Skip to main content

Chiefs and Chieftaincy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Institutions and Agrarian Development

Abstract

Chieftaincy is a key institutional feature in Upper West Africa. We discuss how various levels of chiefs serve as brokers between all four of elementary institutional orderings. Especially, chieftaincy links the formal government hierarchy and the village enclave. We provide both a historical and contemporary account of chiefs and delve into their role in the success (or failure) of development projects, look at attempts to transform chieftaincy through attempts to make chiefs more inclusive and democratic, and their important role in helping communities cope with shocks, such as the Ebola virus crisis of 2014–2015.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Chieftaincy was institutionalized as part of British colonial indirect rule in Sierra Leone from about 1904. Liberia under the presidency of Arthur Barclay adopted the British arrangements in Sierra Leone from about 1910. The French in Guinea appointed chefs de canton as the lowest levels of a single administrative system of direct rule, without pretence that they were working with a “traditional” institution. But these low-level rural officials had to seek local legitimacy, and historians have tended to conclude that the differences between the approaches of the British and French can be exaggerated, at least at the local level (Crowder 1968).

  2. 2.

    Some “amalgamated” chiefdoms were dis-amalgamated in the later years of the All Peoples Congress government of President Koroma, 2007–2018. Whether these changes will be preserved by the Sierra Leone Peoples Party government of President Maada Bio elected in early 2018 remains to be seen.

  3. 3.

    Go bifo is Krio for “to progress.”

References

  • Acemoglu, Daron, Tristran Reed, and James A. Robinson. 2014. Chiefs: Elite Control of Civil Society and Economic Development in Sierra Leone. Journal of Political Economy 122 (2): 319–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, Kate. 2016. The Paradox of Traditional Chiefs in Democratic Africa. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beekman, Gonne, Erwin Bulte, and Eleonora Nillesen. 2014. Corruption, Investments and Contributions to Public Goods: Experimental Evidence from Rural Liberia. Journal of Public Economics 115: 37–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boone, Catherine. 2003. Political Topographies of the African State: Rural Authority and Institutional Choice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Casey, Katherine. 2018. Radical Decentralization: Does Community-Driven Development Work? Annual Review of Economics 10: 139–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casey, Katherine, Rachel Glennerster, and Edward Miguel. 2012. Reshaping Institutions: Evidence on Aid Impacts Using a Pre-analysis Plan. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 127: 1755–1812. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qje027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casey, Katherine, Rachel Glennerster, Edward Miguel, and Maarten Voors. 2018. Skill Versus Voice in Local Development? Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, D., Oeindrila Dube, Johannes Haushofer, Bilal Siddiqi, and Maarten Voors. 2018. Healthcare Delivery During Crises: Experimental Evidence from Sierra Leone’s Ebola Outbreak. Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowder, Michael. 1968. West African Chiefs Under Colonial Rule. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans-Pritchard, Edward. 1940. The Nuer: A Description of the Modes of Livelihood and Political Institutions of a Nilotic People. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenton, James. 1948. Outline of Native Law in Sierra Leone. Freetown: Government Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortes, Meyer, and Edward Evans-Pritchard, eds. 1940. African Political Systems. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, Stefanie, Dany Jaimovich, and Matthias Schündeln. 2018. Development Projects and Economic Networks. Lessons from Rural Gambia. Working Paper, Goethe University Frankfurt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton, Robin. 1972. The History of Stateless Societies in West Africa. In History of West Africa, ed. Jacob Ajayi and Michael Crowder, vol. 1, 78–119. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, Macartan, Raul Sanchez de la Sierra and Peter van der Windt. 2018. Institutional Imitation: Evidence from a Local Democracy Intervention in the Congo. Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mamdani, Mahmood. 1996. Citizen and Subject: Contemporary Africa and the Legacy of Late Colonialism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansuri, Ghazala, and Vijayendra Rao. 2013. Localizing Development: Does Participation Work? Policy Research Report. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalopoulos, Stelios, and Elias Papaioannou. 2013. Pre-colonial Ethnic Institutions and Contemporary African Development. Econometrica 81 (1): 113–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mokuwa, Esther. 2018. Institutional Factors in the Ebola Response, the Case of Community Care Centres. Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mokuwa, Esther, Maarten Voors, Erwin Bulte, and Paul Richards. 2011. Peasant Grievance and Insurgency in Sierra Leone: Judicial Serfdom as a Driver of Conflict. African Affairs 110 (440): 339–366. https://doi.org/10.1093/afraf/adr019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moran, Mary. 2015. Surviving Ebola: The Epidemic and Political Legitimacy in Liberia. Current History 114 (772): 177–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse, Ben, Karen A. Grépin, Robert A. Blair, and Lily Tsai. 2016. Patterns of Demand for Non-Ebola Health Services During and After the Ebola Outbreak: Panel Survey Evidence from Monrovia, Liberia. BMJ Global Health 1 (1): 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, Tristan, and James A. Robinson. 2014. The Chiefdoms of Sierra Leone. Working paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • RFI. 2014. http://en.rfi.fr/africa/20141118-local-chiefs-refuse-be-blamed-spread-ebola-sierra-leone-interview, 9 November. Accessed 18 Mar 2018.

  • Richards, Paul. 2016. Ebola: How a People’s Science Helped End an Epidemic. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, Paul, Steven Archibald, Beverlee Bruce, Watta Modad, Edward Mulbah, Tornotah Varpilah, and James Vincent. 2005. Community Cohesion in Liberia: A Post-conflict Rapid Social Assessment [A Social Assessment of Liberia], Social Development Paper No 21, Conflict prevention and reconstruction group, Washington, DC: World Bank, January 2005, 76pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, P., J. Joseph Amara, M.C. Ferme, P. Kamara, E. Mokuwa, A.I. Sheriff, R. Suluku, and M. Voors. 2015. Social Pathways for Ebola Virus Disease in Rural Sierra Leone, and Some Implications for Containment. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 9 (4): e0003567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van de Grijspaarde, Huib, Maarten Voors, Erwin Bulte, and Paul Richards. 2013. Who Believes in Witches? Moral Ambiguity and Institutional Flux in Post-war Rural Sierra Leone. African Affairs 112 (446): 22–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Windt, Peter, and Maarten Voors. 2018. Local Institutional Quality Explains the Intensity of the 2014–2015 Ebola Epidemic: A Cross-Sectional Analysis in Sierra Leone. Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verweij, Marco, Mary Douglas, Richard Ellis, Frank Hendriks, Susanne Lohmann, Steven Ney, Steven Rayner, and Michael Thompson. 2006. Clumsy Solutions for a Complex World: The Case of Climate Change. Public Administration 84 (4): 817–843. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.09566.x-i1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voors, Maarten, Peter van der Windt, Kostadis J. Papaioannou, and Erwin Bulte. 2017. Resources and Governance in Sierra Leone’s Civil War. The Journal of Development Studies 53 (2): 278–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2016.1160068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voors, Maarten, Erwin Bulte, Andreas Kontoleon, John List, and Ty Turley. 2018. Chief for a Day! Participatory Development and Elite Capture in Sierra Leone. Management Science. Articles In Advance, Published Online:11 Dec 2017. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2866.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bulte, E., Richards, P., Voors, M. (2018). Chiefs and Chieftaincy. In: Institutions and Agrarian Development. Palgrave Studies in Agricultural Economics and Food Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98500-8_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98500-8_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98499-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98500-8

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics