Skip to main content

EU Think Tank Lobbying Strategies: Between Theoretical Advice and Practice

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Lobbying in the European Union

Abstract

There is demand for more in-depth knowledge about the strategies, which think tanks employ to influence EU policy-making. The strategies of the Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS) and the European Centre for Development Policy Management (ECDPM) are explored based on desktop research and interviews with practitioners. The two think tanks have drawn on strategic advice through their concern about assuring quality, independence, transparency, integrity, and last but not least resources. Whereas CEPS has been hesitant to make large-scale changes to its core strategies, the ECDPM has introduced a sound strategy paper 2017–2021. This challenges the idea of a one-size-fits-all template for think tank strategies. While theoretical recommendations may be used in practice, strategic consideration from practitioners might also inspire and nuance advice for successful think tank strategies in the EU and beyond.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Open Europe think tank is of a moderately Eurosceptic persuasion but took a “neutral” position in the referendum campaign.

  2. 2.

    The European Political Strategy Centre (EPSC) is the European Commission’s in-house think tank, established in November 2014 by European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker and operating directly under his authority. In January 2017, the EPSC was awarded the title of “Best New Think Tank 2016” by the authoritative Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program (TTCSP) of the University of Pennsylvania, in its prestigious “2016 Global Go To Think Tank Index,” which charts 6846 think tanks on the basis of a survey conducted among over 4750 journalists, policy-makers, think tankers, and donors from all over the world (McGann 2017).

  3. 3.

    www.ceps.eu

  4. 4.

    www.ecdpm.org

  5. 5.

    The African, Caribbean, and Pacific Group of States (ACP) is an organization created by the Georgetown Agreement in 1975. It is composed of 79 African, Caribbean, and Pacific states, with all of them save Cuba, signatories to the Cotonou Agreement, also known as the “ACP-EC Partnership Agreement” which binds them to the European Union. There are 48 countries from Sub-Saharan Africa, 16 from the Caribbean, and 15 from the Pacific.

  6. 6.

    For instance, the Spanish EU foreign policy think tank FRIDE closed its Brussels office in December 2015 citing financial reasons.

  7. 7.

    In 2002, during the constitutional Convention on the Future of Europe, the European Policy Institutes Network (EPIN) was founded on the initiative of CEPS with the purpose of integrating EU’s national think tank landscape and of applying collectively for EU funds (BEPA 2012, 10). Today EPIN comprises 37 think tanks from 26 countries including member states and candidate countries, coordinated by CEPS.

  8. 8.

    https://www.ceps.eu/content/ceps-ideas-lab. Accessed 7 August 2017

  9. 9.

    Resolution 70/1. “Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development” adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015

  10. 10.

    “Transparify” is a platform contributing to debate about think tanks’ role in evidence-based policy-making by assessing their levels of financial transparency.

  11. 11.

    The African Union (AU) is consisting of all 55 countries on the African continent. It was established on 26 May 2001 and officially launched on 9 July 2002 in South Africa with the aim of replacing the Organization of African Unity (OAU).

  12. 12.

    Hence, the Trans European Policy Studies Association (TEPSA) was the first transnational think tank network to be founded in 1974. Ever since TEPSA has steadily increased currently consisting of 33 members located in 29 countries. With its decentralized approach, TEPSA exemplifies the “bottom-up” approach to European governance (BEPA 2012, 10).

  13. 13.

    www.notre-europe.eu

References

  • Abelson, D. E. (2014). Old world, new world: The evolution and influence of foreign affairs think-tanks. International Affairs, 90, 125–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BEPA. (2012). European think tanks and the EU. Berlaymont Papers, 2, Brussels: EU Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berling, T. V. (2012). Bourdieu, international relations, and European security. Theory and Society, 41, 451–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertelsmann Foundation. (2016). Transformation index BTI. Retrieved July 7, 2017, from https://www.bti-project.org/de/index/

  • Boucher, S., & Royo, M. (2012). Les think tanks. Cerveaux de la guerre des idées. Paris: Éditions du Félin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callahan, W. A. (2007). Future imperfect: The European Union’s encounter with China (and the United States). Journal of Strategic Studies, 30(4–5), 777–807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. L., & Pedersen, O. K. (2014). The national origins of policy ideas: Knowledge regimes in the United States, France, Germany, and Denmark. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Coen, D., & Richardson, J. (Eds.). (2009). Lobbying the European Union. Institutions, actors and issues. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dialer, D., & Füricht-Fiegl, G. (2014a). EU think tanks in the back seat? Perspectives for the 21 century. Challenging Organisations and Society, 3(2), 561–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dialer, D., & Füricht-Fiegl, G. (2014b). EU think tanks: Brücke zwischen Wissenschaft, Politik und Öffentlichkeit? In D. Dialer & M. Richter (Eds.), Lobbying in der Europäischen Union. Zwischen Professionalisierung und Regulierung (pp. 307–318). Wiesbanden: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dressler, W., Sicakkan, H. G., Fuga, A., Mitroi, V., & Terrazzoni, L. (2012). The French republican model, the European diversity perspective and the European public sphere. Social Science Information Sur Les Sciences Sociales, 51(3), 418–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ECFR. (2017). European Foreign Policy Scorecard 2016. Retrieved July 7, 2017, from http://www.ecfr.eu/scorecard/2016

  • EU Transparency Register. (2018). Transparency and the EU. Retrieved June 26, 2018, from http://ec.europa.eu/transparencyregister/public/homePage.do

  • Garcia-Blanco, I., & Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2013). Remote, elitist, or non-existent?: The European public sphere in the debates of British political elites. Javnost-the Public, 20(3), 23–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gueguen, D. (2008). European lobbying. London: John Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howorth, J. (2004). Discourse, ideas, and epistemic communities in European security and defence policy. West European Politics, 27(2), 211–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelstrup, J. D. (2016). The politics of think tanks in Europe. Routledge Research in Comparative Politics. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kelstrup, J. D. (2018). Think tanks in EU public policies. In H. Heinelt & S. Münch (Eds.), Handbook of European policies: Interpretive approaches to the EU. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klinke, I. (2012). Postmodern geopolitics? The European Union eyes Russia. Europe-Asia Studies, 64, 929–947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lahrant, M., & Boucher, S. (2004). Think tanks in Europe and US: Converging or diverging? Paris: Notre Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGann, J. G. (2016). 2015 Global Go-To Think Tank Index Report, Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program (TTCSP), University of Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGann, J. G. (2017). 2016 Global Go-To Think Tank Index Report, Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program (TTCSP), University of Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selee, A. (2013). What Should Think Tanks Do? A Strategic Guide to Policy Impact. Stanford, CA: Stanford Briefs.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sherrington, P. (2000). Shaping the policy agenda: Think tank activity in the European Union. Global Society, 14(2), 173–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. E., Fooks, G., Gilmore, A. B., Collin, J., & Weishaar, H. (2015). Corporate coalitions and policy making in the European Union: How and why British American tobacco promoted better regulation. Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, 40(2), 325–372. https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-2882231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stryk, R. (2015). Improving think tank management: Practical guidance for think tanks. In Research advocacy NGOs and their funders. Washington: Results for Development Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svallfors, S. (2016). Out of the golden cage: PR and the career opportunities of policy professionals. Politics & Policy, 44(1), 56–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ullrich, H. (2004). European Union think tanks: Generating ideas, analysis and debate. In D. Stone & A. Denham (Eds.), Think tank traditions. Policy research and the politics of ideas (pp. 51–68). Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jesper Dahl Kelstrup .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kelstrup, J.D., Dialer, D. (2019). EU Think Tank Lobbying Strategies: Between Theoretical Advice and Practice. In: Dialer, D., Richter, M. (eds) Lobbying in the European Union. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98800-9_33

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics