Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
SpringerLink
Log in

Lügen

  • Chapter
Handbuch Pragmatik

  • 13k Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Das Lügen ist ein altes Thema der Philosophie, insbesondere der Ethik. Berühmte Denker, die sich mit dem Lügen befasst haben, waren Augustinus, Thomas von Aquin, und Immanuel Kant. Dass das Lügen als pragmatisches Phänomen aufgefasst wird, geht auf die Sprechakttheorie von John L. Austin und John Searle und die Bedeutungstheorie von Paul Grice zurück (vgl. Falkenberg 1982). Wenn Lügen sprachliche Handlungen sind, müssen sie auch im Rahmen einer Theorie der sprachlichen Handlung, zum Beispiel der Sprechakttheorie, beschrieben werden. So kann man Lügen als unaufrichtige Behauptungen deuten. Das Moment der Unaufrichtigkeit lässt sich auch als Verstoß gegen die erste spezifische Maxime der Qualitätsmaxime im Rahmen der Griceschen Implikaturentheorie analysieren (vgl. Fallis 2012).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Adler, Jonathan E. (1997): Lying, deceiving, or falsely implicating. In: The Journal of Philosophy XCIV, 435–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asher, Nicholas/Lascarides, Alex (2013): Strategic conversation. In: Semantics & Pragmatics 6, 1–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumann, Holger (2015): Gibt es einen moralisch relevanten Unterschied zwischen Lügen und Irreführen? In: Zeitschrift für Praktische Philosophie 2(1), 9–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beier, Kathi (2010): Selbsttäuschung. Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, Thomas L. (2010): Lying and Deception: Theory and Practice. Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm, Roderick M./Feehan, Thomas D. (1977): The intent to deceive. In: The Journal of Philosophy 74, 143–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, Linda/Kay, Paul (1981): Prototype semantics: The English word lie. In: Language 57, 26–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, Simone (2002): Der Wert der Lüge. Paderborn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, Simone (2017): Die Kunst der Lüge. Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dynel, Marta (2011): A web of deceit: A neo-Gricean view on types of verbal deception. In: International Review of Pragmatics 3, 139–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dynel, Marta (2015): Intention to deceive, bald-faced lies, and deceptive implicatures: Insights into Lying at the semantics-pragmatics interface. In: Intercultural Pragmatics 12(3), 309–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dynel, Marta (2016): Comparing and combining covert and overt untruthfulness: On lying, deception, irony and metaphor. In: Pragmatics & Cognition 23(1), 174–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dynel, Marta (2018): Irony, Deception and Humour: Seeking the Truth about Overt and Covert Untruthfulness. Berlin/Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falkenberg, Gabriel (1982): Lügen. Grundzüge einer Theorie sprachlicher Täuschung. Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fallis, Don (2012): Lying as a violation of Grice’s First Maxim of Quality. In: Dialectica 66(4), 563–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fallis, Don (2015): Are bald-faced lies deceptive after all? In: Ratio 28, 81–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankfurt, Harry G. (2005): On Bullshit. Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granhag, Pär Anders/Vrij, Aldert/Verschuere, Bruno (Hg.) (2015): Detecting Deception. Current Challenges and Cognitive Approaches. Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, Stuart P. (2006): Lying, Cheating, and Stealing. A Moral Theory of White-Collar Crime. Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grice, Paul (1989): Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, Jeffrey T. (2009): Digital deception. The practice of lying in the digital age. In: Brooke Harrington (Hg.): Deception. From Ancient Empires to Internet Dating. Stanford, 109–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardcastle, Gary L./Reisch, George A. (2006): Bullshit and Philosophy. Guaranteed to Get Perfect Results Every Time. Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, Karol J. (2010): The Spanish notion of lie: Revisiting Coleman and Kay. In: Journal of Pragmatics 42, 3199–3213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horn, Laurence R. (2017a): What lies beyond: Untangling the web. In: Rachel Giora/Michael Haugh (Hg.): Doing Pragmatics Interculturally: Cognitive, Philosophical, and Sociopragmatic Perspectives. Berlin/Boston/Munich, 151–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, Laurence R. (2017b): Telling it slant: Toward a taxonomy of deception. In: Janet Giltrow/Dieter Stein (Hg.): The Pragmatic Turn: Inference and Interpretation in Legal Discourse. Berlin/Boston/Munich, 23–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornung, Melanie (2016): Classifying prosocial lies. An empirical approach. In: International Review of Pragmatics 8, 219–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hornung, Melanie/Jörg Meibauer (2016): Prosoziale Lügen als pragmatische Kategorie. In: Der Deutschunterricht LXVIII (3), 26–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keiser, Jessica (2016): Bald-faced lies: how to make a move in a language game without making a move in a conversation. In: Philosophical Studies 173, 461–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenyon, Tim (2010): Assertion and capitulation. In: Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91, 352–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lackey, Jennifer (2008): Learning from Words. Testimony as a Source of Knowledge. Oxford.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lackey, Jennifer (2013): Lies and deception: an unhappy divorce. In: Analysis 73(2), 236–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Kang (2013): Little liars: Development of verbal deception in children. In: Child Development Perspectives 7(2), 91–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leland, Patrick R. (2015): Rational responsibility and the assertoric character of bald-faced lies. In: Analysis 75, 550–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, Timothy R. (Hg.) (2014): Encyclopedia of Deception. Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahon, James Edwin (2015): The definition of lying and deception. In: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu.

  • Mayer Lux, Laura (2013): Die konkludente Täuschung beim Betrug. Göttingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meibauer, Jörg (2005): Lying and falsely implicating. In: Journal of Pragmatics 37, 1373–1399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meibauer, Jörg (2011): On lying: Intentionality, implicature, and imprecision. In: Intercultural Pragmatics 8(2), 277–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meibauer, Jörg (2013): Bullshit als pragmatische Kategorie. In: Linguistische Berichte 235, 267–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meibauer, Jörg (2014): Lying at the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface. Berlin/Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meibauer, Jörg (2015): Konzepte des Lügens. In: Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 34(2), 175–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meibauer, Jörg (2016a): Aspects of a theory of bullshit. In: Pragmatics and Cognition 23(1), 69–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meibauer, Jörg (2016b): Understanding bald-faced lies. An experimental approach. In: International Review of Pragmatics 8(2), 247–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meibauer, Jörg (2016c): Topics in a linguistic theory of lying: A reply to Marta Dynel. In: Intercultural Pragmatics 13(1), 107–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meibauer, Jörg (2018a): The linguistics of lying. In: Annual Review of Linguistics 4, 357–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meibauer, Jörg (2018b) (Hg.): The Oxford Handbook of Lying. Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutschmann, Ronja/Wiegmann, Alex (2017): No need for an intention to deceive: Challenging the traditional definition of lying. In: Philosophical Psychology 30(4), 434–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saliger, Frank (2005): Kann und soll das Recht die Lüge verbieten? In: Otto Depenheuer (Hg.): Recht und Lüge. Münster, 93–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saul, Jennifer (2012): Lying, Misleading, and What is Said. An Exploration in Philosophy of Language and in Ethics. Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solan, Lawrence M./Tiersma, Peter M. (2005): Speaking of Crime. The Language of Criminal Justice. Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen, Roy (2007): Bald-faced lies! Lying without the intent to deceive. In: Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 88, 251–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen, Roy (2010): Knowledge-lies. In: Analysis 70(4), 608–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staffel, Julia (2011): Reply to Sorensen, ›Knowledge-lies‹. In: Analysis 71, 300–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stark, Linda (2016): Zu den Entstehungsbedingungen und dem deutsch-didaktischen Nutzen von Bullshit als pragmatischer Kategorie. In: Wirkendes Wort 66(2), 317–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokke, Andreas (2013a): Lying, deceiving, and misleading. In: Philosophy Compass 8(4), 348–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokke, Andreas (2013b): Lying and asserting. In: Journal of Philosophy 110(1), 33–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokke, Andreas (2016): Lying and misleading in discourse. In: Philosophical Review 125(1), 83–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokke, Andreas (2018): Lying and Insincerety. Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokke, Andreas/Fallis, Don (2017): Bullshitting, lying and indifference toward truth. In: Ergo 4(10), 277–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turri, John (2015): Selfless assertions: some empirical evidence. In: Synthese 192, 1221–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turri, Angelo/Turri, John (2015): The truth about lying. In: Cognition 138, 161–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turri, Angelo/Turri, John (2016): Lying, uptake, assertion, and intent. In: International Review of Pragmatics 8(2), 314–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vincent Marelli, Jocelyne (2004): Words in the Way of Truth. Truthfulness, Deception, Lying across Cultures and Disciplines. Napoli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincent, Jocelyne/Castelfranchi, Cristiano (1981): On the art of deception: How to lie while saying the truth. In: Herman Parret/Marina Sbisà/Jef Verschueren (Hg.): Possibilities and Limitations of Pragmatics. Proceedings of the Conference on Pragmatics, Urbino, July 8–14. Amsterdam, 749–777.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrij, Aldert (2008): Detecting Lies and Deceit: The Psychology of Lying and the Implications for Professional Practice. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weissman, Benjamin/Terkourafi, Marina (2016): Are false implicatures lies? An experimental investigation. In: Fabienne Salfner/Uli Sauerland (Hg.): Pre-proceedings of ›Trends in Experimental Pragmatics‹, XPRAG, Berlin, 162–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiegmann, Alex/Samland, Jana/Waldmann, Michael R. (2016): Lying despite telling the truth. In: Cognition 150, 37–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiegmann, Alex/Willemsen, Pascale (2017): How the truth can make a great lie: An empirical investigation of lying by falsely implicating. In: CogSci 2017, 3516–3521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Bernard (2002): Truth and Truthfulness. An Essay in Genealogy. Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer, Heinz/Perner, Josef (1983): Beliefs about beliefs: representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. In: Cognition 13, 103–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Deutschland

    Jörg Meibauer

Authors
  1. Jörg Meibauer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Universität Leipzig, Leipzig, Deutschland

    Frank Liedtke  & Astrid Tuchen  & 

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Meibauer, J. (2018). Lügen. In: Liedtke, F., Tuchen, A. (eds) Handbuch Pragmatik. J.B. Metzler, Stuttgart. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-04624-6_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-04624-6_33

  • Publisher Name: J.B. Metzler, Stuttgart

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-476-04623-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-476-04624-6

  • eBook Packages: J.B. Metzler Humanities (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation