Skip to main content

Findings and Interpretation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Europe's New Fiscal Union
  • 307 Accesses

Abstract

The height of the crisis management coincided with the institutionalization of a fiscal centre, understood as an incipient and composite fiscal authority that runs across all EMU executive institutions without being embodied by any primus inter pares. The emergence of such a fiscal centre was strongly conditioned and constrained by the path-dependence of the EU’s past institutional modus operandi: an over-reliance on rules on the one hand and the empowerment of technocratic agencies on the other. In the absence of an EMU crisis management mechanism, the crisis acted as a catalyst for the development of common central fiscal capacities. Accordingly, the chapter summarizes the findings of this book and provides an interpretation of the convoluted trajectory that fiscal power centralization took during the euro crisis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Interviewee 40 – EU Council official.

  2. 2.

    Interviewee 38 – European Central Bank official.

  3. 3.

    Obviously, one can however disagree about his claim that the ECB has a ‘very clear but very limited mandate’.

  4. 4.

    Interviewee 30 – Finnish Ministry of Finance official.

  5. 5.

    With the exception of the new emergency procedure in the ESM.

  6. 6.

    Interviewee 40 – EU Council official.

  7. 7.

    Interviewee 46 – European Parliament official.

  8. 8.

    Interviewee 47 – EU Council official.

  9. 9.

    Interviewee 30 – Finnish Ministry of Finance official.

  10. 10.

    Interviewee 30 – Finnish Ministry of Finance official.

  11. 11.

    Interviewee 32 – European Central Bank official.

  12. 12.

    ‘Actually I have another thing I want to mention. Just something I want to throw out there. If we’d known in 2001 we were staying in Afghanistan this long, we would have made some very different choices. Right? Instead our planning cycles rarely look more than 12 months ahead, so this hasn’t been a 14 year war we’ve been waging, but a one-year war, waged 14 times’. Extract from HBO TV Series Homeland, Season 4, Episode 1 S. Berenson, former CIA Director in the fiction.

  13. 13.

    Interviewee 40 – EU Council official.

  14. 14.

    Interviewee 30 – Finnish Ministry of Finance official.

  15. 15.

    See also Honohan (2016).

References

  • Bauer, M., & Becker, S. (2014). The Unexpected Winner of the Crisis: The European Commission’s Strengthened Role in Economic Governance. Journal of European Integration, 36(3), 213–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bickerton, C. J., Hodson, D., & Puetter, U. (2015). The New Intergovernmentalism: States, Supranational Actors, and European Politics in the Post-Maastricht Era. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Coeuré, B. (2012, December 1). Speech, Forum Eco Libération ESCP, Reprendre confiance en (l’)Europe. Paris. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/key/date/2012/html/sp121201.en.html

  • Dehousse, R. (2013). The Politics of Delegation in the European Union. Paris: Centre d’Etudes Européennes de Sciences Po, Cahiers européens de Sciences Po.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duisenberg, W. (2002, May 9). Acceptance Speech by Dr. Willem F. Duisenberg, President of the European Central Bank. International Charlemagne Prize of Aachen for 2002, Aachen. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/key/date/2002/html/sp020509.en.html

  • Eichengreen, B. (2012). European Monetary Integration with Benefit of Hindsight. Journal of Common Market Studies, 50(s1), 123–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (1990, October). One Market, One Money: An Evaluation of the Potential Benefits and Costs of Forming an Economic and Monetary Union. European Economy, Commission of the European Communities, Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabbrini, S. (2015). Which European Union? Europe After the Euro Crisis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, N., Sandholtz, W., & Stone-Sweet, A. (2001). The Institutionalization of Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folkerts-Landau, D., & Garber, P. M. (1992, March). The European Central Bank: A Bank or a Monetary Policy Rule (NBER Working Paper No. 4016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Genschel, P., & Jachtenfuchs, M. (Eds.). (2013). Beyond the Regulatory Polity? The European Integration of Core State Powers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genschel, P., & Jachtenfuchs, M. (2016). More Integration, Less Federation: The European Integration of Core State Powers. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(1), 42–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodhart, C. (1998). The Two Concepts of Money: Implications for the Analysis of Optimal Currency Areas. European Journal of Political Economy, 14(3), 407–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haas, E. (1958). The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social, and Economic Forces (1950–1957). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Héritier, A. (2013). Covert Integration of Core State Powers: Renegotiating Incomplete Contracts. In P. Genschel & M. Jachtenfuchs (Eds.), Beyond the Regulatory Polity? The European Integration of Core State Powers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, D. (2013). The Little Engine That Wouldn’t: Supranational Entrepreneurship and the Barroso Commission. Journal of European Integration, 35(3), 301–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, S. (1966). Obstinate or Obsolete: The Fate of the Nation-State and the Case of Western Europe. Daedalus, 95(3), 862–915.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honohan, P. (2016, April 28). Dinner Speech. EUI Conference on ‘Filling the Gaps in Governance: The Case of Europe’, San Domenico di Fiesole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Issing, O. (2008). The Birth of the Euro. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Joerges, C. (2012). The European Economic Constitution in Crisis: Between “State of Exception” and “Constitutional Moment”. In M. Poiares Maduro, B. De Witte, & M. Kumm (Eds.), The Democratic Governance of the Euro, RSCAS Global Governance Programme, Rscas Policy Paper 2012/8, pp. 39–44, Florence, San Domenico di Fiesole: European University Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kudrna, Z. (2016). Financial Market Regulation: Crisis-Induced Supranationalization. Journal of European Integration, 38(3), 251–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kydland, F., & Prescott, E. (1977). Rules Rather than Discretion: The Inconsistency of Optimal Plans. Journal of Political Economy, 85(3), 473–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laffan, B., & Schlosser, P. (2016). Public Finances in Europe: Fortifying EU Economic Governance in the Shadow of the Crisis. Journal of European Integration, 38(3), 237–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindberg, L. N. (1963). The Political Dynamics of European Economic Integration. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majone, G. (1994). The Rise of the Regulatory State in Europe. West European Politics, 17(3), 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majone, G. (1996). Regulating Europe. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Majone, G. (2002). The European Commission: The Limits of Centralization and the Perils of Parliamentarization. Governance, 15(3), 375–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majone, G. (2014). Rethinking the European Union: Has Integration Gone Too Far? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mcnamara, K. R. (1999). The Currency of Ideas: Monetary Politics in European Union. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitrany, D. (1943). A Working Peace System : An Argument for the Functional Development of International Organization. London: The Royal Institute of International Affairs, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitrany, D. (1948). The Functional Approach to World Organization. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs), 24(3), 350–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitrany, D. (1975). The Functional Theory of Politics. London: London School of Economics and Political Science, Martin Robertson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Möllers, C. (2015, May 22). Presentation given at the European University Institute as Part of the Conference on ‘European Banking Union – Democracy, Technocracy and the State of Integration’. For a Link to the Conference’s Write Up: http://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/36481/FBF_EB_2015_02.pdf?sequence=1

  • Moravcsik, A. (1998). The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, A., & Schimmelfennig, F. (2009). Liberal Intergovernmentalism. In A. Wiener & T. Diez (Eds.), European Integration Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemann, A., & Ioannou, D. (2015). European Economic Integration in Times of Crisis: A Case of Neofunctionalism? Journal of European Public Policy, 22(2), 196–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nye, J. (1971). Comparing Common Markets: A Revised Neo-Functional Model. In L. N. Lindberg & S. Scheingold (Eds.), Regional Integration. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otero-Iglesias, M. (2015). Stateless Euro: The Euro Crisis and the Revenge of Chartalist Theory of Money. Journal of Common Market Studies, 53(2), 349–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padoa-Schioppa, T. (1999, February 24). EMU and Banking Supervision. Lecture by Tommaso Padoa-Schioppa, Member of the ECB Executive Board, London School of Economics, Financial Markets Group, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padoa-Schioppa, T. (2000). The Road to Monetary Union in Europe: The Emperor, the Kings and the Genies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Puetter, U. (2012). Europe’s Deliberative Intergovernmentalism: The Role of the Council and European Council in EU Economic Governance. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(2), 161–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosamond, B. (2000). Theories of European Integration. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F. (1988). The Joint-Decision Trap. Lessons from German Federalism and European Integration. Public Administration, 66(2), 239–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schelkle, W. (2009). The Contentious Creation of the Regulatory State in Fiscal Surveillance. West European Politics, 32(4), 829–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schelkle, W. (2013). Fiscal Integration by Default. In P. Genschel & M. Jachtenfuchs (Eds.), Beyond the Regulatory Polity? The European Integration of Core State Powers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlosser, P. (2015). ‘Tightening the Knot: Strengthening Fiscal Surveillance in EMU during the Euro Crisis’, LUISS Guido Carli School of European Political Economy (Working Paper 12/2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitter, P. (2003). Neo-Neo-Functionalism. In A. Wiener & T. Diez (Eds.), European Integration Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skocpol, T. (1985). Bringing the State Back In: Strategies of Analysis in Current Research. In P. B. Evans, D. Rueschemeyer, & T. Skocpol (Eds.), Bringing the State Back In (pp. 3–43). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Skowronek, S. (1982). Building a New American State: The Expansion of National Administrative Capacities, 1877–1920. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Trondal, J. (2014). The Rise of a European Public Administration: European Capacity Building by Stealth. In P. Genschel & M. Jachtenfuchs (Eds.), Beyond the Regulatory Polity? Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuori, K. (2012). The European Financial Crisis – Constitutional Aspects and Implications (EUI Working Papers). Department of Law, 2012/28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verdun, A. (2007). A Historical Institutionalist Analysis of the Road to Economic and Monetary Union: A Journey with Many Crossroads. In S. Meunier & K. McNamara (Eds.), Making History: European Integration and Institutional Change at Fifty. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verdun, A. (2015). A Historical Institutionalist Explanation of the EU’s Responses to the Euro Area Financial Crisis. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(2), 219–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vilpišauskas, R. (2013). Eurozone Crisis and European Integration: Functional Spill-Over, Political Spill-Back?’. Journal of European Integration, 35(3), 361–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Schlosser, P. (2019). Findings and Interpretation. In: Europe's New Fiscal Union. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98636-4_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics