Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reverie as Reflexivity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Diversity, Affect and Embodiment in Organizing

  • 895 Accesses

Abstract

Although diversity categories enable academics to reflect on relationships and power inequities during the research process, psychosocial scholars argue that they also run the risk of homogenising and constraining our understanding of the other. The chapter employs the radical psychoanalytical principles of Reverie by Wilfred Bion (1962) to develop an approach more attuned to affect in the provision of reflexivity. Drawing on the accounts given by men and women executives and non-executives in accounting and finance, the chapter explains how reverie can alert scholars to the role that affect plays in shaping the direction of an unfolding dialogue, the establishment of affinities, and the presence of unconscious relational forms. The chapter makes a methodological contribution by tracing how the pragmatic imbrication of a specific aspect of psychoanalysis can offer hope to scholars wishing to move beyond the confines of diversity categories, as a way to begin to know their research participants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baker, D.T., and E.K. Kelan. 2018. Splitting and blaming: The psychic life of neoliberal executive women. Human Relations 0 (0): 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bion, W.R. 1962. Learning from experience. London: William Heinemann Medical Books Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. 1990. Gender trouble. New York, US and Oxford, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, D. 2004. The psychoanalytic research interview: Preliminary suggestions. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 52 (1): 209–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Code, L. 1993. Taking subjectivity into account. In Feminist epistemologies, ed. L. Alcoff. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frosh, S. 2010. Psychoanalysis outside the clinic: Interventions in psychosocial studies. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Frosh, S., and L. Baraitser. 2008. Psychoanalysis and psychosocial studies. Psychoanalysis, Culture and Society 13 (S4): 346–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, R. 1998. Standpoints and differences: Writing, reflexivity and the crisis of representation. In Standpoint and differences: Essays in the practice of feminist psychology, ed. K. Henwood, C. Griffin, and A. Phoenix. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. Breaking the silence: The hidden injuries of the neoliberal university. In Secrecy and silence in the research process: Feminist reflections, ed. R. Ryan-Flood and R. Gill. Abingdon/New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, R., and C. Scharff. 2011. New feminities: Postfeminism, neoliberalism and subjectivity. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Grenz, S. 2005. Intersections of sex and power in research on prostitution: A female researcher interviewing male heterosexual clients. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 30 (4): 2091–2113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grotstein, J.S. 2007. A beam of intense darkness. London: Karnac Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, S., and K. Norberg. 2005. New feminist approaches in social science; an introduction. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 30 (4): 2009–2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollway, W. 2008a. The importance of relational thinking in the practice of psycho-social research: Ontology, epistemology, methodology and ethics. In Object relations and social relations: The implications of the relational turn in psychoanalysis, ed. S. Clarke, P. Hoggett, and H. Hahn, 137–161. London: Karnac.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008b. Turning psychosocial? Towards a UK network. Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society 13 (2): 199–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. Preserving vital signs: The use of psychoanalytically informed interviewing and observation in psycho-social longitudinal research. In Intensity and insight: Qualitative longitudinal methods as a route into the psycho-social, ed. R. Thomson. Timescapes working paper. Available from www.timescapes.leeds.ac.uk/

  • ———. 2011a. Psycho-social writing from data. Journal of Psycho-Social Studies 5 (1): 92–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011b. Through discursive psychology to a psycho-social approach. In Social psychology: The turn to discourse, ed. N. Bozatzis and T. Dragonas, 209–240. Athens: Metaixmio.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Reverie in psycho-social research methods. Open Seminar video, from our Centre for Psychoanalytic Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. Emotional experience plus reflection: Countertransference and reflexivity in research. The Psychotherapist.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollway, W., and T. Jefferson. 2000a. Biography, anxiety and the experience of locality. In The turn to biographical methods in social science: Comparative issues and examples, ed. P. Chamberlayne, J. Bornat, and T. Wengraf, 167–180. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2000b. Doing qualitative research differently: Free association, narrative and the interview method. London: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2000c. Narrative, discourse and the unconscious: The case of Tommy. In Lines of narrative: Psychosocial perspective, ed. M. Andrews, S.D. Sclater, C. Squire, et al., 202. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. The free association narrative interview method. In The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods, 296–315. Sevenoaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, J. 2012. A comparison of clinical psychoanalysis and research interviews contextualizing the problem: A question of distance depersonalization and the scientific imperative in psychoanalysis and research. Human Relations 66 (669): 1183–1199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, L. 2010. The place of secrets, silences and sexualities in the research process. In Secrecy and silence in the research process: Feminist reflections, ed. R. Ryan-Flood and R. Gill. Abingdon/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvale, S. 2003. The psychoanalytic interview as inspiration for qualitative research. In Qualitative research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design, ed. P.M. Camic, J.E. Rhodes, and L. Yardley, 315. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Letherby, G. 2003. Feminist research in theory and practice. Philadelphia: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard, M. 1995. Beyond the ‘big three’: The development of feminist theory into the 1990s. Women’s History Review 4 (3): 259–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, L. 1997. Capital culture: Gender at work in the city. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001. Men, management and multiple masculinities in organisations. Geoforum 32 (2): 181–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, N. 2006. Psychoanalysis and qualitative psychology: Complementary or contradictory paradigms? Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (3): 213–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oakley, A. 1981. Interviewing women: A contradiction in terms. In Doing feminist research, ed. H. Roberts. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogden, T. 1997a. Reverie and interpretation: Sensing something human. Northvale/London: Jason Aronson Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1997b. Reverie and metaphor: Some thoughts on how I work as a psychoanalyst. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis 78: 719.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parr, J. 1998. Theoretical voices and women’s own voices: The stories of mature women students. In Feminist dilemmas in qualitative research: Public knowledge and private lives, ed. J. Ribbens and J. Edwards. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramazanoglu, C., and J. Holland. 2002. Feminist methodology: Challenges and choices. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reinharz, S. 1979. On becoming a social scientist. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan-Flood, R., and R. Gill. 2010. Introduction. In Secrecy and silence in the research process: Feminist reflections, ed. R. Ryan-Flood and R. Gill. Abingdon/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharff, C. 2010. Silencing differences: The ‘unspoken’ dimensions of ‘speaking for others. In Secrecy and silence in the research process: Feminist reflections, ed. R. Ryan-Flood and R. Gill. Abingdon/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Standing, K. 1998. Writing the voices of the less powerful: Research on lone mothers. In Feminist dilemmas in qualitative research, ed. J. Ribbens and R. Edwards. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walkerdine, V. 2007. Children, gender, video games: Towards a relational approach to multimedia. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, D. 1996. Feminist dilemmas in fieldwork. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Quinn School of Business, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland

    Darren T. Baker

Authors
  1. Darren T. Baker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Darren T. Baker .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Warwick Business School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK

    Marianna Fotaki

  2. Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia

    Alison Pullen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Baker, D.T. (2019). Reverie as Reflexivity. In: Fotaki, M., Pullen, A. (eds) Diversity, Affect and Embodiment in Organizing. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98917-4_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation