Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Reducing Burglary pp 45–75Cite as

Domestic Burglary: Burglar Responses to Target Attractiveness

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Secured by Design (SBD) is a place-based approach to crime reduction that brings together standards of physical security with the broader principles of Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) to set minimum requirements that enable properties to be awarded SBD status. Developed in 1989 in England, SBD is managed by Police Crime Prevention Initiatives and delivered by Designing Out Crime Officers (DOCOs), Architectural Liaison Officers (ALOs) and Crime Prevention Design Advisors (CPDAs) located within each police force. Whilst the effectiveness of the scheme has been evaluated, so far studies have drawn only on police-recorded or self-reported crime. This study adds offender perceptions to that collection of evaluations. Twenty-two prolific burglars were asked to interpret a series of 16 images of residential housing. The results confirm that housing design plays a key role in influencing offender decision-making, the risk of surveillance and standards of physical security being primary deterrents. The findings highlight areas for improvement within the scheme, particularly relating to measures based upon the concepts of defensible space and management and maintenance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

ACPO:

Association of Chief Police Officers

ALO:

Architectural Liaison Officer

CPDA:

Crime Prevention Design Advisor

CPTED:

Crime Prevention through Environmental Design

DCLG:

Department for Communities and Local Government

DOCO:

Designing Out Crime Officer

ODPM:

Office of the Deputy Prime Minister

SBD:

Secured by Design

References

  • Armitage, R. (2000). An evaluation of secured by design housing within West Yorkshire – Briefing Note 7/00. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, R. (2004). Secured By design – An investigation of its history, Development and future role in crime reduction. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, R. (2006). Sustainability versus safety: Confusion, conflict and contradiction in designing out crime. In G. Farrell, K. Bowers, S. Johnson, & M. Townsley (Eds.), Imagination for crime prevention: Essays in Honour of Ken Pease, Crime prevention studies (Vol. 21, pp. 81–110). Monsey, New York: Criminal Justice Press and Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, R. (2013). Crime prevention through housing design: Policy and practice, Crime Prevention and Security Management Book Series. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, R. (2017a). Burglars’ take on crime prevention through environmental design. Security Journal, 31, 285. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41284-017-0101-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, R. (2017b). Crime prevention through environmental design. In R. Wortley & M. Townsley (Eds.), Environmental criminology and crime analysis (pp. 259–285). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, R., & Monchuk, L. (2011). Sustaining the crime reduction impact of secured by design: 1999 to 2009. Security Journal, 24(4), 320–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, R., Monchuk, L., & Rogerson, M. (2010). It looks good, but what is it like to live there? Assessing the impact of award winning design on crime. Special Volume of European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 17(1), 29–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birks, D., & Davies, T. (2017). Street network structure and crime risk: An agent-based investigation of the encounter and enclosure hypothesis. Criminology, 55(4), 900–937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, K. J., & Guerette, R.T. (2014). Effectiveness of situational crime prevention. In G. Bruinsma & D. Weisburd (Editors in Chief) Encyclopaedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice (pp. 1318–1329). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brantingham, P. J., & Brantingham, P. L. (1993). Environment, routine and situation: Toward a pattern theory of crime. Advances in Criminological Theory, 5, 259–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooke, M. (2013). Secured by design – The story so far. Safer Communities, 12(4), 154–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B. B., & Altman, I. (1983). Territoriality, defensible space and residential burglary: An environmental analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3, 203–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B., & Bentley, D. (1993). Residential burglars judge risk: The role of territoriality. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13, 51–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budd, T. (1999). Burglary of domestic dwellings. Findings from the British Crime Survey. Issue 4/1999. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, R. V. (1992). Introduction. In R. V. Clarke (Ed.), Situational crime prevention – Successful case studies (pp. 3–36). New York: Harrow and Heston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copes, H., & Hochstetler, A. (2014). Consenting to talk: Why inmates participate in prison research. In P. Cromwell & M. Birzer (Eds.), Their own words: Criminals on crime (pp. 19–33). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cozens, P., Hillier, D., & Prescott, G. (2001). Defensible space: Burglars and police evaluate urban residential design. Security Journal., 14, 43–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cromwell, P. F., & Olson, J. N. (1991). Breaking and entering: An ethnographic analysis of burglary. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, T., & Johnson, S. D. (2014). Examining the relationship between road structure and burglary risk via quantitative network analysis. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 31, 481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-014-9235-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department for Communities and Local Government. (2005). Planning policy statement 1: Delivering sustainable development. http://www.communities.gov.uk/publications/planningandbuilding/planningpolicystatement1. Accessed 21 Mar 2012.

  • Department for Communities and Local Government. (2006). Circular 01/2006: Guidance on changes to the development control system. London: DCLG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Communities and Local Government. (2008). The code for sustainable homes: Setting the standard in sustainability in new homes. London: DCLG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Communities and Local Government (2011). Planning policy statement 3: Housing. http://www.communities.gov.uk/publications/planningandbuilding/pps3housing. Accessed 21 Mar 2012.

  • Department for Communities and Local Government. (2012a). External review of government planning practice guidance. London: DCLG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Communities and Local Government. (2012b). National Planning Policy Framework. London: DCLG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Environment, Transport and the Regions. (1999). Towards an urban renaissance – Final report of the urban task force. London: DETR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of the Environment. (1994). Planning out crime: Circular 5/94. London: DoE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elffers, H. (2010). Misinformation, misunderstanding and misleading as validity threats to accounts of offending. In W. Bernasco (Ed.), Offenders on offending: Learning about crime from criminals (pp. 13–22). Cullompton: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Everson, S. (2000). Repeat offenders and repeat victims: Mutual attraction or misfortune? Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Huddersfield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Great Britain. (1998). Crime and Disorder Act 1998. Chapter 37. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homel, R., Macintyre, S., & Wortley, R. (2014). How burglars decide on targets: A computer-based scenario approach. In B. LeClerc & R. Wortley (Eds.), Cognition and crime: Offender decision making and script analyses (pp. 26–47). Oxford: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Housing Corporation. (2003). Scheme development standards (5th ed.). London: Housing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Housing Corporation. (2007). Design and quality standards. London: Housing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffery, C. R. (1971). Crime prevention through environmental design. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S., & Bowers, K. J. (2010). Permeability and burglary risk: Are Cul-de-Sacs safer? Quantitative Journal of Criminology, 26(1), 89–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. D., & Bowers, K. J. (2014). How guardianship dynamics may vary across the street network: A case study of residential burglary. In Liber amicorum voor Henk Elffers. NSCR: Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, A., Valero-Silva, N., & Lucas, D. (2016). The effects of ‘secure warm modern’ homes in Nottingham: Decent homes impact study. Nottingham: Nottingham City Homes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearns, J. N., & Fincham, F. D. (2005). Victim and perpetrator accounts of interpersonal transgressions: Self-serving or relationship-serving biases? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(3), 321–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montoya, L., Junger, M., & Ongena, Y. (2016). The relation between residential property and its surroundings and day- and night-time residential burglary. Environment and Behavior, 09(2014), 516–549. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916514551047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss, K., & Pease, K. (1999). Crime and Disorder Act 1998: Section 17 a wolf in sheep’s clothing? Crime Prevention and Community Safety: An International Journal, 1(4), 15–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nee, C. (2003). Research on burglary at the end of the millennium: A grounded approach to understanding crime. Security Journal, 16(3), 37–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nee, C., & Meenaghan, A. (2006). Expert decision making in burglars. British Journal of Criminology, 46, 935–949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nee, C., White, M., Woolford, K., Pascu, T., Barker, L., & Wainwright, L. (2015). New methods for examining expertise in burglars in natural and simulated environments: preliminary findings. Psychology, Crime & Law, 21(5), 507–513. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2014.989849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, O. (1973). Defensible space: People and design in the Violent City. London: Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. (2000). Our towns and cities: The future – Delivering an urban renaissance. London: ODPM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of the Deputy Prime Minister and Home Office. (2004). Safer places – The planning system and crime prevention. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascoe, T. (1999). Evaluation of secured by design in public sector housing – Final report. Watford: BRE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pease, K. (2001). Cracking crime through design. London: Design Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pease, K., & Gill, M. (2011). Direct and indirect costs and benefits of home security and place design. Leicester: Perpetuity Research and Consultancy International Ltd..

    Google Scholar 

  • Reppetto, T. A. (1974). Residential crime. Cambridge: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynald, D. (2009). Guardianship in action: Developing a new tool for measurement. Crime Prevention and Community Safety, 11, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynald, D. (2010). Guardians on guardianship: Factors affecting the willingness to supervise, the ability to detect potential offenders, and the willingness to intervene. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 47(3), 358–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynald, D. M., & Elffers, H. (2009). The future of Newman’s defensible space theory linking defensible space and the routine activities of place. European Journal of Criminology, 6(1), 25–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Secured by Design. (2016). Secured by Design New Homes – 2014. London: Secured by Design.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, M., & Pease, K. (2000). Research on repeat victimisation in Scotland: Final report. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive Central Research Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidebottom, A. L., Tilley, N., Johnson, S., Bowers, K., Tompson, L., Thornton, A., & Bullock, K. (2017a). Gating alleys to reduce crime: A meta-analysis and realist synthesis. Justice Quarterly, 35, 55. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2017.1293135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidebottom, A.L., Armitage, R., Tompson, L. (2017b, March). Reducing crime through secured by design: A systematic review. Secured by Design National Training Event 2017. Northampton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, R. (2002). Crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED): Yes, no, maybe, unknowable and all of the above. In R. B. Bechtel & A. Churchman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 413–426). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, R., & Gottfredson, S. D. (1987). Environmental design, crime and prevention: An examination of community dynamics. Crime and Justice: An Annual Review of the Research, 8, 387–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teedon, P., Reid, T., Griffiths, P., Lindsay, K., Glen, S., McFayden, A., & Cruz, P. (2009). Secured by design impact evaluation final report. Glasgow: Glasgow Caledonian University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tseloni, A. (2006). Multilevel modeling of the number of property crimes: Household and area effects. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 169(2), 205–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tseloni, A., Ntzoufras, I., Nicolaou, A., & Pease, K. (2010). Concentration of personal and household crimes in England and Wales. European Journal of Applied Mathematics, 21(45), 325–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tseloni, A., Thompson, R., Grove, L. E., Tilley, N., & Farrell, G. (2014). The effectiveness of burglary security devices. Security Journal (advance online publication 30 June 2014; https://doi.org/10.1057/sj.2014.30).

  • Van Der Voordt, T. J. M., & Van Wegen, H. B. R. (1990). Testing building plans for public safety: Usefulness of the delft checklist. Netherlands Journal of Housing and Environmental Research, 5(2), 129–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Gelder, J.-L., Nee, C., Otte, M., van Sintemaartensdijk, I., Demetriou, A., & van Prooijen, J.-W. (2017). Virtual burglary: Exploring the potential of virtual reality to study burglary in action. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 54(1), 29–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427816663997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vollaard, B., & Ours, J. C. V. (2011). Does regulation of built-in security reduce crime? Evidence from a natural experiment. The Economic Journal., 121(May), 485–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisburd, D. (2015). The law of crime concentration and the criminology of place. Criminology, 53(2), 133–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiles, P., & Costello, A. (2000). The ‘road to nowhere’: The evidence for travelling criminals (Home Office Research Study 207). London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winchester, S., & Jackson, H. (1982). Residential burglary: The limits of prevention (Home Office Research Study Number 74). London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UK

    Rachel Armitage

Authors
  1. Rachel Armitage
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rachel Armitage .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Armitage, R. (2018). Domestic Burglary: Burglar Responses to Target Attractiveness. In: Reducing Burglary. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99942-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99942-5_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-99941-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-99942-5

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation