Abstract
Laser pointers are common tools for teachers, students, and researchers as pointer devices in classrooms or meeting rooms. Some people use laser pointers for toys, hobbies and entertainments. For safety concern, these laser pointers are designed to emit laser power level below 5 mW as restricted by many countries regulations. However, advances in laser technology, allowed the production of low low-cost laser pointer devices, at a wide range of visible wavelengths, delivering considerable light output power, which are available for the general public. In fact it is now common, to have laser pointers and laser gadgets of all colors and power range, from few mW to several watts available to buy. As a result, laser pointers are in the hands of uninformed people about the potential injuries that can arise from the handling of these devices. This is resulting in a worldwide increase of retinal injuries reporting. In this research, the laser power levels of randomly purchased laser pointers in Thailand markets will be assessed in order to check the accuracy of their laser safety labels, using a dedicated laser pointer power testing kit developed at National Institute of Metrology (Thailand). A set of twenty laser pointers, red, green and violet, randomly acquired in market have been assessed with respect to their power output level and emitted wavelengths lines. The limits imposed by The US Code of Federal regulations for lasers devices will be used as a reference.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
R. Wong, D. Sim, R. Rajendram, G. Menon, Class 3A laser pointer-induced retinal damage captured on optical coherence tomography. Acta Ophthalmol. Scand. 85(2), 227–228 (2006)
S. Wyrsch, P.B. Baenninger, M.K. Schmid, Retinal injuries from a handheld laser pointer. N. Engl. J. Med. 363(11), 1089–1091 (2010)
K. Ziahosseini, J.P. Doris, G.S. Turner, Maculopathy from handheld green diode laser pointer. BMJ 340(1), c2982–c2982 (2010)
Sydney Morning Herald, Laser Pointers Restricted After Attacks (2008)
P. Blattner, The underrated hazard potential of laser pointers, in METinfo18 (2011)
H. John, H. Michael, K. Marina, Laser product assessment for Lancashire County Council Trading Standards Service, in Proceedings of the 2013 International Laser Safety (2013)
W. Trevor, Proceedings of the 2013 International Laser Safety Conference, Orlando, FL (2013), pp. 48–54
H. Joshua, D. Marla, Accurate, inexpensive testing of laser pointer for safe operation. Meas. Sci. Technol. 24, 045202 (7 pp.) (2013)
H. Joshua, Random testing reveals excessive power in commercial laser pointers. Presentation at the International Laser Safety Conference, Orlando, FL, 20 Mar 2013
Performance Standards for Light-Emitting Products, CFR 2012 Code of Federal Regualtions, Title 21. Food and Drug; Part 1040; Section 1040.10 Laser Products (US 21 CFR 1040.10)
International Electrotechnical Commission, IEC 2007 Safety of Laser Products. Part 1: Equipment classification and requirements, EN 60825-1 ed.2 (2007)
ANSI 2007 Laser Institute of America, American National Standard for the Safe Use of Lasers ANSI Z136.1, Orlando (2007)
K. Han, IEC60825 MPE Js, image (2007), https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=17862637
International Electrotechnical Commission, Safety of laser products—Part 1: Equipment classfication and requirements (2007)
M. Kai, Response silicon photodiode, image (2009), https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=6625679
N. Taylor, C. Kuyatt, Guidelines for Evaluating and Expressing the Uncertainty of NIST Measurement Results. NIST technical Note 1297 (1994)
Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology, Evaluation of measurement data Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (2008)
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by the new researcher scholarship of CSTS, MOST project, which is sponsored by the Coordinating Center for Thai Government Science and Technology Scholarship Students (CSTS), National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
4.1.1 Measurement Results
Average laser output power outcomes from red, green, and violet laser pointer devices are shown in Tables 4.5, 4.6 and 4.7.
Measurement Uncertainty. Measurement uncertainties were estimated following the guideline from Taylor and Kuyatt [16] and Evaluation of measurement data, Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM) [17]. There are 2 types of uncertainties associated with measurement, type A standard uncertainty, arising from statistical analysis of a series of observations, and type B standard uncertainty, coming from other than statistical analysis, for this work, in this case related with the measuring system itself.
Type A Uncertainty. Calculated from standard deviation of 5 laser power measurements, \(S_r\). Type A standard uncertainty corresponds to standard deviation of the mean \(\frac{S_r}{\sqrt{5}}\).
Type B Uncertainty. Obtained from uncertainty of measurement system. In this work, the estimated system uncertainty, \(u_s\), is
where \(u_d\) is the power detector uncertainty of and \(u_f\) is the bandpass filter uncertainty. The combined standard uncertainty of measurement, U, is
The uncertainty of the power detector is obtained by calibration of laser reference standard, by direct comparison with the laser Calorimeter (traceable to SI unit). Calibration was carried out at 633, 515 and 488 nm wavelengths. The calibration experimental setup is shown in Fig. 4.12. The calibration factor (\(C_n\)) is
where \(P_u\) is power measured by the unit under test (thermopile detector) [W], and \(P_s\) is the laser power measure by the standard [W]. The calibration results are shown in Table 4.8.
The uncertainties of the bandpass filters were estimated from transmission calibration measurements using a Nd:YAG laser light source at 1064 nm and 532 nm. The calibration experimental setup is shown in Fig. 4.13. For the 1064 nm bandpass filter, the transmission value considered was the ratio of laser power reading on a standard pyroelectric detector with and without the filter. The calibration attained values are displayed shown in Table 4.3. Concerning the the 800 nm filter, the light transmissions at 1064 nm and 532 nm were checked. The calibration results are in Table 4.9. By using (4.6), a 1% of total uncertainty can be obtained.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nontapot, K., Rujirat, N. (2018). High Accuracy Laser Power Measurement for Laser Pointers Safety Assessment. In: Ribeiro, P., Raposo, M. (eds) Optics, Photonics and Laser Technology. Springer Series in Optical Sciences, vol 218. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98548-0_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98548-0_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98547-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98548-0
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)