Skip to main content

Perfumed Performances: The Reception of Olfactory Theatrical Devices from the Fin-de-siècle to the Present Day

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 597 Accesses

Part of the book series: Avant-Gardes in Performance ((AGP))

Abstract

Perfume is not a common object for media studies, but the devices created to spread and store perfume challenge, in a specific way, two major issues of media theory: novelty and proximity. This chapter outlines the ways in which the history of olfactory devices appears to be tied with the general history of olfactory culture. The focus on mystic references to perfumes in the nineteenth century demonstrates how our obsession for body odours originates in a combination of fascination and repulsion, a need for sublimation. The perfect deodorization that affected society, including in theatre architecture, left us with a strong fear and nostalgia of body smells that are still perceptible in contemporary olfactory art.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The influence of cultural background in the reception of smells has already been studied by many scientists (Ferdenzi et al. 2017).

References

  • Arasse, Daniel. 1992. Le Détail: pour une histoire rapporchée de la peinture. Paris: Flammarion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aurès, Auguste. 1866. Notes sur l’emploi des parfums dans les théâtres et dans les amphitéâtres antiques. Nîmes: Clavel-Ballivet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banes, Sally. 2001. Olfactory Performances. The Drama Review 45 (1): 68–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baps, Germain. 1893. Essai sur l’histoire du theâtre: la mise en scène, le décor, le costume, l’architecture, l’éclairage, l’hygiène. Paris: Hachette.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briot, Eugénie. 2015. La Fabrique des parfums: naissance d’une industrie de luxe. Paris: Vendemiaire.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choquet, Edouard. 1887. Théâtre ancien: résumé historique d’architecture, aperçu de l’histoire et de la littérature dramatique, représentations scéniques considérées dans leurs rapports avec l’hygiène. Paris: Tresse et Stock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clément, P. 1882. Le Manuel complet de parfumerie ou l’art de faire des parfums augmenté de la recette pour faire un baume Jascheck et divers autres. Verdun: P. Bertinet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowther, Bosley. 1959. Smells of China; ‘Behind Great Wall’ Uses AromaRama. New York Times, December 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cyr, Catherine. 2007. Représentation et olfaction: le spectateur au parfum. Jeu: revue de théâtre 125: 127–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daston, Lorraine, and Peter Galison. 2007. Objectivity. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descamps, Jean-Baptiste. 1753. La vie des peintres flamands, allemands et hollandais, Tome I. Paris: Charles-Antoine Jonbert.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domisseck, Sophie, and Roland Salesse. 2015. Le spectateur olfactif: La reception de la pièce Les parfums de l’âme par le public. In L’Art olfactif contemporain, ed. Chantal Jaquet, 287–298. Paris: Classiques Garnier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driou, Alfred. 1873. L’Antiquité pittoresque.... Les peuples illustres: descriptions topographiques, histoire, religion, mœurs, coutumes, monuments, arts et curiosités de l’Asie, de la Phénicie, de la Syrie, de la Judée ou Terre promise, etc. Vol. III. Limoges: Ardant.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fénelon, François de Salignac de La Mothe. 1983. Voyage dans l’île des plaisirs. In Oeuvres tome 1, ed. Jacques Le Brun. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferdenzi, Camille, et al. 2017. Individual Differences in Verbal and Non-Verbal Affective Responses to Smells: Influence of Odor Label Across Cultures. Chemical Senses 42: 37–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleischer, Mary. 2007. Incense & Decadence: Symbolist Theatre’s Use of Scent. In The Senses in Performance, ed. Sally Banes and André Lepecki, 105–114. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fouquier, Henry. 1891. L’Art Mystique. Le Figaro, December 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galopin, Augustin. 1886. Le parfum de la femme et le sens olfactif dans l’amour. Paris: Le Dentu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, Charles. 1892. Les odeurs: demonstrations pratiques avec l’olfactomètre et le pèse-vapeur: conference du 14 mars 1891. Paris: A. Hermann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, Frank W., and William G. Bailey. 1990. Art & Entertainment Fads. In New York. London: The Haworth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hostein, Hyppolyte. 1878. Historiettes et souvenirs d’un homme de théâtre. Paris: E. Dentu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huysmans, Joris-Karl. 1922. Against the Grain. Tran. John Howard. New York: Lieber & Lewis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel. 1914. Critique of Judgment. Trans. J. H. Bernard. London: Macmillan and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, Cheryl. 2014. Decadent Perfume: Under the Skin and Through the Page. Modern Languages Open. www.modernlanguagesopen.org/index.php/mlo/article/view/36/43. Accessed 12 Dec 2016.

  • Leclercq, Julien. 1892. Théâtre d’art. Le Mercure de France, January 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maeterlinck, Maurice. 2007. The Intelligence of Flowers. Trans. Philip Mosley. New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manescu, Simona, et al. 2014. Now You Like Me, Now You Don’t: Impact of Labels on Odour Perception. Chemical Senses 39: 197–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martel, Charles. 1891. Courrier dramatique: représentation du Théâtre d’Art. La Justice, December 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paillot de Montabert, Jacques-Nicolas. 1829–1851. Traité complet de la peinture Tome VIII. Paris: J.-F. Delion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paquet, Dominique. 2004. La dimension olfactive dans le théâtre contemporain: le corps en question. Paris: L’Harmattan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renard, Jules. 2004. Journal 1887–1910. Arles: Actes Sud.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rimmel, Eugène. 1867. The Book of Perfume. London: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd-Barr, Kirsten. 1999. ‘Mise en Scent’: The Théâtre d’Art’s Cantique des cantiques and the Use of Smell as a Theatrical Device. Theatre Research International 24 (2): 152–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taillis. 1891. Théâtres et concerts. La France moderne: Littérature, sciences et art contemporain, December 31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicky, Érika. 2014. La peinture à vue de nez: la juste distance du critique d’art de Diderot à Zola. RACAR (Revue d’art canadienne/Canadian Art Review) 39 (1): 76–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. Gramaire olfactive: les parfums au pluriel. Littérature 185: 68–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zola, Émile. 1886. The Ladies Paradise. Trans. Ernest Alfred Vizetelly. London: Vizetelly and Co.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wicky, É. (2019). Perfumed Performances: The Reception of Olfactory Theatrical Devices from the Fin-de-siècle to the Present Day. In: Wynants, N. (eds) Media Archaeology and Intermedial Performance. Avant-Gardes in Performance. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99576-2_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics