Skip to main content

Conservation of Cave Fauna, with an Emphasis on Europe and the Americas

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Cave Ecology

Part of the book series: Ecological Studies ((ECOLSTUD,volume 235))

Abstract

We review significant conservation and management legislation, policies, and other actions that have been implemented or proposed to protect and conserve subterranean biodiversity in Europe, North America, Central America, and South America. In particular, we focus on legislation at the national and international levels that has been passed or proposed to directly or indirectly protect subterranean biodiversity. Other conservation initiatives, such as the IUCN Red List and NatureServe conservation assessment, also have conservation implications for to subterranean biodiversity. However, there remain several limitations of legislation, policies, and other initiatives to protect and conserve subterranean biodiversity on these continents. Several suggestions are set forth to overcome these shortcomings and better facilitate subterranean biodiversity conservation in Europe, North America, Central America, and South America.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baillie JEM, Collen B, Amin R et al (2008) Toward monitoring global biodiversity. Conserv Lett 1:18–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bossart JL, Carlton CE (2002) Insect conservation in America: status and perspectives. Am Entomol 48:82–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso P (2012) Habitats directive species lists: urgent need of revision. Insect Conserv Diver 5:169–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso P, Borges PAV, Triantis KA et al (2011a) Adapting the IUCN Red List criteria for invertebrates. Biol Conserv 144:2432–2440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso P, Erwin TL, Borges PAV et al (2011b) The seven impediments in invertebrate conservation and how to overcome them. Biol Conserv 144:2647–2655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christman MC, Culver DC, Madden M et al (2005) Patterns of endemism of the eastern North American cave fauna. J Biogeogr 32:1441–1452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark JA, May RM (2002) Taxonomic bias in conservation research. Science 297:191–192

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cordeiro LM, Borghezan R, Trajano E (2014) Subterranean biodiversity in the Serra da Bodoquena karst area, Paraguay River basin, Mato Grosso do Sul, southwestern Brazil. Biota Neotrop 14:1–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Culver DC, Pipan T (2009) The biology of caves and other subterranean habitats, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Culver DC, Pipan T (2014) Shallow subterranean habitats. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Culver DC, Sket B (2000) Hotspots of subterranean biodiversity in caves and wells. J Cave Karst Stud 62:11–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Culver DC, Master LL, Christman MC et al (2000) Obligate cave fauna of the 48 contiguous United States. Conserv Biol 14:386–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Culver DC, Deharveng L, Bedos A et al (2006) The mid-latitude biodiversity ridge in terrestrial cave fauna. Ecography 29:120–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danielopol DL, Pospisil P, Rouch R (2000) Biodiversity in groundwater: a large-scale view. Trends Ecol Evol 15:223–224

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Danielopol DL, Artheau M, Marmonier P (2009) Site prioritisation for the protection of rare subterranean species – the cases of two ostracods from south-western France. Freshw Biol 54:877–884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deharveng L, Bedos A (2012) Diversity patterns in the tropics. In: White WB, Culver DC (eds) Encyclopedia of caves, 2nd edn. Academic, Amsterdam, pp 238–250

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Deharveng L, Stoch F, Gibert J et al (2009) Groundwater biodiversity in Europe. Freshw Biol 54:709–726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deharveng L, Gibert J, Culver DC (2012) Diversity patterns in Europe. In: White WB, Culver DC (eds) Encyclopedia of caves, 2nd edn. Academic, Amsterdam, pp 219–228

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott WR (2000) Conservation of the North American cave and karst biota. In: Wilkens H, Culver DC, Humphreys WF (eds) Subterranean ecosystems: ecosystems of the world, vol 30. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 665–689

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott WR (2007) Zoogeography and biodiversity of Missouri caves and karst. J Cave Karst Stud 69:135–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Faber-Langendoen D, Master L, Nichols J et al (2009) NatureServe conservation status assessments: methodology for assigning ranks. NatureServe, Arlington

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira D, Malard F, Dole-Olivier MJ et al (2007) Obligate groundwater fauna of France: diversity patterns and conservation implications. Biodivers Conserv 16:567–596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallão JE, Bichuette ME (2012) The list of endangered fauna and impediments to inclusion of species – the example of Brazilian troglobitic Fish. Braz J Nat Conserv 10:83–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallão JE, Bichuette ME (2015) Taxonomic distinctness and conservation of a new high biodiversity subterranean area in Brazil. An Acad Bras Cienc 87:209–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallão JE, Bichuette ME (2018) Brazilian obligatory subterranean fauna and the threats to hypogean environment. ZooKeys 746:1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George S, Snape WJ (2010) State endangered species acts. In: Baur DC, Irvin WR (eds) Endangered species act: law, policy, and perspectives, 2nd edn. American Bar Association, Section of Environment, Energy, and Resources, Chicago, pp 344–359

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibert J (2005) World subterranean biodiversity. In: Proceedings of an International Symposium, University of Lyon, Villeurbanne

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibert J, Culver DC (2009) Assessing and conserving groundwater biodiversity: an introduction. Freshw Biol 54:639–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibert J, Deharveng L (2002) Subterranean ecosystems: a truncated functional biodiversity. Bioscience 52:473–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibert J, Culver DC, Dole-Olivier MJ et al (2009) Assessing and conserving groundwater biodiversity: synthesis and perspectives. Freshw Biol 54:930–941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottstein-Matocec S (2002) An overview of the cave and interstitial biota in Croatia. Nat Croat 1:1–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald N, Suckling K, Taylor M (2005) The listing record. In: Goble D, Scott M, Davis F (eds) The endangered species act at thirty: renewing the conservation promise, vol 1. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Griebler C, Stein H, Kellermann C et al (2010) Ecological assessment of groundwater ecosystems – vision or illusion? Ecol Eng 36:1174–1190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haslett JR (2007) European strategy for the conservation of insects. No. 145, Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural Habitats, Council of Europe Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudoklin A (2011) Are we guaranteeing the favourable status of the Proteus anguinus in the Natura 2000 Network in Slovenia? In: Prelovšek M, Zupan Hajna N (eds) Pressures and protection of the underground karst: cases from Slovenia and Croatia. Postojna, Inštitut za raziskovanje krasa ZRC SAZU, Postojna/Karst Research Institute ZRC SAZU, pp 169–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Huppert GN (1995) Legal protection for caves in the United States. Environ Geol 26:121–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huppert GN (2006) Using the law to protect caves: a review of options. In: Hildreth-Werker V, Werker JC (eds) Cave conservation and restoration. National Speleological Society, Huntsville, pp 217–228

    Google Scholar 

  • IUCN (2001) IUCN Red List categories, version 3.1. Prepared by the IUCN Species Survival Commission. IUCN, Gland

    Google Scholar 

  • IUCN (2010) IUCN Red List of threatened species, version 2010.4

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones WK, Hobbs III HH, Wicks CM et al (2003) Recommendations and guidelines for managing caves on protected lands, Special Publication 8. Karst Water Institute, Charles Town

    Google Scholar 

  • Juberthie C (1995) Underground habitats and their protection. No. 72, Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural Habitats, Council of Europe Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Keith DA, Rodriguez JP, Rodriguez-Clark KM et al (2013) Scientific foundations for an IUCN Red List of ecosystems. PLoS One 8:e62111

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keith DA, Rodriguez JP, Brooks TM et al (2015) The IUCN Red List of ecosystems: motivations, challenges, and applications. Conserv Lett 8:214–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korbel KL, Hose GC (2011) A tiered framework for assessing groundwater ecosystem health. Hydrobiologia 661:329–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kueny JA, Day MJ (2002) Designation of protected karstlands in Central America: a regional assessment. J Cave Karst Stud 64:165–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamoreaux PE, Powell WJ, LeGrand HE (1997) Environmental and legal aspects of karst areas. Environ Geol 29:23–36

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lamoreaux J, Akcakaya HR, Bennun L et al (2003) Value of the IUCN Red List. Trends Ecol Evol 18:214–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lera T (2002) Legal protection of caves and bats at the turn of the millennium. Available at http://www.espeleoastur.as/Espeleolex/pdf/LEXUSA1.PDF. Accessed 1 Dec 2015

  • Lugo E (2007) Insect conservation under the endangered species act. UCLA J Environ Law Policy 25:2006–2007

    Google Scholar 

  • Male TD, Bean MJ (2005) Measuring progress in US endangered species conservation. Ecol Lett 8:986–992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin JL, Cardoso P, Arechavaleta M et al (2010) Using taxonomically unbiased criteria to prioritize resource allocation for oceanic island species conservation. Biodivers Conserv 19:1659–1682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Master L, Faber-Langendoen D, Bittman R et al (2009) NatureServe conservation status assessments: factors for assessing extinction risk. Arlington, Virginia NatureServe

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson E, Keith DA, Wilcove DS (2009) Assessing the threat status of ecological communities. Conserv Biol 23:259–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niemiller ML, Zigler KS (2013) Patterns of cave biodiversity and endemism in the Appalachians and Interior Plateau of Tennessee, USA. PLoS One 8:e64177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niemiller ML, Zigler KS, Ober KA et al (2017) Rediscovery and conservation status of six short-range endemic Pseudanophthalmus cave beetles (Carabidae: Trechini). Insect Conserv Biodiv 10:495–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orndorff W (2005) Protecting cave animals through the endangered species acts. Virginia Cave Owner’s Newsletter 16:4–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozimec R (2011) Red book of Dinaric cave fauna – an example from Croatia. In: Prelovšek M, Zupan Hajna N (eds) Pressures and protection of the underground karst: cases from Slovenia and Croatia. Inštitut za raziskovanje krasa ZRC SAZU, Postojna /Karst Research Institute ZRC SAZU, Postojna, pp 182–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Reboleira ASPS, Borges PAV, Gonçalves F et al (2011) The subterranean fauna of a biodiversity hotspot region – Portugal: an overview and its conservation. Int J Speleol 40:23–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues ASL, Pilgrim JD, Lamoreux JF et al (2006) The value of the IUCN Red List for conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 21:71–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez JP, Rodriguez-Clark KM, Baillie JE et al (2011) Establishing IUCN Red List criteria for threatened ecosystems. Conserv Biol 25:21–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez JP, Rodríguez-Clark KM, Keith DA et al (2012) IUCN red List of ecosystems. Sapiens 5:6–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Seiser PE (2013) Evaluating the status of cave wilderness. In: Land L, Joop M (eds) National cave and karst management symposium: proceedings of the twentieth conference, November 4–8, Carlsbad, New Mexico. NCKRI Symposium 3. National Cave and Karst Research Institute, Carlsbad, New Mexico, pp 165–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Simoes MH, Souza-Silva M, Ferreira RL (2014) Cave invertebrates in northwestern Minas Gerais State, Brazil: endemism, threats and conservation priorities. Acta Carsol 43:159–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sket B, Zagmajster M (2004) How to inventory and evaluate biologically important subterranean world heritage? The case of Slovenia (abstract). Acta Carsol 33:28

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein H, Kellermann C, Schmidt SI et al (2010) The potential use of fauna and bacteria as ecological indicators for the assessment of groundwater quality. J Environ Monit 12:242–254

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stein H, Griebler C, Berkhoff S et al (2012) Stygoregions – a promising approach to a bioregional classification of groundwater systems. Sci Rep 2:673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor SJ, Niemiller ML (2016) Biogeography and conservation assessment of Bactrurus groundwater amphipods (Crangonyctidae) in the central and eastern United States. Subterr Biol 17:1–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tercafs R (2001) The protection of the subterranean environment: conservation principles and management tools. P.S. Publishers, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Trajano E (2010) Políticas de Conservação e critérios ambientais: princípios, conceitos e protocolos. Estudos Avançados 24:135–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trajano E, Bichuette (2009) Diversity of Brazilian subterranean invertebrates, with a list of troglomorphic taxa. Subterr Biol 7:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Trajano E, Gallão JE, Bichuette ME (2016) Spots of high diversity of troglobites in Brazil: the challenge of measuring subterranean diversity. Biodivers Conserv 25:1805–1828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams P (2008) World Heritage caves and karst. A global review of karst World Heritage properties: present situation, future prospects and management requirements. IUCN, Gland

    Google Scholar 

  • Zagmajster M, Culver DC, Sket B (2008) Species richness patterns of obligate subterranean beetles in a global biodiversity hotspot—effect of scale and sampling intensity. Divers Distrib 14:95–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank JE Gallão for sharing unpublished data for Brazilian cave fauna, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP), Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), and Fundação o Boticário de Proteção à Natureza (FBPN) for grants to MEB.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew L. Niemiller .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Niemiller, M.L., Taylor, S.J., Bichuette, M.E. (2018). Conservation of Cave Fauna, with an Emphasis on Europe and the Americas. In: Moldovan, O., Kováč, Ľ., Halse, S. (eds) Cave Ecology. Ecological Studies, vol 235. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98852-8_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics