Skip to main content

Institutional Practice and Praxis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Conceptualising the Digital University

Part of the book series: Digital Education and Learning ((DEAL))

  • 687 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, the main concerns lie with the means through which we can translate dialogue and a shared commitment to a more creative, effective, and democratic harnessing of the digital into enabling institutional strategies, policies, and practices. The expanded conceptual matrix and digitally distributed curriculum constructs are positioned as tools to guide collective critical reflection, dialogue, decision-making, and action. Key challenges and enabling dimensions in relation to institutional practice and praxis are explored, including distributed academic leadership, reconciling value pluralism, permissive institutional policies and strategies, and commitment to social justice. The chapter concludes by outlining a number of aspirations and possibilities pertaining to future developments at the institutional level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bolden, R., Petrov, G., & Gosling, J. (2009). Distributed Leadership in Higher Education: Rhetoric and Reality. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 37(2), 257–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143208100301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, J., & Naidoo, R. (2008). Higher Education and the Achievement (and/or Prevention) of Equity and Social Justice. Higher Education, 56(3), 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9127-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czerniewicz, L., & Brown, C. (2009). Intermediaries and Infrastructure as Agents: The Mediation of e-Learning Policy and Use by Institutional Culture. In T. Mayes, D. Morrison, H. Mellar, P. Bullen, & M. Oliver (Eds.), Transforming Higher Education Through Technology-Enhanced Learning (pp. 107–121). York: Higher Education Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. (2011). Towards a Resilient Strategy for Technology-Enhanced Learning. Campus-Wide Information Systems, Special Issue of on Learning Technology and Institutional Strategy, 28(4), 234–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harkavy, I. (2006). The Role of Universities in Advancing Citizenship and Social Justice in the 21st Century. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 1(1), 5–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/1746197906060711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M., & Smyth, K. (2011). Diversity, Value and Technology: Exposing Value Pluralism in Institutional Strategy. Campus-Wide Information Systems, Special Issue of on Learning Technology and Institutional Strategy, 28(4), 211–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S., Lefoe, G., Harvey, M., & Ryland, K. (2012). Distributed Leadership: A Collaborative Framework for Academics, Executives and Professionals in Higher Education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 34(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2012.642334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayes, T., Morrison, D., Mellar, H., Bullen, P., & Oliver, M. (Eds.). (2009). Transforming Higher Education Through Technology-Enhanced Learning. York: Higher Education Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rambe, P., & Dzansi, D. Y. (2016). Informal Distributed Leadership in Technology Adoption. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 8(2), 155–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2016.1147200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, R., Benfield, G., & Richard, F. (2006). Implementing a University e-Learning Strategy: Levers for Change Within Academic Schools. ALT-J, 14(2), 135–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687760600668503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strickland, K., McLatchie, J., & Pelik, R. (2011). Reflections on the Development of a Dynamic Learning, Teaching and Assessment Strategy. Campus-Wide Information Systems, Special Issue of on Learning Technology and Institutional Strategy, 28(4), 294–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitchurch, C., & Gordon, G. (2017). Reconstructing Relationships in Higher Education: Challenging Agendas. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Johnston, B., MacNeill, S., Smyth, K. (2018). Institutional Practice and Praxis. In: Conceptualising the Digital University. Digital Education and Learning. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99160-3_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99160-3_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-99159-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-99160-3

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics