Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

One Country, Two Systems, Three Legal Orders - Perspectives of Evolution pp 751–767Cite as

The Theory, Constitution and Practice of Autonomy: The Case of Hong Kong

  • Conference paper

The experiment of “one country, two systems” has been practiced in Hong Kong for almost 10 years. “One country, two systems” in Hong Kong can be considered a case study of autonomy in comparative constitutional law and politics. It is hoped that the study of Hong Kong's experience in this regard may contribute to general theories of autonomy as well as to other possible models of autonomy in China in future, particularly with regard to the issue of Taiwan. In this paper, we will (in part I) first review some general theoretical considerations relevant to the study of autonomy as a constitutional and political arrangement. We will then (in part II) consider the case of Hong Kong, including the historical origins of Hong Kong's autonomy under the conceptual framework of “one country, two systems”, the constitutional design of such autonomy, its general practice since 1997, and the possible strengths and weaknesses of this model of autonomy. We will then (in part III) explore the question of governance and democracy in Hong Kong as a possible test of Hong Kong's autonomy under Chinese rule. The article will (in part IV) conclude with some reflections regarding the “one country, two systems” model of autonomy as practiced in Hong Kong in the last 10 years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allcock R (2000) Application of Article 158 of the Basic Law. Paper presented at Constitutional law conference on implementation of the Basic Law: a comparative perspective, Faculty of Law, University of Hong Kong and the Department of Justice, HKSAR. Hong Kong, 28–29 April 2000

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonavia D (1983) Hong Kong 1999. South China Morning Post, Hong Kong

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan MK (ed.) (1997) The challenge of Hong Kong's reintegration with China. Hong Kong University Press, Hong Kong

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan MK, Clark DJ (eds.) (1991) The Hong Kong Basic Law: blueprint for “stability and prosperity” under Chinese sovereignty? Hong Kong University Press, Hong Kong

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan MK, Postiglione GA (eds.) (1996) The Hong Kong reader: passage to Chinese sovereignty. Armonk, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen AHY (1989) From colony to Special Administrative Region: Hong Kong's constitutional journey. In: Wacks R (ed.) The future of the law in Hong Kong. Oxford University Press, Hong Kong

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen AHY (1994) Some reflections on Hong Kong's autonomy. Hong Kong Law J 24:173

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen AHY (1997a) The provisional legislative council of the SAR. Hong Kong Law J 27(1):9–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen AHY (1997b) Legal preparation for the establishment of the Hong Kong SAR: chronology and selected documents. Hong Kong Law J 27:405

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen A (1999) Constitutional crisis in Hong Kong: congressional supremacy and judicial review. The International Lawyer 33:1025

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen AHY (2008) A new era in Hong Kong's constitutional history. Hong Kong Law J 38:1

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiu H et al (eds.) (1987) The future of Hong Kong: toward 1997 and beyond. Quorum Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Chow LCH, Fan YK (eds.) (1999) The other Hong Kong report 1998. Chinese University of Hong Kong Press, Hong Kong

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghai Y (1995a) Hong Kong and Macau in transition (I): debating democracy. Democratization 2:270

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghai Y (1995b) Hong Kong and Macau in transition (II): exploring the new political order. Democratization 2:291

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghai Y (1999) Hong Kong's new constitutional order: the resumption of Chinese sovereignty and the Basic Law, 2nd edn. Hong Kong University Press, Hong Kong

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghai Y (2000) The Basic Law of the Special Administrative Region of Macau: some reflections. Int Comp Law Q 49:183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannum H (1990) Autonomy, sovereignty and self-determination. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang Yi (1990) Xianggang Wenti He Yiguo Liangzhi (The question of Hong Kong and “one country, two systems”). Dadi Chubanshe, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Jao YC et al (eds.) (1985) Hong Kong and 1997: strategies for the future. Centre of Asian Studies, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong

    Google Scholar 

  • King AYC (1995) “One country, two systems”: an idea on trial. In: Gungwu W, Siu-lun W (eds.) Hong Kong's transition: a decade after the deal. Oxford University Press, Hong Kong

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuan H-C et al. (1996) The 1995 legislative council elections in Hong Kong. The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuan H-C et al. (eds.) (1999) Power transfer and electoral politics: the first legislative election in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung B, Cheng J (eds.) (1997) Hong Kong SAR: in pursuit of domestic and international order. Chinese University Press, Hong Kong

    Google Scholar 

  • Liaowang zhoukan haiwaiban bianjibu (eds.) (1988) “Yiguo Liangzhi” Yu Zuguo Tongyi (“One country, two systems” and China's reunification). Editorial department of the overseas edition of Liangwang weekly

    Google Scholar 

  • Ling B (1999) Can Hong Kong courts review and nullify acts of the National People's Congress? Hong Kong Law J 29:8

    Google Scholar 

  • Lo S-H (1995a) Comparative political systems: the cases of Hong Kong and Macau. J Contemp Asia 25:254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo S-H (1995b) Political development in Macau. Chinese University Press, Hong Kong

    Google Scholar 

  • Lo S-H (1997) The politics of democratization in Hong Kong. Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch K (1999) The temptation to intervene: problems created by government intervention in the Hong Kong stock market. Hong Kong Law J 29:123

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma Y-J (1993) Policy towards the Chinese mainland: Taipei's view. In Tsang S (ed.) In the shadow of China: political developments in Taiwan since 1949. Hong Kong University Press, Hong Kong

    Google Scholar 

  • Mushkat R (1997) One country, two international legal personalities: the case of Hong Kong. Hong Kong University Press, Hong Kong

    Google Scholar 

  • Patrikeeff F (1989) Mouldering pearl: Hong Kong at the crossroads. George Philip, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Postiglione GA, Tang JTH (eds.) (1997) Hong Kong's reunion with China: global dimensions. Armonk, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tai BY (1999) The development of constitutionalism in Hong Kong. In: Wacks R (ed.) The new legal order in Hong Kong. Hong Kong University Press, Hong Kong

    Google Scholar 

  • Wacks R (1993) One country, two Grundnormen? The Basic Law and the Basic Norm. In: Wacks R (ed.) Hong Kong, China and 1997: Essays in legal theory. Hong Kong University Press, Hong Kong

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang S (ed.) (1997) Xianggang Tebiexingzhengqu Jibenfa Daolun (An introduction to the Basic Law of the HKSAR). Zhonggong Zhongyang Dangxiao Chubanshe, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang G, Wong J (eds.) (1999) Hong Kong in China: the challenges of transition. Times Academic, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • Weng BSJ (1988) The Hong Kong model of “one country, two systems”: promises and problems. In: Wesley-Smith P, Chen A (eds.) The Basic Law and Hong Kong's future. Butterworth, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Wesley-Smith P, Chen A (eds.) (1988) The Basic Law and Hong Kong's future. Butterworth, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu H-H (1994), Bridging the strait: Taiwan, China, and the prospects for reunification. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiao W (ed.) (1990) Yiguo Liangzhi Yu Xianggang Tebiexingzhengqu Jibenfa (“One country, two systems” and the Basic Law of the HKSAR). Cultural and Educational Publications, Hong Kong

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu Chongde (ed.) (1999) Xianfa (Constitutional law). Zhongguo zhengfa daxue chubanshe, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang J (1999) Aomen Jibenfa Shiyi (Commentary on the Basic Law of Macau). People's Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang J, Li X (1997) Gangao Jibenfa Bijiao Yanjiu (A comparative study of the Basic Laws of Hong Kong and Macau). Peking University Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Yee HS, Lo SH (1991) Macau in transition: politics of decolonisation. Asian Surv 31:905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao C (ed.) (1988) Yiguo Liangzhi Gailun (General princiles of “one country, two systems”). Jilin Daxue Chubanshe, Jilin

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong

    Albert H. Y. Chen

Authors
  1. Albert H. Y. Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. International Law Office, Macau

    Jorge Costa Oliveira

  2. University of Macau, Macau

    Paulo Cardinal

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chen, A.H.Y. (2009). The Theory, Constitution and Practice of Autonomy: The Case of Hong Kong. In: Oliveira, J.C., Cardinal, P. (eds) One Country, Two Systems, Three Legal Orders - Perspectives of Evolution. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68572-2_47

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation