Zusammenfassung
Wir leben in einem Zeitalter der religiösen Vielfalt. Es gibt viele unterschiedliche und scheinbar inkompatible religiöse und säkulare Glaubensformen, die einander mit einer erstaunlichen Intensität und Geschwindigkeit dank Globalisierung und sozialen Medien begegnen. Damit wächst die Einsicht, dass das eigene Überzeugungssystem nicht mehr einfach als gegeben und plausibel anzunehmen ist. Aufgrund dieser neuen Entwicklungen haben sich in den letzten Jahren intensive philosophische Diskussionen ergeben.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literatur
Alston, William: Perceiving God: The Epistemology of Religious Experience. Ithaca/London 1991.
Basinger, David: Religious Diversity: A Philosophical Assessment. London 2002.
Chabris, Christopher/Simons, Daniel: The Invisible Gorilla and Other Ways Our Intuition Deceives Us. New York 2011.
Conee, Earl/Feldman, Richard: Evidentialism. Oxford 2004. Cottingham, John: The Spiritual Dimension: Religion, Philosophy and Human Value. Cambridge 2005.
De Cruz, Helen/De Smedt, J.: The Value of Epistemic Disagreement in Scientific Practice: The Case of Homo Floresiensis. In: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 44 (2013), 169–177.
Dormandy, Katherine: Resolving Religious Disagreements: Evidence and Bias. In: Faith and Philosophy 2018a. https://doi.org/10.5840/faithphil201812697.
Dormandy, Katherine: The Epistemic Benefits of Religious Disagreement. In: Religious Studies (im Ersch.), https://doi.org/10.1017/s0034412518000847.
Feldman, Richard: Reasonable Religious Disagreement. In: Antony, Louise (Hg.): Philosophers Without Gods: Meditations on Atheism and the Secular Life. Oxford 2007, 194–214.
Feldman, R./Warfield, T.: Disagreement. Oxford 2010.
Gellman, Jerome: In Defense of a Contented Religious Exclusivism. In: Religious Studies 36/4 (2000), 401–417.
Gutting, Gary: Religious Belief and Religious Skepticism. South Bend 1982.
Hick, John: Religious Pluralism and Salvation. In: Quinn, Philip L. /Meeker, Kevin (Hg.): The Philosophical Challenge of Religious Diversity. Oxford 2000, 54–66.
Hick, John: Problems of Religious Pluralism. New York 1985.
Hick, John: An Interpretation of Religion. New Haven 1989.
Janis, Irving L.: Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes. New York 21982.
King, Nathan: Disagreement: What’s the Problem? or A Good Peer is Hard to Find. In: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research LXXXV/2 (2012), 249–272.
Kuhn, Thomas: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago 1962.
Longino, Helen: Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton 1990.
McKim, Robert: Religious Ambiguity and Religious Diversity. Oxford 2001.
Plantinga, Alvin: Warranted Christian Belief. Oxford 2000a.
Plantinga, Alvin: Pluralism: A Defense of Exclusivism. In: Quinn, Philip L./Meeker, Kevin (Hg.): The Philosophical Challenge of Religious Diversity. Oxford 2000b, 172–192.
Potter, R. Dennis: Religious Disagreement: Internal and External. In: The International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 74/1 (2013), 21–31.
Quinn, Philip: Toward Thinner Theologies: Hick and Alston on Religious Diversity. In: Quinn, Philip L./Meeker, Kevin (Hg.): The Philosophical Challenge of Religious Diversity. Oxford 2000, 226–243.
Schellenberg, John: The Wisdom to Doubt: A Justification of Religious Skepticism. Ithaca 2007.
Solomon, Sheldon/Greenberg, Jeff/Pyszczynski, Tom: A Terror Management Theory of Social Behavior: The Psychological Functions of Self-Esteem and Cultural Worldviews. In: Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 24 (1991). Hg. von M. Zanna, 93–159.
Teresa von Kalkutta (Mutter Teresa): Komm, sei mein Licht! Die geheimen Aufzeichnungen der Heiligen von Kalkutta. Hg. von Brian Kolodiejchuk, übers. von Kathrin Krips- Schmidt. München 2007.
Tetens, Holm: Gott Denken: Ein Versuch über rationale Theologie. Stuttgart 2015.
Ward, Keith: Truth and the Diversity of Religions. In: Quinn, Philip L./Meeker, Kevin (Hg.): The Philosophical Challenge of Religious Diversity. Oxford 2000, 108–125.
Zeimbekis, John/Raftopoulos, Athanassios (Hg.): The Cognitive Penetrability of Perception: New Philosophical Perspectives. Oxford 2015.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dormandy, K. (2019). Die Erkenntnistheorie der religiösen Vielfalt und des religiösen Dissenses. In: Viertbauer, K., Gasser, G. (eds) Handbuch Analytische Religionsphilosophie. J.B. Metzler, Stuttgart. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-04735-9_30
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-04735-9_30
Published:
Publisher Name: J.B. Metzler, Stuttgart
Print ISBN: 978-3-476-04734-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-476-04735-9
eBook Packages: J.B. Metzler Humanities (German Language)