (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Edmondson, A.C.: Framing for learning: Lessons in successful technology implementation. California Management Review 45(2), 34–54 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hollingshead, A.B.: Information suppression and status persistence in group decision making: The effects of communication media. Human Communication Research 23(2), 193–219 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wegner, D.M.: Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In: Mullen, I.B., Goethals, G.R. (eds.) Theories of Group Behavior. Springer, New York (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Argote, L., Liang, D., Moreland, R.: Group versus individual training and group performance: The mediating role of transactive memory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 21(4), 384–393 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Paulus, P.B., Larey, T.S., Dzindolet, M.T.: Creativity in groups and teams. In: Turner, M.E. (ed.) Groups at work: Theory and research. Applied social research. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Thompson, A., Stappenbeck, G.: The Business Strategic Game 6.0. Irwin McGraw Hill (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Steiner, I.D.: Group process and productivity. Academic Press, NY (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Neuman, G.A., Wright, J.: Team effectiveness: Beyond skills and cognitive ability. Journal of Applied Psychology 84(3), 376–389 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Saucier, G.: Mini-Markers: A brief version of Goldberg’s unipolar Big-Five markers. Journal of Personality Assessment 63(3), 506–516 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ruiz, B., Adams, S.: Attitude toward teamwork and effective teaming. Team Performance Management: An International Journal 10(7/8), 145–151 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Eby, L.T., Dobbins, G.H.: Collectivistic orientation in teams: An individual and group-level of analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior 18(3), 275–295 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Martín-Pérez, V., Martín-Cruz, N., Pérez-Santana, P., Hernangómez-Barahona, J., Martín-Sierra, C. (2010). ‘Virtual Learning-by-Doing’ Teamwork KSA: Strategic Management Simulation as an Effective Tool. In: Lytras, M.D., et al. Technology Enhanced Learning. Quality of Teaching and Educational Reform. TECH-EDUCATION 2010. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 73. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13166-0_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13166-0_36

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-13165-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-13166-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics