Abstract
This paper argues that human life must be protected and any attacks on life must be negated: a right to life, and a right to live, exists. But is there a right to terminate life, specifically in the cases of euthanasia and abortion? These two topics inevitably lead to heated discussions, as has been observed in a number of societies. The question this paper asks is: how do young people in Germany evaluate the contradicting arguments surrounding the termination of life (i.e. whether the termination of life should be prohibited or permitted) and what motives determine their attitudes towards these topics? Given that it is a core value, human dignity is taken into consideration, as are respondents’ religious convictions and the value orientation of hedonism. The research that forms the basis of this paper also asks whether young people with different religious backgrounds and religiously non-affiliated young people differ in their attitudes concerning the right to life. The empirical analysis was carried out with German young people (N = 1862) as the respondents. The findings show that young Germans legitimize the possibility of terminating life by euthanasia and, to a lesser extent, by abortion. The less student respondents are religious, the more they agree with these exceptions (i.e. euthanasia and abortion) from the rule that the right to life has to be protected. The value orientation of hedonism is the strongest predictor for a respondent having a permissive attitude towards euthanasia and abortion. The value of human dignity is found to be significant in only a few cases.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
This segment follows the comprehensive elaboration of these issues in: H.-G.Ziebertz and M.Reindl (2013).
- 2.
http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG0015/_INDEX.HTM. With regard to Roman Catholic documents see also the chapter from Anthony and Sterkens.
- 3.
The catechism makes a distinction between euthanasia and suicide. In cases of suicide a person decides to terminate his or her own life with or without help of others. This is, in the Catholic view, clearly forbidden. “Suicide contradicts the natural inclination of the human being to preserve and perpetuate his life. (…) Suicide is contrary to love for the living God” (Catechism no. 2281). Voluntary co -operation in suicide is also contrary to moral law (Catechism no. 2282).
- 4.
- 5.
http://www.ekd.de/EKD-Texte/44666.html (25th June 2010).
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
- 9.
- 10.
References
Bagaric, M., & Allen, J. (2006). The vacuous concept of dignity. Journal of Human Rights, 5, 257–270.
Bowen, D. L. (2003). Contemporary Muslim ethics of abortion. In J. E. Brockopp (Ed.), Islamic ethics of life. Abortion, war and euthanasia (pp. 51–80). Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
Brockopp, J. E. (2003a). The “good death” in Islamic theology and law. In J. E. Brockopp (Ed.), Islamic ethics of life. Abortion, war and euthanasia (pp. 177–193). Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
Brockopp, J. E. (Ed.). (2003b). Islamic ethics of life. Abortion, war and euthanasia. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
Devellis, R. F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and applications. London: Sage.
Dworkin, R. (1993). Life’s dominion. An argument about abortion, euthanasia and individual freedom. New York: Knopf.
Ernst, S. (2007). Verhältnismäßige und unverhältnismäßige Mittel. Eine bedenkenswerte Unterscheidung in der lehramtlichen Bewertung der Sterbehilfe. Münchener Theologische Zeitschrift (MThZ), 58, 43–57.
Grimm, D. (2013). Dignity in a legal context: Dignity as an absolute right. In C. McCrudden (Ed.), Understanding Human Dignity (pp. 381–391). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ilkilic, I. (2008). Medizinethische Entscheidungen am Lebensende in einer wertpluralen Gesellschaft am Beispiel muslimischer Patienten. Zeitschrift für Evangelische Ethik, 52, 34–49.
Kellner, M. (2010). Islamische Rechtsmeinungen zu medizinischen Eingriffen an den Grenzen des Lebens. Ein Beitrag zur kulturübergreifenden Bioethik. Würzburg: Ergon.
Mantei, S. (2004). Nein und Ja zur Abtreibung. In Die evangelische Kirche in der Reformdebatte um §218 StGB (1970–1976). Göttingen: Vandenhoek & Ruprecht.
Nordenfelt, L. (2004). The varieties of dignity. Health Care Analysis, 12, 69–81.
Rosen, M. (2012). Dignity – Its history and meaning. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Schockenhoff, E. (2009). Ethik des Lebens. Freiburg: Herder.
Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? Journal of Social Issues, 50, 19–45.
Schwartz, S. H., & Sagiv, L. (1995). Identifying culture-specifics in the content and structure of values. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26(1), 92–116.
Sterbebegleitung statt aktiver Sterbehilfe. (2003). Eine Textsammlung kirchlicher Erklärungen. (Eds.), Protestant Church in Germany (EKD) & Bishopsconference of the Catholic Church, Hannover/Bonn. http://www.ekd.de/EKD-Texte/44666.html
van der Ven, J. A. (2013). Euthanasia from the angle of law, morality and religion: A cross-cultural perspective. In E. Venbrux & Th. Quartier (Eds.), Changing European death ways (Death studies, Vol. 1). Münster: LIT.
Ziebertz, H.-G., & Reindl, M. (2013). Religion and attitudes towards euthanasia and abortion. An empirical study among young Christians and Muslims in Germany. In J. A. Van der Ven & H.-G. Ziebertz (Eds.), Human rights and the impact of religion (pp. 119–143). Brill: Leiden.
Ziebertz, H.-G., Döhnert, S., & Unser, A. (2017). Predictors of attitudes towards human dignity: An empirical analysis among youth in Germany. In H.-G. Ziebertz & C. Sterkens (Eds.), Religion and civil human rights in empirical perspective. Heidelberg: Springer.
Documents
Charter of Fundamental Rights in the European Union (1950).
Declaration on Euthanasia (Vatican 1980).
Donum Vitae (Vatican 1987).
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (UN, 1966).
Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UN, 1948).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ziebertz, HG. (2019). Human Dignity, Religious Ethics or Hedonism – What Can Predict Young People’s Attitudes in Germany Towards the Right to Life in the Cases of Euthanasia and Abortion?. In: Ziebertz, HG., Zaccaria, F. (eds) Euthanasia, Abortion, Death Penalty and Religion – The Right to Life and its Limitations. Religion and Human Rights, vol 4. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98773-6_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98773-6_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98772-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98773-6
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)