Abstract
We extend the argument on the importance of teachers’ knowledge of advanced mathematics, group theory in particular. We present several examples in which familiarity with properties of groups guided the teacher’s responses in unexpected instructional situations, to which we refer as situations of contingency. We further describe how the situations inspired the design of tasks that capitalize on the applicability of advanced knowledge, and strengthen learners’ connections between different areas of mathematics.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ameis, J. A. (2011). The truth about PEDMAS. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 16(7), 414–420.
Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.
Childs, L. N. (2009). A concrete introduction to higher algebra (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.
Devlin, K. J. (1981). Sets, functions and logic: Basic concepts of university mathematics. New York, NY: Springer.
Dubinsky, E., Dautermann, J., Leron, U., & Zazkis, R. (1994). On learning fundamental concepts of group theory. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 27(3), 267–305.
Dummit, D. S., & Foote, R. M. (2004). Abstract algebra (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
Even, R. (2011). The relevance of advanced mathematics studies to expertise in secondary school mathematics teaching: Practitioners’ views. ZDM Mathematics Education, 43(6–7), 941–950.
Glidden, P. L. (2008). Prospective elementary teachers’ understanding of order of operations. School Science and Mathematics, 108(4), 130–136.
Hadamard, J. (1945). The psychology of invention in the mathematical field. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Hadar, N., & Hadass, R. (1981). Between associativity and commutativity. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 12(5), 535–539.
Hill, H. C., Ball, D. L., & Schilling, S. G. (2008). Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: Conceptualizing and measuring teachers’ topic-specific knowledge. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 372–400.
Koichu, B. (2008). If not, what yes? International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 39(4), 443–454.
Kontorovich, I., & Zazkis, R. (2017). Mathematical conventions: Revisiting arbitrary and necessary. For the Learning of Mathematics, 37(1), 29–34.
Larsen, S. (2010). Struggling to disentangle the associative and commutative properties. For the Learning of Mathematics, 30(1), 37–42.
Mason, J. (2002). Researching your own practice: The discipline of noticing. London, UK: Routledge Falmer.
Musser, G. L., Burger, W. F., & Peterson, B. E. (2010). Mathematics for elementary teachers: A contemporary approach (9th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Polya, G. (1981). Mathematical discovery: On understanding, learning, and teaching problem solving (Combined). New York, NY: Wiley.
Rowland, T., Huckstep, P., & Thwaites, A. (2005). Elementary teachers’ mathematics subject knowledge: The knowledge quartet and the case of Naomi. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8(3), 255–281.
Simon, M. A. (2006). Key developmental understandings in mathematics: A direction for investigating and establishing learning goals. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 8(4), 359–371.
Stewart, J. (2008). Calculus: Early transcendentals (6th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Learning.
Tall, D. (2013). How humans learn to think mathematically: Exploring the three worlds of Mathematics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Wasserman, N. H. (2016). Abstract algebra for algebra teaching: Influencing school mathematics instruction. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 16(1), 28–47.
Wasserman, N. H. (2017). Making sense of Abstract Algebra: Exploring secondary teachers’ understandings of inverse functions in relation to its group structure. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 19(3), 181–201.
Wasserman, N. H. (2018). Knowledge of nonlocal mathematics for teaching. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 49, 116–128.
Watson, A., & Mason, J. (2005). Mathematics as a constructive activity: Learners generating examples. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Weber, K., & Larsen, S. (2008). Teaching and learning group theory. In M. P. Carlson & C. Rasmussen (Eds.), Making the connection: Research and teaching in undergraduate mathematics education (pp. 139–151). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
Zaslavsky, O., & Peled, I. (1996). Inhibiting factors in generating examples by mathematics teachers and student teachers: The case of binary operation. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(1), 67–78.
Zazkis, R. (2017). Order of operations: On conventions, mnemonics and knowledge-in-use. For the Learning of Mathematics, 37(3), 18–20.
Zazkis, R., & Chernoff, E. J. (2008). What makes a counterexample exemplary? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 68(3), 195–208.
Zazkis, R., & Kontorovich, I. (2016). A curious case of superscript (−1): Prospective secondary mathematics teachers explain. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 43, 98–110.
Zazkis, R., & Leikin, R. (2010). Advanced mathematical knowledge in teaching practice: Perceptions of secondary mathematics teachers. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 12(4), 263–281.
Zazkis, R., & Mamolo, A. (2011). Reconceptualising knowledge at the mathematical horizon. For the Learning of Mathematics, 31(2), 8–13.
Zazkis, R., & Rouleau, A. (2018). Order of operations: On convention and met-before acronyms. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 97(2), 143–162.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zazkis, R., Marmur, O. (2018). Groups to the Rescue: Responding to Situations of Contingency. In: Wasserman, N. (eds) Connecting Abstract Algebra to Secondary Mathematics, for Secondary Mathematics Teachers. Research in Mathematics Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99214-3_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99214-3_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-99213-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-99214-3
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)